Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow storing 2024 geometry in GEMGeometryParsFromDD #44429

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 18, 2024

Conversation

watson-ij
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

The GEMGeometryParsFromDDD has a check for the demonstrator which doesn't work for the 2024 geometry. This PR allows the geometry to be dumped properly in order to make a tag.

PR validation:

Dumped the 2024 geometry (with modified version of [1] to load 2024) and checked that it ran over some 2024 data to read out the new GEM chambers (using also the 2024 alignments and channel map). Since it only affects writing the geometry, there should be no visible changes with this PR.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Before submitting your pull requests, make sure you followed this checklist:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 15, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44429/39503

  • This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @watson-ij for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Geometry/GEMGeometryBuilder (upgrade, geometry)

@makortel, @bsunanda, @srimanob, @subirsarkar, @cmsbuild, @mdhildreth, @Dr15Jones, @civanch can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@fabiocos, @jshlee, @bsunanda, @giovanni-mocellin, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@watson-ij
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d8aae7/38191/summary.html
COMMIT: ad94ff7
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-03-15-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/44429/38191/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Mar 16, 2024

+1

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

@watson-ij
Just to confirm, with this PR, it will work also for 2021 geometry, e.g. when we do legacy processing with future release, it will not cause issue to dump config in all cases.

@watson-ij
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @srimanob . Yes, the update should not affect the 2021 geometry dumping either. I just checked, and when using GeometryExtended2021_cff the current code will dump out a geometry with the GE1/1 and the one GE2/1 demonstrator, as it should, and GeometryExtended2024_cff gives the 3 GE2/1 chambers.

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

+Upgrade

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@antoniovilela
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants