Status of PRU #2

eliasbakken · 2014-08-15T12:10:54Z

What is the status of the uio_pruss kernel driver? Is it working? I tried porting some patches from 3.12, but I'm having some trouble with it. If it is working, I can compare, if it is not working I can submit a patch once I find the error.

eliasbakken · 2014-08-15T13:42:17Z

It crashes when the prussdrv tries to determine the hw version (__pruss_detect_hw_version). I'm on thin ice here, but should the sram be allocated somehow? It seems this has been done from patform_data previously which should be avoided now with DT and is still being done on the Davinchi platform. Is it perhaps a better solution to add the size in the DT and init it in the driver like what is done with the DDR?

eliasbakken · 2014-08-15T21:29:04Z

My bad, I was missing the ti-deassert-hardreset patch. There is no SRAM initialized. But PRU is working now.

…nfs_open() Use i_writecount to control whether to get an fscache cookie in nfs_open() as NFS does not do write caching yet. I *think* this is the cause of a problem encountered by Mark Moseley whereby __fscache_uncache_page() gets a NULL pointer dereference because cookie->def is NULL: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010 IP: [<ffffffff812a1903>] __fscache_uncache_page+0x23/0x160 PGD 0 Thread overran stack, or stack corrupted Oops: 0000 [beagleboard#1] SMP Modules linked in: ... CPU: 7 PID: 18993 Comm: php Not tainted 3.11.1 beagleboard#1 Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R420/072XWF, BIOS 1.3.5 08/21/2012 task: ffff8804203460c0 ti: ffff880420346640 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff812a1903>] __fscache_uncache_page+0x23/0x160 RSP: 0018:ffff8801053af878 EFLAGS: 00210286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8800be2f8780 RCX: ffff88022ffae5e8 RDX: 0000000000004c66 RSI: ffffea00055ff440 RDI: ffff8800be2f8780 RBP: ffff8801053af898 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000003 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffea00055ff440 R13: 0000000000001000 R14: ffff8800c50be538 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88042fc60000(0063) knlGS:00000000e439c700 CS: 0010 DS: 002b ES: 002b CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 0000000001d8f000 CR4: 00000000000607f0 Stack: ... Call Trace: [<ffffffff81365a72>] __nfs_fscache_invalidate_page+0x42/0x70 [<ffffffff813553d5>] nfs_invalidate_page+0x75/0x90 [<ffffffff811b8f5e>] truncate_inode_page+0x8e/0x90 [<ffffffff811b90ad>] truncate_inode_pages_range.part.12+0x14d/0x620 [<ffffffff81d6387d>] ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x1fd/0x2e0 [<ffffffff811b95d3>] truncate_inode_pages_range+0x53/0x70 [<ffffffff811b969d>] truncate_inode_pages+0x2d/0x40 [<ffffffff811b96ff>] truncate_pagecache+0x4f/0x70 [<ffffffff81356840>] nfs_setattr_update_inode+0xa0/0x120 [<ffffffff81368de4>] nfs3_proc_setattr+0xc4/0xe0 [<ffffffff81357f78>] nfs_setattr+0xc8/0x150 [<ffffffff8122d95b>] notify_change+0x1cb/0x390 [<ffffffff8120a55b>] do_truncate+0x7b/0xc0 [<ffffffff8121f96c>] do_last+0xa4c/0xfd0 [<ffffffff8121ffbc>] path_openat+0xcc/0x670 [<ffffffff81220a0e>] do_filp_open+0x4e/0xb0 [<ffffffff8120ba1f>] do_sys_open+0x13f/0x2b0 [<ffffffff8126aaf6>] compat_SyS_open+0x36/0x50 [<ffffffff81d7204c>] sysenter_dispatch+0x7/0x24 The code at the instruction pointer was disassembled: > (gdb) disas __fscache_uncache_page > Dump of assembler code for function __fscache_uncache_page: > ... > 0xffffffff812a18ff <+31>: mov 0x48(%rbx),%rax > 0xffffffff812a1903 <+35>: cmpb $0x0,0x10(%rax) > 0xffffffff812a1907 <+39>: je 0xffffffff812a19cd <__fscache_uncache_page+237> These instructions make up: ASSERTCMP(cookie->def->type, !=, FSCACHE_COOKIE_TYPE_INDEX); That cmpb is the faulting instruction (%rax is 0). So cookie->def is NULL - which presumably means that the cookie has already been at least partway through __fscache_relinquish_cookie(). What I think may be happening is something like a three-way race on the same file: PROCESS 1 PROCESS 2 PROCESS 3 =============== =============== =============== open(O_TRUNC|O_WRONLY) open(O_RDONLY) open(O_WRONLY) -->nfs_open() -->nfs_fscache_set_inode_cookie() nfs_fscache_inode_lock() nfs_fscache_disable_inode_cookie() __fscache_relinquish_cookie() nfs_inode->fscache = NULL <--nfs_fscache_set_inode_cookie() -->nfs_open() -->nfs_fscache_set_inode_cookie() nfs_fscache_inode_lock() nfs_fscache_enable_inode_cookie() __fscache_acquire_cookie() nfs_inode->fscache = cookie <--nfs_fscache_set_inode_cookie() <--nfs_open() -->nfs_setattr() ... ... -->nfs_invalidate_page() -->__nfs_fscache_invalidate_page() cookie = nfsi->fscache -->nfs_open() -->nfs_fscache_set_inode_cookie() nfs_fscache_inode_lock() nfs_fscache_disable_inode_cookie() -->__fscache_relinquish_cookie() -->__fscache_uncache_page(cookie) <crash> <--__fscache_relinquish_cookie() nfs_inode->fscache = NULL <--nfs_fscache_set_inode_cookie() What is needed is something to prevent process beagleboard#2 from reacquiring the cookie - and I think checking i_writecount should do the trick. It's also possible to have a two-way race on this if the file is opened O_TRUNC|O_RDONLY instead. Reported-by: Mark Moseley <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Howells <[email protected]>

Michael Semon reported that xfs/299 generated this lockdep warning: ============================================= [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 3.12.0-rc2+ beagleboard#2 Not tainted --------------------------------------------- touch/21072 is trying to acquire lock: (&xfs_dquot_other_class){+.+...}, at: [<c12902fb>] xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin+0x57/0x64 but task is already holding lock: (&xfs_dquot_other_class){+.+...}, at: [<c12902fb>] xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin+0x57/0x64 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&xfs_dquot_other_class); lock(&xfs_dquot_other_class); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 7 locks held by touch/21072: #0: (sb_writers#10){++++.+}, at: [<c11185b6>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e beagleboard#1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#4){+.+.+.}, at: [<c11078ee>] do_last+0x245/0xe40 beagleboard#2: (sb_internal#2){++++.+}, at: [<c122c9e0>] xfs_trans_alloc+0x1f/0x35 beagleboard#3: (&(&ip->i_lock)->mr_lock/1){+.+...}, at: [<c126cd1b>] xfs_ilock+0x100/0x1f1 beagleboard#4: (&(&ip->i_lock)->mr_lock){++++-.}, at: [<c126cf52>] xfs_ilock_nowait+0x105/0x22f beagleboard#5: (&dqp->q_qlock){+.+...}, at: [<c12902fb>] xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin+0x57/0x64 beagleboard#6: (&xfs_dquot_other_class){+.+...}, at: [<c12902fb>] xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin+0x57/0x64 The lockdep annotation for dquot lock nesting only understands locking for user and "other" dquots, not user, group and quota dquots. Fix the annotations to match the locking heirarchy we now have. Reported-by: Michael L. Semon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <[email protected]>

In nfs4_proc_getlk(), when some error causes a retry of the call to _nfs4_proc_getlk(), we can end up with Oopses of the form BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000134 IP: [<ffffffff8165270e>] _raw_spin_lock+0xe/0x30 <snip> Call Trace: [<ffffffff812f287d>] _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x4d/0x70 [<ffffffffa053c4f2>] nfs4_put_lock_state+0x32/0xb0 [nfsv4] [<ffffffffa053c585>] nfs4_fl_release_lock+0x15/0x20 [nfsv4] [<ffffffffa0522c06>] _nfs4_proc_getlk.isra.40+0x146/0x170 [nfsv4] [<ffffffffa052ad99>] nfs4_proc_lock+0x399/0x5a0 [nfsv4] The problem is that we don't clear the request->fl_ops after the first try and so when we retry, nfs4_set_lock_state() exits early without setting the lock stateid. Regression introduced by commit 70cc648 (locks: make ->lock release private data before returning in GETLK case) Reported-by: Weston Andros Adamson <[email protected]> Reported-by: Jorge Mora <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> beagleboard#2.6.22+

->needs_read_fill is used to implement the following behaviors. 1. Ensure buffer filling on the first read. 2. Force buffer filling after a write. 3. Force buffer filling after a successful poll. However, beagleboard#2 and beagleboard#3 don't really work as sysfs doesn't reset file position. While the read buffer would be refilled, the next read would continue from the position after the last read or write, requiring an explicit seek to the start for it to be useful, which makes ->needs_read_fill superflous as read buffer is always refilled if f_pos == 0. Update sysfs_read_file() to test buffer->page for beagleboard#1 instead and remove ->needs_read_fill. While this changes behavior in extreme corner cases - e.g. re-reading a sysfs file after seeking to non-zero position after a write or poll, it's highly unlikely to lead to actual breakage. This change is to prepare for using seq_file in the read path. While at it, reformat a comment in fill_write_buffer(). Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> Cc: Kay Sievers <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

This patch activates the audio device of the Cubox. The audio flow (pin mpp_audio1) is output on both I2S and S/PDIF. The third si5351 clock (beagleboard#2, pin mpp13) is used as the external clock. Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine <[email protected]> Acked-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <[email protected]>

Previously we coalesced windows by expanding the first overlapping one and making the second invalid. But we never look at the expanded first window again, so we fail to notice other windows that overlap it. For example, we coalesced these: [io 0x0000-0x03af] // #0 [io 0x03e0-0x0cf7] // beagleboard#1 [io 0x0000-0xdfff] // beagleboard#2 into these, which still overlap: [io 0x0000-0xdfff] // #0 [io 0x03e0-0x0cf7] // beagleboard#1 The fix is to expand the *second* overlapping resource and ignore the first, so we get this instead with no overlaps: [io 0x0000-0xdfff] // beagleboard#2 [bhelgaas: changelog] Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62511 Signed-off-by: Alexey Neyman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>

Booting a mx6 with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING we get: ====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 3.12.0-rc4-next-20131009+ beagleboard#34 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------- swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock: (&imx_drm_device->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<804575a8>] imx_drm_encoder_get_mux_id+0x28/0x98 but task is already holding lock: (&crtc->mutex){+.+...}, at: [<802fe778>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x54 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> beagleboard#2 (&crtc->mutex){+.+...}: [<800777d0>] __lock_acquire+0x18d4/0x1c24 [<80077fec>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x7c [<805ead5c>] _mutex_lock_nest_lock+0x58/0x3a8 [<802fec50>] drm_crtc_init+0x48/0xa8 [<80457c88>] imx_drm_add_crtc+0xd4/0x144 [<8045e2e8>] ipu_drm_probe+0x114/0x1fc [<80312278>] platform_drv_probe+0x20/0x50 [<80310c68>] driver_probe_device+0x110/0x22c [<80310e20>] __driver_attach+0x9c/0xa0 [<8030f218>] bus_for_each_dev+0x5c/0x90 [<80310750>] driver_attach+0x20/0x28 [<8031034c>] bus_add_driver+0xdc/0x1dc [<803114d8>] driver_register+0x80/0xfc [<80312198>] __platform_driver_register+0x50/0x64 [<808172fc>] ipu_drm_driver_init+0x18/0x20 [<800088c0>] do_one_initcall+0xfc/0x160 [<807e7c5c>] kernel_init_freeable+0x104/0x1d4 [<805e2930>] kernel_init+0x10/0xec [<8000ea68>] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c -> beagleboard#1 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.+.}: [<800777d0>] __lock_acquire+0x18d4/0x1c24 [<80077fec>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x7c [<805eb100>] mutex_lock_nested+0x54/0x3a4 [<802fe758>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x20/0x54 [<802fead4>] drm_encoder_init+0x20/0x7c [<80457ae4>] imx_drm_add_encoder+0x88/0xec [<80459838>] imx_ldb_probe+0x344/0x4fc [<80312278>] platform_drv_probe+0x20/0x50 [<80310c68>] driver_probe_device+0x110/0x22c [<80310e20>] __driver_attach+0x9c/0xa0 [<8030f218>] bus_for_each_dev+0x5c/0x90 [<80310750>] driver_attach+0x20/0x28 [<8031034c>] bus_add_driver+0xdc/0x1dc [<803114d8>] driver_register+0x80/0xfc [<80312198>] __platform_driver_register+0x50/0x64 [<8081722c>] imx_ldb_driver_init+0x18/0x20 [<800088c0>] do_one_initcall+0xfc/0x160 [<807e7c5c>] kernel_init_freeable+0x104/0x1d4 [<805e2930>] kernel_init+0x10/0xec [<8000ea68>] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c -> #0 (&imx_drm_device->mutex){+.+.+.}: [<805e510c>] print_circular_bug+0x74/0x2e0 [<80077ad0>] __lock_acquire+0x1bd4/0x1c24 [<80077fec>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x7c [<805eb100>] mutex_lock_nested+0x54/0x3a4 [<804575a8>] imx_drm_encoder_get_mux_id+0x28/0x98 [<80459a98>] imx_ldb_encoder_prepare+0x34/0x114 [<802ef724>] drm_crtc_helper_set_mode+0x1f0/0x4c0 [<802f0344>] drm_crtc_helper_set_config+0x828/0x99c [<802ff270>] drm_mode_set_config_internal+0x5c/0xdc [<802eebe0>] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x50/0xb4 [<802af580>] fbcon_init+0x490/0x500 [<802dd104>] visual_init+0xa8/0xf8 [<802df414>] do_bind_con_driver+0x140/0x37c [<802df764>] do_take_over_console+0x114/0x1c4 [<802af65c>] do_fbcon_takeover+0x6c/0xd4 [<802b2b30>] fbcon_event_notify+0x7c8/0x818 [<80049954>] notifier_call_chain+0x4c/0x8c [<80049cd8>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x50/0x68 [<80049d10>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x28 [<802a75f0>] fb_notifier_call_chain+0x1c/0x24 [<802a9224>] register_framebuffer+0x188/0x268 [<802ee994>] drm_fb_helper_initial_config+0x2bc/0x4b8 [<802f118c>] drm_fbdev_cma_init+0x7c/0xec [<80817288>] imx_fb_helper_init+0x54/0x90 [<800088c0>] do_one_initcall+0xfc/0x160 [<807e7c5c>] kernel_init_freeable+0x104/0x1d4 [<805e2930>] kernel_init+0x10/0xec [<8000ea68>] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &imx_drm_device->mutex --> &dev->mode_config.mutex --> &crtc->mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&crtc->mutex); lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex); lock(&crtc->mutex); lock(&imx_drm_device->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 6 locks held by swapper/0/1: #0: (registration_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<802a90bc>] register_framebuffer+0x20/0x268 beagleboard#1: (&fb_info->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<802a7a90>] lock_fb_info+0x20/0x44 beagleboard#2: (console_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<802a9218>] register_framebuffer+0x17c/0x268 beagleboard#3: ((fb_notifier_list).rwsem){.+.+.+}, at: [<80049cbc>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x34/0x68 beagleboard#4: (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<802fe758>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x20/0x54 beagleboard#5: (&crtc->mutex){+.+...}, at: [<802fe778>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x54 In order to avoid this lockdep warning, remove the locking from imx_drm_encoder_get_mux_id() and imx_drm_crtc_panel_format_pins(). Tested on a mx6sabrelite and mx53qsb. Reported-by: Russell King <[email protected]> Tested-by: Russell King <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

This patch adds a batch support to nfnetlink. Basically, it adds two new control messages: * NFNL_MSG_BATCH_BEGIN, that indicates the beginning of a batch, the nfgenmsg->res_id indicates the nfnetlink subsystem ID. * NFNL_MSG_BATCH_END, that results in the invocation of the ss->commit callback function. If not specified or an error ocurred in the batch, the ss->abort function is invoked instead. The end message represents the commit operation in nftables, the lack of end message results in an abort. This patch also adds the .call_batch function that is only called from the batch receival path. This patch adds atomic rule updates and dumps based on bitmask generations. This allows to atomically commit a set of rule-set updates incrementally without altering the internal state of existing nf_tables expressions/matches/targets. The idea consists of using a generation cursor of 1 bit and a bitmask of 2 bits per rule. Assuming the gencursor is 0, then the genmask (expressed as a bitmask) can be interpreted as: 00 active in the present, will be active in the next generation. 01 inactive in the present, will be active in the next generation. 10 active in the present, will be deleted in the next generation. ^ gencursor Once you invoke the transition to the next generation, the global gencursor is updated: 00 active in the present, will be active in the next generation. 01 active in the present, needs to zero its future, it becomes 00. 10 inactive in the present, delete now. ^ gencursor If a dump is in progress and nf_tables enters a new generation, the dump will stop and return -EBUSY to let userspace know that it has to retry again. In order to invalidate dumps, a global genctr counter is increased everytime nf_tables enters a new generation. This new operation can be used from the user-space utility that controls the firewall, eg. nft -f restore The rule updates contained in `file' will be applied atomically. cat file ----- add filter INPUT ip saddr 1.1.1.1 counter accept beagleboard#1 del filter INPUT ip daddr 2.2.2.2 counter drop beagleboard#2 -EOF- Note that the rule 1 will be inactive until the transition to the next generation, the rule 2 will be evicted in the next generation. There is a penalty during the rule update due to the branch misprediction in the packet matching framework. But that should be quickly resolved once the iteration over the commit list that contain rules that require updates is finished. Event notification happens once the rule-set update has been committed. So we skip notifications is case the rule-set update is aborted, which can happen in case that the rule-set is tested to apply correctly. This patch squashed the following patches from Pablo: * nf_tables: atomic rule updates and dumps * nf_tables: get rid of per rule list_head for commits * nf_tables: use per netns commit list * nfnetlink: add batch support and use it from nf_tables * nf_tables: all rule updates are transactional * nf_tables: attach replacement rule after stale one * nf_tables: do not allow deletion/replacement of stale rules * nf_tables: remove unused NFTA_RULE_FLAGS Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <[email protected]>

If EM Transmit bit is busy during init ata_msleep() is called. It is wrong - msleep() should be used instead of ata_msleep(), because if EM Transmit bit is busy for one port, it will be busy for all other ports too, so using ata_msleep() causes wasting tries for another ports. The most common scenario looks like that now (six ports try to transmit a LED meaasege): - port #0 tries for the 1st time and succeeds - ports beagleboard#1-5 try for the 1st time and sleeps - port beagleboard#1 tries for the 2nd time and succeeds - ports beagleboard#2-5 try for the 2nd time and sleeps - port beagleboard#2 tries for the 3rd time and succeeds - ports beagleboard#3-5 try for the 3rd time and sleeps - port beagleboard#3 tries for the 4th time and succeeds - ports beagleboard#4-5 try for the 4th time and sleeps - port beagleboard#4 tries for the 5th time and succeeds - port beagleboard#5 tries for the 5th time and sleeps At this moment port beagleboard#5 wasted all its five tries and failed to initialize. Because there are only 5 (EM_MAX_RETRY) tries available usually only five ports succeed to initialize. The sixth port and next ones usually will fail. If msleep() is used instead of ata_msleep() the first port succeeds to initialize in the first try and next ones usually succeed to initialize in the second try. tj: updated comment Signed-off-by: Lukasz Dorau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>

Andrey reported the following report: ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address ffff8800359c99f3 ffff8800359c99f3 is located 0 bytes to the right of 243-byte region [ffff8800359c9900, ffff8800359c99f3) Accessed by thread T13003: #0 ffffffff810dd2da (asan_report_error+0x32a/0x440) beagleboard#1 ffffffff810dc6b0 (asan_check_region+0x30/0x40) beagleboard#2 ffffffff810dd4d3 (__tsan_write1+0x13/0x20) beagleboard#3 ffffffff811cd19e (ftrace_regex_release+0x1be/0x260) beagleboard#4 ffffffff812a1065 (__fput+0x155/0x360) beagleboard#5 ffffffff812a12de (____fput+0x1e/0x30) beagleboard#6 ffffffff8111708d (task_work_run+0x10d/0x140) beagleboard#7 ffffffff810ea043 (do_exit+0x433/0x11f0) beagleboard#8 ffffffff810eaee4 (do_group_exit+0x84/0x130) beagleboard#9 ffffffff810eafb1 (SyS_exit_group+0x21/0x30) beagleboard#10 ffffffff81928782 (system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b) Allocated by thread T5167: #0 ffffffff810dc778 (asan_slab_alloc+0x48/0xc0) beagleboard#1 ffffffff8128337c (__kmalloc+0xbc/0x500) beagleboard#2 ffffffff811d9d54 (trace_parser_get_init+0x34/0x90) beagleboard#3 ffffffff811cd7b3 (ftrace_regex_open+0x83/0x2e0) beagleboard#4 ffffffff811cda7d (ftrace_filter_open+0x2d/0x40) beagleboard#5 ffffffff8129b4ff (do_dentry_open+0x32f/0x430) beagleboard#6 ffffffff8129b668 (finish_open+0x68/0xa0) beagleboard#7 ffffffff812b66ac (do_last+0xb8c/0x1710) beagleboard#8 ffffffff812b7350 (path_openat+0x120/0xb50) beagleboard#9 ffffffff812b8884 (do_filp_open+0x54/0xb0) beagleboard#10 ffffffff8129d36c (do_sys_open+0x1ac/0x2c0) beagleboard#11 ffffffff8129d4b7 (SyS_open+0x37/0x50) beagleboard#12 ffffffff81928782 (system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b) Shadow bytes around the buggy address: ffff8800359c9700: fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd ffff8800359c9780: fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa ffff8800359c9800: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa ffff8800359c9880: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa ffff8800359c9900: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 =>ffff8800359c9980: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00[03]fb ffff8800359c9a00: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa ffff8800359c9a80: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa ffff8800359c9b00: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ffff8800359c9b80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ffff8800359c9c00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes): Addressable: 00 Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Heap redzone: fa Heap kmalloc redzone: fb Freed heap region: fd Shadow gap: fe The out-of-bounds access happens on 'parser->buffer[parser->idx] = 0;' Although the crash happened in ftrace_regex_open() the real bug occurred in trace_get_user() where there's an incrementation to parser->idx without a check against the size. The way it is triggered is if userspace sends in 128 characters (EVENT_BUF_SIZE + 1), the loop that reads the last character stores it and then breaks out because there is no more characters. Then the last character is read to determine what to do next, and the index is incremented without checking size. Then the caller of trace_get_user() usually nulls out the last character with a zero, but since the index is equal to the size, it writes a nul character after the allocated space, which can corrupt memory. Luckily, only root user has write access to this file. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reported-by: Andrey Konovalov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>

…same size Having them be different seems an obscure configuration. Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <[email protected]>

While enabling lockdep on seqlocks, I ran across the warning below caused by the ipv6 stats being updated in both irq and non-irq context. This patch changes from IP6_INC_STATS_BH to IP6_INC_STATS (suggested by Eric Dumazet) to resolve this problem. [ 11.120383] ================================= [ 11.121024] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] [ 11.121663] 3.12.0-rc1+ beagleboard#68 Not tainted [ 11.122229] --------------------------------- [ 11.122867] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage. [ 11.123741] init/4483 [HC0[0]:SC1[3]:HE1:SE0] takes: [ 11.124505] (&stats->syncp.seq#6){+.?...}, at: [<c1ab80c2>] ndisc_send_ns+0xe2/0x130 [ 11.125736] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: [ 11.126447] [<c10e0eb7>] __lock_acquire+0x5c7/0x1af0 [ 11.127222] [<c10e2996>] lock_acquire+0x96/0xd0 [ 11.127925] [<c1a9a2c3>] write_seqcount_begin+0x33/0x40 [ 11.128766] [<c1a9aa03>] ip6_dst_lookup_tail+0x3a3/0x460 [ 11.129582] [<c1a9e0ce>] ip6_dst_lookup_flow+0x2e/0x80 [ 11.130014] [<c1ad18e0>] ip6_datagram_connect+0x150/0x4e0 [ 11.130014] [<c1a4d0b5>] inet_dgram_connect+0x25/0x70 [ 11.130014] [<c198dd61>] SYSC_connect+0xa1/0xc0 [ 11.130014] [<c198f571>] SyS_connect+0x11/0x20 [ 11.130014] [<c198fe6b>] SyS_socketcall+0x12b/0x300 [ 11.130014] [<c1bbf880>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb [ 11.130014] irq event stamp: 1184 [ 11.130014] hardirqs last enabled at (1184): [<c1086901>] local_bh_enable+0x71/0x110 [ 11.130014] hardirqs last disabled at (1183): [<c10868cd>] local_bh_enable+0x3d/0x110 [ 11.130014] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<c108014d>] copy_process.part.42+0x45d/0x11a0 [ 11.130014] softirqs last disabled at (1147): [<c1086e05>] irq_exit+0xa5/0xb0 [ 11.130014] [ 11.130014] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.130014] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 11.130014] [ 11.130014] CPU0 [ 11.130014] ---- [ 11.130014] lock(&stats->syncp.seq#6); [ 11.130014] <Interrupt> [ 11.130014] lock(&stats->syncp.seq#6); [ 11.130014] [ 11.130014] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 11.130014] [ 11.130014] 3 locks held by init/4483: [ 11.130014] #0: (rcu_read_lock){.+.+..}, at: [<c109363c>] SyS_setpriority+0x4c/0x620 [ 11.130014] beagleboard#1: (((&ifa->dad_timer))){+.-...}, at: [<c108c1c0>] call_timer_fn+0x0/0xf0 [ 11.130014] beagleboard#2: (rcu_read_lock){.+.+..}, at: [<c1ab6494>] ndisc_send_skb+0x54/0x5d0 [ 11.130014] [ 11.130014] stack backtrace: [ 11.130014] CPU: 0 PID: 4483 Comm: init Not tainted 3.12.0-rc1+ beagleboard#68 [ 11.130014] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 [ 11.130014] 00000000 00000000 c55e5c10 c1bb0e71 c57128b0 c55e5c4c c1badf79 c1ec1123 [ 11.130014] c1ec1484 00001183 00000000 00000000 00000001 00000003 00000001 00000000 [ 11.130014] c1ec1484 00000004 c5712dcc 00000000 c55e5c84 c10de492 00000004 c10755f2 [ 11.130014] Call Trace: [ 11.130014] [<c1bb0e71>] dump_stack+0x4b/0x66 [ 11.130014] [<c1badf79>] print_usage_bug+0x1d3/0x1dd [ 11.130014] [<c10de492>] mark_lock+0x282/0x2f0 [ 11.130014] [<c10755f2>] ? kvm_clock_read+0x22/0x30 [ 11.130014] [<c10dd8b0>] ? check_usage_backwards+0x150/0x150 [ 11.130014] [<c10e0e74>] __lock_acquire+0x584/0x1af0 [ 11.130014] [<c10b1baf>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xef/0x190 [ 11.130014] [<c10de58c>] ? mark_held_locks+0x8c/0xf0 [ 11.130014] [<c10e2996>] lock_acquire+0x96/0xd0 [ 11.130014] [<c1ab80c2>] ? ndisc_send_ns+0xe2/0x130 [ 11.130014] [<c1ab66d3>] ndisc_send_skb+0x293/0x5d0 [ 11.130014] [<c1ab80c2>] ? ndisc_send_ns+0xe2/0x130 [ 11.130014] [<c1ab80c2>] ndisc_send_ns+0xe2/0x130 [ 11.130014] [<c108cc32>] ? mod_timer+0xf2/0x160 [ 11.130014] [<c1aa706e>] ? addrconf_dad_timer+0xce/0x150 [ 11.130014] [<c1aa70aa>] addrconf_dad_timer+0x10a/0x150 [ 11.130014] [<c1aa6fa0>] ? addrconf_dad_completed+0x1c0/0x1c0 [ 11.130014] [<c108c233>] call_timer_fn+0x73/0xf0 [ 11.130014] [<c108c1c0>] ? __internal_add_timer+0xb0/0xb0 [ 11.130014] [<c1aa6fa0>] ? addrconf_dad_completed+0x1c0/0x1c0 [ 11.130014] [<c108c5b1>] run_timer_softirq+0x141/0x1e0 [ 11.130014] [<c1086b20>] ? __do_softirq+0x70/0x1b0 [ 11.130014] [<c1086b70>] __do_softirq+0xc0/0x1b0 [ 11.130014] [<c1086e05>] irq_exit+0xa5/0xb0 [ 11.130014] [<c106cfd5>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x35/0x50 [ 11.130014] [<c1bbfbca>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x32/0x38 [ 11.130014] [<c10936ed>] ? SyS_setpriority+0xfd/0x620 [ 11.130014] [<c10e26c9>] ? lock_release+0x9/0x240 [ 11.130014] [<c10936d7>] ? SyS_setpriority+0xe7/0x620 [ 11.130014] [<c1bbee6d>] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x1d/0x30 [ 11.130014] [<c1093701>] SyS_setpriority+0x111/0x620 [ 11.130014] [<c109363c>] ? SyS_setpriority+0x4c/0x620 [ 11.130014] [<c1bbf880>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Signed-off-by: John Stultz <[email protected]> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <[email protected]> Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <[email protected]> Cc: James Morris <[email protected]> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> Cc: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]> Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

Erik Hugne says: ==================== tipc: message reassembly using fragment chain We introduce a new reassembly algorithm that improves performance and eliminates the risk of causing out-of-memory situations. v3: -Use skb_try_coalesce, and revert to fraglist if this does not succeed. -Make sure reassembly list head is uncloned. v2: -Rebased on Ying's indentation fix. -Node unlock call in msg_fragmenter case moved from patch beagleboard#2 to beagleboard#1. ('continue' with this lock held would cause spinlock recursion if only patch beagleboard#1 is used) ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

…ux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull x86 boot changes from Ingo Molnar: "Two changes that prettify and compactify the SMP bootup output from: smpboot: Booting Node 0, Processors beagleboard#1 beagleboard#2 beagleboard#3 OK smpboot: Booting Node 1, Processors beagleboard#4 beagleboard#5 beagleboard#6 beagleboard#7 OK smpboot: Booting Node 2, Processors beagleboard#8 beagleboard#9 beagleboard#10 beagleboard#11 OK smpboot: Booting Node 3, Processors beagleboard#12 beagleboard#13 beagleboard#14 beagleboard#15 OK Brought up 16 CPUs to something like: x86: Booting SMP configuration: .... node #0, CPUs: beagleboard#1 beagleboard#2 beagleboard#3 .... node beagleboard#1, CPUs: beagleboard#4 beagleboard#5 beagleboard#6 beagleboard#7 .... node beagleboard#2, CPUs: beagleboard#8 beagleboard#9 beagleboard#10 beagleboard#11 .... node beagleboard#3, CPUs: beagleboard#12 beagleboard#13 beagleboard#14 beagleboard#15 x86: Booted up 4 nodes, 16 CPUs" * 'x86-boot-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message x86: Improve the printout of the SMP bootup CPU table

Nathan Zimmer found that once we get over 10+ cpus, the scalability of SPECjbb falls over due to the contention on the global 'epmutex', which is taken in on EPOLL_CTL_ADD and EPOLL_CTL_DEL operations. Patch beagleboard#1 removes the 'epmutex' lock completely from the EPOLL_CTL_DEL path by using rcu to guard against any concurrent traversals. Patch beagleboard#2 remove the 'epmutex' lock from EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations for simple topologies. IE when adding a link from an epoll file descriptor to a wakeup source, where the epoll file descriptor is not nested. This patch (of 2): Optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL such that it does not require the 'epmutex' by converting the file->f_ep_links list into an rcu one. In this way, we can traverse the epoll network on the add path in parallel with deletes. Since deletes can't create loops or worse wakeup paths, this is safe. This patch in combination with the patch "epoll: Do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies", shows a dramatic performance improvement in scalability for SPECjbb. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <[email protected]> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <[email protected]> Cc: Eric Wong <[email protected]> Cc: Nelson Elhage <[email protected]> Cc: Al Viro <[email protected]> Cc: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]> CC: Wu Fengguang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

Now that seqcounts are lockdep enabled objects, we need to explicitly initialize runtime allocated seqcounts so that lockdep can track them. Without this patch, Fengguang was seeing: [ 4.127282] INFO: trying to register non-static key. [ 4.128027] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation. [ 4.128027] turning off the locking correctness validator. [ 4.128027] CPU: 0 PID: 96 Comm: kworker/u4:1 Not tainted 3.12.0-next-20131108-10601-gbad570d beagleboard#2 [ 4.128027] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 [ ... ] [ 4.128027] Call Trace: [ 4.128027] [<7908e744>] ? console_unlock+0x353/0x380 [ 4.128027] [<79dc7cf2>] dump_stack+0x48/0x60 [ 4.128027] [<7908953e>] __lock_acquire.isra.26+0x7e3/0xceb [ 4.128027] [<7908a1c5>] lock_acquire+0x71/0x9a [ 4.128027] [<794079aa>] ? blk_throtl_bio+0x1c3/0x485 [ 4.128027] [<7940658b>] throtl_update_dispatch_stats+0x7c/0x153 [ 4.128027] [<794079aa>] ? blk_throtl_bio+0x1c3/0x485 [ 4.128027] [<794079aa>] blk_throtl_bio+0x1c3/0x485 ... Use u64_stats_init() for all affected data structures, which initializes the seqcount. Reported-and-Tested-by: Fengguang Wu <[email protected]> Cc: Vivek Goyal <[email protected]> Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> [ Folded in another fix from the mailing list as well as a fix to that fix. Tweaked commit message. ] Signed-off-by: John Stultz <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] [ So I actually think that the two SOBs from PeterZ are the right depiction of the patch route. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

The commit 94a86df seem to have uncovered a long standing bug that did not trigger so far. BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00000009dd503502 IP: [<ffffffff815b1868>] rfcomm_sock_getsockopt+0x128/0x200 PGD 0 Oops: 0000 [beagleboard#1] SMP Modules linked in: ath5k ath mac80211 cfg80211 CPU: 2 PID: 1459 Comm: bluetoothd Not tainted 3.11.0-133163-gcebd830 beagleboard#2 Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/P6T DELUXE V2, BIOS 1202 12/22/2010 task: ffff8803304106a0 ti: ffff88033046a000 task.ti: ffff88033046a000 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff815b1868>] [<ffffffff815b1868>] rfcomm_sock_getsockopt+0x128/0x200 RSP: 0018:ffff88033046bed8 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 00000009dd503502 RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007fffa2ed5548 RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 0000000000000012 RDI: ffff88032fd37480 RBP: ffff88033046bf28 R08: 00007fffa2ed554c R09: ffff88032f5707d8 R10: 00007fffa2ed5548 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: ffff880330bbd000 R13: 00007fffa2ed5548 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: 00007fffa2ed554c FS: 00007fc44cfac700(0000) GS:ffff88033fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000009dd503502 CR3: 00000003304c2000 CR4: 00000000000007e0 Stack: ffff88033046bf28 ffffffff815b0f2f ffff88033046bf18 0002ffff81105ef6 0000000600000000 ffff88032fd37480 0000000000000012 00007fffa2ed5548 0000000000000003 00007fffa2ed554c ffff88033046bf78 ffffffff814c0380 Call Trace: [<ffffffff815b0f2f>] ? rfcomm_sock_setsockopt+0x5f/0x190 [<ffffffff814c0380>] SyS_getsockopt+0x60/0xb0 [<ffffffff815e0852>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Code: 02 00 00 00 0f 47 d0 4c 89 ef e8 74 13 cd ff 83 f8 01 19 c9 f7 d1 83 e1 f2 e9 4b ff ff ff 0f 1f 44 00 00 49 8b 84 24 70 02 00 00 <4c> 8b 30 4c 89 c0 e8 2d 19 cd ff 85 c0 49 89 d7 b9 f2 ff ff ff RIP [<ffffffff815b1868>] rfcomm_sock_getsockopt+0x128/0x200 RSP <ffff88033046bed8> CR2: 00000009dd503502 It triggers in the following segment of the code: 0x1313 is in rfcomm_sock_getsockopt (net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c:743). 738 739 static int rfcomm_sock_getsockopt_old(struct socket *sock, int optname, char __user *optval, int __user *optlen) 740 { 741 struct sock *sk = sock->sk; 742 struct rfcomm_conninfo cinfo; 743 struct l2cap_conn *conn = l2cap_pi(sk)->chan->conn; 744 int len, err = 0; 745 u32 opt; 746 747 BT_DBG("sk %p", sk); The l2cap_pi(sk) is wrong here since it should have been rfcomm_pi(sk), but that socket of course does not contain the low-level connection details requested here. Tracking down the actual offending commit, it seems that this has been introduced when doing some L2CAP refactoring: commit 8c1d787 Author: Gustavo F. Padovan <[email protected]> Date: Wed Apr 13 20:23:55 2011 -0300 @@ -743,6 +743,7 @@ static int rfcomm_sock_getsockopt_old(struct socket *sock, int optname, char __u struct sock *sk = sock->sk; struct sock *l2cap_sk; struct rfcomm_conninfo cinfo; + struct l2cap_conn *conn = l2cap_pi(sk)->chan->conn; int len, err = 0; u32 opt; @@ -787,8 +788,8 @@ static int rfcomm_sock_getsockopt_old(struct socket *sock, int optname, char __u l2cap_sk = rfcomm_pi(sk)->dlc->session->sock->sk; - cinfo.hci_handle = l2cap_pi(l2cap_sk)->conn->hcon->handle; - memcpy(cinfo.dev_class, l2cap_pi(l2cap_sk)->conn->hcon->dev_class, 3); + cinfo.hci_handle = conn->hcon->handle; + memcpy(cinfo.dev_class, conn->hcon->dev_class, 3); The l2cap_sk got accidentally mixed into the sk (which is RFCOMM) and now causing a problem within getsocketopt() system call. To fix this, just re-introduce l2cap_sk and make sure the right socket is used for the low-level connection details. Reported-by: Fabio Rossi <[email protected]> Reported-by: Janusz Dziedzic <[email protected]> Tested-by: Janusz Dziedzic <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <[email protected]>

The following two commits implemented mmap support in the regular file path and merged bin file support into the regular path. 73d9714 ("sysfs: copy bin mmap support from fs/sysfs/bin.c to fs/sysfs/file.c") 3124eb1 ("sysfs: merge regular and bin file handling") After the merge, the following commands trigger a spurious lockdep warning. "test-mmap-read" simply mmaps the file and dumps the content. $ cat /sys/block/sda/trace/act_mask $ test-mmap-read /sys/devices/pci0000\:00/0000\:00\:03.0/resource0 4096 ====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 3.12.0-work+ #378 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------- test-mmap-read/567 is trying to acquire lock: (&of->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8120a8df>] sysfs_bin_mmap+0x4f/0x120 but task is already holding lock: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff8114b399>] vm_mmap_pgoff+0x49/0xa0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> beagleboard#3 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}: ... -> beagleboard#2 (sr_mutex){+.+.+.}: ... -> beagleboard#1 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.+.}: ... -> #0 (&of->mutex){+.+.+.}: ... other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &of->mutex --> sr_mutex --> &mm->mmap_sem Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(sr_mutex); lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(&of->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by test-mmap-read/567: #0: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff8114b399>] vm_mmap_pgoff+0x49/0xa0 stack backtrace: CPU: 3 PID: 567 Comm: test-mmap-read Not tainted 3.12.0-work+ #378 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 ffffffff81ed41a0 ffff880009441bc8 ffffffff81611ad2 ffffffff81eccb80 ffff880009441c08 ffffffff8160f215 ffff880009441c60 ffff880009c75208 0000000000000000 ffff880009c751e0 ffff880009c75208 ffff880009c74ac0 Call Trace: [<ffffffff81611ad2>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x7a [<ffffffff8160f215>] print_circular_bug+0x2b0/0x2bf [<ffffffff8109ca0a>] __lock_acquire+0x1a3a/0x1e60 [<ffffffff8109d6ba>] lock_acquire+0x9a/0x1d0 [<ffffffff81615547>] mutex_lock_nested+0x67/0x3f0 [<ffffffff8120a8df>] sysfs_bin_mmap+0x4f/0x120 [<ffffffff8115d363>] mmap_region+0x3b3/0x5b0 [<ffffffff8115d8ae>] do_mmap_pgoff+0x34e/0x3d0 [<ffffffff8114b3ba>] vm_mmap_pgoff+0x6a/0xa0 [<ffffffff8115be3e>] SyS_mmap_pgoff+0xbe/0x250 [<ffffffff81008282>] SyS_mmap+0x22/0x30 [<ffffffff8161a4d2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b This happens because one file nests sr_mutex, which nests mm->mmap_sem under it, under of->mutex while mmap implementation naturally nests of->mutex under mm->mmap_sem. The warning is false positive as of->mutex is per open-file and the two paths belong to two different files. This warning didn't trigger before regular and bin file supports were merged because only bin file supported mmap and the other side of locking happened only on regular files which used equivalent but separate locking. It'd be best if we give separate locking classes per file but we can't easily do that. Let's differentiate on ->mmap() for now. Later we'll add explicit file operations struct and can add per-ops lockdep key there. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> Reported-by: Dave Jones <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

ttyA has ld associated to n_gsm, when ttyA is closing, it triggers to release gsmttyB's ld data dlci[B], then race would happen if gsmttyB is opening in parallel. Here are race cases we found recently in test: CASE beagleboard#1 ==================================================================== releasing dlci[B] race with gsmtty_install(gsmttyB), then panic in gsmtty_open(gsmttyB), as below: tty_release(ttyA) tty_open(gsmttyB) | | ----- gsmtty_install(gsmttyB) | | ----- gsm_dlci_alloc(gsmttyB) => alloc dlci[B] tty_ldisc_release(ttyA) ----- | | gsm_dlci_release(dlci[B]) ----- | | gsm_dlci_free(dlci[B]) ----- | | ----- gsmtty_open(gsmttyB) gsmtty_open() { struct gsm_dlci *dlci = tty->driver_data; => here it uses dlci[B] ... } In gsmtty_open(gsmttyA), it uses dlci[B] which was release, so hit a panic. ===================================================================== CASE beagleboard#2 ===================================================================== releasing dlci[0] race with gsmtty_install(gsmttyB), then panic in gsmtty_open(), as below: tty_release(ttyA) tty_open(gsmttyB) | | ----- gsmtty_install(gsmttyB) | | ----- gsm_dlci_alloc(gsmttyB) => alloc dlci[B] | | ----- gsmtty_open(gsmttyB) fail | | ----- tty_release(gsmttyB) | | ----- gsmtty_close(gsmttyB) | | ----- gsmtty_detach_dlci(dlci[B]) | | ----- dlci_put(dlci[B]) | | tty_ldisc_release(ttyA) ----- | | gsm_dlci_release(dlci[0]) ----- | | gsm_dlci_free(dlci[0]) ----- | | ----- dlci_put(dlci[0]) In gsmtty_detach_dlci(dlci[B]), it tries to use dlci[0] which was released, then hit panic. ===================================================================== IMHO, n_gsm tty operations would refer released ldisc, as long as gsm_dlci_release() has chance to release ldisc data when some gsmtty operations are not completed.. This patch is try to avoid it by: 1) in n_gsm driver, use a global gsm spin lock to avoid gsm_dlci_release() run in parallel with gsmtty_install(); 2) Increase dlci's ref count in gsmtty_install() instead of in gsmtty_open(), the purpose is to prevent gsm_dlci_release() releasing dlci after gsmtty_install() allocats dlci but before gsmtty_open increases dlci's ref count; 3) Decrease dlci's ref count in gsmtty_remove(), which is a tty framework api, and this is the opposite process of step 2). Signed-off-by: Chao Bi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

If an TRACE_EVENT() uses __assign_str() or __get_str on a NULL pointer then the following oops will happen: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null) IP: [<c127a17b>] strlen+0x10/0x1a *pde = 00000000 ^M Oops: 0000 [beagleboard#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 3.13.0-rc1-test+ beagleboard#2 Hardware name: /DG965MQ, BIOS MQ96510J.86A.0372.2006.0605.1717 06/05/2006^M task: f5cde9f0 ti: f5e5e000 task.ti: f5e5e000 EIP: 0060:[<c127a17b>] EFLAGS: 00210046 CPU: 1 EIP is at strlen+0x10/0x1a EAX: 00000000 EBX: c2472da8 ECX: ffffffff EDX: c2472da8 ESI: c1c5e5fc EDI: 00000000 EBP: f5e5fe84 ESP: f5e5fe80 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068 CR0: 8005003b CR2: 00000000 CR3: 01f32000 CR4: 000007d0 Stack: f5f18b90 f5e5feb8 c10687a8 0759004f 00000005 00000005 00000005 00200046 00000002 00000000 c1082a93 f56c7e28 c2472da8 c1082a93 f5e5fee4 c106bc61^M 00000000 c1082a93 00000000 00000000 00000001 00200046 00200082 00000000 Call Trace: [<c10687a8>] ftrace_raw_event_lock+0x39/0xc0 [<c1082a93>] ? ktime_get+0x29/0x69 [<c1082a93>] ? ktime_get+0x29/0x69 [<c106bc61>] lock_release+0x57/0x1a5 [<c1082a93>] ? ktime_get+0x29/0x69 [<c10824dd>] read_seqcount_begin.constprop.7+0x4d/0x75 [<c1082a93>] ? ktime_get+0x29/0x69^M [<c1082a93>] ktime_get+0x29/0x69 [<c108a46a>] __tick_nohz_idle_enter+0x1e/0x426 [<c10690e8>] ? lock_release_holdtime.part.19+0x48/0x4d [<c10bc184>] ? time_hardirqs_off+0xe/0x28 [<c1068c82>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaf [<c108a8cb>] tick_nohz_idle_enter+0x59/0x62 [<c1079242>] cpu_startup_entry+0x64/0x192 [<c102299c>] start_secondary+0x277/0x27c Code: 90 89 c6 89 d0 88 c4 ac 38 e0 74 09 84 c0 75 f7 be 01 00 00 00 89 f0 48 5e 5d c3 55 89 e5 57 66 66 66 66 90 83 c9 ff 89 c7 31 c0 <f2> ae f7 d1 8d 41 ff 5f 5d c3 55 89 e5 57 66 66 66 66 90 31 ff EIP: [<c127a17b>] strlen+0x10/0x1a SS:ESP 0068:f5e5fe80 CR2: 0000000000000000 ---[ end trace 01bc47bf519ec1b2 ]--- New tracepoints have been added that have allowed for NULL pointers being assigned to strings. To fix this, change the TRACE_EVENT() code to check for NULL and if it is, it will assign "(null)" to it instead (similar to what glibc printf does). Reported-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]> Reported-by: Jovi Zhangwei <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAGdX0WFeEuy+DtpsJzyzn0343qEEjLX97+o1VREFkUEhndC+5Q@mail.gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: 9cbf117 ("tracing/events: provide string with undefined size support") Cc: [email protected] # 2.6.31+ Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>

The way namespace tags are implemented in sysfs is more complicated than necessary. As each tag is a pointer value and required to be non-NULL under a namespace enabled parent, there's no need to record separately what type each tag is. If multiple namespace types are needed, which currently aren't, we can simply compare the tag to a set of allowed tags in the superblock assuming that the tags, being pointers, won't have the same value across multiple types. This patch rips out kobj_ns_type handling from sysfs. sysfs now has an enable switch to turn on namespace under a node. If enabled, all children are required to have non-NULL namespace tags and filtered against the super_block's tag. kobject namespace determination is now performed in lib/kobject.c::create_dir() making sysfs_read_ns_type() unnecessary. The sanity checks are also moved. create_dir() is restructured to ease such addition. This removes most kobject namespace knowledge from sysfs proper which will enable proper separation and layering of sysfs. This is the second try. The first one was cb26a31 ("sysfs: drop kobj_ns_type handling") which tried to automatically enable namespace if there are children with non-NULL namespace tags; however, it was broken for symlinks as they should inherit the target's tag iff namespace is enabled in the parent. This led to namespace filtering enabled incorrectly for wireless net class devices through phy80211 symlinks and thus network configuration failure. a1212d2 ("Revert "sysfs: drop kobj_ns_type handling"") reverted the commit. This shouldn't introduce any behavior changes, for real. v2: Dummy implementation of sysfs_enable_ns() for !CONFIG_SYSFS was missing and caused build failure. Reported by kbuild test robot. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]> Cc: Kay Sievers <[email protected]> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Cc: kbuild test robot <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

…is completed Currently, when mounting pstore file system, a read callback of efi_pstore driver runs mutiple times as below. - In the first read callback, scan efivar_sysfs_list from head and pass a kmsg buffer of a entry to an upper pstore layer. - In the second read callback, rescan efivar_sysfs_list from the entry and pass another kmsg buffer to it. - Repeat the scan and pass until the end of efivar_sysfs_list. In this process, an entry is read across the multiple read function calls. To avoid race between the read and erasion, the whole process above is protected by a spinlock, holding in open() and releasing in close(). At the same time, kmemdup() is called to pass the buffer to pstore filesystem during it. And then, it causes a following lockdep warning. To make the dynamic memory allocation runnable without taking spinlock, holding off a deletion of sysfs entry if it happens while scanning it via efi_pstore, and deleting it after the scan is completed. To implement it, this patch introduces two flags, scanning and deleting, to efivar_entry. On the code basis, it seems that all the scanning and deleting logic is not needed because __efivars->lock are not dropped when reading from the EFI variable store. But, the scanning and deleting logic is still needed because an efi-pstore and a pstore filesystem works as follows. In case an entry(A) is found, the pointer is saved to psi->data. And efi_pstore_read() passes the entry(A) to a pstore filesystem by releasing __efivars->lock. And then, the pstore filesystem calls efi_pstore_read() again and the same entry(A), which is saved to psi->data, is used for resuming to scan a sysfs-list. So, to protect the entry(A), the logic is needed. [ 1.143710] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 1.144058] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at kernel/lockdep.c:2740 lockdep_trace_alloc+0x104/0x110() [ 1.144058] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(irqs_disabled_flags(flags)) [ 1.144058] Modules linked in: [ 1.144058] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Not tainted 3.11.0-rc5 beagleboard#2 [ 1.144058] 0000000000000009 ffff8800797e9ae0 ffffffff816614a5 ffff8800797e9b28 [ 1.144058] ffff8800797e9b18 ffffffff8105510d 0000000000000080 0000000000000046 [ 1.144058] 00000000000000d0 00000000000003af ffffffff81ccd0c0 ffff8800797e9b78 [ 1.144058] Call Trace: [ 1.144058] [<ffffffff816614a5>] dump_stack+0x54/0x74 [ 1.144058] [<ffffffff8105510d>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7d/0xa0 [ 1.144058] [<ffffffff8105517c>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4c/0x50 [ 1.144058] [<ffffffff8131290f>] ? vsscanf+0x57f/0x7b0 [ 1.144058] [<ffffffff810bbd74>] lockdep_trace_alloc+0x104/0x110 [ 1.144058] [<ffffffff81192da0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x50/0x280 [ 1.144058] [<ffffffff815147bb>] ? efi_pstore_read_func.part.1+0x12b/0x170 [ 1.144058] [<ffffffff8115b260>] kmemdup+0x20/0x50 [ 1.144058] [<ffffffff815147bb>] efi_pstore_read_func.part.1+0x12b/0x170 [ 1.144058] [<ffffffff81514800>] ? efi_pstore_read_func.part.1+0x170/0x170 [ 1.144058] [<ffffffff815148b4>] efi_pstore_read_func+0xb4/0xe0 [ 1.144058] [<ffffffff81512b7b>] __efivar_entry_iter+0xfb/0x120 [ 1.144058] [<ffffffff8151428f>] efi_pstore_read+0x3f/0x50 [ 1.144058] [<ffffffff8128d7ba>] pstore_get_records+0x9a/0x150 [ 1.158207] [<ffffffff812af25c>] ? selinux_d_instantiate+0x1c/0x20 [ 1.158207] [<ffffffff8128ce30>] ? parse_options+0x80/0x80 [ 1.158207] [<ffffffff8128ced5>] pstore_fill_super+0xa5/0xc0 [ 1.158207] [<ffffffff811ae7d2>] mount_single+0xa2/0xd0 [ 1.158207] [<ffffffff8128ccf8>] pstore_mount+0x18/0x20 [ 1.158207] [<ffffffff811ae8b9>] mount_fs+0x39/0x1b0 [ 1.158207] [<ffffffff81160550>] ? __alloc_percpu+0x10/0x20 [ 1.158207] [<ffffffff811c9493>] vfs_kern_mount+0x63/0xf0 [ 1.158207] [<ffffffff811cbb0e>] do_mount+0x23e/0xa20 [ 1.158207] [<ffffffff8115b51b>] ? strndup_user+0x4b/0xf0 [ 1.158207] [<ffffffff811cc373>] SyS_mount+0x83/0xc0 [ 1.158207] [<ffffffff81673cc2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 1.158207] ---[ end trace 61981bc62de9f6f4 ]--- Signed-off-by: Seiji Aguchi <[email protected]> Tested-by: Madper Xie <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <[email protected]>

Introduce kernfs interface to manipulate a directory which takes and returns sysfs_dirents. create_dir() is renamed to kernfs_create_dir_ns() and its argumantes and return value are updated. create_dir() usages are replaced with kernfs_create_dir_ns() and sysfs_create_subdir() usages are replaced with kernfs_create_dir(). Dup warnings are handled explicitly by sysfs users of the kernfs interface. sysfs_enable_ns() is renamed to kernfs_enable_ns(). This patch doesn't introduce any behavior changes. v2: Dummy implementation for !CONFIG_SYSFS updated to return -ENOSYS. v3: kernfs_enable_ns() added. v4: Refreshed on top of "sysfs: drop kobj_ns_type handling, take beagleboard#2" so that this patch removes sysfs_enable_ns(). Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

The patch fixes the following lockdep warning, which is 100% reproducible on network restart: ====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 3.12.0+ beagleboard#47 Tainted: GF ------------------------------------------------------- kworker/1:1/27 is trying to acquire lock: ((&(&adapter->watchdog_task)->work)){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8108a5b0>] flush_work+0x0/0x70 but task is already holding lock: (&adapter->mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0177c0a>] e1000_reset_task+0x4a/0xa0 [e1000] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> beagleboard#1 (&adapter->mutex){+.+...}: [<ffffffff810bdb5d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x120 [<ffffffff816b8cbc>] mutex_lock_nested+0x4c/0x390 [<ffffffffa017233d>] e1000_watchdog+0x7d/0x5b0 [e1000] [<ffffffff8108b972>] process_one_work+0x1d2/0x510 [<ffffffff8108ca80>] worker_thread+0x120/0x3a0 [<ffffffff81092c1e>] kthread+0xee/0x110 [<ffffffff816c3d7c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 -> #0 ((&(&adapter->watchdog_task)->work)){+.+...}: [<ffffffff810bd9c0>] __lock_acquire+0x1710/0x1810 [<ffffffff810bdb5d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x120 [<ffffffff8108a5eb>] flush_work+0x3b/0x70 [<ffffffff8108b5d8>] __cancel_work_timer+0x98/0x140 [<ffffffff8108b693>] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x13/0x20 [<ffffffffa0170cec>] e1000_down_and_stop+0x3c/0x60 [e1000] [<ffffffffa01775b1>] e1000_down+0x131/0x220 [e1000] [<ffffffffa0177c12>] e1000_reset_task+0x52/0xa0 [e1000] [<ffffffff8108b972>] process_one_work+0x1d2/0x510 [<ffffffff8108ca80>] worker_thread+0x120/0x3a0 [<ffffffff81092c1e>] kthread+0xee/0x110 [<ffffffff816c3d7c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&adapter->mutex); lock((&(&adapter->watchdog_task)->work)); lock(&adapter->mutex); lock((&(&adapter->watchdog_task)->work)); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kworker/1:1/27: #0: (events){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8108b906>] process_one_work+0x166/0x510 beagleboard#1: ((&adapter->reset_task)){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8108b906>] process_one_work+0x166/0x510 beagleboard#2: (&adapter->mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0177c0a>] e1000_reset_task+0x4a/0xa0 [e1000] stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 27 Comm: kworker/1:1 Tainted: GF 3.12.0+ beagleboard#47 Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/P5B-VM SE, BIOS 0501 05/31/2007 Workqueue: events e1000_reset_task [e1000] ffffffff820f6000 ffff88007b9dba98 ffffffff816b54a2 0000000000000002 ffffffff820f5e50 ffff88007b9dbae8 ffffffff810ba936 ffff88007b9dbac8 ffff88007b9dbb48 ffff88007b9d8f00 ffff88007b9d8780 ffff88007b9d8f00 Call Trace: [<ffffffff816b54a2>] dump_stack+0x49/0x5f [<ffffffff810ba936>] print_circular_bug+0x216/0x310 [<ffffffff810bd9c0>] __lock_acquire+0x1710/0x1810 [<ffffffff8108a5b0>] ? __flush_work+0x250/0x250 [<ffffffff810bdb5d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x120 [<ffffffff8108a5b0>] ? __flush_work+0x250/0x250 [<ffffffff8108a5eb>] flush_work+0x3b/0x70 [<ffffffff8108a5b0>] ? __flush_work+0x250/0x250 [<ffffffff8108b5d8>] __cancel_work_timer+0x98/0x140 [<ffffffff8108b693>] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x13/0x20 [<ffffffffa0170cec>] e1000_down_and_stop+0x3c/0x60 [e1000] [<ffffffffa01775b1>] e1000_down+0x131/0x220 [e1000] [<ffffffffa0177c12>] e1000_reset_task+0x52/0xa0 [e1000] [<ffffffff8108b972>] process_one_work+0x1d2/0x510 [<ffffffff8108b906>] ? process_one_work+0x166/0x510 [<ffffffff8108ca80>] worker_thread+0x120/0x3a0 [<ffffffff8108c960>] ? manage_workers+0x2c0/0x2c0 [<ffffffff81092c1e>] kthread+0xee/0x110 [<ffffffff81092b30>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70 [<ffffffff816c3d7c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [<ffffffff81092b30>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70 == The issue background == The problem occurs, because e1000_down(), which is called under adapter->mutex by e1000_reset_task(), tries to synchronously cancel e1000 auxiliary works (reset_task, watchdog_task, phy_info_task, fifo_stall_task), which take adapter->mutex in their handlers. So the question is what does adapter->mutex protect there? The adapter->mutex was introduced by commit 0ef4ee ("e1000: convert to private mutex from rtnl") as a replacement for rtnl_lock() taken in the asynchronous handlers. It targeted on fixing a similar lockdep warning issued when e1000_down() was called under rtnl_lock(), and it fixed it, but unfortunately it introduced the lockdep warning described above. Anyway, that said the source of this bug is that the asynchronous works were made to take rtnl_lock() some time ago, so let's look deeper and find why it was added there. The rtnl_lock() was added to asynchronous handlers by commit 338c15 ("e1000: fix occasional panic on unload") in order to prevent asynchronous handlers from execution after the module is unloaded (e1000_down() is called) as it follows from the comment to the commit: > Net drivers in general have an issue where timers fired > by mod_timer or work threads with schedule_work are running > outside of the rtnl_lock. > > With no other lock protection these routines are vulnerable > to races with driver unload or reset paths. > > The longer term solution to this might be a redesign with > safer locks being taken in the driver to guarantee no > reentrance, but for now a safe and effective fix is > to take the rtnl_lock in these routines. I'm not sure if this locking scheme fixed the problem or just made it unlikely, although I incline to the latter. Anyway, this was long time ago when e1000 auxiliary works were implemented as timers scheduling real work handlers in their routines. The e1000_down() function only canceled the timers, but left the real handlers running if they were running, which could result in work execution after module unload. Today, the e1000 driver uses sane delayed works instead of the pair timer+work to implement its delayed asynchronous handlers, and the e1000_down() synchronously cancels all the works so that the problem that commit 338c15 tried to cope with disappeared, and we don't need any locks in the handlers any more. Moreover, any locking there can potentially result in a deadlock. So, this patch reverts commits 0ef4ee and 338c15. Fixes: 0ef4eed ("e1000: convert to private mutex from rtnl") Fixes: 338c15e ("e1000: fix occasional panic on unload") Cc: Tushar Dave <[email protected]> Cc: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <[email protected]> Tested-by: Aaron Brown <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <[email protected]>

Dave Jones got the following lockdep splat: > ====================================================== > [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] > 3.12.0-rc3+ beagleboard#92 Not tainted > ------------------------------------------------------- > trinity-child2/15191 is trying to acquire lock: > (&rdp->nocb_wq){......}, at: [<ffffffff8108ff43>] __wake_up+0x23/0x50 > > but task is already holding lock: > (&ctx->lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff81154c19>] perf_event_exit_task+0x109/0x230 > > which lock already depends on the new lock. > > > the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: > > -> beagleboard#3 (&ctx->lock){-.-...}: > [<ffffffff810cc243>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x200 > [<ffffffff81733f90>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80 > [<ffffffff811500ff>] __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x2df/0x5e0 > [<ffffffff81091b83>] perf_event_task_sched_out+0x93/0xa0 > [<ffffffff81732052>] __schedule+0x1d2/0xa20 > [<ffffffff81732f30>] preempt_schedule_irq+0x50/0xb0 > [<ffffffff817352b6>] retint_kernel+0x26/0x30 > [<ffffffff813eed04>] tty_flip_buffer_push+0x34/0x50 > [<ffffffff813f0504>] pty_write+0x54/0x60 > [<ffffffff813e900d>] n_tty_write+0x32d/0x4e0 > [<ffffffff813e5838>] tty_write+0x158/0x2d0 > [<ffffffff811c4850>] vfs_write+0xc0/0x1f0 > [<ffffffff811c52cc>] SyS_write+0x4c/0xa0 > [<ffffffff8173d4e4>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2 > > -> beagleboard#2 (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}: > [<ffffffff810cc243>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x200 > [<ffffffff81733f90>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80 > [<ffffffff810980b2>] wake_up_new_task+0xc2/0x2e0 > [<ffffffff81054336>] do_fork+0x126/0x460 > [<ffffffff81054696>] kernel_thread+0x26/0x30 > [<ffffffff8171ff93>] rest_init+0x23/0x140 > [<ffffffff81ee1e4b>] start_kernel+0x3f6/0x403 > [<ffffffff81ee1571>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c > [<ffffffff81ee1664>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xf1/0xf4 > > -> beagleboard#1 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}: > [<ffffffff810cc243>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x200 > [<ffffffff8173419b>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x90 > [<ffffffff810979d1>] try_to_wake_up+0x31/0x350 > [<ffffffff81097d62>] default_wake_function+0x12/0x20 > [<ffffffff81084af8>] autoremove_wake_function+0x18/0x40 > [<ffffffff8108ea38>] __wake_up_common+0x58/0x90 > [<ffffffff8108ff59>] __wake_up+0x39/0x50 > [<ffffffff8110d4f8>] __call_rcu_nocb_enqueue+0xa8/0xc0 > [<ffffffff81111450>] __call_rcu+0x140/0x820 > [<ffffffff81111b8d>] call_rcu+0x1d/0x20 > [<ffffffff81093697>] cpu_attach_domain+0x287/0x360 > [<ffffffff81099d7e>] build_sched_domains+0xe5e/0x10a0 > [<ffffffff81efa7fc>] sched_init_smp+0x3b7/0x47a > [<ffffffff81ee1f4e>] kernel_init_freeable+0xf6/0x202 > [<ffffffff817200be>] kernel_init+0xe/0x190 > [<ffffffff8173d22c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 > > -> #0 (&rdp->nocb_wq){......}: > [<ffffffff810cb7ca>] __lock_acquire+0x191a/0x1be0 > [<ffffffff810cc243>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x200 > [<ffffffff8173419b>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x90 > [<ffffffff8108ff43>] __wake_up+0x23/0x50 > [<ffffffff8110d4f8>] __call_rcu_nocb_enqueue+0xa8/0xc0 > [<ffffffff81111450>] __call_rcu+0x140/0x820 > [<ffffffff81111bb0>] kfree_call_rcu+0x20/0x30 > [<ffffffff81149abf>] put_ctx+0x4f/0x70 > [<ffffffff81154c3e>] perf_event_exit_task+0x12e/0x230 > [<ffffffff81056b8d>] do_exit+0x30d/0xcc0 > [<ffffffff8105893c>] do_group_exit+0x4c/0xc0 > [<ffffffff810589c4>] SyS_exit_group+0x14/0x20 > [<ffffffff8173d4e4>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2 > > other info that might help us debug this: > > Chain exists of: > &rdp->nocb_wq --> &rq->lock --> &ctx->lock > > Possible unsafe locking scenario: > > CPU0 CPU1 > ---- ---- > lock(&ctx->lock); > lock(&rq->lock); > lock(&ctx->lock); > lock(&rdp->nocb_wq); > > *** DEADLOCK *** > > 1 lock held by trinity-child2/15191: > #0: (&ctx->lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff81154c19>] perf_event_exit_task+0x109/0x230 > > stack backtrace: > CPU: 2 PID: 15191 Comm: trinity-child2 Not tainted 3.12.0-rc3+ beagleboard#92 > ffffffff82565b70 ffff880070c2dbf8 ffffffff8172a363 ffffffff824edf40 > ffff880070c2dc38 ffffffff81726741 ffff880070c2dc90 ffff88022383b1c0 > ffff88022383aac0 0000000000000000 ffff88022383b188 ffff88022383b1c0 > Call Trace: > [<ffffffff8172a363>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x82 > [<ffffffff81726741>] print_circular_bug+0x200/0x20f > [<ffffffff810cb7ca>] __lock_acquire+0x191a/0x1be0 > [<ffffffff810c6439>] ? get_lock_stats+0x19/0x60 > [<ffffffff8100b2f4>] ? native_sched_clock+0x24/0x80 > [<ffffffff810cc243>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x200 > [<ffffffff8108ff43>] ? __wake_up+0x23/0x50 > [<ffffffff8173419b>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x90 > [<ffffffff8108ff43>] ? __wake_up+0x23/0x50 > [<ffffffff8108ff43>] __wake_up+0x23/0x50 > [<ffffffff8110d4f8>] __call_rcu_nocb_enqueue+0xa8/0xc0 > [<ffffffff81111450>] __call_rcu+0x140/0x820 > [<ffffffff8109bc8f>] ? local_clock+0x3f/0x50 > [<ffffffff81111bb0>] kfree_call_rcu+0x20/0x30 > [<ffffffff81149abf>] put_ctx+0x4f/0x70 > [<ffffffff81154c3e>] perf_event_exit_task+0x12e/0x230 > [<ffffffff81056b8d>] do_exit+0x30d/0xcc0 > [<ffffffff810c9af5>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x115/0x1e0 > [<ffffffff810c9bcd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 > [<ffffffff8105893c>] do_group_exit+0x4c/0xc0 > [<ffffffff810589c4>] SyS_exit_group+0x14/0x20 > [<ffffffff8173d4e4>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2 The underlying problem is that perf is invoking call_rcu() with the scheduler locks held, but in NOCB mode, call_rcu() will with high probability invoke the scheduler -- which just might want to use its locks. The reason that call_rcu() needs to invoke the scheduler is to wake up the corresponding rcuo callback-offload kthread, which does the job of starting up a grace period and invoking the callbacks afterwards. One solution (championed on a related problem by Lai Jiangshan) is to simply defer the wakeup to some point where scheduler locks are no longer held. Since we don't want to unnecessarily incur the cost of such deferral, the task before us is threefold: 1. Determine when it is likely that a relevant scheduler lock is held. 2. Defer the wakeup in such cases. 3. Ensure that all deferred wakeups eventually happen, preferably sooner rather than later. We use irqs_disabled_flags() as a proxy for relevant scheduler locks being held. This works because the relevant locks are always acquired with interrupts disabled. We may defer more often than needed, but that is at least safe. The wakeup deferral is tracked via a new field in the per-CPU and per-RCU-flavor rcu_data structure, namely ->nocb_defer_wakeup. This flag is checked by the RCU core processing. The __rcu_pending() function now checks this flag, which causes rcu_check_callbacks() to initiate RCU core processing at each scheduling-clock interrupt where this flag is set. Of course this is not sufficient because scheduling-clock interrupts are often turned off (the things we used to be able to count on!). So the flags are also checked on entry to any state that RCU considers to be idle, which includes both NO_HZ_IDLE idle state and NO_HZ_FULL user-mode-execution state. This approach should allow call_rcu() to be invoked regardless of what locks you might be holding, the key word being "should". Reported-by: Dave Jones <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>

commit 76d588d upstream. Current imc-pmu code triggers a WARNING with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP and CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING enabled, while running a thread_imc event. Command to trigger the warning: # perf stat -e thread_imc/CPM_CS_FROM_L4_MEM_X_DPTEG/ sleep 5 Performance counter stats for 'sleep 5': 0 thread_imc/CPM_CS_FROM_L4_MEM_X_DPTEG/ 5.002117947 seconds time elapsed 0.000131000 seconds user 0.001063000 seconds sys Below is snippet of the warning in dmesg: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:580 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 2869, name: perf-exec preempt_count: 2, expected: 0 4 locks held by perf-exec/2869: #0: c00000004325c540 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: bprm_execve+0x64/0xa90 beagleboard#1: c00000004325c5d8 (&sig->exec_update_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: begin_new_exec+0x460/0xef0 beagleboard#2: c0000003fa99d4e0 (&cpuctx_lock){-...}-{2:2}, at: perf_event_exec+0x290/0x510 beagleboard#3: c000000017ab8418 (&ctx->lock){....}-{2:2}, at: perf_event_exec+0x29c/0x510 irq event stamp: 4806 hardirqs last enabled at (4805): [<c000000000f65b94>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x94/0xd0 hardirqs last disabled at (4806): [<c0000000003fae44>] perf_event_exec+0x394/0x510 softirqs last enabled at (0): [<c00000000013c404>] copy_process+0xc34/0x1ff0 softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 CPU: 36 PID: 2869 Comm: perf-exec Not tainted 6.2.0-rc2-00011-g1247637727f2 beagleboard#61 Hardware name: 8375-42A POWER9 0x4e1202 opal:v7.0-16-g9b85f7d961 PowerNV Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x98/0xe0 (unreliable) __might_resched+0x2f8/0x310 __mutex_lock+0x6c/0x13f0 thread_imc_event_add+0xf4/0x1b0 event_sched_in+0xe0/0x210 merge_sched_in+0x1f0/0x600 visit_groups_merge.isra.92.constprop.166+0x2bc/0x6c0 ctx_flexible_sched_in+0xcc/0x140 ctx_sched_in+0x20c/0x2a0 ctx_resched+0x104/0x1c0 perf_event_exec+0x340/0x510 begin_new_exec+0x730/0xef0 load_elf_binary+0x3f8/0x1e10 ... do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=2001 set at [<00000000fd63e7cf>] do_nanosleep+0x60/0x1a0 WARNING: CPU: 36 PID: 2869 at kernel/sched/core.c:9912 __might_sleep+0x9c/0xb0 CPU: 36 PID: 2869 Comm: sleep Tainted: G W 6.2.0-rc2-00011-g1247637727f2 beagleboard#61 Hardware name: 8375-42A POWER9 0x4e1202 opal:v7.0-16-g9b85f7d961 PowerNV NIP: c000000000194a1c LR: c000000000194a18 CTR: c000000000a78670 REGS: c00000004d2134e0 TRAP: 0700 Tainted: G W (6.2.0-rc2-00011-g1247637727f2) MSR: 9000000000021033 <SF,HV,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 48002824 XER: 00000000 CFAR: c00000000013fb64 IRQMASK: 1 The above warning triggered because the current imc-pmu code uses mutex lock in interrupt disabled sections. The function mutex_lock() internally calls __might_resched(), which will check if IRQs are disabled and in case IRQs are disabled, it will trigger the warning. Fix the issue by changing the mutex lock to spinlock. Fixes: 8f95faa ("powerpc/powernv: Detect and create IMC device") Reported-by: Michael Petlan <[email protected]> Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain <[email protected]> [mpe: Fix comments, trim oops in change log, add reported-by tags] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 769bf60 ] syzbot found a potential circular dependency leading to a deadlock: -> #3 (&hdev->req_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common+0x1b6/0x1bc2 kernel/locking/mutex.c:599 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:732 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x1c kernel/locking/mutex.c:784 hci_dev_do_close+0x3f/0x9f net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:551 hci_rfkill_set_block+0x130/0x1ac net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:935 rfkill_set_block+0x1e6/0x3b8 net/rfkill/core.c:345 rfkill_fop_write+0x2d8/0x672 net/rfkill/core.c:1274 vfs_write+0x277/0xcf5 fs/read_write.c:594 ksys_write+0x19b/0x2bd fs/read_write.c:650 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:55 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x51/0xba arch/x86/entry/common.c:93 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xcb -> #2 (rfkill_global_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common+0x1b6/0x1bc2 kernel/locking/mutex.c:599 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:732 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x1c kernel/locking/mutex.c:784 rfkill_register+0x30/0x7e3 net/rfkill/core.c:1045 hci_register_dev+0x48f/0x96d net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:2622 __vhci_create_device drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c:341 [inline] vhci_create_device+0x3ad/0x68f drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c:374 vhci_get_user drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c:431 [inline] vhci_write+0x37b/0x429 drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c:511 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2109 [inline] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:509 [inline] vfs_write+0xaa8/0xcf5 fs/read_write.c:596 ksys_write+0x19b/0x2bd fs/read_write.c:650 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:55 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x51/0xba arch/x86/entry/common.c:93 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xcb -> #1 (&data->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common+0x1b6/0x1bc2 kernel/locking/mutex.c:599 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:732 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x1c kernel/locking/mutex.c:784 vhci_send_frame+0x68/0x9c drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c:75 hci_send_frame+0x1cc/0x2ff net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:2989 hci_sched_acl_pkt net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:3498 [inline] hci_sched_acl net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:3583 [inline] hci_tx_work+0xb94/0x1a60 net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:3654 process_one_work+0x901/0xfb8 kernel/workqueue.c:2310 worker_thread+0xa67/0x1003 kernel/workqueue.c:2457 kthread+0x36a/0x430 kernel/kthread.c:319 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:298 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&hdev->tx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3053 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3172 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3787 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2d32/0x77fa kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5011 lock_acquire+0x273/0x4d5 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5622 __flush_work+0xee/0x19f kernel/workqueue.c:3090 hci_dev_close_sync+0x32f/0x1113 net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c:4352 hci_dev_do_close+0x47/0x9f net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:553 hci_rfkill_set_block+0x130/0x1ac net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:935 rfkill_set_block+0x1e6/0x3b8 net/rfkill/core.c:345 rfkill_fop_write+0x2d8/0x672 net/rfkill/core.c:1274 vfs_write+0x277/0xcf5 fs/read_write.c:594 ksys_write+0x19b/0x2bd fs/read_write.c:650 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:55 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x51/0xba arch/x86/entry/common.c:93 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xcb This change removes the need for acquiring the open_mutex in vhci_send_frame, thus eliminating the potential deadlock while maintaining the required packet ordering. Fixes: 92d4abd ("Bluetooth: vhci: Fix race when opening vhci device") Signed-off-by: Ying Hsu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 1469417 ] Trying to suspend to RAM on SAMA5D27 EVK leads to the following lockdep warning: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.7.0-rc5-wt+ #532 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- sh/92 is trying to acquire lock: c3cf306c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 but task is already holding lock: c3d7c46c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 6 locks held by sh/92: #0: c3aa0258 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0xd8/0x178 #1: c4c2df44 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x138/0x284 #2: c32684a0 (kn->active){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x148/0x284 #3: c232b6d4 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pm_suspend+0x13c/0x4e8 #4: c387b088 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_suspend+0x1e8/0x91c #5: c3d7c46c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 92 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.7.0-rc5-wt+ #532 Hardware name: Atmel SAMA5 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x18/0x1c show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x48 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x19ec/0x3a0c __lock_acquire from lock_acquire.part.0+0x124/0x2d0 lock_acquire.part.0 from _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x5c/0x78 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave from __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 __irq_get_desc_lock from irq_set_irq_wake+0xa8/0x204 irq_set_irq_wake from atmel_gpio_irq_set_wake+0x58/0xb4 atmel_gpio_irq_set_wake from irq_set_irq_wake+0x100/0x204 irq_set_irq_wake from gpio_keys_suspend+0xec/0x2b8 gpio_keys_suspend from dpm_run_callback+0xe4/0x248 dpm_run_callback from __device_suspend+0x234/0x91c __device_suspend from dpm_suspend+0x224/0x43c dpm_suspend from dpm_suspend_start+0x9c/0xa8 dpm_suspend_start from suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1e0/0xa84 suspend_devices_and_enter from pm_suspend+0x460/0x4e8 pm_suspend from state_store+0x78/0xe4 state_store from kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1a0/0x284 kernfs_fop_write_iter from vfs_write+0x38c/0x6f4 vfs_write from ksys_write+0xd8/0x178 ksys_write from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c Exception stack(0xc52b3fa8 to 0xc52b3ff0) 3fa0: 00000004 005a0ae8 00000001 005a0ae8 00000004 00000001 3fc0: 00000004 005a0ae8 00000001 00000004 00000004 b6c616c0 00000020 0059d190 3fe0: 00000004 b6c61678 aec5a041 aebf1a26 This warning is raised because pinctrl-at91-pio4 uses chained IRQ. Whenever a wake up source configures an IRQ through irq_set_irq_wake, it will lock the corresponding IRQ desc, and then call irq_set_irq_wake on "parent" IRQ which will do the same on its own IRQ desc, but since those two locks share the same class, lockdep reports this as an issue. Fix lockdep false positive by setting a different class for parent and children IRQ Fixes: 7761808 ("pinctrl: introduce driver for Atmel PIO4 controller") Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 807252f ] Running smb2.rename test from Samba smbtorture suite against a kernel built with lockdep triggers a "possible recursive locking detected" warning. This is because mnt_want_write() is called twice with no mnt_drop_write() in between: -> ksmbd_vfs_mkdir() -> ksmbd_vfs_kern_path_create() -> kern_path_create() -> filename_create() -> mnt_want_write() -> mnt_want_write() Fix this by removing the mnt_want_write/mnt_drop_write calls from vfs helpers that call kern_path_create(). Full lockdep trace below: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.6.0-rc5 #775 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- kworker/1:1/32 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888005ac83f8 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksmbd_vfs_mkdir+0xe1/0x410 but task is already holding lock: ffff888005ac83f8 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_create+0xb6/0x260 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(sb_writers#5); lock(sb_writers#5); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 4 locks held by kworker/1:1/32: #0: ffff8880064e4138 ((wq_completion)ksmbd-io){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x40e/0x980 #1: ffff888005b0fdd0 ((work_completion)(&work->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x40e/0x980 #2: ffff888005ac83f8 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_create+0xb6/0x260 #3: ffff8880057ce760 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: filename_create+0x123/0x260 Cc: [email protected] Fixes: 40b268d ("ksmbd: add mnt_want_write to ksmbd vfs functions") Signed-off-by: Marios Makassikis <[email protected]> Acked-by: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steve French <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 3f14b37 ] act_ct adds skb->users before defragmentation. If frags arrive in order, the last frag's reference is reset in: inet_frag_reasm_prepare skb_morph which is not straightforward. However when frags arrive out of order, nobody unref the last frag, and all frags are leaked. The situation is even worse, as initiating packet capture can lead to a crash[0] when skb has been cloned and shared at the same time. Fix the issue by removing skb_get() before defragmentation. act_ct returns TC_ACT_CONSUMED when defrag failed or in progress. [0]: [ 843.804823] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 843.809659] kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:2091! [ 843.814516] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 843.819296] CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G S 6.7.0-rc3 #2 [ 843.824107] Hardware name: XFUSION 1288H V6/BC13MBSBD, BIOS 1.29 11/25/2022 [ 843.828953] RIP: 0010:pskb_expand_head+0x2ac/0x300 [ 843.833805] Code: 8b 70 28 48 85 f6 74 82 48 83 c6 08 bf 01 00 00 00 e8 38 bd ff ff 8b 83 c0 00 00 00 48 03 83 c8 00 00 00 e9 62 ff ff ff 0f 0b <0f> 0b e8 8d d0 ff ff e9 b3 fd ff ff 81 7c 24 14 40 01 00 00 4c 89 [ 843.843698] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000cce07c0 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 843.848524] RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff88811a211d00 RCX: 0000000000000820 [ 843.853299] RDX: 0000000000000640 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88811a211d00 [ 843.857974] RBP: ffff888127d39518 R08: 00000000bee97314 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 843.862584] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff8881109f0000 R12: 0000000000000880 [ 843.867147] R13: ffff888127d39580 R14: 0000000000000640 R15: ffff888170f7b900 [ 843.871680] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff889ffffc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 843.876242] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 843.880778] CR2: 00007fa42affcfb8 CR3: 000000011433a002 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 [ 843.885336] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 843.889809] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 843.894229] PKRU: 55555554 [ 843.898539] Call Trace: [ 843.902772] <IRQ> [ 843.906922] ? __die_body+0x1e/0x60 [ 843.911032] ? die+0x3c/0x60 [ 843.915037] ? do_trap+0xe2/0x110 [ 843.918911] ? pskb_expand_head+0x2ac/0x300 [ 843.922687] ? do_error_trap+0x65/0x80 [ 843.926342] ? pskb_expand_head+0x2ac/0x300 [ 843.929905] ? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x60 [ 843.933398] ? pskb_expand_head+0x2ac/0x300 [ 843.936835] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 [ 843.940226] ? pskb_expand_head+0x2ac/0x300 [ 843.943580] inet_frag_reasm_prepare+0xd1/0x240 [ 843.946904] ip_defrag+0x5d4/0x870 [ 843.950132] nf_ct_handle_fragments+0xec/0x130 [nf_conntrack] [ 843.953334] tcf_ct_act+0x252/0xd90 [act_ct] [ 843.956473] ? tcf_mirred_act+0x516/0x5a0 [act_mirred] [ 843.959657] tcf_action_exec+0xa1/0x160 [ 843.962823] fl_classify+0x1db/0x1f0 [cls_flower] [ 843.966010] ? skb_clone+0x53/0xc0 [ 843.969173] tcf_classify+0x24d/0x420 [ 843.972333] tc_run+0x8f/0xf0 [ 843.975465] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x67a/0x1080 [ 843.978634] ? dev_gro_receive+0x249/0x730 [ 843.981759] __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x12d/0x260 [ 843.984869] netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x1cb/0x2f0 [ 843.987957] ? mlx5e_handle_rx_cqe_mpwrq_rep+0xfa/0x1a0 [mlx5_core] [ 843.991170] napi_complete_done+0x72/0x1a0 [ 843.994305] mlx5e_napi_poll+0x28c/0x6d0 [mlx5_core] [ 843.997501] __napi_poll+0x25/0x1b0 [ 844.000627] net_rx_action+0x256/0x330 [ 844.003705] __do_softirq+0xb3/0x29b [ 844.006718] irq_exit_rcu+0x9e/0xc0 [ 844.009672] common_interrupt+0x86/0xa0 [ 844.012537] </IRQ> [ 844.015285] <TASK> [ 844.017937] asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40 [ 844.020591] RIP: 0010:acpi_safe_halt+0x1b/0x20 [ 844.023247] Code: ff 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 65 48 8b 04 25 00 18 03 00 48 8b 00 a8 08 75 0c 66 90 0f 00 2d 81 d0 44 00 fb f4 <fa> c3 0f 1f 00 89 fa ec 48 8b 05 ee 88 ed 00 a9 00 00 00 80 75 11 [ 844.028900] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000533e70 EFLAGS: 00000246 [ 844.031725] RAX: 0000000000004000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 844.034553] RDX: ffff889ffffc0000 RSI: ffffffff828b7f20 RDI: ffff88a090f45c64 [ 844.037368] RBP: ffff88a0901a2800 R08: ffff88a090f45c00 R09: 00000000000317c0 [ 844.040155] R10: 00ec812281150475 R11: ffff889fffff0e04 R12: ffffffff828b7fa0 [ 844.042962] R13: ffffffff828b7f20 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 844.045819] acpi_idle_enter+0x7b/0xc0 [ 844.048621] cpuidle_enter_state+0x7f/0x430 [ 844.051451] cpuidle_enter+0x2d/0x40 [ 844.054279] do_idle+0x1d4/0x240 [ 844.057096] cpu_startup_entry+0x2a/0x30 [ 844.059934] start_secondary+0x104/0x130 [ 844.062787] secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0x16b/0x16b [ 844.065674] </TASK> Fixes: b57dc7c ("net/sched: Introduce action ct") Signed-off-by: Tao Liu <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit ca34d81 ] This reverts commit 4d56a4f. The DMA-fence annotations cause a lockdep warning (see below). As per https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/462170/ it sounds like the annotations don't work correctly. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.6.0-rc2+ #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kmstest/733 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8000819377f0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x58/0x2d4 but task is already holding lock: ffff800081a06aa0 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: tidss_atomic_commit_tail+0x20/0xc0 [tidss] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}: __dma_fence_might_wait+0x5c/0xd0 dma_resv_lockdep+0x1a4/0x32c do_one_initcall+0x84/0x2fc kernel_init_freeable+0x28c/0x4c4 kernel_init+0x24/0x1dc ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #1 (mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x70/0xe4 __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x58/0x2d4 kmalloc_trace+0x38/0x78 __kthread_create_worker+0x3c/0x150 kthread_create_worker+0x64/0x8c workqueue_init+0x1e8/0x2f0 kernel_init_freeable+0x11c/0x4c4 kernel_init+0x24/0x1dc ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1370/0x20d8 lock_acquire+0x1e8/0x308 fs_reclaim_acquire+0xd0/0xe4 __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x58/0x2d4 __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x58/0xf0 kmemdup+0x34/0x60 regmap_bulk_write+0x64/0x2c0 tc358768_bridge_pre_enable+0x8c/0x12d0 [tc358768] drm_atomic_bridge_call_pre_enable+0x68/0x80 [drm] drm_atomic_bridge_chain_pre_enable+0x50/0x158 [drm] drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_enables+0x164/0x264 [drm_kms_helper] tidss_atomic_commit_tail+0x58/0xc0 [tidss] commit_tail+0xa0/0x188 [drm_kms_helper] drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x1a8/0x1c0 [drm_kms_helper] drm_atomic_commit+0xa8/0xe0 [drm] drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x9ec/0xc80 [drm] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xc4/0x170 [drm] drm_ioctl+0x234/0x4b0 [drm] drm_compat_ioctl+0x110/0x12c [drm] __arm64_compat_sys_ioctl+0x128/0x150 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x110 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0 do_el0_svc_compat+0x1c/0x38 el0_svc_compat+0x48/0xb4 el0t_32_sync_handler+0xb0/0x138 el0t_32_sync+0x194/0x198 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: fs_reclaim --> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start --> dma_fence_map Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(dma_fence_map); lock(mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start); lock(dma_fence_map); lock(fs_reclaim); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kmstest/733: #0: ffff800082e5bba0 (crtc_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x118/0xc80 [drm] #1: ffff000004224c88 (crtc_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: modeset_lock+0xdc/0x1a0 [drm] #2: ffff800081a06aa0 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: tidss_atomic_commit_tail+0x20/0xc0 [tidss] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 733 Comm: kmstest Not tainted 6.6.0-rc2+ #1 Hardware name: Toradex Verdin AM62 on Verdin Development Board (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x98/0x118 show_stack+0x18/0x24 dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0xac dump_stack+0x18/0x24 print_circular_bug+0x288/0x368 check_noncircular+0x168/0x17c __lock_acquire+0x1370/0x20d8 lock_acquire+0x1e8/0x308 fs_reclaim_acquire+0xd0/0xe4 __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x58/0x2d4 __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x58/0xf0 kmemdup+0x34/0x60 regmap_bulk_write+0x64/0x2c0 tc358768_bridge_pre_enable+0x8c/0x12d0 [tc358768] drm_atomic_bridge_call_pre_enable+0x68/0x80 [drm] drm_atomic_bridge_chain_pre_enable+0x50/0x158 [drm] drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_enables+0x164/0x264 [drm_kms_helper] tidss_atomic_commit_tail+0x58/0xc0 [tidss] commit_tail+0xa0/0x188 [drm_kms_helper] drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x1a8/0x1c0 [drm_kms_helper] drm_atomic_commit+0xa8/0xe0 [drm] drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x9ec/0xc80 [drm] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xc4/0x170 [drm] drm_ioctl+0x234/0x4b0 [drm] drm_compat_ioctl+0x110/0x12c [drm] __arm64_compat_sys_ioctl+0x128/0x150 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x110 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0 do_el0_svc_compat+0x1c/0x38 el0_svc_compat+0x48/0xb4 el0t_32_sync_handler+0xb0/0x138 el0t_32_sync+0x194/0x198 Fixes: 4d56a4f ("drm/tidss: Annotate dma-fence critical section in commit path") Reviewed-by: Aradhya Bhatia <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230920-dma-fence-annotation-revert-v1-1-7ebf6f7f5bf6@ideasonboard.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 9d7c8c0 ] This reverts commit 250aa22. The DMA-fence annotations cause a lockdep warning (see below). As per https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/462170/ it sounds like the annotations don't work correctly. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-rc2+ #2 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kmstest/219 is trying to acquire lock: c4705838 (&hdmi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hdmi5_bridge_mode_set+0x1c/0x50 but task is already holding lock: c11e1128 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: omap_atomic_commit_tail+0x14/0xbc which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}: __dma_fence_might_wait+0x48/0xb4 dma_resv_lockdep+0x1b8/0x2bc do_one_initcall+0x68/0x3b0 kernel_init_freeable+0x260/0x34c kernel_init+0x14/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28 -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x70/0xa8 __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x3c/0x368 kmalloc_trace+0x28/0x58 _drm_do_get_edid+0x7c/0x35c hdmi5_bridge_get_edid+0xc8/0x1ac drm_bridge_connector_get_modes+0x64/0xc0 drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes+0x170/0x528 drm_client_modeset_probe+0x208/0x1334 __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x30/0x548 omap_fbdev_client_hotplug+0x3c/0x6c drm_client_register+0x58/0x94 pdev_probe+0x544/0x6b0 platform_probe+0x58/0xbc really_probe+0xd8/0x3fc __driver_probe_device+0x94/0x1f4 driver_probe_device+0x2c/0xc4 __device_attach_driver+0xa4/0x11c bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xdc __device_attach+0xac/0x20c bus_probe_device+0x8c/0x90 device_add+0x588/0x7e0 platform_device_add+0x110/0x24c platform_device_register_full+0x108/0x15c dss_bind+0x90/0xc0 try_to_bring_up_aggregate_device+0x1e0/0x2c8 __component_add+0xa4/0x174 hdmi5_probe+0x1c8/0x270 platform_probe+0x58/0xbc really_probe+0xd8/0x3fc __driver_probe_device+0x94/0x1f4 driver_probe_device+0x2c/0xc4 __device_attach_driver+0xa4/0x11c bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xdc __device_attach+0xac/0x20c bus_probe_device+0x8c/0x90 deferred_probe_work_func+0x8c/0xd8 process_one_work+0x2ac/0x6e4 worker_thread+0x30/0x4ec kthread+0x100/0x124 ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28 -> #0 (&hdmi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x145c/0x29cc lock_acquire.part.0+0xb4/0x258 __mutex_lock+0x90/0x950 mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24 hdmi5_bridge_mode_set+0x1c/0x50 drm_bridge_chain_mode_set+0x48/0x5c crtc_set_mode+0x188/0x1d0 omap_atomic_commit_tail+0x2c/0xbc commit_tail+0x9c/0x188 drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x158/0x18c drm_atomic_commit+0xa4/0xe8 drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x9a4/0xc38 drm_ioctl+0x210/0x4a8 sys_ioctl+0x138/0xf00 ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &hdmi->lock --> fs_reclaim --> dma_fence_map Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(dma_fence_map); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(dma_fence_map); lock(&hdmi->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kmstest/219: #0: f1011de4 (crtc_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0xf0/0xc38 #1: c47059c8 (crtc_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: modeset_lock+0xf8/0x230 #2: c11e1128 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: omap_atomic_commit_tail+0x14/0xbc stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 219 Comm: kmstest Not tainted 6.5.0-rc2+ #2 Hardware name: Generic DRA74X (Flattened Device Tree) unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x58/0x70 dump_stack_lvl from check_noncircular+0x164/0x198 check_noncircular from __lock_acquire+0x145c/0x29cc __lock_acquire from lock_acquire.part.0+0xb4/0x258 lock_acquire.part.0 from __mutex_lock+0x90/0x950 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24 mutex_lock_nested from hdmi5_bridge_mode_set+0x1c/0x50 hdmi5_bridge_mode_set from drm_bridge_chain_mode_set+0x48/0x5c drm_bridge_chain_mode_set from crtc_set_mode+0x188/0x1d0 crtc_set_mode from omap_atomic_commit_tail+0x2c/0xbc omap_atomic_commit_tail from commit_tail+0x9c/0x188 commit_tail from drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x158/0x18c drm_atomic_helper_commit from drm_atomic_commit+0xa4/0xe8 drm_atomic_commit from drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x9a4/0xc38 drm_mode_atomic_ioctl from drm_ioctl+0x210/0x4a8 drm_ioctl from sys_ioctl+0x138/0xf00 sys_ioctl from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c Exception stack(0xf1011fa8 to 0xf1011ff0) 1fa0: 00466d58 be9ab510 00000003 c03864bc be9ab510 be9ab4e0 1fc0: 00466d58 be9ab510 c03864bc 00000036 00466ef0 00466fc0 00467020 00466f20 1fe0: b6bc7ef4 be9ab4d0 b6bbbb00 b6cb2cc0 Fixes: 250aa22 ("drm/omapdrm: Annotate dma-fence critical section in commit path") Reviewed-by: Aradhya Bhatia <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230920-dma-fence-annotation-revert-v1-2-7ebf6f7f5bf6@ideasonboard.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 2b44760 ] Running the following two commands in parallel on a multi-processor AArch64 machine can sporadically produce an unexpected warning about duplicate histogram entries: $ while true; do echo hist:key=id.syscall:val=hitcount > \ /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/raw_syscalls/sys_enter/trigger cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/raw_syscalls/sys_enter/hist sleep 0.001 done $ stress-ng --sysbadaddr $(nproc) The warning looks as follows: [ 2911.172474] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2911.173111] Duplicates detected: 1 [ 2911.173574] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 12247 at kernel/trace/tracing_map.c:983 tracing_map_sort_entries+0x3e0/0x408 [ 2911.174702] Modules linked in: iscsi_ibft(E) iscsi_boot_sysfs(E) rfkill(E) af_packet(E) nls_iso8859_1(E) nls_cp437(E) vfat(E) fat(E) ena(E) tiny_power_button(E) qemu_fw_cfg(E) button(E) fuse(E) efi_pstore(E) ip_tables(E) x_tables(E) xfs(E) libcrc32c(E) aes_ce_blk(E) aes_ce_cipher(E) crct10dif_ce(E) polyval_ce(E) polyval_generic(E) ghash_ce(E) gf128mul(E) sm4_ce_gcm(E) sm4_ce_ccm(E) sm4_ce(E) sm4_ce_cipher(E) sm4(E) sm3_ce(E) sm3(E) sha3_ce(E) sha512_ce(E) sha512_arm64(E) sha2_ce(E) sha256_arm64(E) nvme(E) sha1_ce(E) nvme_core(E) nvme_auth(E) t10_pi(E) sg(E) scsi_mod(E) scsi_common(E) efivarfs(E) [ 2911.174738] Unloaded tainted modules: cppc_cpufreq(E):1 [ 2911.180985] CPU: 2 PID: 12247 Comm: cat Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 6.7.0-default #2 1b58bbb22c97e4399dc09f92d309344f69c44a01 [ 2911.182398] Hardware name: Amazon EC2 c7g.8xlarge/, BIOS 1.0 11/1/2018 [ 2911.183208] pstate: 61400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 2911.184038] pc : tracing_map_sort_entries+0x3e0/0x408 [ 2911.184667] lr : tracing_map_sort_entries+0x3e0/0x408 [ 2911.185310] sp : ffff8000a1513900 [ 2911.185750] x29: ffff8000a1513900 x28: ffff0003f272fe80 x27: 0000000000000001 [ 2911.186600] x26: ffff0003f272fe80 x25: 0000000000000030 x24: 0000000000000008 [ 2911.187458] x23: ffff0003c5788000 x22: ffff0003c16710c8 x21: ffff80008017f180 [ 2911.188310] x20: ffff80008017f000 x19: ffff80008017f180 x18: ffffffffffffffff [ 2911.189160] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: ffff8000a15134b8 [ 2911.190015] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 205d373432323154 x12: 5b5d313131333731 [ 2911.190844] x11: 00000000fffeffff x10: 00000000fffeffff x9 : ffffd1b78274a13c [ 2911.191716] x8 : 000000000017ffe8 x7 : c0000000fffeffff x6 : 000000000057ffa8 [ 2911.192554] x5 : ffff0012f6c24ec0 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : ffff2e5b72b5d000 [ 2911.193404] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff0003ff254480 [ 2911.194259] Call trace: [ 2911.194626] tracing_map_sort_entries+0x3e0/0x408 [ 2911.195220] hist_show+0x124/0x800 [ 2911.195692] seq_read_iter+0x1d4/0x4e8 [ 2911.196193] seq_read+0xe8/0x138 [ 2911.196638] vfs_read+0xc8/0x300 [ 2911.197078] ksys_read+0x70/0x108 [ 2911.197534] __arm64_sys_read+0x24/0x38 [ 2911.198046] invoke_syscall+0x78/0x108 [ 2911.198553] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xd0/0xf8 [ 2911.199157] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x40 [ 2911.199613] el0_svc+0x40/0x178 [ 2911.200048] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x13c/0x158 [ 2911.200621] el0t_64_sync+0x1a8/0x1b0 [ 2911.201115] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- The problem appears to be caused by CPU reordering of writes issued from __tracing_map_insert(). The check for the presence of an element with a given key in this function is: val = READ_ONCE(entry->val); if (val && keys_match(key, val->key, map->key_size)) ... The write of a new entry is: elt = get_free_elt(map); memcpy(elt->key, key, map->key_size); entry->val = elt; The "memcpy(elt->key, key, map->key_size);" and "entry->val = elt;" stores may become visible in the reversed order on another CPU. This second CPU might then incorrectly determine that a new key doesn't match an already present val->key and subsequently insert a new element, resulting in a duplicate. Fix the problem by adding a write barrier between "memcpy(elt->key, key, map->key_size);" and "entry->val = elt;", and for good measure, also use WRITE_ONCE(entry->val, elt) for publishing the element. The sequence pairs with the mentioned "READ_ONCE(entry->val);" and the "val->key" check which has an address dependency. The barrier is placed on a path executed when adding an element for a new key. Subsequent updates targeting the same key remain unaffected. From the user's perspective, the issue was introduced by commit c193707 ("tracing: Remove code which merges duplicates"), which followed commit cbf4100 ("tracing: Add support to detect and avoid duplicates"). The previous code operated differently; it inherently expected potential races which result in duplicates but merged them later when they occurred. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/[email protected] Fixes: c193707 ("tracing: Remove code which merges duplicates") Signed-off-by: Petr Pavlu <[email protected]> Acked-by: Tom Zanussi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

…volume commit 7081929 upstream. If the source file descriptor to the snapshot ioctl refers to a deleted subvolume, we get the following abort: BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 833 at fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1875 create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] Modules linked in: pata_acpi btrfs ata_piix libata scsi_mod virtio_net blake2b_generic xor net_failover virtio_rng failover scsi_common rng_core raid6_pq libcrc32c CPU: 0 PID: 833 Comm: t_snapshot_dele Not tainted 6.7.0-rc6 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] RSP: 0018:ffffa09c01337af8 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9982053e7c78 RCX: 0000000000000027 RDX: ffff99827dc20848 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff99827dc20840 RBP: ffffa09c01337c00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffa09c01337998 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffffffffb96da248 R12: fffffffffffffffe R13: ffff99820535bb28 R14: ffff99820b7bd000 R15: ffff99820381ea80 FS: 00007fe20aadabc0(0000) GS:ffff99827dc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000559a120b502f CR3: 00000000055b6000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: <TASK> ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] ? __warn+0x81/0x130 ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] ? report_bug+0x171/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x3a/0x70 ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] create_pending_snapshots+0x92/0xc0 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x66b/0xf40 [btrfs] btrfs_mksubvol+0x301/0x4d0 [btrfs] btrfs_mksnapshot+0x80/0xb0 [btrfs] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x1c2/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xc4/0x150 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x8a6/0x2650 [btrfs] ? kmem_cache_free+0x22/0x340 ? do_sys_openat2+0x97/0xe0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x97/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x46/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 RIP: 0033:0x7fe20abe83af RSP: 002b:00007ffe6eff1360 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007fe20abe83af RDX: 00007ffe6eff23c0 RSI: 0000000050009417 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fe20ad16cd0 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffe6eff13c0 R14: 00007fe20ad45000 R15: 0000559a120b6d58 </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- BTRFS: error (device vdc: state A) in create_pending_snapshot:1875: errno=-2 No such entry BTRFS info (device vdc: state EA): forced readonly BTRFS warning (device vdc: state EA): Skipping commit of aborted transaction. BTRFS: error (device vdc: state EA) in cleanup_transaction:2055: errno=-2 No such entry This happens because create_pending_snapshot() initializes the new root item as a copy of the source root item. This includes the refs field, which is 0 for a deleted subvolume. The call to btrfs_insert_root() therefore inserts a root with refs == 0. btrfs_get_new_fs_root() then finds the root and returns -ENOENT if refs == 0, which causes create_pending_snapshot() to abort. Fix it by checking the source root's refs before attempting the snapshot, but after locking subvol_sem to avoid racing with deletion. CC: [email protected] # 4.14+ Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 169410e ] These three bpf_map_{lookup,update,delete}_elem() helpers are also available for sleepable bpf program, so add the corresponding lock assertion for sleepable bpf program, otherwise the following warning will be reported when a sleepable bpf program manipulates bpf map under interpreter mode (aka bpf_jit_enable=0): WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 4985 at kernel/bpf/helpers.c:40 ...... CPU: 3 PID: 4985 Comm: test_progs Not tainted 6.6.0+ #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) ...... RIP: 0010:bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x54/0x60 ...... Call Trace: <TASK> ? __warn+0xa5/0x240 ? bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x54/0x60 ? report_bug+0x1ba/0x1f0 ? handle_bug+0x40/0x80 ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x50 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20 ? __pfx_bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x10/0x10 ? rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online+0x65/0xb0 ? rcu_is_watching+0x23/0x50 ? bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x54/0x60 ? __pfx_bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x10/0x10 ___bpf_prog_run+0x513/0x3b70 __bpf_prog_run32+0x9d/0xd0 ? __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable_recur+0xad/0x120 ? __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable_recur+0x3e/0x120 bpf_trampoline_6442580665+0x4d/0x1000 __x64_sys_getpgid+0x5/0x30 ? do_syscall_64+0x36/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 </TASK> Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit fc3a553 ] An issue occurred while reading an ELF file in libbpf.c during fuzzing: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0000000000958e97 in bpf_object.collect_prog_relos () at libbpf.c:4206 4206 in libbpf.c (gdb) bt #0 0x0000000000958e97 in bpf_object.collect_prog_relos () at libbpf.c:4206 #1 0x000000000094f9d6 in bpf_object.collect_relos () at libbpf.c:6706 #2 0x000000000092bef3 in bpf_object_open () at libbpf.c:7437 #3 0x000000000092c046 in bpf_object.open_mem () at libbpf.c:7497 #4 0x0000000000924afa in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput () at fuzz/bpf-object-fuzzer.c:16 #5 0x000000000060be11 in testblitz_engine::fuzzer::Fuzzer::run_one () #6 0x000000000087ad92 in tracing::span::Span::in_scope () #7 0x00000000006078aa in testblitz_engine::fuzzer::util::walkdir () #8 0x00000000005f3217 in testblitz_engine::entrypoint::main::{{closure}} () #9 0x00000000005f2601 in main () (gdb) scn_data was null at this code(tools/lib/bpf/src/libbpf.c): if (rel->r_offset % BPF_INSN_SZ || rel->r_offset >= scn_data->d_size) { The scn_data is derived from the code above: scn = elf_sec_by_idx(obj, sec_idx); scn_data = elf_sec_data(obj, scn); relo_sec_name = elf_sec_str(obj, shdr->sh_name); sec_name = elf_sec_name(obj, scn); if (!relo_sec_name || !sec_name)// don't check whether scn_data is NULL return -EINVAL; In certain special scenarios, such as reading a malformed ELF file, it is possible that scn_data may be a null pointer Signed-off-by: Mingyi Zhang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Xin Liu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Changye Wu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 47bf0f8 ] ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-kfd-fkuehlin #276 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/8:2/2676 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9435aae95c88 ((work_completion)(&svm_bo->eviction_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x52/0x550 but task is already holding lock: ffff9435cd8e1720 (&svms->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: svm_range_deferred_list_work+0xe8/0x340 [amdgpu] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&svms->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x97/0xd30 kfd_ioctl_alloc_memory_of_gpu+0x6d/0x3c0 [amdgpu] kfd_ioctl+0x1b2/0x5d0 [amdgpu] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x86/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x39/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: down_read+0x42/0x160 svm_range_evict_svm_bo_worker+0x8b/0x340 [amdgpu] process_one_work+0x27a/0x540 worker_thread+0x53/0x3e0 kthread+0xeb/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&svm_bo->eviction_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1426/0x2200 lock_acquire+0xc1/0x2b0 __flush_work+0x80/0x550 __cancel_work_timer+0x109/0x190 svm_range_bo_release+0xdc/0x1c0 [amdgpu] svm_range_free+0x175/0x180 [amdgpu] svm_range_deferred_list_work+0x15d/0x340 [amdgpu] process_one_work+0x27a/0x540 worker_thread+0x53/0x3e0 kthread+0xeb/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (work_completion)(&svm_bo->eviction_work) --> &mm->mmap_lock --> &svms->lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&svms->lock); lock(&mm->mmap_lock); lock(&svms->lock); lock((work_completion)(&svm_bo->eviction_work)); I believe this cannot really lead to a deadlock in practice, because svm_range_evict_svm_bo_worker only takes the mmap_read_lock if the BO refcount is non-0. That means it's impossible that svm_range_bo_release is running concurrently. However, there is no good way to annotate this. To avoid the problem, take a BO reference in svm_range_schedule_evict_svm_bo instead of in the worker. That way it's impossible for a BO to get freed while eviction work is pending and the cancel_work_sync call in svm_range_bo_release can be eliminated. v2: Use svm_bo_ref_unless_zero and explained why that's safe. Also removed redundant checks that are already done in amdkfd_fence_enable_signaling. Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Philip Yang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 2a9de42 ] ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-kfd-yangp #2289 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/0:2/996 is trying to acquire lock: (srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: __synchronize_srcu+0x5/0x1a0 but task is already holding lock: ((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x211/0x560 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 ((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __flush_work+0x88/0x4f0 svm_range_list_lock_and_flush_work+0x3d/0x110 [amdgpu] svm_range_set_attr+0xd6/0x14c0 [amdgpu] kfd_ioctl+0x1d1/0x630 [amdgpu] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0 -> #2 (&info->lock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x99/0xc70 amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_restore_process_bos+0x54/0x740 [amdgpu] restore_process_helper+0x22/0x80 [amdgpu] restore_process_worker+0x2d/0xa0 [amdgpu] process_one_work+0x29b/0x560 worker_thread+0x3d/0x3d0 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&(&process->restore_work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __flush_work+0x88/0x4f0 __cancel_work_timer+0x12c/0x1c0 kfd_process_notifier_release_internal+0x37/0x1f0 [amdgpu] __mmu_notifier_release+0xad/0x240 exit_mmap+0x6a/0x3a0 mmput+0x6a/0x120 do_exit+0x322/0xb90 do_group_exit+0x37/0xa0 __x64_sys_exit_group+0x18/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x80 -> #0 (srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1521/0x2510 lock_sync+0x5f/0x90 __synchronize_srcu+0x4f/0x1a0 __mmu_notifier_release+0x128/0x240 exit_mmap+0x6a/0x3a0 mmput+0x6a/0x120 svm_range_deferred_list_work+0x19f/0x350 [amdgpu] process_one_work+0x29b/0x560 worker_thread+0x3d/0x3d0 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: srcu --> &info->lock#2 --> (work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work) Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)); lock(&info->lock#2); lock((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)); sync(srcu); Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 169410e ] These three bpf_map_{lookup,update,delete}_elem() helpers are also available for sleepable bpf program, so add the corresponding lock assertion for sleepable bpf program, otherwise the following warning will be reported when a sleepable bpf program manipulates bpf map under interpreter mode (aka bpf_jit_enable=0): WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 4985 at kernel/bpf/helpers.c:40 ...... CPU: 3 PID: 4985 Comm: test_progs Not tainted 6.6.0+ #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) ...... RIP: 0010:bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x54/0x60 ...... Call Trace: <TASK> ? __warn+0xa5/0x240 ? bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x54/0x60 ? report_bug+0x1ba/0x1f0 ? handle_bug+0x40/0x80 ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x50 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20 ? __pfx_bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x10/0x10 ? rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online+0x65/0xb0 ? rcu_is_watching+0x23/0x50 ? bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x54/0x60 ? __pfx_bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x10/0x10 ___bpf_prog_run+0x513/0x3b70 __bpf_prog_run32+0x9d/0xd0 ? __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable_recur+0xad/0x120 ? __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable_recur+0x3e/0x120 bpf_trampoline_6442580665+0x4d/0x1000 __x64_sys_getpgid+0x5/0x30 ? do_syscall_64+0x36/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 </TASK> Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit fc3a553 ] An issue occurred while reading an ELF file in libbpf.c during fuzzing: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0000000000958e97 in bpf_object.collect_prog_relos () at libbpf.c:4206 4206 in libbpf.c (gdb) bt #0 0x0000000000958e97 in bpf_object.collect_prog_relos () at libbpf.c:4206 #1 0x000000000094f9d6 in bpf_object.collect_relos () at libbpf.c:6706 #2 0x000000000092bef3 in bpf_object_open () at libbpf.c:7437 #3 0x000000000092c046 in bpf_object.open_mem () at libbpf.c:7497 #4 0x0000000000924afa in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput () at fuzz/bpf-object-fuzzer.c:16 #5 0x000000000060be11 in testblitz_engine::fuzzer::Fuzzer::run_one () #6 0x000000000087ad92 in tracing::span::Span::in_scope () #7 0x00000000006078aa in testblitz_engine::fuzzer::util::walkdir () #8 0x00000000005f3217 in testblitz_engine::entrypoint::main::{{closure}} () #9 0x00000000005f2601 in main () (gdb) scn_data was null at this code(tools/lib/bpf/src/libbpf.c): if (rel->r_offset % BPF_INSN_SZ || rel->r_offset >= scn_data->d_size) { The scn_data is derived from the code above: scn = elf_sec_by_idx(obj, sec_idx); scn_data = elf_sec_data(obj, scn); relo_sec_name = elf_sec_str(obj, shdr->sh_name); sec_name = elf_sec_name(obj, scn); if (!relo_sec_name || !sec_name)// don't check whether scn_data is NULL return -EINVAL; In certain special scenarios, such as reading a malformed ELF file, it is possible that scn_data may be a null pointer Signed-off-by: Mingyi Zhang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Xin Liu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Changye Wu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 47bf0f8 ] ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-kfd-fkuehlin #276 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/8:2/2676 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9435aae95c88 ((work_completion)(&svm_bo->eviction_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x52/0x550 but task is already holding lock: ffff9435cd8e1720 (&svms->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: svm_range_deferred_list_work+0xe8/0x340 [amdgpu] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&svms->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x97/0xd30 kfd_ioctl_alloc_memory_of_gpu+0x6d/0x3c0 [amdgpu] kfd_ioctl+0x1b2/0x5d0 [amdgpu] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x86/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x39/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: down_read+0x42/0x160 svm_range_evict_svm_bo_worker+0x8b/0x340 [amdgpu] process_one_work+0x27a/0x540 worker_thread+0x53/0x3e0 kthread+0xeb/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&svm_bo->eviction_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1426/0x2200 lock_acquire+0xc1/0x2b0 __flush_work+0x80/0x550 __cancel_work_timer+0x109/0x190 svm_range_bo_release+0xdc/0x1c0 [amdgpu] svm_range_free+0x175/0x180 [amdgpu] svm_range_deferred_list_work+0x15d/0x340 [amdgpu] process_one_work+0x27a/0x540 worker_thread+0x53/0x3e0 kthread+0xeb/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (work_completion)(&svm_bo->eviction_work) --> &mm->mmap_lock --> &svms->lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&svms->lock); lock(&mm->mmap_lock); lock(&svms->lock); lock((work_completion)(&svm_bo->eviction_work)); I believe this cannot really lead to a deadlock in practice, because svm_range_evict_svm_bo_worker only takes the mmap_read_lock if the BO refcount is non-0. That means it's impossible that svm_range_bo_release is running concurrently. However, there is no good way to annotate this. To avoid the problem, take a BO reference in svm_range_schedule_evict_svm_bo instead of in the worker. That way it's impossible for a BO to get freed while eviction work is pending and the cancel_work_sync call in svm_range_bo_release can be eliminated. v2: Use svm_bo_ref_unless_zero and explained why that's safe. Also removed redundant checks that are already done in amdkfd_fence_enable_signaling. Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Philip Yang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 2a9de42 ] ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-kfd-yangp #2289 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/0:2/996 is trying to acquire lock: (srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: __synchronize_srcu+0x5/0x1a0 but task is already holding lock: ((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x211/0x560 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 ((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __flush_work+0x88/0x4f0 svm_range_list_lock_and_flush_work+0x3d/0x110 [amdgpu] svm_range_set_attr+0xd6/0x14c0 [amdgpu] kfd_ioctl+0x1d1/0x630 [amdgpu] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0 -> #2 (&info->lock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x99/0xc70 amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_restore_process_bos+0x54/0x740 [amdgpu] restore_process_helper+0x22/0x80 [amdgpu] restore_process_worker+0x2d/0xa0 [amdgpu] process_one_work+0x29b/0x560 worker_thread+0x3d/0x3d0 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&(&process->restore_work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __flush_work+0x88/0x4f0 __cancel_work_timer+0x12c/0x1c0 kfd_process_notifier_release_internal+0x37/0x1f0 [amdgpu] __mmu_notifier_release+0xad/0x240 exit_mmap+0x6a/0x3a0 mmput+0x6a/0x120 do_exit+0x322/0xb90 do_group_exit+0x37/0xa0 __x64_sys_exit_group+0x18/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x80 -> #0 (srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1521/0x2510 lock_sync+0x5f/0x90 __synchronize_srcu+0x4f/0x1a0 __mmu_notifier_release+0x128/0x240 exit_mmap+0x6a/0x3a0 mmput+0x6a/0x120 svm_range_deferred_list_work+0x19f/0x350 [amdgpu] process_one_work+0x29b/0x560 worker_thread+0x3d/0x3d0 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: srcu --> &info->lock#2 --> (work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work) Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)); lock(&info->lock#2); lock((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)); sync(srcu); Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

Hou Tao says: ==================== Check the remaining info_cnt before repeating btf fields From: Hou Tao <[email protected]> Hi, The patch set adds the missed check again info_cnt when flattening the array of nested struct. The problem was spotted when developing dynptr key support for hash map. Patch #1 adds the missed check and patch #2 adds three success test cases and one failure test case for the problem. Comments are always welcome. Change Log: v2: * patch #1: check info_cnt in btf_repeat_fields() * patch #2: use a hard-coded number instead of BTF_FIELDS_MAX, because BTF_FIELDS_MAX is not always available in vmlinux.h (e.g., for llvm 17/18) v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/T/#t ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>

Syzkaller reported a lockdep splat: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- syz-executor364/5113 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline] ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328 but task is already holding lock: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline] ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(k-slock-AF_INET); lock(k-slock-AF_INET); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 7 locks held by syz-executor364/5113: #0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline] #0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x153/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1806 #1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline] #1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x11f/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1727 #2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline] #2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline] #2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x5f/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470 #3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline] #3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline] #3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x45f/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:228 #4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: local_lock_acquire include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:29 [inline] #4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x33b/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6104 #5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline] #5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline] #5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0x230/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:232 #6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline] #6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5113 Comm: syz-executor364 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <IRQ> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119 check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline] validate_chain+0x15d3/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3855 __lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759 __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline] _raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154 spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline] sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328 mptcp_sk_clone_init+0x32/0x13c0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3279 subflow_syn_recv_sock+0x931/0x1920 net/mptcp/subflow.c:874 tcp_check_req+0xfe4/0x1a20 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:853 tcp_v4_rcv+0x1c3e/0x37f0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2267 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x22e/0x440 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205 ip_local_deliver_finish+0x341/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233 NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314 NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline] __netif_receive_skb+0x2bf/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775 process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108 __napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772 napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline] net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963 handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554 do_softirq+0x11b/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:455 </IRQ> <TASK> __local_bh_enable_ip+0x1bb/0x200 kernel/softirq.c:382 local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline] rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline] __dev_queue_xmit+0x1763/0x3e90 net/core/dev.c:4450 dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline] neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:526 [inline] neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:540 [inline] ip_finish_output2+0xd41/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235 ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline] __ip_queue_xmit+0x118c/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:535 __tcp_transmit_skb+0x2544/0x3b30 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466 tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6542 [inline] tcp_rcv_state_process+0x2c32/0x4570 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6729 tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77d/0xc70 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1934 sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1111 [inline] __release_sock+0x214/0x350 net/core/sock.c:3004 release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3558 mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x1ad/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1733 mptcp_sendmsg+0x1884/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1812 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745 ____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597 ___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline] __sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737 __do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline] __se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f04fb13a6b9 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 01 1a 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffd651f42d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f04fb13a6b9 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000d00 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 00007ffd651f4310 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000020000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000f4240 R13: 00007f04fb187449 R14: 00007ffd651f42f4 R15: 00007ffd651f4300 </TASK> As noted by Cong Wang, the splat is false positive, but the code path leading to the report is an unexpected one: a client is attempting an MPC handshake towards the in-kernel listener created by the in-kernel PM for a port based signal endpoint. Such connection will be never accepted; many of them can make the listener queue full and preventing the creation of MPJ subflow via such listener - its intended role. Explicitly detect this scenario at initial-syn time and drop the incoming MPC request. Fixes: 1729cf1 ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port") Cc: [email protected] Reported-by: [email protected] Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f4aacdfef2c6a6529c3e Cc: Cong Wang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>

…/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD KVM/arm64 fixes for 6.12, take #2 - Fix the guest view of the ID registers, making the relevant fields writable from userspace (affecting ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 and ID_AA64PFR1_EL1) - Correcly expose S1PIE to guests, fixing a regression introduced in 6.12-rc1 with the S1POE support - Fix the recycling of stage-2 shadow MMUs by tracking the context (are we allowed to block or not) as well as the recycling state - Address a couple of issues with the vgic when userspace misconfigures the emulation, resulting in various splats. Headaches courtesy of our Syzkaller friends

Fix possible use-after-free in 'taprio_dump()' by adding RCU read-side critical section there. Never seen on x86 but found on a KASAN-enabled arm64 system when investigating https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b65e0af58423fc8a73aa: [T15862] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in taprio_dump+0xa0c/0xbb0 [T15862] Read of size 4 at addr ffff0000d4bb88f8 by task repro/15862 [T15862] [T15862] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 15862 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.11.0-rc1-00293-gdefaf1a2113a-dirty #2 [T15862] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS edk2-20240524-5.fc40 05/24/2024 [T15862] Call trace: [T15862] dump_backtrace+0x20c/0x220 [T15862] show_stack+0x2c/0x40 [T15862] dump_stack_lvl+0xf8/0x174 [T15862] print_report+0x170/0x4d8 [T15862] kasan_report+0xb8/0x1d4 [T15862] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x20/0x2c [T15862] taprio_dump+0xa0c/0xbb0 [T15862] tc_fill_qdisc+0x540/0x1020 [T15862] qdisc_notify.isra.0+0x330/0x3a0 [T15862] tc_modify_qdisc+0x7b8/0x1838 [T15862] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3c8/0xc20 [T15862] netlink_rcv_skb+0x1f8/0x3d4 [T15862] rtnetlink_rcv+0x28/0x40 [T15862] netlink_unicast+0x51c/0x790 [T15862] netlink_sendmsg+0x79c/0xc20 [T15862] __sock_sendmsg+0xe0/0x1a0 [T15862] ____sys_sendmsg+0x6c0/0x840 [T15862] ___sys_sendmsg+0x1ac/0x1f0 [T15862] __sys_sendmsg+0x110/0x1d0 [T15862] __arm64_sys_sendmsg+0x74/0xb0 [T15862] invoke_syscall+0x88/0x2e0 [T15862] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xe4/0x2a0 [T15862] do_el0_svc+0x44/0x60 [T15862] el0_svc+0x50/0x184 [T15862] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x120/0x12c [T15862] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 [T15862] [T15862] Allocated by task 15857: [T15862] kasan_save_stack+0x3c/0x70 [T15862] kasan_save_track+0x20/0x3c [T15862] kasan_save_alloc_info+0x40/0x60 [T15862] __kasan_kmalloc+0xd4/0xe0 [T15862] __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x194/0x334 [T15862] taprio_change+0x45c/0x2fe0 [T15862] tc_modify_qdisc+0x6a8/0x1838 [T15862] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3c8/0xc20 [T15862] netlink_rcv_skb+0x1f8/0x3d4 [T15862] rtnetlink_rcv+0x28/0x40 [T15862] netlink_unicast+0x51c/0x790 [T15862] netlink_sendmsg+0x79c/0xc20 [T15862] __sock_sendmsg+0xe0/0x1a0 [T15862] ____sys_sendmsg+0x6c0/0x840 [T15862] ___sys_sendmsg+0x1ac/0x1f0 [T15862] __sys_sendmsg+0x110/0x1d0 [T15862] __arm64_sys_sendmsg+0x74/0xb0 [T15862] invoke_syscall+0x88/0x2e0 [T15862] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xe4/0x2a0 [T15862] do_el0_svc+0x44/0x60 [T15862] el0_svc+0x50/0x184 [T15862] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x120/0x12c [T15862] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 [T15862] [T15862] Freed by task 6192: [T15862] kasan_save_stack+0x3c/0x70 [T15862] kasan_save_track+0x20/0x3c [T15862] kasan_save_free_info+0x4c/0x80 [T15862] poison_slab_object+0x110/0x160 [T15862] __kasan_slab_free+0x3c/0x74 [T15862] kfree+0x134/0x3c0 [T15862] taprio_free_sched_cb+0x18c/0x220 [T15862] rcu_core+0x920/0x1b7c [T15862] rcu_core_si+0x10/0x1c [T15862] handle_softirqs+0x2e8/0xd64 [T15862] __do_softirq+0x14/0x20 Fixes: 18cdd2f ("net/sched: taprio: taprio_dump and taprio_change are protected by rtnl_mutex") Acked-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>

Hou Tao says: ==================== Add the missing BPF_LINK_TYPE invocation for sockmap From: Hou Tao <[email protected]> Hi, The tiny patch set fixes the out-of-bound read problem when reading the fdinfo of sock map link fd. And in order to spot such omission early for the newly-added link type in the future, it also checks the validity of the link->type and adds a WARN_ONCE() for missed invocation. Please see individual patches for more details. And comments are always welcome. v3: * patch #2: check and warn the validity of link->type instead of adding a static assertion for bpf_link_type_strs array. v2: http://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>

Currently, when configuring TMU (Time Management Unit) mode of a given router, we take into account only its own TMU requirements ignoring other routers in the domain. This is problematic if the router we are configuring has lower TMU requirements than what is already configured in the domain. In the scenario below, we have a host router with two USB4 ports: A and B. Port A connected to device router #1 (which supports CL states) and existing DisplayPort tunnel, thus, the TMU mode is HiFi uni-directional. 1. Initial topology [Host] A/ / [Device #1] / Monitor 2. Plug in device #2 (that supports CL states) to downstream port B of the host router [Host] A/ B\ / \ [Device #1] [Device #2] / Monitor The TMU mode on port B and port A will be configured to LowRes which is not what we want and will cause monitor to start flickering. To address this we first scan the domain and search for any router configured to HiFi uni-directional mode, and if found, configure TMU mode of the given router to HiFi uni-directional as well. Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Gil Fine <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <[email protected]>

Running rcutorture scenario TREE05, the below warning is triggered. [ 32.604594] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 32.605928] 6.11.0-rc5-00040-g4ba4f1afb6a9 #55238 Not tainted [ 32.607812] ----------------------------- [ 32.609140] kernel/events/core.c:13946 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! [ 32.611595] other info that might help us debug this: [ 32.614247] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 32.616392] 3 locks held by cpuhp/4/35: [ 32.617687] #0: ffffffffb666a650 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x4e/0x200 [ 32.620563] #1: ffffffffb666cd20 (cpuhp_state-down){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x4e/0x200 [ 32.623412] #2: ffffffffb677c288 (pmus_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: perf_event_exit_cpu_context+0x32/0x2f0 In perf_event_clear_cpumask(), uses list_for_each_entry_rcu() without an obvious RCU read-side critical section. Either pmus_srcu or pmus_lock is good enough to protect the pmus list. In the current context, pmus_lock is already held. The list_for_each_entry_rcu() is not required. Fixes: 4ba4f1a ("perf: Generic hotplug support for a PMU with a scope") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2b66dff8-b827-494b-b151-1ad8d56f13e6@paulmck-laptop/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/[email protected] Reported-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]> Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Tested-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

generic/077 on x86_32 CONFIG_DEBUG_KMAP_LOCAL_FORCE_MAP=y with highmem, on huge=always tmpfs, issues a warning and then hangs (interruptibly): WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 3517 at mm/highmem.c:622 kunmap_local_indexed+0x62/0xc9 CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 3517 Comm: cp Not tainted 6.12.0-rc4 #2 ... copy_page_from_iter_atomic+0xa6/0x5ec generic_perform_write+0xf6/0x1b4 shmem_file_write_iter+0x54/0x67 Fix copy_page_from_iter_atomic() by limiting it in that case (include/linux/skbuff.h skb_frag_must_loop() does similar). But going forward, perhaps CONFIG_DEBUG_KMAP_LOCAL_FORCE_MAP is too surprising, has outlived its usefulness, and should just be removed? Fixes: 908a1ad ("iov_iter: Handle compound highmem pages in copy_page_from_iter_atomic()") Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>

Hou Tao says: ==================== The patch set fixes several issues in bits iterator. Patch #1 fixes the kmemleak problem of bits iterator. Patch #2~#3 fix the overflow problem of nr_bits. Patch #4 fixes the potential stack corruption when bits iterator is used on 32-bit host. Patch #5 adds more test cases for bits iterator. Please see the individual patches for more details. And comments are always welcome. --- v4: * patch #1: add ack from Yafang * patch #3: revert code-churn like changes: (1) compute nr_bytes and nr_bits before the check of nr_words. (2) use nr_bits == 64 to check for single u64, preventing build warning on 32-bit hosts. * patch #4: use "BITS_PER_LONG == 32" instead of "!defined(CONFIG_64BIT)" v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/T/#t * split the bits-iterator related patches from "Misc fixes for bpf" patch set * patch #1: use "!nr_bits || bits >= nr_bits" to stop the iteration * patch #2: add a new helper for the overflow problem * patch #3: decrease the limitation from 512 to 511 and check whether nr_bytes is too large for bpf memory allocator explicitly * patch #5: add two more test cases for bit iterator v2: http://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>

Petr Machata says: ==================== mlxsw: Fixes In this patchset: - Tx header should be pushed for each packet which is transmitted via Spectrum ASICs. Patch #1 adds a missing call to skb_cow_head() to make sure that there is both enough room to push the Tx header and that the SKB header is not cloned and can be modified. - Commit b5b60bb ("mlxsw: pci: Use page pool for Rx buffers allocation") converted mlxsw to use page pool for Rx buffers allocation. Sync for CPU and for device should be done for Rx pages. In patches #2 and #3, add the missing calls to sync pages for, respectively, CPU and the device. - Patch #4 then fixes a bug to IPv6 GRE forwarding offload. Patch #5 adds a generic forwarding test that fails with mlxsw ports prior to the fix. ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>

When we compile and load lib/slub_kunit.c,it will cause a panic. The root cause is that __kmalloc_cache_noprof was directly called instead of kmem_cache_alloc,which resulted in no alloc_tag being allocated.This caused current->alloc_tag to be null,leading to a null pointer dereference in alloc_tag_ref_set. Despite the fact that my colleague Pei Xiao will later fix the code in slub_kunit.c,we still need fix null pointer check logic for ref and tag to avoid panic caused by a null pointer dereference. Here is the log for the panic: [ 74.779373][ T2158] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000020 [ 74.780130][ T2158] Mem abort info: [ 74.780406][ T2158] ESR = 0x0000000096000004 [ 74.780756][ T2158] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 74.781225][ T2158] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 74.781529][ T2158] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 74.781836][ T2158] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault [ 74.782288][ T2158] Data abort info: [ 74.782577][ T2158] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000 [ 74.783068][ T2158] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 [ 74.783533][ T2158] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 [ 74.784010][ T2158] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000105f34000 [ 74.784586][ T2158] [0000000000000020] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 [ 74.785293][ T2158] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] SMP [ 74.785805][ T2158] Modules linked in: slub_kunit kunit ip6t_rpfilter ip6t_REJECT nf_reject_ipv6 ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 xt_conntrack ebtable_nat ebtable_broute ip6table_nat ip6table_mangle 4 [ 74.790661][ T2158] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 2158 Comm: kunit_try_catch Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W N 6.12.0-rc3+ #2 [ 74.791535][ T2158] Tainted: [W]=WARN, [N]=TEST [ 74.791889][ T2158] Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 74.792479][ T2158] pstate: 40400005 (nZcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 74.793101][ T2158] pc : alloc_tagging_slab_alloc_hook+0x120/0x270 [ 74.793607][ T2158] lr : alloc_tagging_slab_alloc_hook+0x120/0x270 [ 74.794095][ T2158] sp : ffff800084d33cd0 [ 74.794418][ T2158] x29: ffff800084d33cd0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000000000 [ 74.795095][ T2158] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000012 x24: ffff80007b30e314 [ 74.795822][ T2158] x23: ffff000390ff6f10 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: 0000000000000088 [ 74.796555][ T2158] x20: ffff000390285840 x19: fffffd7fc3ef7830 x18: ffffffffffffffff [ 74.797283][ T2158] x17: ffff8000800e63b4 x16: ffff80007b33afc4 x15: ffff800081654c00 [ 74.798011][ T2158] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 205d383531325420 x12: 5b5d383734363537 [ 74.798744][ T2158] x11: ffff800084d337e0 x10: 000000000000005d x9 : 00000000ffffffd0 [ 74.799476][ T2158] x8 : 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f x7 : ffff80008219d188 x6 : c0000000ffff7fff [ 74.800206][ T2158] x5 : ffff0003fdbc9208 x4 : ffff800081edd188 x3 : 0000000000000001 [ 74.800932][ T2158] x2 : 0beaa6dee1ac5a00 x1 : 0beaa6dee1ac5a00 x0 : ffff80037c2cb000 [ 74.801656][ T2158] Call trace: [ 74.801954][ T2158] alloc_tagging_slab_alloc_hook+0x120/0x270 [ 74.802494][ T2158] __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x148/0x33c [ 74.802976][ T2158] test_kmalloc_redzone_access+0x4c/0x104 [slub_kunit] [ 74.803607][ T2158] kunit_try_run_case+0x70/0x17c [kunit] [ 74.804124][ T2158] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x2c/0x4c [kunit] [ 74.804768][ T2158] kthread+0x10c/0x118 [ 74.805141][ T2158] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [ 74.805540][ T2158] Code: b9400a80 11000400 b9000a80 97ffd858 (f94012d3) [ 74.806176][ T2158] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs [ 74.808130][ T2158] Starting crashdump kernel... Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: e0a955b ("mm/codetag: add pgalloc_tag_copy()") Signed-off-by: Hao Ge <[email protected]> Acked-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yu Zhao <[email protected]> Cc: Kent Overstreet <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

The scope of the TX skb is wider than just mse102x_tx_frame_spi(), so in case the TX skb room needs to be expanded, we should free the the temporary skb instead of the original skb. Otherwise the original TX skb pointer would be freed again in mse102x_tx_work(), which leads to crashes: Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#2] PREEMPT SMP CPU: 0 PID: 712 Comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G D 6.6.23 Hardware name: chargebyte Charge SOM DC-ONE (DT) Workqueue: events mse102x_tx_work [mse102x] pstate: 20400009 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : skb_release_data+0xb8/0x1d8 lr : skb_release_data+0x1ac/0x1d8 sp : ffff8000819a3cc0 x29: ffff8000819a3cc0 x28: ffff0000046daa60 x27: ffff0000057f2dc0 x26: ffff000005386c00 x25: 0000000000000002 x24: 00000000ffffffff x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000001 x21: ffff0000057f2e50 x20: 0000000000000006 x19: 0000000000000000 x18: ffff00003fdacfcc x17: e69ad452d0c49def x16: 84a005feff870102 x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 000000000000024a x13: 0000000000000002 x12: 0000000000000000 x11: 0000000000000400 x10: 0000000000000930 x9 : ffff00003fd913e8 x8 : fffffc00001bc008 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000008 x5 : ffff00003fd91340 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000009 x2 : 00000000fffffffe x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000 Call trace: skb_release_data+0xb8/0x1d8 kfree_skb_reason+0x48/0xb0 mse102x_tx_work+0x164/0x35c [mse102x] process_one_work+0x138/0x260 worker_thread+0x32c/0x438 kthread+0x118/0x11c ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Code: aa1303e0 97fffab6 72001c1f 54000141 (f9400660) Cc: [email protected] Fixes: 2f207cb ("net: vertexcom: Add MSE102x SPI support") Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>

eliasbakken closed this as completed Aug 15, 2014

jadonk pushed a commit to jadonk/linux-1 that referenced this issue Aug 25, 2014

ARC: cacheflush refactor beagleboard#2: I and D caches lines to have …

63d2dfd

…same size Having them be different seems an obscure configuration. Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <[email protected]>

graftonskaggs mentioned this issue Nov 29, 2023

Where is the documentation to put the new kernel on the beaglebone black #284

Open

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Status of PRU #2

Status of PRU #2

eliasbakken commented Aug 15, 2014

eliasbakken commented Aug 15, 2014

eliasbakken commented Aug 15, 2014