-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dev Test: Gravity and Orbits 1.2.0-dev.16/phet-io/ #519
Comments
Adding a reference to the issue where we prepared the dev version: phetsims/gravity-and-orbits#345 |
Putting at medium priority at the moment, given the current QA backlog |
Discussed today during phet-io meeting. This dev version most likely has all the same phet-io bugs as reported in #514. These are currently fixed on master, but likely we should take a GAO dev version from master now before testing this. |
@pixelzoom mentioned that perhaps the best process is to have @KatieWoe ping @samreid when she is ready to test this. Then we can get a fresh dev version at that time. |
I agree, the dev version 1.2.0-dev.12 is stale, please reach out to me when ready for testing and I'll publish a new version. |
@ariel-phet or @KatieWoe can you estimate when QA may be ready for the next dev test for Gravity and Orbits? It may help us ensure master is stable around that time. |
@samreid I think around Monday Aug 31st would be my guess currently, depending on how Ph Scale testing and such goes next week |
I published a fresh dev version with both brands: |
I've sometimes seen times where the path doesn't fade, but I can't reproduce it reliably, I just see it some times. @arouinfar if you want to go over it let me know, but I'm not always convinced I'm seeing anything and I don't know what causes it, so let me know if you want an issue for it. |
QA is done |
This sounds like the path occasionally has full opacity, which seems relatively minor to me. Given that it isn't reliably reproduced, I don't think it warrants an issue. |
All issues mentioned above are closed, ready for review or on my project board. Thanks for the great test @KatieWoe, closing. |
@ariel-phet, @arouinfar, @kathy-phet, @KatieWoe, 1.2.0-dev.16/phet-io/ is ready for dev testing. If this passes testing,
this dev version will be delivered to a client. Ideally by 11/1 for a dev version and 12/15 for a published version, but sooner is best for a dev delivery. Please be aware this is the 2nd dev version for QA, and several of the issues discovered by QA in the first dev version were scheduled to be implemented for RC, but not for the 2nd dev version. Document issues in https://github.com/phetsims/gravity-and-orbits/issues and link to this issue.
Assigning @ariel-phet for prioritization.
General Dev Test
What to Test
Focus and Special Instructions
Only the PhET-iO version will be delivered to the client, but any bugs discovered in the PhET brand version will likely
appear in the PhET-iO version as well.
General Dev Test Platforms
These issues should have either use the labels "status:ready-for-qa" or "status:ready-for-review." If it is ready for
QA then close the issue if fixed. If ready for review then leave open and assign back to the developer.
Link(s)
PhET-iO Dev Test
What to Test
sure the simulation loads without crashing or throwing errors.
General Dev Test Platforms
Focus and Special Instructions
For this version, studio and customizability are more important than other features like data stream.
Link(s)
FAQs for QA Members
There are multiple tests in this issue... Which test should I do first?
Test in order! Test the first thing first, the second thing second, and so on.
How should I format my issue?
Here's a template for making issues:
Who should I assign?
We typically assign the developer who opened the issue in the QA repository.
My question isn't in here... What should I do?
You should:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: