Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.15] Backports for PRs before 7.9.2024 #1989

Merged

Conversation

michalvavrik
Copy link
Member

@michalvavrik michalvavrik commented Sep 7, 2024

Summary

Backports:

Please select the relevant options.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Dependency update
  • Refactoring
  • Backport
  • New scenario (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • This change requires a documentation update
  • This change requires execution against OCP (use run tests phrase in comment)

Checklist:

  • Methods and classes used in PR scenarios are meaningful
  • Commits are well encapsulated and follow the best practices

michalvavrik and others added 20 commits September 7, 2024 16:06
(cherry picked from commit 25a8612)
(cherry picked from commit e88a571)
Using quarkus-spring-core-api which has no deps, spring-di depends on arc
Customizing BOM instead of version which turned out to be quite problematic because of branching

(cherry picked from commit 78ed432)
@michalvavrik michalvavrik force-pushed the backports-3.15/tls-registry-support branch from afb3646 to 3d6b1fb Compare September 7, 2024 15:20
@michalvavrik
Copy link
Member Author

run tests

Copy link
Member

@gtroitsk gtroitsk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the backport effort. CI is green, approving

@gtroitsk gtroitsk merged commit 6b0386a into quarkus-qe:3.15 Sep 7, 2024
10 checks passed
@michalvavrik michalvavrik deleted the backports-3.15/tls-registry-support branch September 7, 2024 20:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants