-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pop inbox Pagination fix #1907
Pop inbox Pagination fix #1907
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/PopInbox.js
(7 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/PopInbox.js (1)
Pattern **/*.js
: check
📓 Learnings (1)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/PopInbox.js (2)
Learnt from: rachana-egov
PR: egovernments/DIGIT-Frontend#1832
File: health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/PopInbox.js:592-594
Timestamp: 2024-11-14T12:48:23.024Z
Learning: In `PopInbox.js`, when integrating the `ConfirmationPopUp` component, error handling for API failures is managed internally within the component, so explicitly passing an `onError` prop is not necessary.
Learnt from: rachana-egov
PR: egovernments/DIGIT-Frontend#1837
File: health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/PopInbox.js:559-561
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T10:15:57.370Z
Learning: In `PopInbox.js`, error handling for the `onError` callback in `WorkflowCommentPopUp` is handled within the component, so explicit error handling in the parent component is unnecessary.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/PopInbox.js (5)
167-172
: LGTM! Proper pagination reset on search.
The implementation correctly preserves the page size while resetting to the first page on new search, following React best practices with functional state updates.
459-465
: Part of pagination reset pattern.
This implementation follows the same pattern discussed in the previous comment.
625-631
: Part of pagination reset pattern.
This implementation follows the same pattern discussed in the previous comment.
704-710
: Part of pagination reset pattern.
This implementation follows the same pattern discussed in the previous comment.
89-89
: LGTM! Proper access control implementation.
The condition correctly restricts non-root approvers to only see their assigned items, improving security through proper data access scoping.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the context further to understand the complete implementation.
Based on the gathered context, I can now provide a final response:
Verified: Access control implementation is consistent and secure
The assignee condition is correctly implemented with proper role-based access control:
- Root approvers (ROOT_POPULATION_DATA_APPROVER) can see all items
- Regular users only see their assigned items except when viewing "ASSIGNED_TO_ALL" or "VALIDATED" status
- The condition is consistently applied across both status count fetching and data fetching operations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the assignee condition is consistently applied across all data fetching operations
rg -A 5 "assignee.*user\.info\.uuid" .
Length of output: 2429
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the conditions around assignee usage to understand the access control logic
ast-grep --pattern 'ASSIGNED_TO_ALL'
Length of output: 36
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for any other assignee-related conditions
rg -B 3 -A 3 "ASSIGNED_TO_ALL"
Length of output: 5149
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any validation or role checks around these assignments
rg "isRootApprover|isApprover|hasAccess" .
Length of output: 8079
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
These updates aim to provide a smoother and more intuitive user experience by accurately reflecting the current data state and improving interaction responsiveness.