Update NTP wallpapers (Fall 2019)

[cezaraugusto]

Close brave/brave-browser#6904

Submitter Checklist:

• Submitted a ticket for my issue if one did not already exist.
• Used Github auto-closing keywords in the commit message.
• Added/updated tests for this change (for new code or code which already has tests).
• Verified that these changes build without errors on
  • Android
  • iOS
  • Linux
  • macOS
  • Windows
• Verified that these changes pass automated tests (unit, browser, security tests) on
  • iOS
  • Linux
  • macOS
  • Windows
• Verified that all lint errors/warnings are resolved (npm run lint)
• Ran git rebase master (if needed).
• Ran git rebase -i to squash commits (if needed).
• Tagged reviewers and labelled the pull request as needed.
• Request a security/privacy review as needed.
• Add appropriate QA labels (QA/Yes or QA/No) to include the closed issue in milestone
• Public documentation has been updated as necessary. For instance:
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Deviations-from-Chromium-(features-we-disable-or-remove)
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Proxy-redirected-URLs
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Fingerprinting-Protection-Mode
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Brave%E2%80%99s-Use-of-Referral-Codes
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Custom-Headers
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Web-compatibility-issues-with-tracking-protection
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/QA-Guide

Test Plan:

• New tab page images should be updated.
• Author attribution should match PDF file located in the referenced issue.

Reviewer Checklist:

• New files have MPL-2.0 license header.
• Request a security/privacy review as needed.
• Adequate test coverage exists to prevent regressions
• Verify test plan is specified in PR before merging to source

After-merge Checklist:

• The associated issue milestone is set to the smallest version that the
  changes has landed on.
• All relevant documentation has been updated.

[fmarier]

Looks good except for two entries which are missing links.

[petemill]

@cezaraugusto Do you know which settings you used to compress these images? The file sizes are often a lot lower than the files that they are replacing. They don't seem to be to be as crisp and I can notice a few artifacts, but will double check on different screens and resolutions if the quality of these has been seen by design team yet.

[bsclifton]

@fmarier ready for re-review 😄

[bsclifton]

@cezaraugusto even though we merged, would you be able to answer questions by @petemill?

I checked myself on Nightly and the images are not horrible, but there are some quality issues (compression artifacts, pixelation)