Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for CTAG face2|4 Audio Card #104

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

henrix
Copy link

@henrix henrix commented Oct 2, 2016

This commit adds support for CTAG face2|4 Audio Card.

  • Drivers are compatible with BeagleBone Black/Green and BeagleBoard-X15.
  • Asynchronous sampling rates has been enabled in Multichannel Audio Serial Port (McASP) driver.
  • AD193x ASoC probe function has been modified for correct clock settings with CTAG face2|4 Audio Card.

@henrix
Copy link
Author

henrix commented Oct 2, 2016

Travis-CI showed up the error:
"arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc:** error: unrecognized command line option ‘-fstack-protector-strong’"
Compilation works fine for me on Ubuntu 16.04 with arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc of the official package repos.

RobertCNelson added a commit to RobertCNelson/ti-linux-kernel-dev that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2016
RobertCNelson added a commit to RobertCNelson/ti-linux-kernel-dev that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2016
@RobertCNelson
Copy link
Member

Thanks @henrix merged, and i've tweaked the travis build, so it'll atleast build the kernel.. We had been trying something even more fanicer, but where running out of time on the travis build limit..

Regards,

fhgwright pushed a commit to fhgwright/bb-linux that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2018
commit f4483f2 upstream.

When a tail call fails, it is documented that the tail call should
continue execution at the following instruction.  An example tail call
sequence is:

  12: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12
  13: (b7) r0 = 0
  14: (95) exit

The ARM assembler for the tail call in this case ends up branching to
instruction 14 instead of instruction 13, resulting in the BPF filter
returning a non-zero value:

  178:	ldr	r8, [sp, #588]	; insn 12
  17c:	ldr	r6, [r8, r6]
  180:	ldr	r8, [sp, #580]
  184:	cmp	r8, r6
  188:	bcs	0x1e8
  18c:	ldr	r6, [sp, #524]
  190:	ldr	r7, [sp, #528]
  194:	cmp	r7, #0
  198:	cmpeq	r6, beagleboard#32
  19c:	bhi	0x1e8
  1a0:	adds	r6, r6, beagleboard#1
  1a4:	adc	r7, r7, #0
  1a8:	str	r6, [sp, #524]
  1ac:	str	r7, [sp, #528]
  1b0:	mov	r6, beagleboard#104
  1b4:	ldr	r8, [sp, #588]
  1b8:	add	r6, r8, r6
  1bc:	ldr	r8, [sp, #580]
  1c0:	lsl	r7, r8, beagleboard#2
  1c4:	ldr	r6, [r6, r7]
  1c8:	cmp	r6, #0
  1cc:	beq	0x1e8
  1d0:	mov	r8, beagleboard#32
  1d4:	ldr	r6, [r6, r8]
  1d8:	add	r6, r6, beagleboard#44
  1dc:	bx	r6
  1e0:	mov	r0, #0		; insn 13
  1e4:	mov	r1, #0
  1e8:	add	sp, sp, #596	; insn 14
  1ec:	pop	{r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, sl, pc}

For other sequences, the tail call could end up branching midway through
the following BPF instructions, or maybe off the end of the function,
leading to unknown behaviours.

Fixes: 39c13c2 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler")
Signed-off-by: Russell King <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
RobertCNelson pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2018
[ Upstream commit d2753e6 ]

Paul Menzel reported the following bug:

> Enabling the undefined behavior sanitizer and building GNU/Linux 4.18-rc5+
> (with some unrelated commits) with GCC 8.1.0 from Debian Sid/unstable, the
> warning below is shown.
>
> > [    2.111913]
> > ================================================================================
> > [    2.111917] UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c:582:24
> > [    2.111919] member access within null pointer of type 'struct perf_event'
> > [    2.111926] CPU: 0 PID: 144 Comm: udevadm Not tainted 4.18.0-rc5-00316-g4864b68cedf2 #104
> > [    2.111928] Hardware name: ASROCK E350M1/E350M1, BIOS TIMELESS 01/01/1970
> > [    2.111930] Call Trace:
> > [    2.111943]  dump_stack+0x55/0x89
> > [    2.111949]  ubsan_epilogue+0xb/0x33
> > [    2.111953]  handle_null_ptr_deref+0x7f/0x90
> > [    2.111958]  __ubsan_handle_type_mismatch_v1+0x55/0x60
> > [    2.111964]  perf_ibs_handle_irq+0x596/0x620

The code dereferences event before checking the STARTED bit. Patch
below should cure the issue.

The warning should not trigger, if I analyzed the thing correctly.
(And Paul's testing confirms this.)

Reported-by: Paul Menzel <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Paul Menzel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Menzel <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Cc: Vince Weaver <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
RobertCNelson pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2018
[ Upstream commit d2753e6 ]

Paul Menzel reported the following bug:

> Enabling the undefined behavior sanitizer and building GNU/Linux 4.18-rc5+
> (with some unrelated commits) with GCC 8.1.0 from Debian Sid/unstable, the
> warning below is shown.
>
> > [    2.111913]
> > ================================================================================
> > [    2.111917] UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c:582:24
> > [    2.111919] member access within null pointer of type 'struct perf_event'
> > [    2.111926] CPU: 0 PID: 144 Comm: udevadm Not tainted 4.18.0-rc5-00316-g4864b68cedf2 #104
> > [    2.111928] Hardware name: ASROCK E350M1/E350M1, BIOS TIMELESS 01/01/1970
> > [    2.111930] Call Trace:
> > [    2.111943]  dump_stack+0x55/0x89
> > [    2.111949]  ubsan_epilogue+0xb/0x33
> > [    2.111953]  handle_null_ptr_deref+0x7f/0x90
> > [    2.111958]  __ubsan_handle_type_mismatch_v1+0x55/0x60
> > [    2.111964]  perf_ibs_handle_irq+0x596/0x620

The code dereferences event before checking the STARTED bit. Patch
below should cure the issue.

The warning should not trigger, if I analyzed the thing correctly.
(And Paul's testing confirms this.)

Reported-by: Paul Menzel <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Paul Menzel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Menzel <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Cc: Vince Weaver <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
RobertCNelson pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2020
commit d0bab0c upstream.

On a system with only one CPU online, when another one CPU panics while
starting-up, smp_send_stop() will fail to send any STOP message to the
other already online core, resulting in a system still responsive and
alive at the end of the panic procedure.

[  186.700083] CPU3: shutdown
[  187.075462] CPU2: shutdown
[  187.162869] CPU1: shutdown
[  188.689998] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  188.691645] kernel BUG at arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c:886!
[  188.692079] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[  188.692444] Modules linked in:
[  188.693031] CPU: 3 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc4-00001-g338d25c35a98 #104
[  188.693175] Hardware name: Foundation-v8A (DT)
[  188.693492] pstate: 200001c5 (nzCv dAIF -PAN -UAO)
[  188.694183] pc : has_cpuid_feature+0xf0/0x348
[  188.694311] lr : verify_local_elf_hwcaps+0x84/0xe8
[  188.694410] sp : ffff800011b1bf60
[  188.694536] x29: ffff800011b1bf60 x28: 0000000000000000
[  188.694707] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000
[  188.694801] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffff80001189a25c
[  188.694905] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000000
[  188.694996] x21: ffff8000114aa018 x20: ffff800011156a38
[  188.695089] x19: ffff800010c944a0 x18: 0000000000000004
[  188.695187] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
[  188.695280] x15: 0000249dbde5431e x14: 0262cbe497efa1fa
[  188.695371] x13: 0000000000000002 x12: 0000000000002592
[  188.695472] x11: 0000000000000080 x10: 00400032b5503510
[  188.695572] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : ffff800010c80204
[  188.695659] x7 : 00000000410fd0f0 x6 : 0000000000000001
[  188.695750] x5 : 00000000410fd0f0 x4 : 0000000000000000
[  188.695836] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : ffff8000100939d8
[  188.695919] x1 : 0000000000180420 x0 : 0000000000180480
[  188.696253] Call trace:
[  188.696410]  has_cpuid_feature+0xf0/0x348
[  188.696504]  verify_local_elf_hwcaps+0x84/0xe8
[  188.696591]  check_local_cpu_capabilities+0x44/0x128
[  188.696666]  secondary_start_kernel+0xf4/0x188
[  188.697150] Code: 52805001 72a00301 6b01001f 54000ec0 (d4210000)
[  188.698639] ---[ end trace 3f12ca47652f7b72 ]---
[  188.699160] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
[  188.699546] Kernel Offset: disabled
[  188.699828] CPU features: 0x00004,20c02008
[  188.700012] Memory Limit: none
[  188.700538] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task! ]---

[root@arch ~]# echo Helo
Helo
[root@arch ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep proce
processor	: 0

Make smp_send_stop() account also for the online status of the calling CPU
while evaluating how many CPUs are effectively online: this way, the right
number of STOPs is sent, so enforcing a proper freeze of the system at the
end of panic even under the above conditions.

Fixes: 08e875c ("arm64: SMP support")
Reported-by: Dave Martin <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants