refactor: ♻️ rename users-application to users #43
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a series of changes primarily focused on simplifying the naming conventions and paths in the Jest configuration and project files associated with the users application. The project name, display names, and coverage directories have been updated to remove the "application" suffix, reflecting a more streamlined structure. Additionally, test files have been reformatted for improved readability, while no changes to the logic or functionality of the tests themselves were made. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
apps/users-e2e/jest.config.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 9.15.0 TypeError: Error while loading rule '@typescript-eslint/no-unused-expressions': Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'allowShortCircuit') 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (9)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
🔇 Additional comments (4)apps/users-e2e/project.json (2)
The build dependency has been updated to #!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the build target exists in the users project
# Check if the build target is properly configured in the users project
cat apps/users/project.json | jq '.targets.build'
The renaming from "users-application" to "users" has been applied consistently across all references in the configuration file, including the project name, dependencies, and paths. Let's verify that all references to the old name have been updated throughout the workspace: Also applies to: 5-5, 11-11, 14-14 ✅ Verification successfulRenaming verification completed successfully The verification confirms that:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to "users-application"
# that might have been missed during the renaming
# Search for any remaining references to "users-application"
rg "users-application" --type json --type typescript
# Check if the new "users" project exists and is properly configured
cat nx.json | jq '.projects | keys[] | select(contains("users"))'
Length of output: 148 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search approach
# Check for any files containing "users-application"
rg -l "users-application"
# List all project.json files to verify project configurations
fd "project.json$"
# Check contents of nx.json for project configurations
cat nx.json
# Check the users-e2e project configuration
cat apps/users-e2e/project.json
Length of output: 1817 apps/users/webpack.config.js (1)
The path update aligns with the PR objective of renaming from users-application to users. Let's verify if any deployment configurations or scripts depend on the old output path: ✅ Verification successfulOutput path change is safe to proceed The webpack output path change from 'users-application' to 'users' appears safe as:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any references to the old output path in deployment configurations
# Look for potential references to the old path in various configuration files
rg -l "users-application" \
--type yaml \
--type json \
--type javascript \
--type typescript \
--glob '!node_modules' \
--glob '!dist' \
--glob '!*.test.*' \
--glob '!jest.config.*' \
--glob '!**/webpack.config.js'
# Check for deployment-related files that might need updates
fd -e yaml -e yml -e json deploy config ci cd
Length of output: 472 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to search for deployment configurations and old path references
# Search for any files containing 'users-application'
rg -l "users-application" \
--type yaml \
--type json \
--type ts \
--type js \
--glob '!node_modules' \
--glob '!dist' \
--glob '!*.test.*' \
--glob '!jest.config.*'
# Find deployment-related files
fd -e yaml -e yml -e json . | grep -iE '(deploy|ci|cd|k8s|kubernetes|docker)'
# Find any package.json files that might contain build/deploy scripts
fd package.json
Length of output: 261 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of package.json for any build/deploy scripts or paths
cat package.json
# Let's also check for any docker or deployment files in the root
fd -e dockerfile -e dockerignore -e yaml -e yml . | grep -iE '(docker|compose|deployment|k8s)'
Length of output: 1984 nx.json (1)
The updated exclude pattern aligns with the PR objective of renaming from users-application to users. Let's verify the directory rename consistency: ✅ Verification successfulDirectory rename is complete and consistent The verification confirms that:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the old directory name is completely renamed and there are no lingering references
# Check if old directory still exists
if [ -d "apps/users-application-e2e" ]; then
echo "Warning: Old directory apps/users-application-e2e still exists"
fi
# Search for any remaining references to the old name
rg -l "users-application-e2e"
# Verify the new directory exists
if [ ! -d "apps/users-e2e" ]; then
echo "Warning: New directory apps/users-e2e does not exist"
fi
Length of output: 101 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive check using different commands
# Check for any references to the old name pattern using ripgrep with case-insensitive search
echo "=== Searching for any references to old name ==="
rg -i "users-application"
# List all directories under apps to see the structure
echo -e "\n=== Listing directories under apps ==="
ls -la apps/
# Check for any Jest configuration files that might reference the old name
echo -e "\n=== Searching for Jest config files ==="
fd -e config.js -e config.ts -e config.json . apps/
Length of output: 1026 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot reviewed 27 out of 29 changed files in this pull request and generated no suggestions.
Files not reviewed (2)
- apps/users-e2e/project.json: Language not supported
- apps/users/project.json: Language not supported
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot reviewed 27 out of 29 changed files in this pull request and generated no suggestions.
Files not reviewed (2)
- apps/users-e2e/project.json: Language not supported
- apps/users/project.json: Language not supported
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 1.0.0 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Related #47
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores