Usermanagement css and boundaryScreen css #1791
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range comments (3)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/UserManagement.js (2)
Line range hint
1-67: Code quality improvements needed.Several code quality issues need attention:
- Remove unused imports (Loader)
- Remove unused state (tqmInboxSession)
- Add error boundaries for better error handling
- Consider adding loading states for data fetching
Here's a suggested implementation for error handling and loading states:
const UserManagement = () => { const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false); const [error, setError] = useState(null); if (error) { return <div className="error-container">{error.message}</div>; } if (isLoading) { return <Loader />; } return ( // ... existing JSX ); };
Line range hint
22-35: Improve error handling consistency in row click handler.The error handling in
onClickRowis inconsistent. Some errors are logged while others might be silently failed.Suggested improvement:
const onClickRow = (data) => { + try { const selection = window.getSelection().toString(); if (selection.length > 0) { return; } if (Array.isArray(data.cells) && data.cells.length > 0) { const row = data.cells[0].value; const tenantId = Digit.ULBService.getCurrentTenantId(); const contextPath = state?.ContextPathForUser?.[0]?.contextPathConfig; if (!contextPath) { - console.error("Context path configuration is missing"); - return; + throw new Error("Context path configuration is missing"); } history.push(`/${contextPath}/employee/hrms/details/${tenantId}/${row}`); } else { - console.error("Invalid data format: cells array is missing or empty."); + throw new Error("Invalid data format: cells array is missing or empty."); } + } catch (error) { + console.error("Error in onClickRow:", error); + // Consider showing a user-friendly error message + } }health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/CampaignBoundary.js (1)
Line range hint
1-359: General code quality improvements neededSeveral areas could be improved for better maintainability:
- Remove the commented-out test data (selectedData array) - if needed, move it to a separate test file
- Consider breaking down complex useEffect hooks into smaller, more focused ones
- Be consistent with null checking - either use optional chaining (?.) throughout or implement proper null checks
Consider:
- Moving the boundary hierarchy logic into a custom hook
- Creating a separate constants file for static data
- Adding proper TypeScript types or PropTypes for better type safety
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/CampaignBoundary.js(2 hunks)health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/subBoundaryView.js(2 hunks)health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/UserManagement.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/CampaignBoundary.js (1)
Pattern **/*.js: check
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/subBoundaryView.js (1)
Pattern **/*.js: check
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/UserManagement.js (1)
Pattern **/*.js: check
🔇 Additional comments (3)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/UserManagement.js (1)
50-50: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Verify the removal of inbox count display.
The inbox count has been removed from the header. Please confirm if this was intentional and doesn't impact any user requirements or metrics visibility needs.
Consider moving inline styles to a CSS module or styled-component for better maintainability:
-<Header styles={{ fontSize: "32px" }}>{t(config?.label)}</Header>
+<Header className="user-management-header">{t(config?.label)}</Header>Add to your CSS file:
.user-management-header {
font-size: 32px;
}health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/subBoundaryView.js (1)
23-25: Document style precedence and consider style management approach.
The Header component now uses both className and styles prop, which could lead to style conflicts. Consider:
- Documenting which styles take precedence
- Using a more structured approach to style management (e.g., CSS-in-JS or CSS modules)
✅ Verification successful
From analyzing the search results, I can see that the Header component is imported from "@egovernments/digit-ui-react-components" and is widely used across the application. The component appears to be a standardized component that supports both className and styles props as part of its API.
Let me verify one more aspect about the styling:
Based on the comprehensive search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the Header component styling:
Using both className and styles props is a valid pattern in this codebase
- The Header component is imported from "@egovernments/digit-ui-react-components" which is a standardized component library used across the DIGIT platform.
- The component supports both className and styles props as part of its API design.
- The className "summary-sub-heading subBoundary" provides semantic meaning and base styles, while the styles prop with headerStyle allows for component-specific customization.
- This pattern of combining both className and inline styles is commonly used throughout the codebase for flexibility in styling.
[incorrect_review_comment]
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential style conflicts in CSS files
rg -g "*.css" "summary-sub-heading|subBoundary"
# Check if Header component is used elsewhere with similar styling
ast-grep --pattern 'Header className="summary-sub-heading"'
Length of output: 111
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for Header component usage patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'Header $$$className$$$'
# Search for any CSS files that might contain related styles
fd -e css -x cat {}
# Check if Header component is imported and where it comes from
rg "import.*Header" -A 1
Length of output: 66612
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for Header component implementation
rg -g "*.js" -g "*.jsx" "export.*Header" -A 5
# Look for any style-related documentation
fd -e md -x cat {}
Length of output: 51140
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/CampaignBoundary.js (1)
305-305: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Verify the header font size impact on UI hierarchy
The font size of 1.6rem for SubBoundaryView headers seems relatively large. This might disrupt the visual hierarchy, especially since this component appears to be a child element in the boundary tree structure.
Consider testing with different font sizes to ensure proper visual hierarchy is maintained. You might want to:
- Compare it with parent/sibling component header sizes
- Ensure it follows your design system's typography scale
Consider moving the headerStyle configuration to a theme or constants file to maintain consistency across the application.
...micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/subBoundaryView.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...icro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/CampaignBoundary.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Usermanagement css and boundaryScreen css
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
SubBoundaryViewcomponent.CampaignBoundarycomponent.Bug Fixes
UserManagementcomponent by removing the inbox count display from the header.These updates improve the visual presentation and localization capabilities of the components while maintaining existing functionality.