Skip to content

UX meeting 20190214

Nina Eleanor Alter edited this page Feb 14, 2019 · 2 revisions

Logistics

Time

17:00-17:30 UTC

Good design, will you be my Valentine? (ok, not really—theme this week was NoScript messaging)

Attending

@redshiftzero, @eloquence, @harrislapiroff, @deeplow, @saptak, @kushal

Place

https://meet.jit.si/QuickWizardsDanceHigh

Agenda

Review NoScript messaging things for asap release: https://github.com/freedomofpress/securedrop-ux/issues/44

Feedback/Discussion

  • Nina's overview of the slides shown

    • See pink annotations at top of page
    • See arrows to navigate between pages
    • Design ideas progress from least-impact to highest-impact wrt text & styles changes
      • 2 basic directions presented: Ordered List vs Messaging Bubble
      • First slides cut-paste existing text verbatim, to preserve existing translations work
      • Further slides present recommended edits to reduce cognitive burden, ease UI test parsing
      • Furthest slides hide Encryption stuff behind a hidden Div; let the experts read that, don't intimidate non-GPG users with what is likely to promote imposter syndrome and potentially divert use to an insecure "but friendlier" medium.
    • Key Considerations between the two
      • Messaging bubble treatment obvs prioritizes urgency in a pleasing fashion; however, the "message" not going away when a user has changed their settings, is likely to be confusing. Tech realities vs user expectations.
      • Ordered List treatment is dependent on true (vs what we'd prefer) dependencies being shown in ordered priority.
        • The NoScript thing, first; the basic functionality offered by the tool, second; and how we'd like you to use it, third.
    • Additional things explored, tangential to NoScripts bug
      • Blue cloud arrow icon: Cloud semiotics, bad wrt implications for how data storage security does not work, with SD
        • Blue also suggests actionability, which this is not
        • Would like to replace with b/w SD logo, as users are putting things on an org's SecureDrop in this interaction
      • Button Icons: not necessary, visual noise, eliminate
      • Body font: Change font family to something more dense-text screen friendly than Helvetica Neu (which is my personal fav typeface, but it sucks for readability below header size). Google fonts are my personal fav library to pull from (and these mockups use Roboto, Montserrat, and Ariel), and open source—but @harrislapiroff flagged issues with Tor not even being able to use those families, when embedded, on the highest security setting? @kushal or @redshiftzero, any knowledge of this?
      • Encryption: Hide details in hidden Div; most Source users likely do not know what encryption is, or are not existing GPG users. Do we want to force Opsec 101 on this page, or calmly guide use of this page's functionality?
      • Hide/Show Passcode: Spiffier presentation; whole bar clickable, white-on-grey type treatment enhances accessibility with a low-contrast, while also making it more difficult for cameras to legibly capture information from afar
  • Feedback

    • Everyone prefers Message bubble treatment, yet agrees with hypothesis it will confuse users by not being ephemeral
    • Ordered List version gets the green light
    • Body font too disruptive to change in such a quick fix release
    • Let's discuss the tangential tweaks (including what the default newsroom logo shipped with the product and included in documentation, is), in a future meeting?
    • Erik and Jen on the fence about swapping items 2 and 3. Nina feels strongly that ordering is more user-centered, as-is. John agrees with Nina. Who will win the bloody battle?
  • Action Items

    • Nina to finish complete instructional page
    • Nina to cut-paste PNGs of page mockups into parent Issue in GH Repo
    • Nina to finalize text & cut-art for coding, and separately put into same GH issue

Who Uses SecureDrop?
Learn about SecureDrop's users!

Contributors

Learn!

Et cetera

Clone this wiki locally