Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pop inbox Pagination fix #1907

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2024
Merged

Pop inbox Pagination fix #1907

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2024

Conversation

rachana-egov
Copy link

@rachana-egov rachana-egov commented Nov 27, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved user action handling and state management in the PopInbox component.
    • Enhanced pagination control to reset when performing search, clear, or filter actions.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Streamlined error handling for fetching status counts, ensuring consistent user notifications.

These updates aim to provide a smoother and more intuitive user experience by accurately reflecting the current data state and improving interaction responsiveness.

@rachana-egov rachana-egov requested a review from a team as a code owner November 27, 2024 08:16
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 27, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in the PopInbox.js component focus on enhancing user action handling and state management. Key modifications include updating the fetchStatusCount function to adjust criteria based on user roles, implementing state resets for pagination during various actions, and refining error handling. The pagination logic has been preserved while ensuring that the UI accurately reflects the current state based on user interactions, such as search and filter actions.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/PopInbox.js - Updated fetchStatusCount to use assignee: user.info.uuid for non-root approvers.
- Introduced state resets for pagination in setLimitAndOffset across multiple functions.
- Modified handlePageChange, handlePerRowsChange, and clearFilters to maintain pagination logic.
- Enhanced error handling in fetchStatusCount with consistent toast notifications.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • nipunarora-eGov
  • nabeelmd-eGov

🐰 In the poppy fields where bunnies play,
We’ve spruced up the inbox in a bright new way!
With filters and states all set to reset,
User actions flow smoothly, you bet!
Hopping through pages, with joy we’ll convey,
A seamless experience, hip-hip-hooray! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0c09a8a and 020c6ff.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/PopInbox.js (7 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/PopInbox.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

📓 Learnings (1)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/PopInbox.js (2)
Learnt from: rachana-egov
PR: egovernments/DIGIT-Frontend#1832
File: health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/PopInbox.js:592-594
Timestamp: 2024-11-14T12:48:23.024Z
Learning: In `PopInbox.js`, when integrating the `ConfirmationPopUp` component, error handling for API failures is managed internally within the component, so explicitly passing an `onError` prop is not necessary.
Learnt from: rachana-egov
PR: egovernments/DIGIT-Frontend#1837
File: health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/PopInbox.js:559-561
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T10:15:57.370Z
Learning: In `PopInbox.js`, error handling for the `onError` callback in `WorkflowCommentPopUp` is handled within the component, so explicit error handling in the parent component is unnecessary.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/PopInbox.js (5)

167-172: LGTM! Proper pagination reset on search.

The implementation correctly preserves the page size while resetting to the first page on new search, following React best practices with functional state updates.


459-465: Part of pagination reset pattern.

This implementation follows the same pattern discussed in the previous comment.


625-631: Part of pagination reset pattern.

This implementation follows the same pattern discussed in the previous comment.


704-710: Part of pagination reset pattern.

This implementation follows the same pattern discussed in the previous comment.


89-89: LGTM! Proper access control implementation.

The condition correctly restricts non-root approvers to only see their assigned items, improving security through proper data access scoping.

✅ Verification successful

Let me analyze the context further to understand the complete implementation.


Based on the gathered context, I can now provide a final response:

Verified: Access control implementation is consistent and secure

The assignee condition is correctly implemented with proper role-based access control:

  • Root approvers (ROOT_POPULATION_DATA_APPROVER) can see all items
  • Regular users only see their assigned items except when viewing "ASSIGNED_TO_ALL" or "VALIDATED" status
  • The condition is consistently applied across both status count fetching and data fetching operations
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the assignee condition is consistently applied across all data fetching operations
rg -A 5 "assignee.*user\.info\.uuid" .

Length of output: 2429


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the conditions around assignee usage to understand the access control logic
ast-grep --pattern 'ASSIGNED_TO_ALL'

Length of output: 36


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for any other assignee-related conditions
rg -B 3 -A 3 "ASSIGNED_TO_ALL"

Length of output: 5149


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any validation or role checks around these assignments
rg "isRootApprover|isApprover|hasAccess" .

Length of output: 8079

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants