Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

consistent implementation of nano step for Run 3 #36167

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 29, 2021

Conversation

kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Supersedes #36050 to fix #35966 by redoing #35412 in a consistent way. All special workflows that target Run 3 scenarios are updated to handle the new Nano-related steps.

PR validation:

Checked both relval and production-like workflows to see that the desired steps are created.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36167/26724

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @kpedro88 (Kevin Pedro) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)

@jordan-martins, @bbilin, @wajidalikhan, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @missirol, @slomeo, @fabiocos, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

test parameters:
workflow = 11834.21
relvals_opt = -w upgrade

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-827954/20610/summary.html
COMMIT: 8567468
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_2_X_2021-11-18-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/36167/20610/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

RelVals

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

@smuzaffar it seems like adding -w upgrade prevented it from running the normal matrix tests. I thought this had worked in the past. Is there a different setting needed?

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

@kpedro88 , I don't think it ever worked. The only way is to explicitly pass -w <comma,separated,list,of,other,works,>upgrade . Note that there are some sets which define the same workflow number. So it is bit tricky to get the correct list

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

okay, i'm just going to add it to the regular matrix.

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

test parameters:
workflow = 11834.21

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #36167 was updated. @jordan-martins, @bbilin, @wajidalikhan, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen can you please check and sign again.

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-827954/20688/summary.html
COMMIT: 469b45f
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_2_X_2021-11-22-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/36167/20688/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-827954/11834.21_TTbar_14TeV+2021PU_ProdLike+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSim+DigiPU+RecoNanoPU+MiniAODPU+NanoPU

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 42
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2206928
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 5
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2206900
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.004 KiB( 36 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 153 log files, 37 edm output root files, 42 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@mariadalfonso
Copy link
Contributor

would be nice to have this PR soon, so that next integrations of the nano in view of Run3 are validated in the runTheMatrix
@cms-sw/upgrade-l2 @cms-sw/pdmv-l2 : is there something more to check ?

@kskovpen
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

+Upgrade

This PR is to take care Nano step to run properly in relvals. PR test runs fine and the result is expected (No change).

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Nov 29, 2021

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 3214f5f into cms-sw:master Nov 29, 2021
@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Nov 30, 2021

apparently this broke GPU workflows
runTheMatrix.py -w gpu -n -e -l 11634.506 had 4 steps in CMSSW_12_2_X_2021-11-29-1100 and only 2 steps in CMSSW_12_2_X_2021-11-29-2300 and the only relevant change seems to be from this PR.

@cms-sw/heterogeneous-l2

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

@slava77 thanks for spotting this, see #36309

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Run3 production-like workflow contains duplicated NANO step since 12_1_0_pre5
8 participants