refactor: ♻️ import User from @user/domain #31
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve updating the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
libs/user/domain/src/lib/user.entity.ts (2)
1-1: Add JSDoc documentation and consider making the class immutable.As a domain entity, this class should be well-documented with JSDoc comments describing its purpose, properties, and usage. Additionally, consider making the entire class immutable to ensure data integrity.
+/** + * Represents a user entity in the domain. + * @immutable + */ export class User {
1-6: Consider enhancing the domain model with business methods.The current implementation is quite minimal for a domain entity. Consider adding:
- Domain-specific validation methods (e.g.,
isValid())- Business methods (e.g.,
updateName())- Value objects for complex properties
- Factory methods for common creation patterns
Example enhancement:
export class User { private constructor( public readonly id: string, private readonly _name: string, ) { this.validate(); } get name(): string { return this._name; } private validate(): void { if (!this.id?.trim()) { throw new Error('User ID cannot be empty'); } if (!this._name?.trim()) { throw new Error('User name cannot be empty'); } } public static create(id: string, name: string): User { return new User(id, name); } public withUpdatedName(newName: string): User { return new User(this.id, newName); } }apps/users-application/src/users/users.service.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM! Good architectural decision.Moving the
Usermodel to a separate domain package follows domain-driven design principles and improves modularity.
11-12: Consider adding error handling for invalid IDs.The implementation looks good and is type-safe. However, consider adding error handling for cases where the ID format is invalid or not found.
findById(id: string): User | undefined { + if (!id?.trim()) { + throw new Error('Invalid user ID'); + } return this.users.find((user) => user.id === id); }libs/user/domain/src/lib/user.entity.spec.ts (2)
4-8: Consider adding more test cases for ID validation.While the basic test case is good, consider adding tests for:
- Different ID formats (UUIDs, longer strings)
- Edge cases (empty strings, very long strings)
- Invalid inputs (if any validation exists)
3-15: Consider expanding test coverage with additional scenarios.The current test suite could be enhanced with these categories:
- Input validation tests (if any validation exists)
- Object comparison/equality tests
- Tests for any additional methods or properties
- Edge cases and error scenarios
This would provide more comprehensive coverage of the User entity's behavior.
apps/users-application/src/users/users.resolver.spec.ts (1)
50-54: LGTM! Consider adding edge case testsThe test cases for
resolveReferencemethod have been correctly updated to use string IDs. While the current coverage is good, consider adding tests for edge cases:
- Invalid ID format
- Empty string ID
- Non-User __typename
Would you like me to provide example test cases for these scenarios?
Also applies to: 60-61
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
apps/users-application/src/users/users.resolver.spec.ts(2 hunks)apps/users-application/src/users/users.resolver.ts(1 hunks)apps/users-application/src/users/users.service.spec.ts(2 hunks)apps/users-application/src/users/users.service.ts(1 hunks)libs/user/domain/README.md(1 hunks)libs/user/domain/eslint.config.js(1 hunks)libs/user/domain/jest.config.ts(1 hunks)libs/user/domain/project.json(1 hunks)libs/user/domain/src/index.ts(1 hunks)libs/user/domain/src/lib/user.entity.spec.ts(1 hunks)libs/user/domain/src/lib/user.entity.ts(1 hunks)libs/user/domain/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)libs/user/domain/tsconfig.lib.json(1 hunks)libs/user/domain/tsconfig.spec.json(1 hunks)tsconfig.base.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
- libs/user/domain/README.md
- libs/user/domain/eslint.config.js
- libs/user/domain/jest.config.ts
- libs/user/domain/project.json
- libs/user/domain/src/index.ts
- libs/user/domain/tsconfig.json
- libs/user/domain/tsconfig.lib.json
- libs/user/domain/tsconfig.spec.json
🔇 Additional comments (11)
libs/user/domain/src/lib/user.entity.ts (1)
3-3: Verify consistent ID type usage across the codebase.
Since this change is part of transitioning from number to string IDs, let's verify the consistency of this change across the codebase.
libs/user/domain/src/lib/user.entity.spec.ts (1)
1-1: LGTM!
The import statement correctly references the User entity from the local path.
apps/users-application/src/users/users.resolver.ts (3)
18-18: Verify federation reference handling
The ID type change in resolveReference is consistent with the getUser method. Since this affects GraphQL federation, ensure that other services in the federation can handle string IDs correctly.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other federation reference resolvers that might need updates
# Look for other resolveReference implementations
ast-grep --pattern '@ResolveReference()
$$$
resolveReference'11-11: Verify ID type consistency across the codebase
The change from number to string for the ID parameter aligns well with GraphQL's ID scalar type. However, we should ensure this change is consistently applied across all related components.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential inconsistencies in ID type usage
# Look for any remaining number type annotations for user IDs
ast-grep --pattern 'id: number'
# Check for potential GraphQL ID type declarations
rg -A 2 "@Args\({ name: 'id'"2-2: LGTM! Verify other User model imports
The import change aligns with the PR objective of refactoring User imports to use @user/domain.
✅ Verification successful
Import change verified - all User imports are consistent
The verification shows that all User imports across the codebase are already using either @user/domain or local relative imports within the domain package itself. No instances of the old import path ./models/user.model were found, confirming the migration is complete and consistent.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old-style User model imports that might need updating
rg -g '*.ts' "from './models/user.model'"
Length of output: 309
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any imports containing 'user.model'
rg "import.*user\.model"
# Search for any imports from old relative path containing models/user
rg "import.*from ['\"].*models/user['\"]"
# Search for User imports to verify migration completeness
rg "import.*\{ User \}.*from"
Length of output: 549
apps/users-application/src/users/users.service.spec.ts (2)
22-23: Verify consistent ID type usage across the codebase
The test cases have been properly updated to use string IDs. Let's verify this change is consistent throughout the codebase.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent usage of string IDs for User entity
# Check for any remaining numeric ID usage with User
ast-grep --pattern 'findById($ID)' | rg "[0-9]+"
# Check User-related files for consistent ID type
rg -g "*.ts" "id.*:.*number" -A 2 -B 2Also applies to: 27-27
2-2: Verify @user/domain module configuration
The import change aligns with the PR objective. Let's verify the module configuration is complete.
✅ Verification successful
Import from @user/domain is correctly configured
The module configuration is complete and correct:
- User entity exists in
libs/user/domain/src/lib/user.entity.ts - It's properly exported via the barrel file at
libs/user/domain/src/index.ts - The path alias
@user/domainis correctly configured intsconfig.base.json - The User class has been updated to use string IDs as per the PR objectives
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the @user/domain module configuration and exports
# Check if the module exists and has proper configuration
fd -t f "package.json|tsconfig.json" -p "libs/user/domain"
# Verify User entity is properly exported
rg -g "*.ts" "export.*User" "libs/user/domain"
Length of output: 520
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the module and imports
# Check for the existence of the user domain module
fd "user" -t d "libs"
# Look for User-related files in the libs directory
fd "user" -t f -e ts "libs"
# Search for User class definition and exports
rg -g "*.ts" "export.*class.*User" "libs"
# Check for path aliases in tsconfig
fd "tsconfig" -t f -x cat {} \; | grep -A 5 "paths"
Length of output: 722
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the path alias and exports for @user/domain
# Check the contents of user.entity.ts
cat "libs/user/domain/src/lib/user.entity.ts"
# Check for index files that might re-export the User
fd "index.ts" "libs/user/domain"
# Check tsconfig files specifically in the user domain module
fd "tsconfig" "libs/user"
Length of output: 333
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Final verification of the export chain
# Check the contents of the index.ts to verify User is properly exported
cat "libs/user/domain/src/index.ts"
# Check if the path alias is properly configured in root tsconfig
cat "tsconfig.base.json" | grep -A 10 "paths"
Length of output: 482
tsconfig.base.json (2)
18-24: LGTM! Clean formatting changes.
The path mappings are now consistently formatted, improving readability.
25-25: Verify the new @user/domain path mapping integration.
The addition of @user/domain path mapping aligns with the refactoring objective to centralize User-related domain logic.
Let's verify the proper setup and usage of this new path:
✅ Verification successful
Path mapping for @user/domain is properly integrated and utilized
The verification confirms:
- The target file
libs/user/domain/src/index.tsexists - The new path mapping is actively used in multiple files:
apps/users-application/src/users/users.resolver.tsapps/users-application/src/users/users.service.ts- And their respective test files
- No legacy import patterns were found that should be using the new path
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the domain files and their imports
# Check if the target file exists
if [ ! -f "libs/user/domain/src/index.ts" ]; then
echo "Error: Target file libs/user/domain/src/index.ts does not exist"
exit 1
fi
# Check for imports using the new path
echo "Checking usage of @user/domain imports:"
rg "from ['|\"]@user/domain" -l
# Verify there are no old import patterns that should be using the new path
echo "Checking for potential missed imports:"
rg "from ['|\"].*user.*model" -l
Length of output: 507
apps/users-application/src/users/users.resolver.spec.ts (2)
33-37: LGTM! Test cases properly handle string IDs
The test cases for getUser method have been correctly updated to use string IDs, maintaining consistency with the new User model type. Both successful and unsuccessful scenarios are properly covered.
Also applies to: 43-44
4-4: Verify TypeScript path alias configuration
The import statement uses the @user/domain path alias. Let's ensure it's properly configured.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify the path alias configuration.
Path alias @user/domain is correctly configured and used
The import statement is valid as:
- The path alias
@user/domainis properly configured intsconfig.base.json - The User class is correctly exported from
libs/user/domain/src/lib/user.entity.ts - The export is properly re-exported through the library's index.ts
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify TypeScript path alias configuration
# Check for tsconfig.json files that might define the @user/domain alias
fd tsconfig.json --exec sh -c 'echo "=== {} ==="; cat {}'
# Check if the User model exists in the expected location
fd -g "*/user/domain/**/User.{ts,js}" --exec echo "Found User model at: {}"
Length of output: 3103
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the root tsconfig.base.json for path mappings
echo "=== Checking root tsconfig.base.json for path mappings ==="
cat tsconfig.base.json
# Check if User model exists in the user domain library
echo -e "\n=== Checking for User model in user domain library ==="
fd -t f -e ts -e js . libs/user/domain --exec grep -l "export.*User"
Length of output: 1201
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the User entity file and index.ts
echo "=== Content of user.entity.ts ==="
cat libs/user/domain/src/lib/user.entity.ts
echo -e "\n=== Content of index.ts ==="
cat libs/user/domain/src/index.ts
Length of output: 365
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 1.0.0 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Related #24
Related #47
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Userclass for better representation of user entities.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores
Usermodel across various files.