-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 562
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BeagleBone Black dtb with HDMI Audio disabled #101
Comments
@bigguiness in /boot/uEnv.txt set:
On the next reboot, cape universal will be loaded. PS, on 2016-05-13 it still might have been too early, so grab the latest from here: http://elinux.org/Beagleboard:BeagleBoneBlack_Debian Regards, |
Opps, i see what you meant... HDMI no audio + eMMC.. i need to setup that config.. The issue, i couldn't get the mmc working reliably as an overlay, so it's either on or off in v4.1.x+ Regards, |
Thanks for looking into this. So my only option right now is the wheezy images (3.x kernels)? |
Has this been fixed in any of the latest Jessie images? |
commit f222449 upstream. We cannot do printk() from tk_debug_account_sleep_time(), because tk_debug_account_sleep_time() is called under tk_core seq lock. The reason why printk() is unsafe there is that console_sem may invoke scheduler (up()->wake_up_process()->activate_task()), which, in turn, can return back to timekeeping code, for instance, via get_time()->ktime_get(), deadlocking the system on tk_core seq lock. [ 48.950592] ====================================================== [ 48.950622] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [ 48.950622] 4.10.0-rc7-next-20170213+ #101 Not tainted [ 48.950622] ------------------------------------------------------- [ 48.950622] kworker/0:0/3 is trying to acquire lock: [ 48.950653] (tk_core){----..}, at: [<c01cc624>] retrigger_next_event+0x4c/0x90 [ 48.950683] but task is already holding lock: [ 48.950683] (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-...}, at: [<c01cc610>] retrigger_next_event+0x38/0x90 [ 48.950714] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 48.950714] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 48.950714] -> #5 (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-...}: [ 48.950744] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x64 [ 48.950775] lock_hrtimer_base+0x28/0x58 [ 48.950775] hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x20/0x5c8 [ 48.950775] __enqueue_rt_entity+0x320/0x360 [ 48.950805] enqueue_rt_entity+0x2c/0x44 [ 48.950805] enqueue_task_rt+0x24/0x94 [ 48.950836] ttwu_do_activate+0x54/0xc0 [ 48.950836] try_to_wake_up+0x248/0x5c8 [ 48.950836] __setup_irq+0x420/0x5f0 [ 48.950836] request_threaded_irq+0xdc/0x184 [ 48.950866] devm_request_threaded_irq+0x58/0xa4 [ 48.950866] omap_i2c_probe+0x530/0x6a0 [ 48.950897] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xb0 [ 48.950897] driver_probe_device+0x1f8/0x2cc [ 48.950897] __driver_attach+0xc0/0xc4 [ 48.950927] bus_for_each_dev+0x6c/0xa0 [ 48.950927] bus_add_driver+0x100/0x210 [ 48.950927] driver_register+0x78/0xf4 [ 48.950958] do_one_initcall+0x3c/0x16c [ 48.950958] kernel_init_freeable+0x20c/0x2d8 [ 48.950958] kernel_init+0x8/0x110 [ 48.950988] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24 [ 48.950988] -> #4 (&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock){-.-...}: [ 48.951019] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x50 [ 48.951019] rq_offline_rt+0x9c/0x2bc [ 48.951019] set_rq_offline.part.2+0x2c/0x58 [ 48.951049] rq_attach_root+0x134/0x144 [ 48.951049] cpu_attach_domain+0x18c/0x6f4 [ 48.951049] build_sched_domains+0xba4/0xd80 [ 48.951080] sched_init_smp+0x68/0x10c [ 48.951080] kernel_init_freeable+0x160/0x2d8 [ 48.951080] kernel_init+0x8/0x110 [ 48.951080] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24 [ 48.951110] -> #3 (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}: [ 48.951110] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x50 [ 48.951141] task_fork_fair+0x30/0x124 [ 48.951141] sched_fork+0x194/0x2e0 [ 48.951141] copy_process.part.5+0x448/0x1a20 [ 48.951171] _do_fork+0x98/0x7e8 [ 48.951171] kernel_thread+0x2c/0x34 [ 48.951171] rest_init+0x1c/0x18c [ 48.951202] start_kernel+0x35c/0x3d4 [ 48.951202] 0x8000807c [ 48.951202] -> #2 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}: [ 48.951232] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x64 [ 48.951232] try_to_wake_up+0x30/0x5c8 [ 48.951232] up+0x4c/0x60 [ 48.951263] __up_console_sem+0x2c/0x58 [ 48.951263] console_unlock+0x3b4/0x650 [ 48.951263] vprintk_emit+0x270/0x474 [ 48.951293] vprintk_default+0x20/0x28 [ 48.951293] printk+0x20/0x30 [ 48.951324] kauditd_hold_skb+0x94/0xb8 [ 48.951324] kauditd_thread+0x1a4/0x56c [ 48.951324] kthread+0x104/0x148 [ 48.951354] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24 [ 48.951354] -> #1 ((console_sem).lock){-.....}: [ 48.951385] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x64 [ 48.951385] down_trylock+0xc/0x2c [ 48.951385] __down_trylock_console_sem+0x24/0x80 [ 48.951385] console_trylock+0x10/0x8c [ 48.951416] vprintk_emit+0x264/0x474 [ 48.951416] vprintk_default+0x20/0x28 [ 48.951416] printk+0x20/0x30 [ 48.951446] tk_debug_account_sleep_time+0x5c/0x70 [ 48.951446] __timekeeping_inject_sleeptime.constprop.3+0x170/0x1a0 [ 48.951446] timekeeping_resume+0x218/0x23c [ 48.951477] syscore_resume+0x94/0x42c [ 48.951477] suspend_enter+0x554/0x9b4 [ 48.951477] suspend_devices_and_enter+0xd8/0x4b4 [ 48.951507] enter_state+0x934/0xbd4 [ 48.951507] pm_suspend+0x14/0x70 [ 48.951507] state_store+0x68/0xc8 [ 48.951538] kernfs_fop_write+0xf4/0x1f8 [ 48.951538] __vfs_write+0x1c/0x114 [ 48.951538] vfs_write+0xa0/0x168 [ 48.951568] SyS_write+0x3c/0x90 [ 48.951568] __sys_trace_return+0x0/0x10 [ 48.951568] -> #0 (tk_core){----..}: [ 48.951599] lock_acquire+0xe0/0x294 [ 48.951599] ktime_get_update_offsets_now+0x5c/0x1d4 [ 48.951629] retrigger_next_event+0x4c/0x90 [ 48.951629] on_each_cpu+0x40/0x7c [ 48.951629] clock_was_set_work+0x14/0x20 [ 48.951660] process_one_work+0x2b4/0x808 [ 48.951660] worker_thread+0x3c/0x550 [ 48.951660] kthread+0x104/0x148 [ 48.951690] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24 [ 48.951690] other info that might help us debug this: [ 48.951690] Chain exists of: tk_core --> &rt_b->rt_runtime_lock --> hrtimer_bases.lock [ 48.951721] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 48.951721] CPU0 CPU1 [ 48.951721] ---- ---- [ 48.951721] lock(hrtimer_bases.lock); [ 48.951751] lock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock); [ 48.951751] lock(hrtimer_bases.lock); [ 48.951751] lock(tk_core); [ 48.951782] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 48.951782] 3 locks held by kworker/0:0/3: [ 48.951782] #0: ("events"){.+.+.+}, at: [<c0156590>] process_one_work+0x1f8/0x808 [ 48.951812] #1: (hrtimer_work){+.+...}, at: [<c0156590>] process_one_work+0x1f8/0x808 [ 48.951843] #2: (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-...}, at: [<c01cc610>] retrigger_next_event+0x38/0x90 [ 48.951843] stack backtrace: [ 48.951873] CPU: 0 PID: 3 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 4.10.0-rc7-next-20170213+ [ 48.951904] Workqueue: events clock_was_set_work [ 48.951904] [<c0110208>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010c224>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 48.951934] [<c010c224>] (show_stack) from [<c04ca6c0>] (dump_stack+0xac/0xe0) [ 48.951934] [<c04ca6c0>] (dump_stack) from [<c019b5cc>] (print_circular_bug+0x1d0/0x308) [ 48.951965] [<c019b5cc>] (print_circular_bug) from [<c019d2a8>] (validate_chain+0xf50/0x1324) [ 48.951965] [<c019d2a8>] (validate_chain) from [<c019ec18>] (__lock_acquire+0x468/0x7e8) [ 48.951995] [<c019ec18>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c019f634>] (lock_acquire+0xe0/0x294) [ 48.951995] [<c019f634>] (lock_acquire) from [<c01d0ea0>] (ktime_get_update_offsets_now+0x5c/0x1d4) [ 48.952026] [<c01d0ea0>] (ktime_get_update_offsets_now) from [<c01cc624>] (retrigger_next_event+0x4c/0x90) [ 48.952026] [<c01cc624>] (retrigger_next_event) from [<c01e4e24>] (on_each_cpu+0x40/0x7c) [ 48.952056] [<c01e4e24>] (on_each_cpu) from [<c01cafc4>] (clock_was_set_work+0x14/0x20) [ 48.952056] [<c01cafc4>] (clock_was_set_work) from [<c015664c>] (process_one_work+0x2b4/0x808) [ 48.952087] [<c015664c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0157774>] (worker_thread+0x3c/0x550) [ 48.952087] [<c0157774>] (worker_thread) from [<c015d644>] (kthread+0x104/0x148) [ 48.952087] [<c015d644>] (kthread) from [<c0107830>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24) Replace printk() with printk_deferred(), which does not call into the scheduler. Fixes: 0bf43f1 ("timekeeping: Prints the amounts of time spent during suspend") Reported-and-tested-by: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]> Cc: Petr Mladek <[email protected]> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <[email protected]> Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> Cc: John Stultz <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit eae5f70 ] __printf is useful to verify format and arguments. Fix arg mismatch reported by gcc, remove the following warnings (with W=1): arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1467:31: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1471:31: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1504:33: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1505:33: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1506:33: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1507:33: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1508:33: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1509:33: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1975:39: error: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1986:27: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:2567:38: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:2567:46: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘long unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:2569:38: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:2569:46: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘long unsigned int’ The patch also include arg mismatch fix for case with #define DEBUG_PROM (warning not listed here). This patch fix also the following warnings revealed by checkpatch: WARNING: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'alloc_up', this function's name, in a string #101: FILE: arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1235: + prom_debug("alloc_up(%lx, %lx)\n", size, align); and WARNING: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'alloc_down', this function's name, in a string #138: FILE: arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1278: + prom_debug("alloc_down(%lx, %lx, %s)\n", size, align, Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
I have same problem. Any progress with the issue? |
@Renha , that was 2 years ago, "same problem" isn't valid anymore... Please try again... Please state what issue are "you" having.. Adding the output of:
Regards, |
Thank you for answer! Ok, my problem of trying to use pins taken by HDMI audio (namely P9_28 P9_29 P9_31) may be "invalid", but "I" still need to solve it. How would I do this in 2k19?
|
@Renha , you can disable hdmi audio and thus use the pins for something else via, adding this line to /boot/uEnv.txt
https://elinux.org/Beagleboard:BeagleBoneBlack_Debian#U-Boot_Disable_on-board_devices Regards, |
[ Upstream commit ea01007 ] redundant copy_from_user in rds_sendmsg system call expose rds to issue where rds_rdma_extra_size walk the rds iovec and and calculate the number pf pages (sgs) it need to add to the tail of rds message and later rds_cmsg_rdma_args copy the rds iovec again and re calculate the same number and get different result causing WARN_ON in rds_message_alloc_sgs. fix this by doing the copy_from_user only once per rds_sendmsg system call. When issue occur the below dump is seen: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 19789 at net/rds/message.c:316 rds_message_alloc_sgs+0x10c/0x160 net/rds/message.c:316 Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ... CPU: 0 PID: 19789 Comm: syz-executor827 Not tainted 4.19.0-next-20181030+ beagleboard#101 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x244/0x39d lib/dump_stack.c:113 panic+0x2ad/0x55c kernel/panic.c:188 __warn.cold.8+0x20/0x45 kernel/panic.c:540 report_bug+0x254/0x2d0 lib/bug.c:186 fixup_bug arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:178 [inline] do_error_trap+0x11b/0x200 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:271 do_invalid_op+0x36/0x40 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:290 invalid_op+0x14/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:969 RIP: 0010:rds_message_alloc_sgs+0x10c/0x160 net/rds/message.c:316 Code: c0 74 04 3c 03 7e 6c 44 01 ab 78 01 00 00 e8 2b 9e 35 fa 4c 89 e0 48 83 c4 08 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d c3 e8 14 9e 35 fa <0f> 0b 31 ff 44 89 ee e8 18 9f 35 fa 45 85 ed 75 1b e8 fe 9d 35 fa RSP: 0018:ffff8801c51b7460 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: ffff8801bc412080 RBX: ffff8801d7bf4040 RCX: ffffffff8749c9e6 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff8749ca5c RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: ffff8801c51b7490 R08: ffff8801bc412080 R09: ffffed003b5c5b67 R10: ffffed003b5c5b67 R11: ffff8801dae2db3b R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000000000007165c R14: 000000000007165c R15: 0000000000000005 rds_cmsg_rdma_args+0x82d/0x1510 net/rds/rdma.c:623 rds_cmsg_send net/rds/send.c:971 [inline] rds_sendmsg+0x19a2/0x3180 net/rds/send.c:1273 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:622 [inline] sock_sendmsg+0xd5/0x120 net/socket.c:632 ___sys_sendmsg+0x7fd/0x930 net/socket.c:2117 __sys_sendmsg+0x11d/0x280 net/socket.c:2155 __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2164 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2162 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x78/0xb0 net/socket.c:2162 do_syscall_64+0x1b9/0x820 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe RIP: 0033:0x44a859 Code: e8 dc e6 ff ff 48 83 c4 18 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 6b cb fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 RSP: 002b:00007f1d4710ada8 EFLAGS: 00000297 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000006dcc28 RCX: 000000000044a859 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000020001600 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00000000006dcc20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000297 R12: 00000000006dcc2c R13: 646e732f7665642f R14: 00007f1d4710b9c0 R15: 00000000006dcd2c Kernel Offset: disabled Rebooting in 86400 seconds.. Reported-by: [email protected] Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: shamir rabinovitch <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit 32d3182 ] packet_sendmsg() checks tx_ring.pg_vec to decide if it must call tpacket_snd(). Problem is that the check is lockless, meaning another thread can issue a concurrent setsockopt(PACKET_TX_RING ) to flip tx_ring.pg_vec back to NULL. Given that tpacket_snd() grabs pg_vec_lock mutex, we can perform the check again to solve the race. syzbot reported : kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 1 PID: 11429 Comm: syz-executor394 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc4+ #101 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 RIP: 0010:packet_lookup_frame+0x8d/0x270 net/packet/af_packet.c:474 Code: c1 ee 03 f7 73 0c 80 3c 0e 00 0f 85 cb 01 00 00 48 8b 0b 89 c0 4c 8d 24 c1 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 89 e1 48 c1 e9 03 <80> 3c 01 00 0f 85 94 01 00 00 48 8d 7b 10 4d 8b 3c 24 48 b8 00 00 RSP: 0018:ffff88809f82f7b8 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff8880a45c7030 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 1ffff110148b8e06 RDI: ffff8880a45c703c RBP: ffff88809f82f7e8 R08: ffff888087aea200 R09: fffffbfff134ae50 R10: fffffbfff134ae4f R11: ffffffff89a5727f R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff8880a45c6ac0 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007fa04716f700(0000) GS:ffff8880ae900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fa04716edb8 CR3: 0000000091eb4000 CR4: 00000000001406e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: packet_current_frame net/packet/af_packet.c:487 [inline] tpacket_snd net/packet/af_packet.c:2667 [inline] packet_sendmsg+0x590/0x6250 net/packet/af_packet.c:2975 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:637 [inline] sock_sendmsg+0xd7/0x130 net/socket.c:657 ___sys_sendmsg+0x3e2/0x920 net/socket.c:2311 __sys_sendmmsg+0x1bf/0x4d0 net/socket.c:2413 __do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2442 [inline] __se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2439 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmmsg+0x9d/0x100 net/socket.c:2439 do_syscall_64+0xfd/0x6a0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:296 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe Fixes: 69e3c75 ("net: TX_RING and packet mmap") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> Reported-by: syzbot <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
commit 9ac26e9 upstream. With current ALU32 subreg handling and retval refine fix from last patches we see an expected failure in test_verifier. With verbose verifier state being printed at each step for clarity we have the following relavent lines [I omit register states that are not necessarily useful to see failure cause], #101/p bpf_get_stack return R0 within range FAIL Failed to load prog 'Success'! [..] 14: (85) call bpf_get_stack#67 R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=48,imm=0) R3_w=inv48 15: R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=48,var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) 15: (b7) r1 = 0 16: R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=48,var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1_w=inv0 16: (bf) r8 = r0 17: R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=48,var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1_w=inv0 R8_w=inv(id=0,smax_value=48,var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) 17: (67) r8 <<= 32 18: R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=48,var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1_w=inv0 R8_w=inv(id=0,smax_value=9223372032559808512, umax_value=18446744069414584320, var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff00000000), s32_min_value=0, s32_max_value=0, u32_max_value=0, var32_off=(0x0; 0x0)) 18: (c7) r8 s>>= 32 19 R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=48,var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1_w=inv0 R8_w=inv(id=0,smin_value=-2147483648, smax_value=2147483647, var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) 19: (cd) if r1 s< r8 goto pc+16 R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=48,var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1_w=inv0 R8_w=inv(id=0,smin_value=-2147483648, smax_value=0, var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) 20: R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=48,var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1_w=inv0 R8_w=inv(id=0,smin_value=-2147483648, smax_value=0, R9=inv48 20: (1f) r9 -= r8 21: (bf) r2 = r7 22: R2_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=48,imm=0) 22: (0f) r2 += r8 value -2147483648 makes map_value pointer be out of bounds After call bpf_get_stack() on line 14 and some moves we have at line 16 an r8 bound with max_value 48 but an unknown min value. This is to be expected bpf_get_stack call can only return a max of the input size but is free to return any negative error in the 32-bit register space. The C helper is returning an int so will use lower 32-bits. Lines 17 and 18 clear the top 32 bits with a left/right shift but use ARSH so we still have worst case min bound before line 19 of -2147483648. At this point the signed check 'r1 s< r8' meant to protect the addition on line 22 where dst reg is a map_value pointer may very well return true with a large negative number. Then the final line 22 will detect this as an invalid operation and fail the program. What we want to do is proceed only if r8 is positive non-error. So change 'r1 s< r8' to 'r1 s> r8' so that we jump if r8 is negative. Next we will throw an error because we access past the end of the map value. The map value size is 48 and sizeof(struct test_val) is 48 so we walk off the end of the map value on the second call to get bpf_get_stack(). Fix this by changing sizeof(struct test_val) to 24 by using 'sizeof(struct test_val) / 2'. After this everything passes as expected. Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/158560426019.10843.3285429543232025187.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
[ no upstream commit ] Switch the comparison, so that is_branch_taken() will recognize that below branch is never taken: [...] 17: [...] R1_w=inv0 [...] R8_w=inv(id=0,smin_value=-2147483648,smax_value=-1,umin_value=18446744071562067968,var_off=(0xffffffff80000000; 0x7fffffff)) [...] 17: (67) r8 <<= 32 18: [...] R8_w=inv(id=0,smax_value=-4294967296,umin_value=9223372036854775808,umax_value=18446744069414584320,var_off=(0x8000000000000000; 0x7fffffff00000000)) [...] 18: (c7) r8 s>>= 32 19: [...] R8_w=inv(id=0,smin_value=-2147483648,smax_value=-1,umin_value=18446744071562067968,var_off=(0xffffffff80000000; 0x7fffffff)) [...] 19: (6d) if r1 s> r8 goto pc+16 [...] R1_w=inv0 [...] R8_w=inv(id=0,smin_value=-2147483648,smax_value=-1,umin_value=18446744071562067968,var_off=(0xffffffff80000000; 0x7fffffff)) [...] [...] Currently we check for is_branch_taken() only if either K is source, or source is a scalar value that is const. For upstream it would be good to extend this properly to check whether dst is const and src not. For the sake of the test_verifier, it is probably not needed here: # ./test_verifier 101 #101/p bpf_get_stack return R0 within range OK Summary: 1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED I haven't seen this issue in test_progs* though, they are passing fine: # ./test_progs-no_alu32 -t get_stack Switching to flavor 'no_alu32' subdirectory... #20 get_stack_raw_tp:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED # ./test_progs -t get_stack #20 get_stack_raw_tp:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Please re-open if still an issue with our current Debian images: Please note that the cape manager has been removed and our Debian images now use U-Boot Overlays: Also, consider posting a question on the BeagleBoard.org community mailing list: You may also be interested in the Debian images and kernel builds that we are currently testing for the next release: |
commit 1036f69 upstream. On RZ/Five SMARC EVK, where probing of SDHI is deferred due to probe deferral of the vqmmc-supply regulator: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/time/timer.c:1738 __run_timers.part.0+0x1d0/0x1e8 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.7.0-rc4 #101 Hardware name: Renesas SMARC EVK based on r9a07g043f01 (DT) epc : __run_timers.part.0+0x1d0/0x1e8 ra : __run_timers.part.0+0x134/0x1e8 epc : ffffffff800771a4 ra : ffffffff80077108 sp : ffffffc800003e60 gp : ffffffff814f5028 tp : ffffffff8140c5c0 t0 : ffffffc800000000 t1 : 0000000000000001 t2 : ffffffff81201300 s0 : ffffffc800003f20 s1 : ffffffd8023bc4a0 a0 : 00000000fffee6b0 a1 : 0004010000400000 a2 : ffffffffc0000016 a3 : ffffffff81488640 a4 : ffffffc800003e60 a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : 0000000004000000 a7 : ffffffc800003e68 s2 : 0000000000000122 s3 : 0000000000200000 s4 : 0000000000000000 s5 : ffffffffffffffff s6 : ffffffff81488678 s7 : ffffffff814886c0 s8 : ffffffff814f49c0 s9 : ffffffff81488640 s10: 0000000000000000 s11: ffffffc800003e60 t3 : 0000000000000240 t4 : 0000000000000a52 t5 : ffffffd8024ae018 t6 : ffffffd8024ae038 status: 0000000200000100 badaddr: 0000000000000000 cause: 0000000000000003 [<ffffffff800771a4>] __run_timers.part.0+0x1d0/0x1e8 [<ffffffff800771e0>] run_timer_softirq+0x24/0x4a [<ffffffff80809092>] __do_softirq+0xc6/0x1fa [<ffffffff80028e4c>] irq_exit_rcu+0x66/0x84 [<ffffffff80800f7a>] handle_riscv_irq+0x40/0x4e [<ffffffff80808f48>] call_on_irq_stack+0x1c/0x28 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- What happens? renesas_sdhi_probe() { tmio_mmc_host_alloc() mmc_alloc_host() INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&host->detect, mmc_rescan); devm_request_irq(tmio_mmc_irq); /* * After this, the interrupt handler may be invoked at any time * * tmio_mmc_irq() * { * __tmio_mmc_card_detect_irq() * mmc_detect_change() * _mmc_detect_change() * mmc_schedule_delayed_work(&host->detect, delay); * } */ tmio_mmc_host_probe() tmio_mmc_init_ocr() -EPROBE_DEFER tmio_mmc_host_free() mmc_free_host() } When expire_timers() runs later, it warns because the MMC host structure containing the delayed work was freed, and now contains an invalid work function pointer. Fix this by cancelling any pending delayed work before releasing the MMC host structure. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> Tested-by: Lad Prabhakar <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/205dc4c91b47e31b64392fe2498c7a449e717b4b.1701689330.git.geert+renesas@glider.be Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Hello,
I have been trying to get the latest image from BeagleBoard.org (Debian Image 2016-05-13) to work and can't seem to figure out the right combination.
My cape uses pin P5_25. With the older wheezy images I was able to get this pin by loading the overlay with HDMI and EMMC enabled (BB-BONELT-HDMIN) and then use the cape-universal overlay.
Is this possible with the jessie images?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: