Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PRUSS doesn't work well #88

Closed
YuryAlkevich opened this issue May 18, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

PRUSS doesn't work well #88

YuryAlkevich opened this issue May 18, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@YuryAlkevich
Copy link

YuryAlkevich commented May 18, 2016

This issue has already been on 3.8 kernel
beagleboard/kernel#37
Anytime I try to enable pruss via .dtbo I get
pruss_uio 4a300000.pruss: No children
If found out that source code (uio_pruss.c) for pruss driver on kernel 3.8 is different from kernel 4.1. And pruss doesn't throw error when there is no child nodes in pruss node of dts file on 3.8. Initialization won't continue after this error, but i guess pruss driver should work well without any children nodes in dts file.

@roboknight
Copy link

I think that patch made it back in somehow. I use the PRU and was able to fix it by adding some "children" pins to my overlay, but it clearly should be "fixed again"?

RobertCNelson pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 12, 2017
commit 1c7de2b upstream.

There is at least one Chelsio 10Gb card which uses VPD area to store some
non-standard blocks (example below).  However pci_vpd_size() returns the
length of the first block only assuming that there can be only one VPD "End
Tag".

Since 4e1a635 ("vfio/pci: Use kernel VPD access functions"), VFIO
blocks access beyond that offset, which prevents the guest "cxgb3" driver
from probing the device.  The host system does not have this problem as its
driver accesses the config space directly without pci_read_vpd().

Add a quirk to override the VPD size to a bigger value.  The maximum size
is taken from EEPROMSIZE in drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb3/common.h.
We do not read the tag as the cxgb3 driver does as the driver supports
writing to EEPROM/VPD and when it writes, it only checks for 8192 bytes
boundary.  The quirk is registered for all devices supported by the cxgb3
driver.

This adds a quirk to the PCI layer (not to the cxgb3 driver) as the cxgb3
driver itself accesses VPD directly and the problem only exists with the
vfio-pci driver (when cxgb3 is not running on the host and may not be even
loaded) which blocks accesses beyond the first block of VPD data.  However
vfio-pci itself does not have quirks mechanism so we add it to PCI.

This is the controller:
Ethernet controller [0200]: Chelsio Communications Inc T310 10GbE Single Port Adapter [1425:0030]

This is what I parsed from its VPD:
===
b'\x82*\x0010 Gigabit Ethernet-SR PCI Express Adapter\x90J\x00EC\x07D76809 FN\x0746K'
 0000 Large item 42 bytes; name 0x2 Identifier String
	b'10 Gigabit Ethernet-SR PCI Express Adapter'
 002d Large item 74 bytes; name 0x10
	#00 [EC] len=7: b'D76809 '
	#0a [FN] len=7: b'46K7897'
	#14 [PN] len=7: b'46K7897'
	#1e [MN] len=4: b'1037'
	#25 [FC] len=4: b'5769'
	#2c [SN] len=12: b'YL102035603V'
	#3b [NA] len=12: b'00145E992ED1'
 007a Small item 1 bytes; name 0xf End Tag

 0c00 Large item 16 bytes; name 0x2 Identifier String
	b'S310E-SR-X      '
 0c13 Large item 234 bytes; name 0x10
	#00 [PN] len=16: b'TBD             '
	#13 [EC] len=16: b'110107730D2     '
	#26 [SN] len=16: b'97YL102035603V  '
	#39 [NA] len=12: b'00145E992ED1'
	#48 [V0] len=6: b'175000'
	#51 [V1] len=6: b'266666'
	#5a [V2] len=6: b'266666'
	#63 [V3] len=6: b'2000  '
	#6c [V4] len=2: b'1 '
	#71 [V5] len=6: b'c2    '
	#7a [V6] len=6: b'0     '
	#83 [V7] len=2: b'1 '
	#88 [V8] len=2: b'0 '
	#8d [V9] len=2: b'0 '
	#92 [VA] len=2: b'0 '
	#97 [RV] len=80: b's\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00'...
 0d00 Large item 252 bytes; name 0x11
	#00 [VC] len=16: b'122310_1222 dp  '
	#13 [VD] len=16: b'610-0001-00 H1\x00\x00'
	#26 [VE] len=16: b'122310_1353 fp  '
	#39 [VF] len=16: b'610-0001-00 H1\x00\x00'
	#4c [RW] len=173: b'\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00'...
 0dff Small item 0 bytes; name 0xf End Tag

10f3 Large item 13315 bytes; name 0x62
!!! unknown item name 98: b'\xd0\x03\x00@`\x0c\x08\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00'
===

Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
crow-misia pushed a commit to crow-misia/linux that referenced this issue Dec 2, 2018
[ Upstream commit 153fcd5 ]

brd_free() may be called in failure path on one brd instance which
disk isn't added yet, so release handler of gendisk may free the
associated request_queue early and causes the following use-after-free[1].

This patch fixes this issue by associating gendisk with request_queue
just before adding disk.

[1] KASAN: use-after-free Read in del_timer_syncNon-volatile memory driver v1.3
Linux agpgart interface v0.103
[drm] Initialized vgem 1.0.0 20120112 for virtual device on minor 0
usbcore: registered new interface driver udl
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __lock_acquire+0x36d9/0x4c20
kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3218
Read of size 8 at addr ffff8801d1b6b540 by task swapper/0/1

CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.19.0+ beagleboard#88
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS
Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
  dump_stack+0x244/0x39d lib/dump_stack.c:113
  print_address_description.cold.7+0x9/0x1ff mm/kasan/report.c:256
  kasan_report_error mm/kasan/report.c:354 [inline]
  kasan_report.cold.8+0x242/0x309 mm/kasan/report.c:412
  __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x14/0x20 mm/kasan/report.c:433
  __lock_acquire+0x36d9/0x4c20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3218
  lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3844
  del_timer_sync+0xb7/0x270 kernel/time/timer.c:1283
  blk_cleanup_queue+0x413/0x710 block/blk-core.c:809
  brd_free+0x5d/0x71 drivers/block/brd.c:422
  brd_init+0x2eb/0x393 drivers/block/brd.c:518
  do_one_initcall+0x145/0x957 init/main.c:890
  do_initcall_level init/main.c:958 [inline]
  do_initcalls init/main.c:966 [inline]
  do_basic_setup init/main.c:984 [inline]
  kernel_init_freeable+0x5c6/0x6b9 init/main.c:1148
  kernel_init+0x11/0x1ae init/main.c:1068
  ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:350

Reported-by: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
crow-misia pushed a commit to crow-misia/linux that referenced this issue Feb 1, 2019
commit a88289f upstream.

syzbot reported:

BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in tipc_conn_rcv_sub+0x184/0x950 net/tipc/topsrv.c:373
CPU: 0 PID: 66 Comm: kworker/u4:4 Not tainted 4.17.0-rc3+ beagleboard#88
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Workqueue: tipc_rcv tipc_conn_recv_work
Call Trace:
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
 dump_stack+0x185/0x1d0 lib/dump_stack.c:113
 kmsan_report+0x142/0x240 mm/kmsan/kmsan.c:1067
 __msan_warning_32+0x6c/0xb0 mm/kmsan/kmsan_instr.c:683
 tipc_conn_rcv_sub+0x184/0x950 net/tipc/topsrv.c:373
 tipc_conn_rcv_from_sock net/tipc/topsrv.c:409 [inline]
 tipc_conn_recv_work+0x3cd/0x560 net/tipc/topsrv.c:424
 process_one_work+0x12c6/0x1f60 kernel/workqueue.c:2145
 worker_thread+0x113c/0x24f0 kernel/workqueue.c:2279
 kthread+0x539/0x720 kernel/kthread.c:239
 ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:412

Local variable description: ----s.i@tipc_conn_recv_work
Variable was created at:
 tipc_conn_recv_work+0x65/0x560 net/tipc/topsrv.c:419
 process_one_work+0x12c6/0x1f60 kernel/workqueue.c:2145

In tipc_conn_rcv_from_sock(), it always supposes the length of message
received from sock_recvmsg() is not smaller than the size of struct
tipc_subscr. However, this assumption is false. Especially when the
length of received message is shorter than struct tipc_subscr size,
we will end up touching uninitialized fields in tipc_conn_rcv_sub().

Reported-by: [email protected]
Reported-by: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ying Xue <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
crow-misia pushed a commit to crow-misia/linux that referenced this issue Mar 20, 2019
[ Upstream commit 797a22b ]

syzbot was able to trigger another soft lockup [1]

I first thought it was the O(N^2) issue I mentioned in my
prior fix (f657d22ee1f "net/x25: do not hold the cpu
too long in x25_new_lci()"), but I eventually found
that x25_bind() was not checking SOCK_ZAPPED state under
socket lock protection.

This means that multiple threads can end up calling
x25_insert_socket() for the same socket, and corrupt x25_list

[1]
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 123s! [syz-executor.2:10492]
Modules linked in:
irq event stamp: 27515
hardirqs last  enabled at (27514): [<ffffffff81006673>] trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
hardirqs last disabled at (27515): [<ffffffff8100668f>] trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
softirqs last  enabled at (32): [<ffffffff8632ee73>] x25_get_neigh+0xa3/0xd0 net/x25/x25_link.c:336
softirqs last disabled at (34): [<ffffffff86324bc3>] x25_find_socket+0x23/0x140 net/x25/af_x25.c:341
CPU: 0 PID: 10492 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc7+ beagleboard#88
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
RIP: 0010:__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x4/0x50 kernel/kcov.c:97
Code: f4 ff ff ff e8 11 9f ea ff 48 c7 05 12 fb e5 08 00 00 00 00 e9 c8 e9 ff ff 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 55 48 89 e5 <48> 8b 75 08 65 48 8b 04 25 40 ee 01 00 65 8b 15 38 0c 92 7e 81 e2
RSP: 0018:ffff88806e94fc48 EFLAGS: 00000286 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13
RAX: 1ffff1100d84dac5 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffffc90006197000
RDX: 0000000000040000 RSI: ffffffff86324bf3 RDI: ffff88806c26d628
RBP: ffff88806e94fc48 R08: ffff88806c1c6500 R09: fffffbfff1282561
R10: fffffbfff1282560 R11: ffffffff89412b03 R12: ffff88806c26d628
R13: ffff888090455200 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
FS:  00007f3a107e4700(0000) GS:ffff8880ae800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f3a107e3db8 CR3: 00000000a5544000 CR4: 00000000001406f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 __x25_find_socket net/x25/af_x25.c:327 [inline]
 x25_find_socket+0x7d/0x140 net/x25/af_x25.c:342
 x25_new_lci net/x25/af_x25.c:355 [inline]
 x25_connect+0x380/0xde0 net/x25/af_x25.c:784
 __sys_connect+0x266/0x330 net/socket.c:1662
 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:1673 [inline]
 __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:1670 [inline]
 __x64_sys_connect+0x73/0xb0 net/socket.c:1670
 do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
RIP: 0033:0x457e29
Code: ad b8 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 7b b8 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
RSP: 002b:00007f3a107e3c78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002a
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 0000000000457e29
RDX: 0000000000000012 RSI: 0000000020000200 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 000000000073c040 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f3a107e46d4
R13: 00000000004be362 R14: 00000000004ceb98 R15: 00000000ffffffff
Sending NMI from CPU 0 to CPUs 1:
NMI backtrace for cpu 1
CPU: 1 PID: 10493 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc7+ beagleboard#88
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
RIP: 0010:__read_once_size include/linux/compiler.h:193 [inline]
RIP: 0010:queued_write_lock_slowpath+0x143/0x290 kernel/locking/qrwlock.c:86
Code: 4c 8d 2c 01 41 83 c7 03 41 0f b6 45 00 41 38 c7 7c 08 84 c0 0f 85 0c 01 00 00 8b 03 3d 00 01 00 00 74 1a f3 90 41 0f b6 55 00 <41> 38 d7 7c eb 84 d2 74 e7 48 89 df e8 cc aa 4e 00 eb dd be 04 00
RSP: 0018:ffff888085c47bd8 EFLAGS: 00000206
RAX: 0000000000000300 RBX: ffffffff89412b00 RCX: 1ffffffff1282560
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffffffff89412b00
RBP: ffff888085c47c70 R08: 1ffffffff1282560 R09: fffffbfff1282561
R10: fffffbfff1282560 R11: ffffffff89412b03 R12: 00000000000000ff
R13: fffffbfff1282560 R14: 1ffff11010b88f7d R15: 0000000000000003
FS:  00007fdd04086700(0000) GS:ffff8880ae900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007fdd04064db8 CR3: 0000000090be0000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 queued_write_lock include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h:104 [inline]
 do_raw_write_lock+0x1d6/0x290 kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:203
 __raw_write_lock_bh include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h:204 [inline]
 _raw_write_lock_bh+0x3b/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:312
 x25_insert_socket+0x21/0xe0 net/x25/af_x25.c:267
 x25_bind+0x273/0x340 net/x25/af_x25.c:703
 __sys_bind+0x23f/0x290 net/socket.c:1481
 __do_sys_bind net/socket.c:1492 [inline]
 __se_sys_bind net/socket.c:1490 [inline]
 __x64_sys_bind+0x73/0xb0 net/socket.c:1490
 do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
RIP: 0033:0x457e29

Fixes: 90c2729 ("X.25 remove bkl in bind")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Cc: andrew hendry <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
RobertCNelson pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 27, 2019
[ Upstream commit 797a22b ]

syzbot was able to trigger another soft lockup [1]

I first thought it was the O(N^2) issue I mentioned in my
prior fix (f657d22ee1f "net/x25: do not hold the cpu
too long in x25_new_lci()"), but I eventually found
that x25_bind() was not checking SOCK_ZAPPED state under
socket lock protection.

This means that multiple threads can end up calling
x25_insert_socket() for the same socket, and corrupt x25_list

[1]
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 123s! [syz-executor.2:10492]
Modules linked in:
irq event stamp: 27515
hardirqs last  enabled at (27514): [<ffffffff81006673>] trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
hardirqs last disabled at (27515): [<ffffffff8100668f>] trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
softirqs last  enabled at (32): [<ffffffff8632ee73>] x25_get_neigh+0xa3/0xd0 net/x25/x25_link.c:336
softirqs last disabled at (34): [<ffffffff86324bc3>] x25_find_socket+0x23/0x140 net/x25/af_x25.c:341
CPU: 0 PID: 10492 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc7+ #88
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
RIP: 0010:__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x4/0x50 kernel/kcov.c:97
Code: f4 ff ff ff e8 11 9f ea ff 48 c7 05 12 fb e5 08 00 00 00 00 e9 c8 e9 ff ff 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 55 48 89 e5 <48> 8b 75 08 65 48 8b 04 25 40 ee 01 00 65 8b 15 38 0c 92 7e 81 e2
RSP: 0018:ffff88806e94fc48 EFLAGS: 00000286 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13
RAX: 1ffff1100d84dac5 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffffc90006197000
RDX: 0000000000040000 RSI: ffffffff86324bf3 RDI: ffff88806c26d628
RBP: ffff88806e94fc48 R08: ffff88806c1c6500 R09: fffffbfff1282561
R10: fffffbfff1282560 R11: ffffffff89412b03 R12: ffff88806c26d628
R13: ffff888090455200 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
FS:  00007f3a107e4700(0000) GS:ffff8880ae800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f3a107e3db8 CR3: 00000000a5544000 CR4: 00000000001406f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 __x25_find_socket net/x25/af_x25.c:327 [inline]
 x25_find_socket+0x7d/0x140 net/x25/af_x25.c:342
 x25_new_lci net/x25/af_x25.c:355 [inline]
 x25_connect+0x380/0xde0 net/x25/af_x25.c:784
 __sys_connect+0x266/0x330 net/socket.c:1662
 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:1673 [inline]
 __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:1670 [inline]
 __x64_sys_connect+0x73/0xb0 net/socket.c:1670
 do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
RIP: 0033:0x457e29
Code: ad b8 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 7b b8 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
RSP: 002b:00007f3a107e3c78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002a
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 0000000000457e29
RDX: 0000000000000012 RSI: 0000000020000200 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 000000000073c040 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f3a107e46d4
R13: 00000000004be362 R14: 00000000004ceb98 R15: 00000000ffffffff
Sending NMI from CPU 0 to CPUs 1:
NMI backtrace for cpu 1
CPU: 1 PID: 10493 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc7+ #88
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
RIP: 0010:__read_once_size include/linux/compiler.h:193 [inline]
RIP: 0010:queued_write_lock_slowpath+0x143/0x290 kernel/locking/qrwlock.c:86
Code: 4c 8d 2c 01 41 83 c7 03 41 0f b6 45 00 41 38 c7 7c 08 84 c0 0f 85 0c 01 00 00 8b 03 3d 00 01 00 00 74 1a f3 90 41 0f b6 55 00 <41> 38 d7 7c eb 84 d2 74 e7 48 89 df e8 cc aa 4e 00 eb dd be 04 00
RSP: 0018:ffff888085c47bd8 EFLAGS: 00000206
RAX: 0000000000000300 RBX: ffffffff89412b00 RCX: 1ffffffff1282560
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffffffff89412b00
RBP: ffff888085c47c70 R08: 1ffffffff1282560 R09: fffffbfff1282561
R10: fffffbfff1282560 R11: ffffffff89412b03 R12: 00000000000000ff
R13: fffffbfff1282560 R14: 1ffff11010b88f7d R15: 0000000000000003
FS:  00007fdd04086700(0000) GS:ffff8880ae900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007fdd04064db8 CR3: 0000000090be0000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 queued_write_lock include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h:104 [inline]
 do_raw_write_lock+0x1d6/0x290 kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:203
 __raw_write_lock_bh include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h:204 [inline]
 _raw_write_lock_bh+0x3b/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:312
 x25_insert_socket+0x21/0xe0 net/x25/af_x25.c:267
 x25_bind+0x273/0x340 net/x25/af_x25.c:703
 __sys_bind+0x23f/0x290 net/socket.c:1481
 __do_sys_bind net/socket.c:1492 [inline]
 __se_sys_bind net/socket.c:1490 [inline]
 __x64_sys_bind+0x73/0xb0 net/socket.c:1490
 do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
RIP: 0033:0x457e29

Fixes: 90c2729 ("X.25 remove bkl in bind")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Cc: andrew hendry <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
crow-misia pushed a commit to crow-misia/linux that referenced this issue Jun 4, 2019
[ Upstream commit 73e6ff7 ]

Super-IO accesses may fail on a system with no or unmapped LPC bus.

Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffbffee0002e
pgd = ffffffc1d68d4000
[ffffffbffee0002e] *pgd=0000000000000000, *pud=0000000000000000
Internal error: Oops: 94000046 [beagleboard#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: f71805f(+) hwmon
CPU: 3 PID: 1659 Comm: insmod Not tainted 4.5.0+ beagleboard#88
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
task: ffffffc1f6665400 ti: ffffffc1d6418000 task.ti: ffffffc1d6418000
PC is at f71805f_find+0x6c/0x358 [f71805f]

Also, other drivers may attempt to access the LPC bus at the same time,
resulting in undefined behavior.

Use request_muxed_region() to ensure that IO access on the requested
address space is supported, and to ensure that access by multiple
drivers is synchronized.

Fixes: e53004e ("hwmon: New f71805f driver")
Reported-by: Kefeng Wang <[email protected]>
Reported-by: John Garry <[email protected]>
Cc: John Garry <[email protected]>
Acked-by: John Garry <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
@pdp7
Copy link
Contributor

pdp7 commented Jun 10, 2020

Please re-open if still an issue with our current Debian images:
https://github.com/beagleboard/Latest-Images

@pdp7 pdp7 closed this as completed Jun 10, 2020
RobertCNelson pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 16, 2022
[ Upstream commit db52f57 ]

Branch data available to BPF programs can be very useful to get stack traces
out of userspace application.

Commit fff7b64 ("bpf: Add bpf_read_branch_records() helper") added BPF
support to capture branch records in x86. Enable this feature also for other
architectures as well by removing checks specific to x86.

If an architecture doesn't support branch records, bpf_read_branch_records()
still has appropriate checks and it will return an -EINVAL in that scenario.
Based on UAPI helper doc in include/uapi/linux/bpf.h, unsupported architectures
should return -ENOENT in such case. Hence, update the appropriate check to
return -ENOENT instead.

Selftest 'perf_branches' result on power9 machine which has the branch stacks
support:

 - Before this patch:

  [command]# ./test_progs -t perf_branches
   #88/1 perf_branches/perf_branches_hw:FAIL
   #88/2 perf_branches/perf_branches_no_hw:OK
   #88 perf_branches:FAIL
  Summary: 0/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED

 - After this patch:

  [command]# ./test_progs -t perf_branches
   #88/1 perf_branches/perf_branches_hw:OK
   #88/2 perf_branches/perf_branches_no_hw:OK
   #88 perf_branches:OK
  Summary: 1/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Selftest 'perf_branches' result on power9 machine which doesn't have branch
stack report:

 - After this patch:

  [command]# ./test_progs -t perf_branches
   #88/1 perf_branches/perf_branches_hw:SKIP
   #88/2 perf_branches/perf_branches_no_hw:OK
   #88 perf_branches:OK
  Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 1 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Fixes: fff7b64 ("bpf: Add bpf_read_branch_records() helper")
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants