refactor: ♻️ move user/usecases to users/application #44
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request encompasses several changes primarily focused on the user-related modules within the project. Key modifications include the removal of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
libs/users/application/jest.config.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 9.15.0 TypeError: Error while loading rule '@typescript-eslint/no-unused-expressions': Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'allowShortCircuit') Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot reviewed 8 out of 17 changed files in this pull request and generated no suggestions.
Files not reviewed (9)
- .vscode/settings.json: Language not supported
- libs/user/usecase/project.json: Language not supported
- libs/user/usecase/tsconfig.json: Language not supported
- libs/users/application/project.json: Language not supported
- libs/users/application/tsconfig.json: Language not supported
- tsconfig.base.json: Language not supported
- libs/user/usecase/README.md: Evaluated as low risk
- libs/user/usecase/src/index.ts: Evaluated as low risk
- README.md: Evaluated as low risk
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
tsconfig.base.json (1)
Line range hint
16-22: Consider standardizing module naming conventions.There's an inconsistency in the naming pattern:
- Most paths use singular form (
@user/domain,@prompt/domain)- The new path uses plural form (
@users/application)If this represents a new architectural direction, consider planning the migration of other modules to follow the same convention.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
.vscode/settings.json(0 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)libs/user/usecase/README.md(0 hunks)libs/user/usecase/project.json(0 hunks)libs/user/usecase/src/index.ts(0 hunks)libs/user/usecase/tsconfig.json(0 hunks)libs/users/application/README.md(1 hunks)libs/users/application/jest.config.ts(1 hunks)libs/users/application/project.json(1 hunks)libs/users/application/src/index.ts(1 hunks)libs/users/application/src/lib/use-case/get-user.use-case.spec.ts(2 hunks)libs/users/application/src/lib/use-case/get-user.use-case.ts(1 hunks)libs/users/application/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)tsconfig.base.json(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (5)
- .vscode/settings.json
- libs/user/usecase/README.md
- libs/user/usecase/project.json
- libs/user/usecase/src/index.ts
- libs/user/usecase/tsconfig.json
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (7)
- README.md
- libs/users/application/README.md
- libs/users/application/project.json
- libs/users/application/src/index.ts
- libs/users/application/src/lib/use-case/get-user.use-case.spec.ts
- libs/users/application/src/lib/use-case/get-user.use-case.ts
- libs/users/application/tsconfig.json
🔇 Additional comments (3)
libs/users/application/jest.config.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM! Configuration updates align with the restructuring.
The changes to displayName and coverageDirectory correctly reflect the new module structure and naming convention.
Also applies to: 9-9
Line range hint 1-11: Verify related configuration updates.
Let's ensure all related configurations have been updated consistently with this restructuring.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify the configuration consistency thoroughly.
Let me do one final check to verify the project structure and related configurations.
Configuration files are properly structured and consistent
Based on the verification results:
- Project structure follows the NX workspace conventions
- Jest configuration correctly references the preset and tsconfig paths
- TSConfig files are properly configured with correct extends and references
- All necessary configuration files are present and properly linked
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent naming and paths across related configuration files
# Check for any remaining references to the old path/naming
rg -l "user-usecase|user/usecase" --type=json --type=ts
# Check for project references in nx configuration
fd "project.json|workspace.json" --type f --exec cat {} \; | grep -A 5 -B 5 "users-application"
# Verify test configuration consistency
fd "jest.config.ts" --type f --exec grep -l "users-application" {} \;
Length of output: 656
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for tsconfig files and their configurations
fd tsconfig.json --type f --exec cat {} \; | grep -A 5 -B 5 "users-application"
# Check for any path references in nx.json
cat nx.json 2>/dev/null | grep -A 5 -B 5 "users-application"
# Check the jest.preset.js file referenced in the config
cat jest.preset.js 2>/dev/null
# Verify the existence and content of the tsconfig.spec.json
cat libs/users/application/tsconfig.spec.json 2>/dev/null
# Check for any potential path mismatches in package.json
cat package.json 2>/dev/null | grep -A 5 -B 5 "users-application"
Length of output: 610
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the tsconfig.json in the application directory
cat libs/users/application/tsconfig.json 2>/dev/null
# List files in the users/application directory to verify structure
ls -R libs/users/application/
# Check for any potential references in tsconfig.base.json
cat tsconfig.base.json 2>/dev/null | grep -A 5 -B 5 "users-application"
Length of output: 695
tsconfig.base.json (1)
21-21: LGTM! Path mapping aligns with the architectural changes.
The update from @user/usecase to @users/application correctly reflects the architectural refactoring.
Let's verify the consistency of imports and file structure:
✅ Verification successful
Path mapping and imports verified successfully
The verification confirms:
- The new path
libs/users/application/src/index.tsexists in the codebase - No remaining imports using the old
@user/usecasepath were found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the new path exists and check for any remaining old imports
# Verify the new path exists
fd --type f "index.ts" libs/users/application/src/
# Check for any remaining imports using the old path
rg -l "@user/usecase" --type ts
Length of output: 118
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 1.0.0 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Related #47 #33
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
users-applicationlibrary with documentation and testing instructions.Improvements
Bug Fixes
user-usecaselibrary, streamlining the project structure.Configuration Changes