Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(inheritance-report): overview confirmations #15855

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 2, 2024

Conversation

albinagu
Copy link
Member

@albinagu albinagu commented Sep 2, 2024

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added new confirmation fields for assets, debts, and heirs in the inheritance report, enhancing user input accuracy.
    • Introduced new description and checkbox fields in the debts and heirs sections for improved user interaction.
    • Enhanced the asset overview structure to support multiple fields, improving organization and detail.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed unnecessary descriptive text in the asset overview to streamline user experience.
  • Documentation

    • Added new message entries for localized feedback in the application, improving accessibility for users.

@albinagu albinagu requested a review from a team as a code owner September 2, 2024 16:23
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve enhancements to the inheritance report application, including the addition of new confirmation fields for assets, debts, and heirs. Modifications to various components and schemas improve the structure and functionality of the forms, enabling better user interaction and data collection. New message definitions for internationalization support localized confirmations, ensuring user inputs can be acknowledged in their native language.

Changes

Files Change Summary
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/inheritance-report/utils/mappers.ts Added new properties (assetsConfirmation, debtsConfirmation, heirsConfirmation) to the expandAnswers function's exported object, enhancing data handling.
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/fields/Overview/OverviewAssets/index.tsx Removed JSX block rendering asset overview description, simplifying component output while retaining core functionality.
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/assets.ts Replaced buildCustomField with buildMultiField, introducing a nested structure for the asset overview, which now includes multiple child components, enhancing organization and interactivity.
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/debtsAndFuneralCost.ts Added new fields: a description field and a checkbox field for user confirmation regarding debts, improving user interaction.
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/heirs.ts Introduced a description field and a checkbox field for user confirmation in the heirs section, enhancing user engagement and contextual information.
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/lib/dataSchema.ts Added new properties (assetsConfirmation, debtsConfirmation, heirsConfirmation) to the inheritanceReportSchema, requiring explicit confirmations for each category.
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/lib/messages.ts Introduced new message entries (assetsOverviewConfirmation, debtsOverviewConfirmation, heirsOverviewConfirmation) for localized user confirmations regarding assets, debts, and heirs.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Tip

Early access features: enabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • Anthropic claude-3-5-sonnet for code reviews: Anthropic claims that the new Claude model has stronger code understanding and code generation capabilities than their previous models. Note: Our default code review model was also updated late last week. Please compare the quality of the reviews between the two models by toggling the early access feature.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues on the discussion post.

