Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

V0.1.31 rebase master #23

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Sep 6, 2018

Conversation

jboyd01
Copy link

@jboyd01 jboyd01 commented Sep 6, 2018

(tag: v0.1.31, upstream/master) Bump version 0.1.31 (kubernetes-retired#2324)
Use controller's default brokerRelistInterval for namespaced brokers (kubernetes-retired#2313)
svcat deprovision --wait doesn't work properly in some cases (kubernetes-retired#2293)
Add namespace flags to get plans (kubernetes-retired#2285)
modify the document format (kubernetes-retired#2320)
Escape question mark character in testdata filenames (kubernetes-retired#2316)
Fix variable name in reconcileClusterServiceClassKey() (kubernetes-retired#2312)
Add deregister command in svcat (kubernetes-retired#2314)
Run validation subtests with testing.Run() (kubernetes-retired#2297)
Rename PR_TEMPLATE.md to PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (kubernetes-retired#2317)
support for headless services for API server (kubernetes-retired#2304)
Fix field order in CatalogRestriction in servicecatalog/types.go (kubernetes-retired#2300)
Reject ServiceBrokers whose catalogRestrictions reference invalid fields (kubernetes-retired#2311)
Fix validation error's bad value (ServicePlan instead of ServiceClass) (kubernetes-retired#2296)
Remove regex validation of service class external IDs (kubernetes-retired#2303)

jberkhahn and others added 16 commits August 28, 2018 11:58
kubernetes-retired#2296)

When validation of Broker.Spec.CatalogRestrictions.ServicePlan failed,
spec.CatalogRestrictions.ServiceClass was passed as the bad value in
the validation error. It should be spec.CatalogRestrictions.ServicePlan.
…lds (kubernetes-retired#2311)

The admission control plugin now validates if the fields being selected
in broker.spec.catalogRestrictions are on the approved list or not.
…ernetes-retired#2300)

The order did not match the one in v1beta1/types.go, leading to an
incorrect conversion between the two types.
* support for headless services (Type:clusterIP;clusterIP:None). In addiiton this feature also allow to use userdefined clusterIp type service, where user can specify the IP or let Kubernetes choose an IP.

* changed clusterIp -> clusterIP
fixed a typo.
* Run validation subtests with testing.Run()

* Don't print testcase name in error message
svcat only support register now, deregister is added to support
remove broker registered.
…tired#2312)

When the clusterserviceclass controller reconciles the key, the
value should be like 'class' not 'plan'.
…red#2316)

Question marks are not allowed in filenames on windows.
* modify the doc format

* modify trailing
* Add namespace flags to get plans

* Fix unit tests

* Add "Namespace" column to Plans table output
…tes-retired#2293)

* svcat deprovision - wait for instance to not exist vs change status

* remove dead test case, clean up error handling
…ubernetes-retired#2313)

* Use controller's default brokerRelistInterval for namespaced brokers

* Refactor shouldReconcile(Cluster)ServiceBroker into a single function

The two functions only relied on common components.

* Remove duplicated code in getTestClusterServiceBrokerWithStatus

* Run subtests with testing.Run()

* Add test where relistDuration is nil and interval has elapsed
Merge executed via ./UPSTREAM-MERGE.sh v0.1.31 upstream master

Overwritten conflicts:
<NONE>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 6, 2018
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 6, 2018
@jboyd01
Copy link
Author

jboyd01 commented Sep 6, 2018

/test service-catalog

@jpeeler
Copy link

jpeeler commented Sep 6, 2018

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jboyd01, jpeeler

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 6, 2018
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit c0f3fe8 into openshift:master Sep 6, 2018
@jpeeler jpeeler mentioned this pull request Oct 31, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.