Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Top Open PRs #1454

Closed
MTRichards opened this issue Jan 27, 2016 · 15 comments
Closed

Top Open PRs #1454

MTRichards opened this issue Jan 27, 2016 · 15 comments

Comments

@MTRichards
Copy link

@AndyScherzinger @tobiasKaminsky opened this for input on your top PRs.

@LukeOwncloud FYI.

@tobiasKaminsky
Copy link
Contributor

The biggest improvement for user would be #1044 (resized images), I think.
But this might not be the best to start with as it depends on gallery+ for < OC 8.2 and gallery for => 8.2

But any PR is fine for me. Looking forward to get it started 👍
If I can help you with updating (my) PRs, please let me know!

@AndyScherzinger
Copy link
Contributor

I also don't have any preferences. A top PR imho would be #1191 (Cancel upload on wlan exit) since this prevents extra costs for users for example with their data plans especially when you are abroad and leave the hotel.

My PRs can be considered rather low prio since I usually implement ui stuff so that is rather polishing work. The FAB PR (#1100) would be nice though since I adds a primary action to the UI. On the other hand my PRs should be rather simple to merge and test in comparison to PRs that add new functionality.

@MTRichards
Copy link
Author

Hello @tobiasKaminsky @AndyScherzinger we are looking at 1191 in the next sprint - which is the next 2 weeks starting today, now that the new version is out (yeah!). Further, looking at #1100 at the top of the backlog as well (which means if we get time in the next 2 weeks, and we will get it in the next release), and then finishing the uploads view #471 in the next 2 weeks as well.

And a bug or two on the side as well. Any new PRs that would be high priority? Let us know, we can prioritize them higher for the next sprint.

@AndyScherzinger
Copy link
Contributor

@MTRichards Thanks for the update! Sounds fine to me. One UI PR I would suggest would be #1413 which implements @jancborchardt requirements regarding styling of the new share privilege dialogs. The FAB #1100 would be nice but as far as I understand depends on a decision if we add another library (part of the PR) to the app or not, since Android doesn't provide a out of the box implementation for the specified "speed dial".

@LukeOwlclaw
Copy link

LukeOwlclaw commented Mar 18, 2016

I support @tobiasKaminsky's suggestions for next sprint:

Further, there are 18 very small PRs (max 3 touched files, but most only 1 file).
Reviewing them and if appropriate accepting them would be great, in order to reduce the number of open PRs. Currently we are at 49. This is a little discouraging for developers...

@tobiasKaminsky
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah that would be great.
I can help with update the branches and testing them.

@davivel
Copy link
Contributor

davivel commented Apr 14, 2016

I took the liberty to edit @LukeOwncloud's comment so that checboxes are shown.

I'm having a first look to the PRs in the list.

@AndyScherzinger
Copy link
Contributor

AndyScherzinger commented Apr 14, 2016

I added my latest ones to the list, all more or less UI related....

@davivel
Copy link
Contributor

davivel commented May 24, 2016

I think we should move this issue to owncloud/core#24684 .

cc @owncloud/android-developers

@davivel davivel closed this as completed May 24, 2016
@davivel
Copy link
Contributor

davivel commented May 24, 2016

Please, everybody take there your suggestions.

@tobiasKaminsky
Copy link
Contributor

I thought that the linked issue is about enhancements that are platform wide and not individual per each subsystem (calendar, contacts, gallery,...).
Devs from iOS are not interested in specific PRs from us, or?

@MTRichards
Copy link
Author

What I think would be helpful is to add an issue to the master list @davivel pointed to, but keep a link back to the specific Android or iOS issue that discusses the change in more detail. That way there is an overview of what is going on (and some voting and prioritization), but the details are still here.

And I do think iOS is interested in some of the changes, because we will want to make the user experience similar over time.

@tobiasKaminsky
Copy link
Contributor

Ok, I see the point.
I have added a description for my very favourite PR (#1599) and hope that it gets upvoted :)

@MTRichards
Copy link
Author

Thank you!

@rperezb
Copy link

rperezb commented May 27, 2016

@tobiasKaminsky certainly yes! from iOS team we are also interesting in what it's going on Android and back way, no doubt! the goal is to build a platform. I'd go one step away and add the desktop client too.
We try to propagate what it's being done on each client, for instance, when we implemented the internal sharing we took care of following similar approaches
btw, voted your suggestion 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants