feat: ✨ mongoose of user infrastructure #38
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Warning Rate limit exceeded@zhumeisongsong has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 24 minutes and 41 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
zhumeisongsong
changed the title
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/user.schema.ts (1)
10-10: Consider adding schema middleware and configuration.While the schema creation is correct, consider adding common middleware for user management:
Add these configurations after the schema creation:
// Add pre-save middleware for password hashing UserSchema.pre('save', async function(next) { if (this.isModified('passwordHash')) { // Add password hashing logic here } next(); }); // Add index for email field UserSchema.index({ email: 1 }, { unique: true }); // Add methods UserSchema.methods.comparePassword = async function(candidatePassword: string): Promise<boolean> { // Add password comparison logic here return true; };libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.ts (2)
7-10: Consider adding error handling for database connection issues.While the constructor implementation is correct, consider adding error handling to gracefully handle database connection issues or initialization failures.
export class MongooseUserRepository implements UserRepository { constructor( @InjectModel(UserDocument.name) private userModel: Model<UserDocument>, - ) {} + ) { + if (!userModel) { + throw new Error('UserModel is not initialized'); + } + }
7-16: Consider additional architectural improvements for the user repository.As this is part of the initial user infrastructure, consider the following architectural improvements:
- Document the repository interface contract with JSDoc comments
- Consider implementing a caching strategy for frequently accessed users
- Plan for additional user operations that might be needed (create, update, delete)
- Add logging for monitoring and debugging purposes
Example documentation:
/** * MongoDB implementation of the UserRepository interface. * @implements {UserRepository} */ export class MongooseUserRepository implements UserRepository { /** * Retrieves a user by their unique identifier. * @param {string} id - The unique identifier of the user * @returns {Promise<User | null>} The user if found, null otherwise * @throws {Error} If the database operation fails */ async findById(id: string): Promise<User | null>libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.spec.ts (1)
39-46: Add error handling test casesThe current tests only cover successful scenarios. Consider adding test cases for:
- Database errors
- Invalid ID format
- Network timeouts
Here's an example test case to add:
it('should handle database errors gracefully', async () => { jest.spyOn(userModel, 'findById').mockReturnValue({ exec: jest.fn().mockRejectedValue(new Error('Database connection failed')), } as unknown as any); await expect(repository.findById('1')).rejects.toThrow('Database connection failed'); });README.md (2)
59-59: Enhance the usecase(application) layer descriptionConsider expanding the description to better illustrate its role in the application architecture. For example:
-| usecase(application) | Define business use cases and encapsulate business logic. | +| usecase(application) | Define and implement application-specific business use cases that orchestrate the flow between the domain entities and infrastructure layers. Examples include user registration, authentication, and profile management. |
61-61: Remove redundant phrasing in repository descriptionThe phrase "specific details" is redundant. Consider simplifying:
-| repository(domain) | Interfaces (or abstract classes), which define methods for manipulating data without concern for specific database implementations. <br/>By defining this interface, we can decouple database access: the specific details of data access will be done by implementation classes, such as specific implementations using tools like Mongoose, TypeORM, Prisma, and so on. | +| repository(domain) | Interfaces (or abstract classes), which define methods for manipulating data without concern for specific database implementations. <br/>By defining this interface, we can decouple database access: data access details are handled by implementation classes using tools like Mongoose, TypeORM, Prisma, and so on. |🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~61-~61: This phrase is redundant. Consider writing “details”.
Context: ...e, we can decouple database access: the specific details of data access will be done by implemen...(SPECIFIC_DETAILS)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
README.md(1 hunks)libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/README.md(1 hunks)libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/eslint.config.js(1 hunks)libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/jest.config.ts(1 hunks)libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/project.json(1 hunks)libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/src/index.ts(1 hunks)libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.spec.ts(1 hunks)libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.ts(1 hunks)libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/user.schema.spec.ts(1 hunks)libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/user.schema.ts(1 hunks)libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.lib.json(1 hunks)libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.spec.json(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)tsconfig.base.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
- libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/README.md
- libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/eslint.config.js
- libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/jest.config.ts
- libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/project.json
- libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/src/index.ts
- libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.json
- libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.lib.json
- libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.spec.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[style] ~61-~61: This phrase is redundant. Consider writing “details”.
Context: ...e, we can decouple database access: the specific details of data access will be done by implemen...
(SPECIFIC_DETAILS)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/user.schema.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM! Imports are clean and well-organized.
The necessary decorators and types are properly imported, following the convention of framework imports before library imports.
1-10: Consider security and integration aspects of the user infrastructure.
As this is part of the initial user infrastructure setup:
- Ensure proper encryption for sensitive user data in transit and at rest
- Consider implementing rate limiting and brute force protection at the infrastructure level
- Plan for user data auditing and GDPR compliance
- Consider implementing soft delete functionality
- Plan for user session management integration
Let's verify the current security measures in place:
libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.ts (1)
1-5: LGTM! Clean imports following architecture principles.
The imports are well-organized, maintaining a clear separation between domain and infrastructure dependencies.
tsconfig.base.json (1)
21-23: LGTM! Path mapping follows the established pattern.
The new path mapping for @user/infrastructure-mongoose maintains consistency with the existing module structure and supports clean architecture by isolating infrastructure concerns.
Let's verify the target path exists:
✅ Verification successful
Path mapping and target file verified successfully
The verification confirms that both the directory structure libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose and the target file libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/src/index.ts exist in the codebase, validating the path mapping in tsconfig.base.json.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the Mongoose infrastructure module
# Expected: The target path and index file should exist
# Check if the directory structure exists
fd --type d "infrastructure/mongoose" libs/user
# Verify the index.ts file exists
fd --type f "index.ts" libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/src
Length of output: 155
libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/user.schema.spec.ts (1)
4-4: Verify security measures in the actual schema implementation
Let's verify that the actual UserDocument schema implements proper security measures.
✅ Verification successful
No security concerns found in the current schema implementation
The UserDocument schema is a simple implementation with only a required name field. There are no sensitive fields like passwords or personal information that would require additional security measures. The schema uses NestJS's mongoose decorators and follows proper typing with TypeScript.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the actual schema implementation for security measures
# Look for password field handling and any sensitive data exposure
rg -A 10 "password|secret|sensitive" ./libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/user.schema.ts
# Check for proper schema validation and security middleware
ast-grep --pattern 'schema.pre("save", function($$$) { $$$ })'
Length of output: 162
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check the content of the schema file
cat ./libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/user.schema.ts
# Also check for any mongoose schema definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'new Schema({
$$$
})'
# Look for any type definitions that might reveal the schema structure
ast-grep --pattern 'interface UserDocument {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 439
libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.spec.ts (2)
12-27: Consider expanding test coverage for all repository methods
The test setup only mocks the findById method. If the repository implements other methods, they should also be included in the mock and tested.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other methods in the repository implementation
# Search for methods in the repository implementation
echo "Checking repository implementation for other methods..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class MongooseUserRepository {
$$$
$_($$): $$ {
$$$
}
$$$
}'1-7: Verify the domain package dependency
The test imports User from '@user/domain'. Let's ensure this dependency is properly configured.
✅ Verification successful
The domain package dependency is properly configured
The import @user/domain is correctly set up in the monorepo:
- The path alias is properly configured in tsconfig.base.json
- The domain package exists at the correct location (libs/user/domain/)
- The package structure includes the necessary entity and repository files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the domain package dependency configuration
# Check if the domain package is listed in package.json
echo "Checking package.json for @user/domain dependency..."
jq '.dependencies["@user/domain"] // .devDependencies["@user/domain"]' package.json
# Check if the domain package exists in the workspace
echo "Checking for domain package in the workspace..."
fd -t d "domain" libs/user/
Length of output: 482
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the package.json in the mongoose package and its dependencies
# Check package.json in the mongoose package
echo "Checking package.json in mongoose package..."
cat libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/package.json
# Check if domain package is properly configured
echo -e "\nChecking domain package configuration..."
cat libs/user/domain/package.json
# Check project.json for dependencies
echo -e "\nChecking project.json for dependencies..."
cat libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/project.json
Length of output: 904
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the workspace configuration since this seems to be an Nx monorepo
# Check root package.json for workspace dependencies
echo "Checking root package.json..."
cat package.json
# Check tsconfig paths configuration
echo -e "\nChecking tsconfig paths..."
cat tsconfig.base.json
# List files in the domain directory to understand its structure
echo -e "\nListing domain package structure..."
ls -R libs/user/domain/
Length of output: 3301
package.json (2)
23-23: LGTM! Version compatibility is maintained.
The @nestjs/mongoose version ^10.1.0 aligns well with other @nestjs/* packages which are on version ^10.4.7.
29-29: Verify mongoose version compatibility and security.
Let's verify the mongoose version for any known vulnerabilities or compatibility issues.
✅ Verification successful
Mongoose version 8.8.1 is secure and compatible
The version 8.8.1 being used is:
- The current latest stable release
- Free from any known security vulnerabilities (all reported vulnerabilities affect versions < 6.4.6)
- Compatible with the latest @nestjs/mongoose 10.1.0
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check mongoose version compatibility and security advisories
# Check latest versions from npm
echo "Latest mongoose versions:"
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/mongoose | jq -r '."dist-tags"'
# Check for security advisories
echo -e "\nSecurity advisories for mongoose:"
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "mongoose") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
# Check NestJS compatibility matrix
echo -e "\nChecking @nestjs/mongoose compatibility:"
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/@nestjs/mongoose | jq -r '."dist-tags"'
Length of output: 2034
README.md (1)
57-62: Architecture documentation effectively captures the clean architecture pattern
The updated architecture section clearly defines the layers and their responsibilities, establishing a solid foundation for the user infrastructure. The separation between domain, application, and infrastructure layers follows clean architecture principles, which will facilitate maintainability and testability.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~61-~61: This phrase is redundant. Consider writing “details”.
Context: ...e, we can decouple database access: the specific details of data access will be done by implemen...
(SPECIFIC_DETAILS)
libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/user/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
61-61: Minor: Remove redundancy in repository layer descriptionThe phrase "specific details" is redundant as "details" alone conveys the same meaning.
-| repository(domain) | Interfaces (or abstract classes), which define methods for manipulating data without concern for specific database implementations. <br/>By defining this interface, we can decouple database access: the specific details of data access will be done by implementation classes, such as specific implementations using tools like Mongoose, TypeORM, Prisma, and so on. | +| repository(domain) | Interfaces (or abstract classes), which define methods for manipulating data without concern for specific database implementations. <br/>By defining this interface, we can decouple database access: the details of data access will be handled by implementation classes using tools like Mongoose, TypeORM, Prisma, and so on. |🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~61-~61: This phrase is redundant. Consider writing “details”.
Context: ...e, we can decouple database access: the specific details of data access will be done by implemen...(SPECIFIC_DETAILS)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[style] ~61-~61: This phrase is redundant. Consider writing “details”.
Context: ...e, we can decouple database access: the specific details of data access will be done by implemen...
(SPECIFIC_DETAILS)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)
62-62: LGTM! Comprehensive mongoose layer description
The mongoose(infrastructure) layer description effectively communicates its role, responsibilities, and relationship with other layers. It provides clear examples and maintains consistency with the clean architecture principles.
…ration-workspace into feature/user-infrastructure
…ration-workspace into feature/user-infrastructure
Copilot
AI
left a comment
Copilot
AI
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot reviewed 5 out of 14 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 suggestion.
Files not reviewed (9)
- libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/project.json: Language not supported
- libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.json: Language not supported
- libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.lib.json: Language not supported
- libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.spec.json: Language not supported
- tsconfig.base.json: Language not supported
- README.md: Evaluated as low risk
- libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/README.md: Evaluated as low risk
- libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/eslint.config.js: Evaluated as low risk
- libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/jest.config.ts: Evaluated as low risk
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/user.schema.ts (1)
10-10: Consider adding schema middleware for common operations.While the schema creation is correct, consider enhancing it with middleware for common operations:
- Password hashing before save
- Case-insensitive email handling
Example enhancement:
// Add after schema creation UserSchema.pre('save', async function(next) { if (this.isModified('password')) { // Add password hashing logic here } next(); }); // Add case-insensitive email collation UserSchema.index({ email: 1 }, { unique: true, collation: { locale: 'en', strength: 2 } });libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.ts (1)
7-16: Consider implementing additional common repository methodsAs this is part of the user management infrastructure, consider implementing these common repository methods:
findByEmailorfindByUsernamefor authenticationcreatefor user registrationupdatefor profile managementdeletefor account removalfindAllwith pagination for admin purposesThis would provide a complete set of operations for user management.
libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.spec.ts (3)
8-28: Enhance test setup robustness and type safety.While the basic setup is good, consider these improvements:
- Provide a complete mock implementation of the UserDocument model interface.
- Avoid using
anytype assertions by properly typing the mock object.- Add error handling test scenarios.
Consider this improved mock setup:
{ provide: getModelToken(UserDocument.name), useValue: { - findById: jest.fn(), + findById: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(), + exec: jest.fn(), + // Add other methods that might be needed } as Partial<Model<UserDocument>>, },
39-46: Enhance negative test case coverage.The "user not found" test could be improved with:
- Verification of method calls.
- More descriptive test name.
- Additional edge cases.
Consider this enhanced version:
-it('should return null when user is not found', async () => { +it('should return null when findById returns no document', async () => { + const userId = '1'; jest.spyOn(userModel, 'findById').mockReturnValue({ exec: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(null), } as any); - const user = await repository.findById('1'); + const user = await repository.findById(userId); + expect(userModel.findById).toHaveBeenCalledWith(userId); + expect(userModel.findById().exec).toHaveBeenCalled(); expect(user).toBeNull(); }); +it('should handle invalid ObjectId format', async () => { + const invalidId = 'invalid-id'; + jest.spyOn(userModel, 'findById').mockImplementation(() => { + throw new Error('Invalid ObjectId format'); + }); + + await expect(repository.findById(invalidId)).rejects.toThrow(); +});
1-47: Consider implementing a complete repository test suite.While the current tests cover the basic findById functionality, consider creating a comprehensive test suite that:
- Verifies all methods defined in the UserRepository interface.
- Includes a shared test suite for repository contract verification.
- Adds integration tests with an in-memory MongoDB instance.
Would you like assistance in setting up a complete repository test suite structure?
README.md (1)
64-64: Consider removing redundant wordingThe repository layer description contains redundant phrasing.
-| repository(domain) | Interfaces (or abstract classes), which define methods for manipulating data without concern for specific database implementations. <br/>By defining this interface, we can decouple database access: the specific details of data access will be done by implementation classes, such as specific implementations using tools like Mongoose, TypeORM, Prisma, and so on. | +| repository(domain) | Interfaces (or abstract classes), which define methods for manipulating data without concern for specific database implementations. <br/>By defining this interface, we can decouple database access: data access will be handled by implementation classes using tools like Mongoose, TypeORM, Prisma, and so on. |🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~64-~64: This phrase is redundant. Consider writing “details”.
Context: ...e, we can decouple database access: the specific details of data access will be done by implemen...(SPECIFIC_DETAILS)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
README.md(1 hunks)libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/README.md(1 hunks)libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/eslint.config.js(1 hunks)libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/jest.config.ts(1 hunks)libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/project.json(1 hunks)libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/index.ts(1 hunks)libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.spec.ts(1 hunks)libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.ts(1 hunks)libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/user.schema.spec.ts(1 hunks)libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/user.schema.ts(1 hunks)libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.lib.json(1 hunks)libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.spec.json(1 hunks)tsconfig.base.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
- libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/README.md
- libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/eslint.config.js
- libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/jest.config.ts
- libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/project.json
- libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/index.ts
- libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.json
- libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.lib.json
- libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.spec.json
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- tsconfig.base.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[style] ~64-~64: This phrase is redundant. Consider writing “details”.
Context: ...e, we can decouple database access: the specific details of data access will be done by implemen...
(SPECIFIC_DETAILS)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/user.schema.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM! Imports are clean and necessary.
The imports are correctly structured and include all required dependencies for the schema definition.
1-10: Verify schema integration with the rest of the system.
Let's ensure this schema is properly integrated with:
- Repository implementation
- GraphQL types
- NestJS module configuration
✅ Verification successful
Schema integration is properly implemented across the system
The verification shows that the UserSchema is well integrated:
- Repository implementation (
mongoose-user.repository.ts) correctly uses UserDocument and implements UserRepository interface - GraphQL integration exists through UserDto with matching fields (
@ObjectType()with id and name fields) - Proper domain model imports in the repository (
@user/domain)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for repository implementation and module configuration
echo "Checking repository implementation..."
rg -l "UserDocument|UserSchema" --type ts
echo "Checking NestJS module configuration..."
ast-grep --pattern 'MongooseModule.forFeature([{
$$$
schema: UserSchema,
$$$
}])' --lang ts
echo "Checking GraphQL type definitions..."
rg "type User" --type graphql
Length of output: 732
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the repository implementation and module configuration in detail
echo "Checking repository implementation details..."
rg "class.*Repository" -A 5 libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.ts
echo "Checking module configuration..."
rg "MongooseModule" -A 5 --type ts
echo "Checking GraphQL types with different extension..."
fd . -e gql -e graphql
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
# If no .gql/.graphql files, check TypeScript files for GraphQL decorators
echo "Checking TypeScript files for GraphQL type definitions..."
ast-grep --pattern '@ObjectType()
class User {
$$$
}' --lang ts
fi
Length of output: 2086
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for the module configuration of UserSchema and GraphQL types in TypeScript files
echo "Checking UserSchema module configuration..."
rg "UserSchema" -B 5 -A 5 --type ts
echo "Checking for GraphQL User type in TypeScript..."
rg "@ObjectType\(\)|@InputType\(\)" -B 1 -A 10 --type ts | grep -A 10 -B 1 "class.*User"
echo "Checking imports in repository implementation..."
rg "import.*User" libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.ts
Length of output: 1845
libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.ts (3)
7-10: LGTM! Well-structured repository implementation
The repository class follows NestJS best practices with proper dependency injection and interface implementation.
1-5: Verify the UserDocument schema implementation
The imports look clean and follow proper layering. However, we should verify that the referenced schema file exists and is properly implemented.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the actual implementation of the schema file since we confirmed its existence.
Schema implementation is properly structured and follows NestJS conventions
The UserDocument schema is correctly implemented with:
- Proper imports from
@nestjs/mongoose - Schema decorator and document inheritance
- Required name property with Prop decorator
- Schema factory export
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and implementation of user.schema.ts
# Check if the schema file exists in the same directory
fd -t f "user.schema.ts" "$(dirname "libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.ts")"
# Verify the schema implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'export class UserDocument {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 266
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of user.schema.ts to verify proper implementation
cat libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/user.schema.ts
# Also verify if it's properly using mongoose decorators
ast-grep --pattern '@Schema()
export class UserDocument {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 406
12-15:
Add error handling and improve type safety
The current implementation has several potential issues:
- No error handling for invalid MongoDB ObjectId format
- No validation of required fields when mapping to User entity
- Missing type safety in the document to entity mapping
Consider implementing this safer version:
async findById(id: string): Promise<User | null> {
+ try {
const userDoc = await this.userModel.findById(id).exec();
- return userDoc ? new User(userDoc.id, userDoc.name) : null;
+ if (!userDoc || !userDoc.id || !userDoc.name) {
+ return null;
+ }
+ return new User(userDoc.id, userDoc.name);
+ } catch (error) {
+ if (error.name === 'CastError') {
+ return null;
+ }
+ throw error;
+ }
}libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/user.schema.spec.ts (1)
1-4: Verify the UserDocument schema implementation
The imports look correct, but we need to ensure that the UserDocument schema is properly implemented with the required fields and validation rules.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the UserDocument schema implementation to provide a complete verification.
The imports are correct and match the schema implementation
The imports in the test file correctly match the actual UserDocument schema implementation. The schema is properly defined with a required 'name' field using NestJS's @Prop decorator and Mongoose's Schema functionality. The test file imports all the necessary dependencies to work with this schema.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the UserDocument schema implementation
# Expected: Find the schema definition with validation rules
# Search for the schema definition
ast-grep --pattern 'Schema({
$$$
})'
# Search for specific validation rules in the schema
rg -A 5 "required: true" ./libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib
Length of output: 530
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete UserDocument schema implementation
cat ./libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/user.schema.ts
# Check if there are any other required fields or validation rules
rg -A 2 "@Prop" ./libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/user.schema.ts
Length of output: 462
libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.spec.ts (1)
1-7: LGTM! Clean imports following domain-driven design.
The imports are well-organized and follow clean architecture principles with clear separation between infrastructure and domain layers.
README.md (1)
61-62: LGTM! Clear and well-structured architecture layers
The new mongoose(infrastructure) layer is well-documented with clear responsibilities, and the renaming of use-case to use-case(application) improves clarity about its role in the architecture.
libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/index.ts (1)
1-2: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments.The exports are well-organized, following a clean architecture pattern by separating the repository implementation from the schema definition. Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the public API.
+/** + * @packageDocumentation + * Mongoose implementation of the user infrastructure layer + */ + +/** Export the mongoose repository implementation */ export * from './lib/mongoose-user.repository'; + +/** Export the mongoose schema and document type */ export * from './lib/user.schema';libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/eslint.config.js (1)
1-1: Consider using workspace-relative paths instead of relative pathsThe current path traversal (
../../../../) is fragile and could break if the directory structure changes. Consider using workspace-relative paths or module aliases for better maintainability.-const baseConfig = require('../../../../eslint.config.js'); +const baseConfig = require('@workspace/eslint-config');libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/README.md (1)
5-7: Enhance testing documentationWhile the basic test command is provided, consider adding:
- Different testing scenarios (e.g., integration tests)
- Test coverage information
- Instructions for running specific test suites
## Running unit tests Run `nx test users-infrastructure-mongoose` to execute the unit tests via [Jest](https://jestjs.io). + +### Test Scenarios + +- Run specific test suite: + ```bash + nx test users-infrastructure-mongoose --testFile=user-repository.spec.ts + ``` + +- Run with coverage: + ```bash + nx test users-infrastructure-mongoose --coverage + ``` + +### Test Structure + +- `user-repository.spec.ts`: Tests for MongooseUserRepository implementation +- `user-schema.spec.ts`: Tests for Mongoose Schema validationlibs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/user.schema.ts (1)
10-10: Consider adding Mongoose middleware and plugins.While the schema creation is correct, consider enhancing it with:
- Password hashing middleware
- Validation plugins
- Custom methods or query helpers
Example enhancement:
export const UserSchema = SchemaFactory.createForClass(UserDocument); + +// Add password hashing middleware +UserSchema.pre('save', async function(next) { + if (this.isModified('password')) { + // Hash password here + } + next(); +}); + +// Add custom methods +UserSchema.methods.comparePassword = async function(candidatePassword: string): Promise<boolean> { + // Implement password comparison + return true; +};libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.lib.json (1)
3-8: Review compiler options for Mongoose integrationThe compiler options look good for a Node.js backend library using Mongoose. However, there are some potential enhancements to consider:
Consider adding these compiler options for better type safety with Mongoose:
{ "extends": "./tsconfig.json", "compilerOptions": { "module": "commonjs", "outDir": "../../../../dist/out-tsc", "declaration": true, - "types": ["node"] + "types": ["node"], + "strict": true, + "esModuleInterop": true, + "skipLibCheck": true },These additions will:
- Enable strict type checking for better type safety
- Improve compatibility with Mongoose's TypeScript definitions
- Skip type checking of declaration files for better build performance
libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.spec.json (1)
1-14: Consider using path aliases for better maintainabilitySince this is part of a new infrastructure layer, consider using TypeScript path aliases in the base tsconfig.json to make imports more maintainable and reduce the need for relative paths.
Example addition to the base tsconfig.json:
{ "compilerOptions": { "paths": { "@infrastructure/*": ["libs/*/infrastructure/*"], "@users/*": ["libs/users/*"] } } }libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/project.json (2)
6-6: Add scope and type tags for better project organizationTags help in organizing and constraining dependencies between projects in an NX workspace.
Apply this diff to add relevant tags:
- "tags": [], + "tags": ["scope:users", "type:infrastructure"]
7-7: Use proper JSON commentsThe current comment about targets uses JavaScript-style commenting which isn't valid JSON. Consider moving this information to the README.md file or using a JSON-compatible comment format.
Apply this diff to fix the comment format:
- "// targets": "to see all targets run: nx show project users-infrastructure-mongoose --web", + "$comment": "to see all targets run: nx show project users-infrastructure-mongoose --web"libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.ts (1)
7-10: Consider enhancing type safety with a generic type parameter.While the current implementation is correct, we can make it more type-safe by explicitly defining the document type.
-export class MongooseUserRepository implements UserRepository { +export class MongooseUserRepository implements UserRepository { constructor( - @InjectModel(UserDocument.name) private userModel: Model<UserDocument>, + @InjectModel(UserDocument.name) private userModel: Model<UserDocument, Record<string, unknown>>, ) {}libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/user.schema.spec.ts (1)
1-5: Consider adding mongoose testing utilitiesFor comprehensive schema validation testing, consider importing
MongooseModuleandMongoMemoryServerfor proper schema validation in an isolated environment.Add these imports:
import { Test, TestingModule } from '@nestjs/testing'; import { getModelToken } from '@nestjs/mongoose'; import { Model } from 'mongoose'; import { UserDocument } from './user.schema'; +import { MongooseModule } from '@nestjs/mongoose'; +import { MongoMemoryServer } from 'mongodb-memory-server';libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.spec.ts (1)
8-28: Consider enhancing the test setup for future extensibility.While the current setup works for these tests, consider creating a more comprehensive mock implementation of the UserDocument model to support future test cases.
- useValue: { - findById: jest.fn(), - }, + useValue: { + findById: jest.fn(), + create: jest.fn(), + findOne: jest.fn(), + find: jest.fn(), + updateOne: jest.fn(), + deleteOne: jest.fn(), + },README.md (1)
64-64: Minor: Remove redundant phrasing in repository layer description.The phrase "specific details" is redundant as "details" alone conveys the same meaning.
-By defining this interface, we can decouple database access: the specific details of data access will be done by implementation classes, such as specific implementations using tools like Mongoose, TypeORM, Prisma, and so on. +By defining this interface, we can decouple database access: the details of data access will be handled by implementation classes, such as specific implementations using tools like Mongoose, TypeORM, Prisma, and so on.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~64-~64: This phrase is redundant. Consider writing “details”.
Context: ...e, we can decouple database access: the specific details of data access will be done by implemen...(SPECIFIC_DETAILS)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
README.md(1 hunks)libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/README.md(1 hunks)libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/eslint.config.js(1 hunks)libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/jest.config.ts(1 hunks)libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/project.json(1 hunks)libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/index.ts(1 hunks)libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.spec.ts(1 hunks)libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.ts(1 hunks)libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/user.schema.spec.ts(1 hunks)libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/user.schema.ts(1 hunks)libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.lib.json(1 hunks)libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.spec.json(1 hunks)tsconfig.base.json(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[style] ~64-~64: This phrase is redundant. Consider writing “details”.
Context: ...e, we can decouple database access: the specific details of data access will be done by implemen...
(SPECIFIC_DETAILS)
🔇 Additional comments (23)
libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/eslint.config.js (1)
1-3: Verify the base ESLint configuration path
Let's ensure the base configuration file exists at the specified path and is properly referenced.
✅ Verification successful
Base ESLint configuration path is correctly referenced
The base ESLint configuration file exists at the repository root (eslint.config.js) and exports a valid configuration array that includes NX ESLint plugins and rules. The relative path ../../../../eslint.config.js from libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/eslint.config.js correctly points to this base configuration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and structure of the base ESLint config
# Check if the base config exists
if [ -f "eslint.config.js" ]; then
echo "Base config exists at repository root"
# Show the structure of the base config
cat eslint.config.js
else
echo "Warning: Base config not found at repository root"
# Search for any ESLint config files
fd -e js -e cjs -e json -g "*eslint*config*"
fi
Length of output: 888
libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/user.schema.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM! Imports are clean and follow NestJS best practices.
1-10: Verify uniqueness of user schema implementation.
Let's ensure there are no duplicate or conflicting user schema implementations in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try another search strategy to ensure we catch all possible user schema implementations:
User schema implementation is unique and properly structured
The verification confirms that:
- There is only one Mongoose schema implementation for users in
libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/user.schema.ts - The implementation follows a clean architecture pattern with proper separation of concerns:
- Domain entity in
libs/user/domain/src/lib/user.entity.ts - Mongoose schema for persistence
- Repository implementation in
libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.ts - DTOs for presentation in
libs/users/presentation/dto/src/lib/user.dto.ts
- Domain entity in
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other user schema implementations
echo "Searching for other user schema definitions..."
rg -l "class.*User.*extends.*Document" --type typescript
echo "Searching for mongoose schema definitions..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ extends Document {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 686
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for files containing "user" and "schema" case-insensitive
echo "Searching for user schema related files..."
fd -i "user.*schema" -t f
# Search for mongoose schema definitions with "user" in the name
echo "Searching for mongoose schema patterns with 'user'..."
rg -i "class.*user.*\{" -A 5
# Search for mongoose schema factory usage with "user"
echo "Searching for SchemaFactory usage with 'user'..."
rg -i "schemaFactory.*user" -A 2
Length of output: 4709
libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.lib.json (2)
9-10: LGTM! File filtering configuration is appropriate
The exclude and include patterns are well-configured for a library:
- Properly excludes test files
- Includes only TypeScript source files
- Excludes Jest configuration
5-5: Verify the output directory structure
The output path ../../../../dist/out-tsc uses multiple parent directory references which can be fragile. Consider using a more robust path resolution approach.
Consider:
- Using workspace-level path aliases
- Implementing a more maintainable path resolution strategy through the base configuration
libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.spec.json (3)
5-6: LGTM: Appropriate compiler configuration for testing
The configuration correctly:
- Uses CommonJS modules which is compatible with Jest
- Includes necessary type definitions for Jest and Node
8-13: Verify test file coverage patterns
The include patterns look good but let's verify they match your actual test files.
✅ Verification successful
Test file patterns are correctly configured
The configured patterns in tsconfig.spec.json correctly cover all test files in the codebase:
- All test files follow the
.spec.tspattern - Found test files:
mongoose-user.repository.spec.tsanduser.schema.spec.ts - No test files with other patterns (
.test.ts) were found - No test code was found in non-test files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all test files in the directory match the configured patterns
# Expected: No test files should be missed by these patterns
# Check for any test files that might not be covered by the current patterns
cd libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose && \
fd . -t f -e ts -E "*.d.ts" src/ | grep -vE "(test|spec|d)\.ts$" | \
while read -r file; do
if grep -l "describe\|test\|it(" "$file" > /dev/null; then
echo "Warning: Potential test file not covered by patterns: $file"
fi
done
Length of output: 334
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the existence and patterns of test files
cd libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose && \
echo "Test files found:" && \
fd . -t f -e ts src/ | grep -E "(test|spec)\.ts$"
echo -e "\nAll TypeScript files for reference:" && \
fd . -t f -e ts src/
Length of output: 456
4-4: Verify the output directory path
The output directory path uses a relative path with multiple parent directory traversals. While this works, it could be fragile if the project structure changes.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the TypeScript configuration patterns in the project to make a well-informed decision.
Output directory path is correctly configured
The relative path "../../../../dist/out-tsc" is actually the correct and consistent pattern across the project. This is a standard setup in an Nx monorepo where:
- All spec configurations across apps and libs use the same relative path pattern to the workspace root's
dist/out-tsc - The path is relative to each module's location, explaining the different levels of parent traversal
- The root
tsconfig.base.jsonconfirms this is a properly structured Nx workspace with correct path mappings - While the output directory is not present in the filesystem, this is expected as it's typically created during build time
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the output directory structure exists and is consistent across the project
# Expected: Similar patterns in other tsconfig files for consistency
# Check if the output directory pattern is consistent across the project
fd tsconfig.spec.json | xargs grep -l "dist/out-tsc"
# Verify the actual directory structure
fd . -t d -d 4 | grep "dist/out-tsc" || echo "Output directory not found"
Length of output: 646
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the base tsconfig.json files to understand the project-wide output directory configuration
fd tsconfig.json -E "*.spec.json" | xargs grep -l "dist/out-tsc"
# Check if there's a root level tsconfig.json that might define the base configuration
cat tsconfig.base.json 2>/dev/null || cat tsconfig.json 2>/dev/null
# Check if there's any nx configuration that might define the output structure
cat nx.json 2>/dev/null
Length of output: 2274
libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/jest.config.ts (3)
1-10: LGTM! The Jest configuration follows best practices.
The configuration is well-structured and includes all necessary settings for testing a Node.js/TypeScript module:
- Appropriate test environment for Mongoose/MongoDB testing
- Proper TypeScript support with ts-jest
- Coverage reporting configured
- Correct file extensions for the tech stack
6-6: Verify the existence of tsconfig.spec.json
The ts-jest configuration references a TypeScript configuration file for tests.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of tsconfig.spec.json
# Expected: File should exist in the same directory as jest.config.ts
# Check if the file exists in the module directory
if [ -f "libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.spec.json" ]; then
echo "Content of tsconfig.spec.json:"
cat libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.spec.json
else
echo "tsconfig.spec.json not found in module directory"
fi3-3: Verify the existence of jest.preset.js
The configuration references a shared Jest preset file. Let's ensure it exists and is properly configured.
✅ Verification successful
Jest preset configuration is valid and properly used across the project
The jest.preset.js file exists in the root directory and extends the @nx/jest/preset, which is the recommended setup for NX monorepos. The preset is consistently used across multiple Jest configurations in the project with correct relative paths, including the one under review.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and content of jest.preset.js
# Expected: File should exist and contain valid Jest preset configuration
if [ -f "jest.preset.js" ]; then
echo "Content of jest.preset.js:"
cat jest.preset.js
else
echo "jest.preset.js not found in root directory"
fi
Length of output: 468
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try searching for jest.preset.js in the repository root
fd --type f --full-path jest.preset.js
# Also check if there are any other Jest preset files that might be relevant
fd --type f --glob '*jest.preset*'
# Let's also check package.json in the root for any Jest-related configuration
if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
echo "Checking package.json for Jest configuration:"
cat package.json | grep -A 10 '"jest":'
fi
Length of output: 586
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of jest.preset.js since we confirmed it exists
cat jest.preset.js
# Also check if there are any other Jest configs that might be importing this preset
rg "preset.*jest\.preset\.js" -g "jest.config.*"
Length of output: 1049
libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.json (2)
3-11: LGTM! Compiler options follow TypeScript best practices.
The configuration enforces strict type checking and includes important safety checks that will help catch potential issues early in development.
1-22: Verify the existence of referenced TypeScript configurations.
The configuration references several other TypeScript files that should exist:
- Base configuration:
../../../../tsconfig.base.json - Library configuration:
./tsconfig.lib.json - Test configuration:
./tsconfig.spec.json
✅ Verification successful
All referenced TypeScript configuration files are present ✓
The verification confirms that all required TypeScript configuration files exist:
- Root level
tsconfig.base.json tsconfig.lib.jsonin the mongoose directorytsconfig.spec.jsonin the mongoose directory
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of referenced TypeScript configuration files
echo "Checking for referenced TypeScript configurations..."
# Check base configuration
if [ -f tsconfig.base.json ]; then
echo "✓ Base configuration exists"
else
echo "✗ Missing base configuration: tsconfig.base.json"
fi
# Check library and test configurations
cd libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose
for config in tsconfig.lib.json tsconfig.spec.json; do
if [ -f "$config" ]; then
echo "✓ $config exists"
else
echo "✗ Missing configuration: $config"
fi
done
Length of output: 548
libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.ts (3)
1-5: LGTM! Imports are well-organized.
The imports are properly structured, following the convention of external dependencies first, followed by internal modules.
12-15:
Add error handling for invalid ObjectId format.
The current implementation might throw an error if the provided id is not a valid MongoDB ObjectId format. Consider adding error handling to gracefully handle such cases.
async findById(id: string): Promise<User | null> {
+ try {
const userDoc = await this.userModel.findById(id).exec();
- return userDoc ? new User(userDoc.id, userDoc.name) : null;
+ return userDoc ? new User(userDoc._id, userDoc.name) : null;
+ } catch (error) {
+ if (error.name === 'CastError') {
+ return null;
+ }
+ throw error;
+ }
}The suggestion to use userDoc._id instead of userDoc.id from the previous review is still applicable.
2-2: Verify domain interface compatibility.
Let's ensure the implementation matches the domain interface requirements.
✅ Verification successful
Import and implementation are correctly aligned with domain requirements
The MongooseUserRepository properly implements the UserRepository interface from the domain:
- The import statement correctly references
@user/domain - The implementation includes all required methods (
findById) - Method signatures match exactly, including return types
- The implementation properly handles the domain entity conversion
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the UserRepository interface definition and its usage
# Check the interface definition
ast-grep --pattern 'interface UserRepository {
$$$
findById(id: string): Promise<$_>
$$$
}'
# Check for other required methods in the interface that might need implementation
rg -t typescript "interface UserRepository" -A 10
Length of output: 406
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify both the interface and implementation
# First, check the domain interface definition
cat libs/user/domain/src/lib/user.repository.ts
# Then check the mongoose implementation
cat libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.ts
# Also check if there are any other methods being used across the codebase
rg "UserRepository\." -A 2
Length of output: 806
tsconfig.base.json (2)
25-27: LGTM! Path mapping follows established conventions.
The new path mapping for @users/infrastructure-mongoose follows the project's established naming conventions and module organization patterns, maintaining consistency with existing infrastructure implementations like @shared/infrastructure-mongoose.
25-27: Verify the target file structure.
Let's ensure the target file exists and has the expected exports.
✅ Verification successful
File structure and exports are correctly configured
The verification confirms that:
- The target path
libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/index.tsexists - The index file correctly exports the repository and schema modules
- All expected files are present:
- Repository implementation and tests
- Schema definition and tests
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and structure of the mongoose infrastructure files
# Check if the target file exists
if [ -f "libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/index.ts" ]; then
echo "✓ Target file exists"
# Check the exports in index.ts
echo "Checking exports in index.ts:"
cat libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/index.ts
# Look for expected repository and schema files
echo -e "\nChecking for repository and schema files:"
fd -e ts . libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib
else
echo "✗ Target file not found at libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/index.ts"
fi
Length of output: 739
libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/user.schema.spec.ts (1)
4-4: Verify the corresponding schema file exists
Ensure that the user.schema.ts file exists and contains the proper schema definition that these tests are validating.
✅ Verification successful
Schema file exists with proper definition
The verification confirms that user.schema.ts exists and contains the proper schema definition with:
UserDocumentclass extendingDocument- Required
namefield properly decorated - Exported
UserSchemacreated from the class
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the schema file exists and contains the necessary definitions
fd -e ts "user.schema.ts" | xargs cat
# Look for mongoose schema definition
ast-grep --pattern 'export class UserDocument {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 370
libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.spec.ts (2)
1-7: LGTM! Well-structured imports following clean architecture principles.
The imports are logically organized and demonstrate good separation of concerns between domain and infrastructure layers.
1-47: Verify the MongooseUserRepository implementation.
Let's ensure the repository implementation matches these test cases.
✅ Verification successful
Implementation matches test cases perfectly
The MongooseUserRepository implementation aligns exactly with the test cases:
- Uses
findByIdwith Mongoose model as tested - Returns
new User(id, name)when document is found - Returns
nullwhen document is not found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find and display the repository implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class MongooseUserRepository {
$$$
findById($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 97
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the repository implementation
# First, let's locate the file
fd "mongoose-user.repository.ts" --type f --exclude "*.spec.ts"
# Then let's examine its content
rg -A 10 "class MongooseUserRepository"
Length of output: 1234
README.md (2)
61-61: LGTM! Clear and comprehensive layer description.
The mongoose(infrastructure) layer description effectively communicates its responsibilities and relationship with the domain layer.
57-64: LGTM! Well-structured architecture documentation.
The architecture table effectively communicates the layered design, with clear separation of concerns and responsibilities for each layer. The renaming of use-case to use-case(application) adds clarity to its role.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~64-~64: This phrase is redundant. Consider writing “details”.
Context: ...e, we can decouple database access: the specific details of data access will be done by implemen...
(SPECIFIC_DETAILS)
libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/users/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/mongoose-user.repository.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 1.1.0 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Closes: #39
Related: #47
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
MongooseUserRepositoryfor user data retrieval in MongoDB.Documentation
users-infrastructure-mongooselibrary with testing instructions.Tests
MongooseUserRepositoryandUserDocumentschema.Chores