Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #235: Change fragment implementation from directly xml code to better kotlin code. #238

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Oct 16, 2019

Conversation

veena14cs
Copy link
Contributor

@veena14cs veena14cs commented Oct 15, 2019

This PR fixes xml files that are using fragment tag directly to display a particular fragment.
It implements FrameLayout as container in xml and kotlin files initialize the corresponding fragment.

This change are implemented in following cases for now:

  • exploration_fragment.xml
  • state_fragment.xml

@veena14cs veena14cs changed the title Fix issue #42, #163: Change fragment implementation from directly xml code to better kotlin code. Fix #42 & #163: Change fragment implementation from directly xml code to better kotlin code. Oct 15, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@rt4914 rt4914 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PTAL @veena14cs

@rt4914
Copy link
Contributor

rt4914 commented Oct 15, 2019

@veena14cs
The title of this PR is incorrect. #42 and #163 are full implementation of some other work items.

You should reference this to its issue #235

@rt4914 rt4914 assigned veena14cs and unassigned rt4914 Oct 15, 2019
@veena14cs veena14cs changed the title Fix #42 & #163: Change fragment implementation from directly xml code to better kotlin code. Fix #235: Change fragment implementation from directly xml code to better kotlin code. Oct 15, 2019
Copy link
Member

@BenHenning BenHenning left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Nice change. Changes LGTM once Rajat's comments are addressed.

@BenHenning BenHenning removed their assignment Oct 16, 2019
@veena14cs veena14cs requested a review from rt4914 October 16, 2019 05:09
@veena14cs veena14cs assigned rt4914 and unassigned veena14cs Oct 16, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@rt4914 rt4914 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PTAL Nit change

Copy link
Contributor

@nikitamarysolomanpvt nikitamarysolomanpvt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants