-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updates for 2024 Wfs (PR Testing, IBs, Patatrack, inputs) #44075
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44075/39037
|
A new Pull Request was created by @AdrianoDee for master. It involves the following packages:
@srimanob, @cmsbuild, @miquork, @sunilUIET, @AdrianoDee, @subirsarkar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
enable gpu |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals-INPUT RelValsValueError: Undefined workflows: 12834.7 RelVals-INPUTGPU Comparison SummarySummary:
|
222be81
to
f766eca
Compare
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-0f11bf/37674/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
GPU Comparison SummarySummary:
|
12434.7, # RelValTTbar_14TeV mkFit | ||
11634.0, # TTbar_14TeV 2021 | ||
13234.0, # RelValTTbar_14TeV 2021 FastsSim | ||
12434.0, # RelValTTbar_14TeV 2023 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
any strong reason to keep this in the system?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not really strong, actually. Seemed harmless to just keep one 2023 test for the moment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, just for the record, this is what is causing the changes explained at #44026 (comment).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi,
I think we should keep at least one workflow around, to monitor its healthy if we will have legacy wf later (not hlt part, of course).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should keep at least one workflow around, to monitor its healthy if we will have legacy wf later
not proposing to remove entirely btw, just in the limited matrix.
REMINDER @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio: This PR was tested with #44026, please check if they should be merged together |
+pdmv |
urgent |
@cms-sw/upgrade-l2 can you please have a look? |
+Upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This PR updates the wfs used in PR testing, IB test (standard and GPU). It includes f77b3b3 from @mmusich.
For the moment the 2023 wfs are kept as they are with the idea of reducing them later this year.
The default input GEN-SIM datasets for 2024 conditions are updated to
14_0_0_pre3
RelVals.