@albinagu albinagu added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Sep 2, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.94%. Comparing base (9babb09) to head (71a892e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #15855   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   36.94%   36.94%           
=======================================
  Files        6680     6680           
  Lines      136459   136459           
  Branches    38745    38771   +26     
=======================================
+ Hits        50409    50410    +1     
+ Misses      86050    86049    -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
air-discount-scheme-backend 54.20% <ø> (ø)
air-discount-scheme-web 0.00% <ø> (ø)
api 3.39% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-air-discount-scheme 37.13% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-assets 26.71% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-auth-admin 53.90% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-communications 40.62% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-criminal-record 48.24% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-driving-license 44.56% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-education 31.72% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-health-insurance 35.17% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-mortgage-certificate 36.07% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-payment-schedule 41.40% <ø> (ø)
application-api-files 58.00% <ø> (ø)
application-core 72.28% <ø> (+0.33%) ⬆️
application-system-api 41.75% <ø> (ø)
application-template-api-modules 23.66% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
application-templates-accident-notification 19.83% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-car-recycling 3.12% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-criminal-record 22.12% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-driving-license 15.98% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-estate 11.89% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-example-payment 20.79% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-financial-aid 12.09% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-general-petition 18.86% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-health-insurance 23.27% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-inheritance-report 4.63% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-marriage-conditions 10.47% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-mortgage-certificate 44.39% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-parental-leave 28.40% <ø> (+0.11%) ⬆️
application-types 6.74% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-components 1.52% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-shell 21.17% <ø> (ø)
clients-charge-fjs-v2 27.54% <ø> (ø)
clients-driving-license 41.10% <ø> (ø)
clients-driving-license-book 44.20% <ø> (ø)
clients-financial-statements-inao 49.55% <ø> (ø)
clients-license-client 1.83% <ø> (ø)
clients-regulations 43.06% <ø> (ø)
clients-rsk-company-registry 30.64% <ø> (ø)
clients-rsk-personal-tax-return 38.00% <ø> (ø)
clients-smartsolutions 12.77% <ø> (ø)
clients-syslumenn 50.02% <ø> (ø)
cms 0.43% <ø> (ø)
cms-translations 39.78% <ø> (ø)
dokobit-signing 62.85% <ø> (ø)
download-service 44.67% <ø> (ø)
email-service 60.65% <ø> (ø)
feature-flags 90.69% <ø> (ø)
file-storage 53.01% <ø> (ø)
financial-aid-backend 56.48% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-api 18.26% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-audit-trail 68.53% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-backend 56.20% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-message 66.79% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-message-handler 47.61% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-scheduler 69.55% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-web 28.75% <ø> (ø)
license-api 42.93% <ø> (ø)
nest-config 78.07% <ø> (ø)
nest-feature-flags 51.91% <ø> (ø)
nova-sms 62.18% <ø> (ø)
portals-admin-regulations-admin 2.01% <ø> (ø)
portals-core 16.22% <ø> (ø)
services-auth-admin-api 51.07% <ø> (ø)
services-auth-delegation-api 61.57% <ø> (ø)
services-auth-ids-api 53.86% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
services-auth-personal-representative 48.05% <ø> (-0.05%) ⬇️
services-auth-personal-representative-public 43.95% <ø> (ø)
services-auth-public-api 51.96% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
services-endorsements-api 55.11% <ø> (ø)
services-sessions 65.61% <ø> (ø)
services-university-gateway 48.58% <ø> (+0.05%) ⬆️
services-user-notification 47.75% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
services-user-profile 62.37% <ø> (+0.07%) ⬆️
web 1.88% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...ules/templates/inheritance-report/utils/mappers.ts 2.99% <ø> (ø)
...eport/src/fields/Overview/OverviewAssets/index.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...es/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/assets.ts 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...e-report/src/forms/sections/debtsAndFuneralCost.ts 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...tes/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/heirs.ts 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...templates/inheritance-report/src/lib/dataSchema.ts 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...n/templates/inheritance-report/src/lib/messages.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9babb09...71a892e. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

Datadog Report

All test runs 4313fec 🔗

5 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 5 Passed
⬆️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 increased (+0.1%), 14 no change

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
api 0 0 0 4 0 2.87s 1 no change Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 111 2 2m 56.5s 1 no change Link
application-template-api-modules 0 0 0 109 0 1m 40.7s 1 no change Link
application-templates-parental-leave 0 0 0 162 0 18.27s 1 increased (+0.1%) Link
application-ui-shell 0 0 0 74 0 31.53s 1 no change Link

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/debtsAndFuneralCost.ts (1)

187-198: LGTM: New fields enhance user interaction.

The added buildDescriptionField and buildCheckboxField improve the form's structure and functionality:

  • The description field adds appropriate spacing.
  • The checkbox field allows users to confirm their understanding of the debts overview.

Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the empty description field for better code readability:

 buildDescriptionField({
   id: 'space',
   title: '',
   marginBottom: 'containerGutter',
+  // Add vertical space between elements
 }),
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/heirs.ts (1)

399-410: New fields added correctly, with a minor suggestion.

The new description field (spacer) and checkbox field are implemented correctly and enhance the form's structure and functionality.

Consider extracting the checkbox label to a separate constant for better maintainability:

+const HEIRS_CONFIRMATION_LABEL = m.heirsOverviewConfirmation;

 buildCheckboxField({
   id: 'heirsConfirmation',
   title: '',
   large: false,
   backgroundColor: 'white',
-  options: [{ value: YES, label: m.heirsOverviewConfirmation }],
+  options: [{ value: YES, label: HEIRS_CONFIRMATION_LABEL }],
 }),
Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9babb09 and 0ef4795.

Files selected for processing (7)
  • libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/inheritance-report/utils/mappers.ts (1 hunks)
  • libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/fields/Overview/OverviewAssets/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/assets.ts (2 hunks)
  • libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/debtsAndFuneralCost.ts (2 hunks)
  • libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/heirs.ts (3 hunks)
  • libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (1 hunks)
  • libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/lib/messages.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/fields/Overview/OverviewAssets/index.tsx
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (6)
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/debtsAndFuneralCost.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/inheritance-report/utils/mappers.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/heirs.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/assets.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/lib/messages.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
Additional comments not posted (10)
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/debtsAndFuneralCost.ts (2)

2-2: LGTM: Import changes are appropriate.

The new imports buildCheckboxField and YES are correctly added to support the new fields in the form.

Also applies to: 8-8


Line range hint 1-205: Adherence to libs directory guidelines confirmed.

The changes maintain compliance with the additional instructions for files in the libs directory:

  • TypeScript is used for defining props and exporting types.
  • Components and hooks remain reusable across different NextJS apps.
  • The code structure supports effective tree-shaking and bundling practices.
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/inheritance-report/utils/mappers.ts (1)

Line range hint 1-339: Approval: Good TypeScript usage and reusability

The code demonstrates good practices in terms of TypeScript usage and reusability:

  1. Proper use of TypeScript for type definitions and imports.
  2. Utilization of zod for schema validation, which enhances type safety and allows for runtime type checking.
  3. The expandAnswers function is exported, making it available for use in other parts of the application or other NextJS apps within the project.
  4. The use of generic types derived from zod schemas (InheritanceReportSchema) promotes flexibility and reusability.

These practices align well with the requirements for reusability across different NextJS apps and effective TypeScript usage.

libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/heirs.ts (2)

2-2: New imports added correctly.

The new imports buildCheckboxField and YES are appropriately added to support the new checkbox field in the form.

Also applies to: 13-13


Line range hint 1-410: Adherence to library guidelines confirmed.

The changes in this file:

  1. Maintain reusability of components across different NextJS apps.
  2. Continue to use TypeScript for defining props and exporting types.
  3. Do not negatively impact tree-shaking or bundling practices.
libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (1)

784-786: LGTM! New confirmation fields added.

The addition of assetsConfirmation, debtsConfirmation, and heirsConfirmation fields enhances the schema by requiring explicit confirmations for these key areas of the inheritance report. This change aligns well with the PR objectives.

To ensure reusability across different NextJS apps, let's verify if these new fields are exported:

Consider extracting the confirmation field definition into a reusable function to improve maintainability:

const createConfirmationField = () => z.array(z.enum([YES])).length(1);

// Usage
assetsConfirmation: createConfirmationField(),
debtsConfirmation: createConfirmationField(),
heirsConfirmation: createConfirmationField(),

This approach would make it easier to maintain consistency across confirmation fields and reduce code duplication.

Verification successful

Fields are reusable as part of the exported schema.

The new fields assetsConfirmation, debtsConfirmation, and heirsConfirmation are included in the inheritanceReportSchema, which is exported and re-exported. This ensures their reusability across different parts of the application.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the new fields are exported
rg -i "export.*assetsConfirmation|export.*debtsConfirmation|export.*heirsConfirmation" libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/

Length of output: 139


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for exports of objects or schemas that might contain the new fields
rg -i "export.*inheritanceReportSchema" libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/ -A 10

Length of output: 1405

libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/assets.ts (3)

2-2: New import added for checkbox field.

The buildCheckboxField function is now imported from the core application module. This addition suggests new functionality in the form.


683-706: Restructured asset overview subsection with new fields.

The assetOverview subsection has been restructured using buildMultiField. This change improves the organization and modularity of the form. New fields have been added:

  1. A custom field for overview assets (lines 688-693)
  2. A description field for spacing (lines 694-698)
  3. A checkbox field for assets confirmation (lines 699-705)

These additions enhance the user interaction and data collection capabilities of the form.

To ensure that these changes are properly integrated and don't introduce any issues, please run the following verification script:

Verification successful

Verification Successful: Asset Overview Subsection Restructured Correctly

The assetOverview subsection has been successfully restructured using buildMultiField, and the new fields are correctly integrated into the codebase. The usage of buildCheckboxField and buildMultiField, along with the IDs overviewAssets and assetsConfirmation, is consistent and without conflicts.

  • The functions and IDs are used appropriately in libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/forms/sections/assets.ts.
  • The naming of assetOverview is consistent across the codebase.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of new fields and their integration

# Test 1: Check if the new imports are used correctly
rg --type typescript "buildCheckboxField|buildMultiField" libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src

# Test 2: Verify the consistency of field IDs across the codebase
rg --type typescript "id: 'overviewAssets'|id: 'assetsConfirmation'" libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src

# Test 3: Check for any potential naming conflicts
rg --type typescript "assetOverview" libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src

Length of output: 434


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of new fields and their integration

# Test 1: Check if the new imports are used correctly
rg --type ts "buildCheckboxField|buildMultiField" libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src

# Test 2: Verify the consistency of field IDs across the codebase
rg --type ts "id: 'overviewAssets'|id: 'assetsConfirmation'" libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src

# Test 3: Check for any potential naming conflicts
rg --type ts "assetOverview" libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src

Length of output: 7210


683-706: Verify TypeScript usage and reusability.

The changes adhere to TypeScript usage by properly defining props for the new fields. The use of core building blocks like buildMultiField, buildCustomField, buildDescriptionField, and buildCheckboxField promotes reusability across different NextJS apps.

To ensure proper TypeScript usage and reusability, please run the following verification script:

Verification successful

Verification of TypeScript Usage and Reusability

The verification script successfully identified TypeScript type definitions, exports, and the usage of reusable components across the codebase. The following observations were made:

  • TypeScript Type Definitions: The file libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/types.ts contains multiple type and interface definitions, ensuring proper TypeScript usage.
  • Exports: The file libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/index.ts and others in the directory export various components and types, promoting reusability.
  • Reusable Components: The components buildMultiField, buildCustomField, buildDescriptionField, and buildCheckboxField are used extensively across different files, indicating their reusability.

These findings confirm that the changes adhere to TypeScript usage and promote reusability across the codebase.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify TypeScript usage and reusability of components

# Test 1: Check for proper TypeScript type definitions
rg --type typescript "interface|type|extends" libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src

# Test 2: Verify the export of types and components
rg --type typescript "export.*{.*}" libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src

# Test 3: Check for the usage of reusable components across the codebase
rg --type typescript "buildMultiField|buildCustomField|buildDescriptionField|buildCheckboxField" libs/application/

Length of output: 476


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify TypeScript usage and reusability of components

# Test 1: Check for proper TypeScript type definitions
rg "interface|type|extends" --glob "*.ts" libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src

# Test 2: Verify the export of types and components
rg "export\s+\{.*\}" --glob "*.ts" libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src

# Test 3: Check for the usage of reusable components across the codebase
rg "buildMultiField|buildCustomField|buildDescriptionField|buildCheckboxField" --glob "*.ts" libs/application/

Length of output: 289206

libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/lib/messages.ts (1)

835-852: New confirmation messages added

The changes introduce three new message entries for confirming the accuracy of entered information regarding assets, debts, and heirs. These additions enhance the user experience and align with the PR objectives.

To ensure consistency with existing entries, let's verify the structure of these new messages:

Verification successful

New confirmation messages are correctly structured and integrated

The new message entries assetsOverviewConfirmation, debtsOverviewConfirmation, and heirsOverviewConfirmation are correctly structured with id and defaultMessage properties. They are also referenced in other parts of the codebase, indicating proper integration.

  • The entries are present in libs/application/templates/inheritance-report/src/lib/messages.ts.
  • They are used in related sections like heirs.ts, debtsAndFuneralCost.ts, and assets.ts.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the structure of the new message entries
# Test: Check if the new entries follow the same pattern as existing ones
# Expect: Each new entry should have an 'id' and a 'defaultMessage' property

rg --type typescript -A 3 'assetsOverviewConfirmation|debtsOverviewConfirmation|heirsOverviewConfirmation'

Length of output: 143


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the structure of the new message entries
# Test: Check if the new entries follow the same pattern as existing ones
# Expect: Each new entry should have an 'id' and a 'defaultMessage' property

rg -A 3 'assetsOverviewConfirmation|debtsOverviewConfirmation|heirsOverviewConfirmation'

Length of output: 3086

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants