Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(inheritance-report): adding funeral service cost #17159

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 6, 2024
Merged

Conversation

albinagu
Copy link
Member

@albinagu albinagu commented Dec 6, 2024

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a new field for funeral service costs in the debts and funeral cost section.
    • Introduced a new row in the overview debts component to display funeral service costs.
    • Enhanced total calculation in the funeral cost component to include service costs.
  • Updates

    • Updated messaging for funeral service costs and clarified terminology for deceased share in the inheritance report.

@albinagu albinagu requested a review from a team as a code owner December 6, 2024 11:28
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several modifications to enhance the handling of funeral costs within the inheritance report. Key changes include the addition of a servicesCost variable in the FuneralCost component's total calculation, a new row for displaying funeral service costs in the OverviewDebts component, and an updated data structure in the debtsAndFuneralCost section to accommodate user input for funeral services. Additionally, new message definitions have been added to improve clarity in the report.

Changes

File Change Summary
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/fields/FuneralCost/index.tsx Modified calculateTotal function to include servicesCost in total calculation.
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/fields/Overview/OverviewDebts/index.tsx Added a new row to display funeral service costs, retrieving values from answers.funeralCost.service.
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/debtsAndFuneralCost.ts Introduced a new field for funeral service costs in the funeralCost section of the form.
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/lib/messages.ts Added new message for funeralServiceCost and updated deceasedShare terminology.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

automerge, deploy-feature

Suggested reviewers

  • kksteini
  • juni-haukur

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@albinagu albinagu added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Dec 6, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 35.73%. Comparing base (c4685ef) to head (d7c25ec).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...nheritance-report/src/fields/FuneralCost/index.tsx 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
...report/src/fields/Overview/OverviewDebts/index.tsx 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #17159      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   35.73%   35.73%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        6926     6926              
  Lines      147677   147678       +1     
  Branches    42062    42062              
==========================================
  Hits        52775    52775              
- Misses      94902    94903       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.33% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 38.77% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
application-template-api-modules 27.82% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
application-templates-inheritance-report 6.54% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
application-ui-shell 22.48% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...e-report/src/forms/sections/debtsAndFuneralCost.ts 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...n/templates/inheritance-report/src/lib/messages.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...nheritance-report/src/fields/FuneralCost/index.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...report/src/fields/Overview/OverviewDebts/index.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c4685ef...d7c25ec. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/fields/FuneralCost/index.tsx (1)

Line range hint 79-90: LGTM! Consider grouping related costs

The addition of servicesCost is implemented correctly, following the established pattern. However, consider grouping related costs together for better maintainability.

Consider grouping the costs by category:

    const buildCost = valueToNumber(values?.build)
    const cremationCost = valueToNumber(values?.cremation)
+   const servicesCost = valueToNumber(values?.service)
    const printCost = valueToNumber(values?.print)
    const flowersCost = valueToNumber(values?.flowers)
    const musicCost = valueToNumber(values?.music)
    const rentCost = valueToNumber(values?.rent)
    const foodCost = valueToNumber(values?.food)
    const tombstoneCost = valueToNumber(values?.tombstone)
-   const servicesCost = valueToNumber(values?.service)
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/lib/messages.ts (1)

998-1002: Consider adding a description for the funeralServiceCost message

The description field is empty. Consider adding a meaningful description to maintain consistency with other messages and help other developers understand the context of this translation key.

   funeralServiceCost: {
     id: 'ir.application:funeralServiceCost',
     defaultMessage: 'Útfararþjónusta',
-    description: '',
+    description: 'Label for funeral service cost field in the funeral costs section',
   },
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d1f95c5 and 06985ca.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/fields/FuneralCost/index.tsx (2 hunks)
  • libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/fields/Overview/OverviewDebts/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/debtsAndFuneralCost.ts (1 hunks)
  • libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/lib/messages.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/fields/Overview/OverviewDebts/index.tsx (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/debtsAndFuneralCost.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/fields/FuneralCost/index.tsx (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/lib/messages.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (3)
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/fields/Overview/OverviewDebts/index.tsx (1)

97-102: LGTM! Consistent implementation

The new row for funeral service cost is implemented correctly, following the established patterns for internationalization and currency formatting.

libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/debtsAndFuneralCost.ts (1)

158-161: LGTM! Verify message definition

The new field for funeral service cost is properly configured. Let's verify that the corresponding message is defined.

✅ Verification successful

Message definition verified successfully

The message key funeralServiceCost is properly defined in the messages file with the appropriate ID structure ir.application:funeralServiceCost.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the message key exists in the messages file
rg -A 1 "funeralServiceCost.*=.*{" libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/lib/messages.ts

Length of output: 214


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for funeralServiceCost in messages file with proper escaping
rg "funeralServiceCost" libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/lib/messages.ts

Length of output: 158

libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/lib/messages.ts (1)

1261-1261: LGTM: Terminology update for deceased's share

The change from "Hlutfall séreignar" to "Búshluti maka" improves clarity by using consistent terminology for spouse's share throughout the application.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Datadog Report

All test runs bfe64ef 🔗

5 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 4 Passed
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 12 no change

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
api 0 0 0 4 0 3.08s 1 no change Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 46 0 2m 30.57s 1 no change Link
application-template-api-modules 0 0 0 118 0 2m 2.66s 1 no change Link
application-ui-shell 0 0 0 74 0 30.72s 1 no change Link
download-service 0 0 0 0 0 686.09ms 1 no change Link

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit d8a0379 into main Dec 6, 2024
45 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the ir_service_cost branch December 6, 2024 12:45
thorhildurt pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2024
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants