Skip to content

2020 09 28 Open NEST Developer Video Conference

Dennis Terhorst edited this page Sep 28, 2020 · 6 revisions

previous | list | next

Agenda

  1. Welcome
  2. Review of NEST User Mailing List
  3. Project team round
  4. In-depth discussion Benchmarking setups for CoSim and the NRP-NEST coupling (Kim Sontheimer and Cristian Jimenez-Romero)

Mailing list

Project team round

Here we discuss topics that need broader attention, for example questions that came up but are outside a single project's scope, larger planned changes/PRs that affect all teams or pending work that is blocked by external factors.

  1. Models / NESTML
    • no report
  2. PyNEST
    • please have a look at #1773, note your ideas/comments in the issue
  3. Kernel
    • nothing to report
  4. Installation
    • nothing to report, closed couple of issues, still looking for MacOS developers.
  5. Infrastructure
    • no report
  6. Documentation
    • no major updates, cleaup and PRs as usual
  7. EBRAINS
    • nothing to report
  8. (Feature) Random number generation
    • still waiting, currently no updates
  9. (Feature) Automated Testing
    • no report

In-depth discussion: Benchmarking setups for CoSim and NRP–NEST coupling

Special guests are Kim Sontheimer and Cristian Jimenez-Romero of the SimLab Neuroscience (Jülich)

Benchmarking setups for CoSim

Introduction of the discussion by Kim Sontheimer

  • In-transit coupling of NEST and Elephant, stream simulation output into a synchronous analysis with Elephant
  • Current Implementation, MPI send spikeevents to in-transit server (sorting, transposition, …) coupled to down-stream analysis
  • Plans are to scale up to test till which size of network the synchronous analysis can keep pace

Discussion

  • neurons per rank are known
  • clarification of "real-time" meaning, that simulation time advances at the same speed as the wall-clock.
  • which scalable model could be used for testing?
    • hpc_benchmark long known
    • structured models available, but difficult to scale. need to keep reasonable activity
  • real-time not relevant for analysis, but only for real-world applications like robotics, sound-click, …

NEST–NRP interface architecture

Introduction of the discussion by Cristian Jimenez-Romero

Discussion

  • is a NEST simulator-simulator available for testing? – not necessary, computationally inexpensive simulations can create sufficiently large streams of data. NEST's dry-run mode is not yet usable for this in the new versions.
  • NRP is free of real-time constraint. closed-loop simulations should be able to run as fast as possible in a simulated environment.
  • interactions with NEST are coordinated also with NEST Desktop
Clone this wiki locally