Update Hsdecipher #51093
Update Hsdecipher #51093
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request involves an update to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
recipes/hsdecipher/meta.yaml (1)
Build Script Missing and Checksum Verification Failed
- The
conda_build_package.shscript is missing from therecipes/hsdecipherdirectory. This script is essential for the build process.- Checksum verification failed due to the absence of the build script and the
sha256sumcommand, which prevents validating the integrity of the package.- Ensure that the build script is added to the repository and that all necessary dependencies for the build process are available.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
12-38: Consider updating Python version and review build script.
The current Python version requirement is >=3.7. Consider updating this to a more recent version if the package is compatible with newer Python releases.
The build process uses a bash script
conda_build_package.sh. Ensure this script is up-to-date and follows best practices for conda package building.The
run_exportssection is correctly implemented, which helps prevent API, ABI, and CLI breakage as mentioned in the PR objectives.The
noarch: pythonspecification is appropriate for this Python package.To verify the contents of the build script, run:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Display the contents of the conda build script cat recipes/hsdecipher/conda_build_package.shLength of output: 1114
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all files in the recipes/hsdecipher directory to check for build scripts ls -la recipes/hsdecipher/Length of output: 213
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search the repository for any build scripts related to hsdecipher fd 'conda_build_package\.sh$' || echo "No conda_build_package.sh script found in the repository."Length of output: 31
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- recipes/hsdecipher/meta.yaml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
recipes/hsdecipher/meta.yaml (2)
2-2: Version update looks good.The version has been correctly updated from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2, which is consistent with the PR title and Bioconda guidelines for updating a recipe.
10-10: Verify the updated SHA256 checksum.The SHA256 checksum has been updated, which is necessary for the new version. However, we should verify that this checksum is correct for the new source archive.
Run the following script to verify the SHA256 checksum:
Describe your pull request here
update hsdecipher fixing the bugs
Please read the guidelines for Bioconda recipes before opening a pull request (PR).
General instructions
@BiocondaBot please add labelcommand.@bioconda/corein a comment.Instructions for avoiding API, ABI, and CLI breakage issues
Conda is able to record and lock (a.k.a. pin) dependency versions used at build time of other recipes.
This way, one can avoid that expectations of a downstream recipe with regards to API, ABI, or CLI are violated by later changes in the recipe.
If not already present in the meta.yaml, make sure to specify
run_exports(see here for the rationale and comprehensive explanation).Add a
run_exportssection like this:with
...being one of:{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin=None) }}while replacing
"myrecipe"with eithernameif aname|lowervariable is defined in your recipe or with the lowercase name of the package in quotes.Bot commands for PR management
Please use the following BiocondaBot commands:
Everyone has access to the following BiocondaBot commands, which can be given in a comment:
@BiocondaBot please update@BiocondaBot please add labelplease review & mergelabel.@BiocondaBot please fetch artifactsYou can use this to test packages locally.
Note that the
@BiocondaBot please mergecommand is now depreciated. Please just squash and merge instead.Also, the bot watches for comments from non-members that include
@bioconda/<team>and will automatically re-post them to notify the addressed<team>.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes