-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 781
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[alert_handler] D2(S) Signoff #20993
Comments
Commits since Earlgrey-ES tapeout
ab4b36f [ipgen,rstmgr] Fix paths to rstmgr in md files Issues closed since the Earlgrey-ES tapeout
None of these issues should block D2(S) signoff of this IP. Currently open issueshttps://github.com/lowRISC/opentitan/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+alert_handler
None of these issues should block D2(S) signoff of this IP. SummaryThe following commits changed alert_handler's RTL (from There are currently no TODOs in alert_handler's RTL. Checklistalert_handler has been signed off at D3 before ✔️ No behavioral changes were made. ConclusionI think alert_handler still fulfills the D2S signoff criteria. Is there a reason we don't directly sign it off at D3? |
@msfschaffner: Can you PTAL at this signoff analysis? TIA! |
Thanks for the analysis @andreaskurth. The idea for this exercise was to double check that the IP fulfills the PROD.M2 exit criteria which is D2S/V2S. Given that there were no changes, and that the Hjson still claims D3, I am fine with leaving it at D3: opentitan/hw/ip_templates/alert_handler/data/alert_handler.hjson.tpl Lines 18 to 22 in 2714197
|
Description
Ensure D2(S) signoff criteria are still maintained (this is not a focus area block).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: