-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add LA harvester to 1001.2 wf #36245
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36245/26882
|
A new Pull Request was created by @tvami (Tamas Vami) for master. It involves the following packages:
@jordan-martins, @bbilin, @wajidalikhan, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild , please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5abfd2/20750/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
Should we test 1001.2 as an additional step introduced in this PR? @tvami @kskovpen |
I agree, let's test it explicitly here as well. |
test parameters:
|
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5abfd2/20754/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+Upgrade This PR is to add an additional ALCA step to a specific workflow, 1001.2. The PR test runs fine. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
It came up here
#36241 (comment)
that the wf 1001.2 doesnt have the LA harvester step. This PR adds that.
PR validation:
runTheMatrix.py -l 1001.2 -j 0
is now giving
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
N/A