-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add NanoAOD DQM to RelVal wfs #35412
Conversation
Update master branch
update master
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35412/25522
|
A new Pull Request was created by @kskovpen for master. It involves the following packages:
@jordan-martins, @bbilin, @wajidalikhan, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
Please test |
@@ -3504,6 +3504,15 @@ def gen2021HiMix(fragment,howMuch): | |||
'--geometry' : geom | |||
} | |||
|
|||
upgradeStepDict['NanoDQM'][k] = {'-s':'NANO,DQM:@nanoAODDQM', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what is the rational to define the NanoDQM here ?
I do not see the miniAODDQM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! I have updated the PR accordingly.
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8496ea/18914/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35412/25531
|
Thanks - just was confused for a moment :) |
@srimanob I understood from the ORP right now that this was not really that "urgent" for pre4... |
OK, sure. No problem. I am waiting for the comparison to come. How can I remove urgent label? |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8496ea/19413/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
I have edited your comments to remove "urgent" |
+Upgrade This PR is to add NanoAOD and NanoDQM to the standard sequence, in the same step as RECO and Mini. In addition, for the prod-like workflow, Nano step is added also after MiniAOD step. |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
Here is the fix #35597 |
PR description:
Add Nano+DQM steps to standard 2021 RelVal workflows.
PR validation:
The updated workflows were run through runTheMatrix and tested locally.
FYI @bbilin @jmartinb @rappoccio