feat: ✨ add @shared/infrastructure-mongoose #42
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several modifications primarily focused on configuration management within the application. Key changes include updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Warning Rate limit exceeded@zhumeisongsong has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 3 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/database.module.spec.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 9.15.0 TypeError: Error while loading rule '@typescript-eslint/no-unused-expressions': Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'allowShortCircuit') 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
…ration-workspace into feature/shared-infrastructure
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
.env.sample (2)
12-12: Consider using 127.0.0.1 instead of localhostWhile both
localhostand127.0.0.1typically resolve to the loopback address, using127.0.0.1can be more reliable as it:
- Avoids potential DNS resolution overhead
- Prevents issues in environments with modified host files
- Is more consistent across different operating systems
-DATABASE_HOST=localhost +DATABASE_HOST=127.0.0.1
14-14: Review database naming conventionThe database name
product_a_mainsuggests a multi-product architecture. Consider:
- Documenting the naming convention for other developers
- Adding a comment explaining the significance of the
_mainsuffix- Ensuring this aligns with your database isolation strategy
libs/shared/config/src/lib/database.config.ts (3)
Line range hint
4-8: Add 'name' field to database schema validationThe schema validation is missing the newly added 'name' field, which could lead to runtime issues if an invalid value is provided.
Apply this diff to update the schema:
const databaseSchema = z.object({ host: z.string().min(1), port: z.coerce.number().int().min(1).max(65535), + name: z.string(), });
Line range hint
8-8: Review port coercion edge casesThe current port coercion might have edge cases with non-numeric strings. While Zod handles basic coercion, explicit handling would be more robust.
Consider adding a custom validation for the port:
const validatePort = (value: unknown): number => { const port = Number(value); if (isNaN(port) || port < 1 || port > 65535) { throw new Error('Invalid port number'); } return port; }; // Then in schema: port: z.unknown().transform(validatePort),Also applies to: 14-14
Line range hint
1-19: Consider adding connection URL builderSince this is part of a Mongoose infrastructure setup, it would be helpful to add a method to construct the MongoDB connection URL.
Consider adding a method like:
export const getMongoConnectionUrl = (config: DatabaseConfig): string => { const { host, port, name } = config; return `mongodb://${host}:${port}/${name}`; };This would centralize the connection string creation and make it consistent across the application.
libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/database.module.ts (1)
1-21: Add authentication support and security considerationsThe current implementation lacks authentication support which is crucial for production environments.
Consider these security improvements:
- Add support for authentication credentials:
uri: `mongodb://${databaseConfig.username}:${databaseConfig.password}@${databaseConfig.host}:${databaseConfig.port}`,
- Add SSL/TLS support for encrypted connections:
ssl: true, sslValidate: true,
- Consider adding connection pooling configuration:
minPoolSize: 5, maxPoolSize: 10,tsconfig.base.json (1)
19-22: LGTM! Well-structured path mappings following clean architecture.The new path mappings for shared modules demonstrate good architectural decisions:
- Separation of infrastructure concerns (mongoose) from core business logic
- Consistent module organization under the
@sharednamespace- Clear module boundaries through explicit path mappings
Consider maintaining documentation for the shared modules to help other developers understand:
- The purpose and responsibility of each shared module
- Guidelines for when to use
@shared/infrastructure-mongoosevs direct mongoose usage- Migration guide for teams moving from
@libs/*to@shared/*patternsapps/users/src/users/users.module.ts (1)
Line range hint
13-31: Consider adding database health checkSince we're adding database connectivity to the Users module, it would be good to have a health check endpoint to monitor the database connection status.
Consider adding the
@nestjs/terminushealth check module with a database health indicator. I can help implement this if needed.apps/gateway/src/app/app.module.ts (2)
Line range hint
12-33: Consider documenting the configuration structureThe module uses both
gatewayConfiganduserAppConfigfor setting up GraphQL federation. Since these configs are now part of a shared infrastructure, it would be helpful to document their expected structure and required fields.Consider adding a comment block above the ConfigModule setup:
/** * Configuration structure: * gatewayConfig: { * // Add expected fields * } * userAppConfig: { * name: string; * protocol: string; * host: string; * port: number; * } */
Line range hint
19-33: Verify error handling for missing configurationThe GraphQL setup depends on userAppConfig values. Consider adding validation or error handling for cases where the configuration might be missing or incomplete.
Consider adding validation:
useFactory: (configService: ConfigService) => { const userAppConfig = configService.get('userApp'); + if (!userAppConfig?.host || !userAppConfig?.port) { + throw new Error('Missing required userApp configuration'); + } return { driver: ApolloGatewayDriver,
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (23)
.env.sample(1 hunks)apps/gateway/src/app/app.module.ts(1 hunks)apps/users/src/app/app.module.ts(1 hunks)apps/users/src/users/users.module.ts(2 hunks)libs/config/eslint.config.js(0 hunks)libs/config/project.json(0 hunks)libs/shared/config/eslint.config.js(1 hunks)libs/shared/config/jest.config.ts(1 hunks)libs/shared/config/project.json(1 hunks)libs/shared/config/src/lib/database.config.ts(1 hunks)libs/shared/config/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)libs/shared/config/tsconfig.spec.json(1 hunks)libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/README.md(1 hunks)libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/eslint.config.js(1 hunks)libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/jest.config.ts(1 hunks)libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/project.json(1 hunks)libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/index.ts(1 hunks)libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/database.module.ts(1 hunks)libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.lib.json(1 hunks)libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.spec.json(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)tsconfig.base.json(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- libs/config/eslint.config.js
- libs/config/project.json
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (11)
- libs/shared/config/eslint.config.js
- libs/shared/config/project.json
- libs/shared/config/tsconfig.json
- libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/README.md
- libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/eslint.config.js
- libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/jest.config.ts
- libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/project.json
- libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/index.ts
- libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.json
- libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.lib.json
- libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/tsconfig.spec.json
🔇 Additional comments (13)
.env.sample (1)
12-14: Verify the database migration from MySQL to MongoDB
The change in port from 3306 to 27017 indicates a migration from MySQL to MongoDB. This is a significant architectural change that requires careful verification.
Run the following script to verify the database configuration usage and ensure consistent migration across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the database configuration and usage to verify this migration thoroughly.
Let me try one more search with corrected file type flags:
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
MongoDB migration appears to be properly implemented
The codebase shows a consistent MongoDB implementation with no traces of MySQL:
- MongoDB infrastructure is properly set up in
libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose - Database configuration is handled through dedicated config files
- The hardcoded MongoDB URI in
database.module.tsmatches the new port (27017)
However, there's a minor inconsistency:
- The module uses a hardcoded connection string (
mongodb://localhost:27017) while commented code suggests it should use environment variables
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify database configuration consistency
# Check for any remaining MySQL-related configurations or dependencies
# Check for MySQL-related dependencies in package.json files
echo "Checking for MySQL dependencies..."
fd package.json --exec jq -r '.dependencies + .devDependencies | keys[]' {} \; | grep -iE 'mysql|sequelize'
# Check for MySQL connection strings or configurations
echo "Checking for MySQL configurations..."
rg -l '3306|mysql:' --type-add 'config:*.{json,yaml,yml,env}' -t config
# Check for Mongoose/MongoDB configurations
echo "Checking for MongoDB configurations..."
ast-grep --pattern 'MongooseModule.forRoot'
Length of output: 479
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for database-related configurations and imports
echo "Checking database configurations and imports..."
rg -l "mongoose|mongodb|typeorm|mysql" --type typescript
# Check for database connection setup in config files
echo "Checking database connection setup..."
rg -A 5 "database.*config|db.*config" --type typescript
# Look for any remaining MySQL imports or configurations
echo "Checking for MySQL imports..."
ast-grep --pattern 'import $_ from "mysql"'
ast-grep --pattern 'import $_ from "typeorm"'
# Look for Mongoose/MongoDB setup
echo "Checking MongoDB setup..."
ast-grep --pattern 'import $_ from "mongoose"'
ast-grep --pattern 'import { MongooseModule }'
Length of output: 698
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for database-related configurations and imports
echo "Checking database configurations and imports..."
rg -l "mongoose|mongodb|typeorm|mysql" --type ts --type js
# Check for database connection setup in config files
echo "Checking database connection setup..."
rg -A 5 "database.*config|db.*config" --type ts --type js
# Look for environment variable usage
echo "Checking environment variable usage..."
rg "process\.env\.(DATABASE|DB)_" --type ts --type js
# Check for any remaining old .env files
echo "Checking .env files..."
fd -g ".env*"
Length of output: 2176
libs/shared/config/tsconfig.spec.json (1)
4-4: LGTM! Output directory path update aligns with module reorganization.
The change from "../../dist/out-tsc" to "../../../dist/out-tsc" correctly reflects the new module structure where config is moved under the shared directory.
libs/shared/config/jest.config.ts (2)
Line range hint 1-11: LGTM! Path updates are consistent with the project reorganization
The configuration changes correctly reflect the new directory structure, moving from @libs/config to @shared/config. The changes maintain the proper relative paths while preserving all other Jest configuration options.
3-3: Verify the updated paths exist in the new structure
The path changes align with the migration from @libs/config to @shared/config. Let's verify the referenced files exist in the new structure.
Also applies to: 9-9
✅ Verification successful
Path references in Jest configuration are valid
All referenced paths in the Jest configuration exist or can be created:
jest.preset.jsis present at the repository rootlibs/shared/configdirectory structure exists- Coverage directory path is valid
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of Jest preset and coverage directory structure
# Check if jest.preset.js exists at the new location
if [ -f "jest.preset.js" ]; then
echo "✓ jest.preset.js found at repository root"
else
echo "⨯ jest.preset.js not found at repository root"
fi
# Verify the libs/shared/config directory structure
if [ -d "libs/shared/config" ]; then
echo "✓ libs/shared/config directory exists"
else
echo "⨯ libs/shared/config directory not found"
fi
# Check if the coverage directory exists or can be created
if [ -d "coverage/libs/shared/config" ] || mkdir -p "coverage/libs/shared/config" 2>/dev/null; then
echo "✓ Coverage directory structure is valid"
else
echo "⨯ Cannot verify coverage directory structure"
fi
Length of output: 406
apps/users/src/app/app.module.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM! Import path updated correctly.
The import path change from @libs/config to @shared/config aligns with the module reorganization.
1-1: Verify consistent usage of @shared/config across the codebase.
Let's ensure all imports from @libs/config have been updated to use @shared/config.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can generate the final response as we have clear evidence that:
- No instances of
@libs/configimports were found in the codebase @shared/configis consistently used in both apps (users and gateway)- The path mapping in tsconfig.base.json correctly maps
@shared/configto the shared config library
All imports from @libs/config have been successfully migrated to @shared/config
The migration appears complete and consistent across the codebase. The path alias is properly configured in tsconfig.base.json, and all relevant modules are using the new import path.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining @libs/config imports that need to be updated
# Search for any remaining @libs/config imports
echo "Checking for remaining @libs/config imports..."
rg "@libs/config"
# Search for new @shared/config imports to verify consistency
echo "Checking @shared/config usage..."
rg "@shared/config"
# Check tsconfig.base.json for path mappings
echo "Verifying path mappings in tsconfig.base.json..."
cat tsconfig.base.json | jq '.compilerOptions.paths'
Length of output: 1176
libs/shared/config/src/lib/database.config.ts (1)
13-15: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance environment variable handling
The direct use of process.env could lead to runtime issues if the values are malformed. Consider adding proper sanitization and validation.
Apply this diff to improve environment variable handling:
- host: process.env['DATABASE_HOST'] || 'localhost',
- port: process.env['DATABASE_PORT'] || 27017,
- name: process.env['DATABASE_NAME'] || '',
+ host: process.env['DATABASE_HOST']?.trim() || 'localhost',
+ port: Number(process.env['DATABASE_PORT']) || 27017,
+ name: process.env['DATABASE_NAME']?.trim() || '',Additionally, consider adding validation for the database name format to ensure it meets MongoDB naming requirements.
tsconfig.base.json (1)
19-22: Verify the removal of @libs/config mapping.
The AI summary indicates that @libs/config mapping was removed. Let's verify that all imports have been updated to use the new @shared/config path.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify this further by checking for any references to the old path in a different way and also look for the new path to ensure the migration was complete.
Migration to @shared/config is complete and correct
The verification confirms that:
- No references to the old
@libs/configpath exist anywhere in the codebase - The new
@shared/configpath is properly used in:- tsconfig.base.json (path mapping)
- apps/gateway/src/app/app.module.ts
- apps/users/src/app/app.module.ts
- The shared/config directory structure is present
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to @libs/config that might cause build failures
# Search for any remaining imports of @libs/config
echo "Checking for remaining @libs/config imports..."
rg "from ['|\"]@libs/config" -l
# Search for any remaining references to @libs/config in package.json files
echo "Checking for @libs/config dependencies..."
fd "package.json" --exec grep -l "@libs/config" {}
# Check if the old config directory still exists
echo "Checking if old config directory exists..."
fd -t d "libs/config$"
Length of output: 402
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search with a broader pattern to catch any reference to @libs/config
echo "Checking for any @libs/config references..."
rg "@libs/config" -l
# Check if the new shared config is being used
echo "Checking usage of new @shared/config..."
rg "@shared/config" -l
# Check the actual path structure
echo "Checking directory structure..."
fd -t d "shared/config"
Length of output: 413
apps/users/src/users/users.module.ts (2)
10-10: Verify the import path alias configuration
The import path @shared/infrastructure-mongoose needs to be properly configured in the TypeScript path aliases.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the path alias configuration exists in tsconfig files
# Check for path alias configuration in tsconfig files
echo "Checking tsconfig files for @shared/infrastructure-mongoose path configuration..."
rg -l "@shared/infrastructure-mongoose" --type json29-29: Verify DatabaseModule initialization requirements
The DatabaseModule is imported without configuration. Let's verify if it requires any initialization parameters or if it's using forRoot()/forFeature() pattern common in NestJS.
✅ Verification successful
DatabaseModule import is correctly configured
The DatabaseModule is properly imported as-is, without requiring any additional configuration. The module internally handles its configuration by:
- Using
MongooseModule.forRootAsync()with dependency injection - Automatically injecting ConfigService for database configuration
- Exporting MongooseModule for use in importing modules
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if DatabaseModule has forRoot/forFeature static methods that should be used
# Search for DatabaseModule implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'export class DatabaseModule {
$$$
}'
# Search for potential forRoot/forFeature implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'static forRoot($$$) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 354
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find DatabaseModule implementation and its usage patterns
# Search for DatabaseModule definition
rg -l "DatabaseModule" --type typescript
# Then let's look for the actual implementation
rg "export.*DatabaseModule" --type typescript -A 5
Length of output: 163
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try without type filtering since typescript type is not recognized
# Find files containing DatabaseModule
rg -l "DatabaseModule"
# Look for the actual implementation
rg "export.*DatabaseModule" -A 5
Length of output: 251
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the full implementation of DatabaseModule to understand its configuration
# Get the full content of DatabaseModule
cat libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/database.module.ts
Length of output: 695
apps/gateway/src/app/app.module.ts (1)
2-2: Verify the module path configuration for @shared/config
The import path has been changed from '@libs/config' to '@shared/config'. While the change aligns with the PR's objective of adding shared infrastructure, we should verify the path configuration.
✅ Verification successful
Import path change to @shared/config is correctly configured
The path change from '@libs/config' to '@shared/config' is properly configured in the project:
- Found path alias in tsconfig.base.json:
"@shared/config": ["libs/shared/config/src/index.ts"] - The import is consistently used across multiple files:
- apps/gateway/src/app/app.module.ts
- apps/users/src/app/app.module.ts
This change appears to be part of a well-structured reorganization, with proper path configurations in place.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the module path configuration and its usage
# Check if the path alias is configured in tsconfig
echo "Checking tsconfig for path configuration:"
fd tsconfig.json --exec cat {} \; | jq '.compilerOptions.paths | select(."@shared/*" != null)'
# Check for other usages of this config import
echo "Checking other files using this config:"
rg --type typescript '@shared/config'
Length of output: 354
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the configuration
# Check all tsconfig files for path mappings
echo "Checking all tsconfig files:"
fd tsconfig.json -x cat {}
# Check for any imports using @shared pattern
echo "Checking files using @shared imports:"
rg "@shared/"
# Check package.json files for dependencies and path configurations
echo "Checking package.json files:"
fd package.json -x cat {}
Length of output: 6860
package.json (2)
23-23: LGTM! Dependencies versions are up-to-date.
The added MongoDB-related dependencies are using the latest stable versions and are compatible with the existing NestJS framework version (v10.x.x).
Let's verify the latest versions and compatibility:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify latest versions and compatibility of mongoose packages
# Check latest versions on npm
echo "Checking latest versions:"
npm show @nestjs/mongoose version
npm show mongoose version
# Check peer dependencies
echo -e "\nChecking peer dependencies:"
npm info @nestjs/mongoose peerDependenciesAlso applies to: 29-29
23-23: Verify security advisories for mongoose packages
Let's ensure there are no known vulnerabilities in the added dependencies.
Also applies to: 29-29
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the mongoose version in package.json to verify if it's affected by the vulnerabilities found.
No security vulnerabilities found in the mongoose packages
The security scan revealed:
- @nestjs/mongoose (v10.1.0): No known vulnerabilities
- mongoose (v8.8.1): No vulnerabilities in this version. The latest known vulnerabilities affected versions < 6.4.6
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for security advisories for mongoose packages
# Check for security advisories using GitHub API
echo "Checking security advisories for @nestjs/mongoose and mongoose:"
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "mongoose") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}
'
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "@nestjs/mongoose") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}
'
Length of output: 1939
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check mongoose version in package.json
cat package.json | jq '.dependencies.mongoose'
Length of output: 55
Copilot
AI
left a comment
Copilot
AI
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot reviewed 20 out of 31 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 suggestion.
Files not reviewed (11)
- .env.sample: Language not supported
- libs/config/project.json: Language not supported
- libs/shared/config/project.json: Language not supported
- libs/shared/config/tsconfig.json: Language not supported
- libs/shared/config/tsconfig.lib.json: Language not supported
- libs/shared/config/tsconfig.spec.json: Language not supported
- libs/config/eslint.config.js: Evaluated as low risk
- apps/gateway/src/app/app.module.ts: Evaluated as low risk
- apps/users/src/app/app.module.ts: Evaluated as low risk
- apps/users/src/users/users.module.ts: Evaluated as low risk
- libs/shared/config/src/lib/database.config.ts: Evaluated as low risk
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/databse.module.spec.ts (1)
8-15: Enhance mock configuration with more realistic valuesThe current mock uses hardcoded values that might not represent real-world scenarios. Consider using environment-specific configurations or constants.
const mockConfigService = { get: jest.fn().mockReturnValue({ - host: 'test-host', - port: 27017, - name: 'test-db' + host: process.env.TEST_DB_HOST || 'localhost', + port: parseInt(process.env.TEST_DB_PORT || '27017', 10), + name: process.env.TEST_DB_NAME || 'test-database' }) };libs/shared/config/src/lib/database.config.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
27-32: Consider making the test name more specific to MongoDBThe test now expects MongoDB's default port (27017), but the test name is generic. Consider renaming it to better reflect the MongoDB-specific nature.
- it('should return the default port if DATABASE_PORT is not set', () => { + it('should return the default MongoDB port (27017) if DATABASE_PORT is not set', () => {🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 43-43: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
apps/users/src/app/app.module.ts(2 hunks)libs/shared/config/src/lib/database.config.spec.ts(2 hunks)libs/shared/config/src/lib/database.config.ts(1 hunks)libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/database.module.ts(1 hunks)libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/databse.module.spec.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- apps/users/src/app/app.module.ts
- libs/shared/config/src/lib/database.config.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
libs/shared/config/src/lib/database.config.spec.ts
[error] 43-43: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/database.module.ts (1)
1-21: Verify database configuration setup
Let's verify that the database configuration is properly set up in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Database configuration is properly set up and validated
The database configuration is correctly implemented with:
- Proper schema validation using zod with required fields (host, port, name)
- Environment variables defined in
.env.samplewith correct defaults - Config loaded in the Users app module where database is used
- Values properly accessed in DatabaseModule through ConfigService
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify database configuration setup
# Check database config schema
echo "Checking database config schema..."
rg -t ts "registerAs.*database" -A 10
# Check environment variables
echo -e "\nChecking environment variables..."
fd -t f "^\.env" -x echo "=== {}" \; -x cat {}
# Check ConfigModule setup
echo -e "\nChecking ConfigModule setup..."
rg -t ts "ConfigModule.forRoot.*load.*database" -A 5
Length of output: 1286
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify with a different approach
# 1. Check database schema definition
echo "=== Checking database schema definition..."
rg -t ts "databaseSchema.*=.*z\." -A 5
# 2. Check .env.sample or similar files
echo -e "\n=== Checking .env.sample..."
fd -H "\.env" -x echo "=== {}" \; -x cat {}
# 3. Check ConfigModule setup in app module
echo -e "\n=== Checking app module configuration..."
fd "app\.module\.ts" -x echo "=== {}" \; -x cat {}
# 4. Check if database config is imported
echo -e "\n=== Checking database config imports..."
rg -t ts "import.*database.*config"
Length of output: 3354
libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/databse.module.spec.ts (1)
1-28: Verify DatabaseModule implementation
The test assumes the existence of a properly implemented DatabaseModule. Let's verify its implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to find the DatabaseModule implementation.
DatabaseModule implementation is correctly aligned with the test
The DatabaseModule implementation matches the test's expectations perfectly:
- It uses MongooseModule.forRootAsync with ConfigService injection
- The useFactory correctly retrieves database config using configService.get('database')
- The configuration structure matches the test's mock (host, port, name)
- The module exports MongooseModule as expected
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for DatabaseModule implementation
echo "Searching for DatabaseModule implementation..."
rg -t typescript "export class DatabaseModule" ./libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/
# Check if MongooseModule.forRootAsync is used correctly
echo "Checking MongooseModule configuration..."
ast-grep --pattern 'MongooseModule.forRootAsync({
$$$
useFactory: $_,
inject: [$_]
$$$
})'
Length of output: 425
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for DatabaseModule in the directory
echo "Searching for database.module.ts..."
fd "database.module.ts" ./libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/
# If found, display its contents
echo "Contents of database.module.ts:"
cat ./libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/database.module.ts
# Also search for any MongooseModule.forRoot usage as an alternative pattern
echo "Checking for MongooseModule.forRoot usage..."
rg "MongooseModule\.forRoot" ./libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/
Length of output: 1222
libs/shared/config/src/lib/database.config.spec.ts (3)
18-18: LGTM! Well-structured test modification
The addition of DATABASE_NAME testing follows good testing practices with clear arrangement and assertions.
Also applies to: 23-23
Line range hint 3-13: LGTM! Robust test environment handling
The test suite properly manages environment variables with appropriate setup and cleanup.
42-47: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize delete operator usage and verify default behavior
- For better performance, consider replacing the delete operator:
- delete process.env['DATABASE_NAME'];
+ process.env['DATABASE_NAME'] = undefined;- Verify if an empty string is the intended default for database name:
✅ Verification successful
Consider using undefined assignment and validate empty string default
-
The suggestion to use
process.env['DATABASE_NAME'] = undefinedinstead ofdelete process.env['DATABASE_NAME']is valid for better performance. -
The empty string default for database name is indeed the intended behavior as shown in the implementation:
name: process.env['DATABASE_NAME'] || '',Since there's no direct mongoose connection configuration in the codebase (as evidenced by the empty search results), this configuration module appears to be just defining environment-based defaults, where an empty string is an acceptable fallback value that can be overridden by the actual database connection setup elsewhere.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if empty database name is handled properly in Mongoose configuration
ast-grep --pattern 'mongoose.connect($_, { dbName: $_ })'
Length of output: 59
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check the database configuration implementation
rg -A 5 "export const databaseConfig"
# Also check for any mongoose connection setup
rg -A 5 "mongoose.connect"
# And check for any database name related configuration
rg "DATABASE_NAME"
Length of output: 1109
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 43-43: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/databse.module.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/databse.module.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/databse.module.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/database.module.spec.ts (2)
7-8: Consider adding more test cases for comprehensive coverage.While the happy path is covered, consider adding test cases for:
- Invalid configuration values
- Missing database name
- Connection error scenarios
- Reconnection attempts
Example test case structure:
describe('DatabaseModule', () => { it('should configure MongoDB connection using config service values', async () => { // existing test }); it('should throw error when database name is missing', async () => { // test with undefined name }); it('should handle invalid port number', async () => { // test with invalid port }); });
9-15: Enhance mock configuration with validation and realistic values.Consider using environment variables or test constants for configuration values. Also, validate that the configuration object matches the expected interface.
// Create an interface or type for database config interface DatabaseConfig { host: string; port: number; name: string; } // Use test constants const TEST_CONFIG: DatabaseConfig = { host: process.env.TEST_DB_HOST || 'test-host', port: parseInt(process.env.TEST_DB_PORT || '27017'), name: process.env.TEST_DB_NAME || 'test-db' }; const mockConfigService = { get: jest.fn().mockReturnValue(TEST_CONFIG) };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/database.module.spec.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/database.module.spec.ts (3)
1-5: LGTM! Imports are well-organized.
The imports are correctly structured with external dependencies separated from local imports.
17-22: LGTM! Test module setup follows best practices.
The test module configuration correctly uses NestJS testing utilities and provider override patterns.
5-5: Verify DatabaseModule implementation matches test assumptions.
Let's verify that the DatabaseModule implementation aligns with these tests.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the DatabaseModule implementation and its tests.
DatabaseModule implementation and tests are properly aligned
The test file correctly verifies the essential aspects of the DatabaseModule:
- It tests the async configuration using ConfigService
- It verifies the database configuration is retrieved with the correct key
- It confirms the MongooseModule is properly exported and available
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for DatabaseModule implementation
echo "Searching for DatabaseModule implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export class DatabaseModule {
$$$
}'
# Check for forRoot/forFeature usage
echo "Checking Mongoose configuration..."
rg -l "MongooseModule\.(forRoot|forFeature)" --type ts
Length of output: 362
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the content of both files
echo "DatabaseModule implementation:"
cat libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/database.module.ts
echo -e "\nDatabaseModule tests:"
cat libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/database.module.spec.ts
Length of output: 1686
libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/database.module.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot reviewed 20 out of 31 changed files in this pull request and generated no suggestions.
Files not reviewed (11)
- .env.sample: Language not supported
- libs/config/project.json: Language not supported
- libs/shared/config/project.json: Language not supported
- libs/shared/config/tsconfig.json: Language not supported
- libs/shared/config/tsconfig.lib.json: Language not supported
- libs/shared/config/tsconfig.spec.json: Language not supported
- libs/config/eslint.config.js: Evaluated as low risk
- apps/gateway/src/app/app.module.ts: Evaluated as low risk
- apps/users/src/app/app.module.ts: Evaluated as low risk
- apps/users/src/users/users.module.ts: Evaluated as low risk
- libs/shared/config/src/lib/database.config.ts: Evaluated as low risk
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
libs/shared/config/src/lib/database.config.spec.ts (2)
42-47: Consider using undefined assignment instead of delete operatorWhile the test is logically correct, the use of
deleteoperator can impact performance.- delete process.env['DATABASE_NAME']; + process.env['DATABASE_NAME'] = undefined;🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 43-43: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
Line range hint
1-48: Consider adding edge case testsThe test suite covers the happy path and default cases well, but consider adding tests for:
- Invalid port numbers
- Empty string values for DATABASE_NAME
- Special characters in database names
Would you like me to help generate these additional test cases?
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 43-43: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/database.module.spec.ts (2)
9-16: Consider enhancing test isolation.While the current setup/teardown is good, consider adding
process.env = {}before restoring variables to ensure complete isolation between tests.beforeEach(() => { jest.resetModules(); + process.env = {}; process.env = { ...OLD_ENV }; });
6-64: Add test cases for error scenarios.The test suite should include cases for:
- Invalid port numbers
- Connection failures
- Invalid database names
- Authentication failures (if applicable)
This will ensure the module handles errors gracefully.
Would you like me to help generate these additional test cases?
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 32-32: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 33-33: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 34-34: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
libs/shared/config/src/lib/database.config.spec.ts(2 hunks)libs/shared/config/src/lib/database.config.ts(1 hunks)libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/database.module.spec.ts(1 hunks)libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/database.module.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- libs/shared/config/src/lib/database.config.ts
- libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/database.module.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
libs/shared/config/src/lib/database.config.spec.ts
[error] 43-43: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/database.module.spec.ts
[error] 32-32: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 33-33: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 34-34: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
libs/shared/config/src/lib/database.config.spec.ts (3)
18-18: LGTM: Database name validation added to existing test
The addition of DATABASE_NAME validation to the existing environment variables test maintains good test organization by grouping related assertions together.
Also applies to: 23-23
35-40: LGTM: Clear test for DATABASE_NAME environment variable
The test case effectively validates that the configuration picks up the DATABASE_NAME environment variable when set.
32-32: Verify MongoDB port change across the codebase
The default port change from 5432 (PostgreSQL) to 27017 (MongoDB) indicates a database technology switch.
✅ Verification successful
MongoDB configuration is correctly implemented across the codebase
The port change to 27017 is consistent with MongoDB usage throughout the codebase. The verification shows:
- MongoDB is explicitly used via
MongooseModulein theDatabaseModule - The connection string format is MongoDB-specific:
mongodb://${databaseConfig.host}:${databaseConfig.port} - No references to PostgreSQL port 5432 were found
- The default port 27017 is the standard MongoDB port
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining PostgreSQL port references that might need updating
# Search for PostgreSQL default port
rg -l "5432" --type ts
# Search for any potential database connection strings or configuration files
fd -e yaml -e yml -e env -e json | xargs rg -l "5432"
Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the database configuration more comprehensively
# Check for MongoDB port references
rg "27017" --type ts -C 2
# Look for any database configuration files or connection strings
fd "database|mongo|connection" -e ts -e js -e json -e yaml -e yml | xargs cat
# Search for any environment files that might contain DB configuration
fd ".env" | xargs cat
Length of output: 5241
libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/database.module.spec.ts (1)
18-29: Strengthen test assertions.
The current test only verifies module existence. The previous review comment about strengthening assertions is still valid.
libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/database.module.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/database.module.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/shared/infrastructure/mongoose/src/lib/database.module.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 1.0.0 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Closes #50
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
DatabaseModulefor MongoDB integration using Mongoose.Bug Fixes
Documentation
shared-infrastructure-mongooselibrary.Tests
DatabaseModule.Chores