-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pin gsl to 2.5 for rmats #51411
Pin gsl to 2.5 for rmats #51411
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- recipes/rmats/meta.yaml (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
recipes/rmats/meta.yaml (4)
13-13
: LGTM: Build number increment is correct.Incrementing the build number from 2 to 3 is appropriate when making changes to the recipe without changing the package version. This follows Conda packaging best practices.
29-29
: LGTM: GSL version pinning is correct.Pinning GSL to version 2.5 in both host and run requirements is correct and aligns with the PR objective. This ensures consistency during both build and runtime.
Also applies to: 36-36
Line range hint
1-53
: Overall changes align with PR objectives, but some improvements suggested.The main objective of pinning GSL to version 2.5 for RMATS has been achieved, and the build number has been correctly incremented. However, there are a few points to address:
- The
run_exports
section mentioned in the PR objectives is not present in the changes. Consider adding this to thegsl
package recipe as suggested earlier.- The addition of the linux-aarch64 platform, while beneficial, seems unrelated to the main PR objective. Please clarify the reason for including this change in this PR.
- Ensure that all changes are necessary and directly related to the PR's main objective of pinning GSL for RMATS.
To verify the impact of these changes, we can check the current and new build configurations:
#!/bin/bash # Check current RMATS package conda search rmats --override-channels -c bioconda # Verify GSL version in current RMATS package conda list gsl --explicit -n $(conda create -n rmats_test rmats -c bioconda -y | grep -o "rmats_test") # Clean up conda env remove -n rmats_test -yPlease review these suggestions and make any necessary adjustments before proceeding.
53-53
: LGTM: New platform addition is beneficial, but clarification needed.Adding support for the linux-aarch64 platform is a positive change that increases the package's compatibility. The addition of a newline at the end of the file is also good practice.
However, this change seems unrelated to the main PR objective of pinning GSL to version 2.5. Could you please clarify the reason for including this change in this PR?
To verify if this platform addition is necessary, we can check if RMATS is already built for linux-aarch64:
recipes/rmats/meta.yaml
Outdated
@@ -26,14 +26,14 @@ requirements: | |||
- python | |||
- cython | |||
- numpy | |||
- gsl | |||
- gsl=2.5 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding a run_exports
section for GSL.
While pinning GSL to version 2.5 is correct, the PR objectives mention adding a run_exports
section to prevent potential API, ABI, or CLI breakage issues. Consider adding this section to the gsl
package in its recipe, not in the rmats
recipe.
Here's an example of how it might look in the gsl
package recipe:
build:
run_exports:
- {{ pin_subpackage('gsl', max_pin='x.x') }}
This ensures that packages depending on GSL will automatically use the correct version constraints.
Pin gsl to 2.5 for rmats
Please read the guidelines for Bioconda recipes before opening a pull request (PR).
General instructions
@BiocondaBot please add label
command.@bioconda/core
in a comment.Instructions for avoiding API, ABI, and CLI breakage issues
Conda is able to record and lock (a.k.a. pin) dependency versions used at build time of other recipes.
This way, one can avoid that expectations of a downstream recipe with regards to API, ABI, or CLI are violated by later changes in the recipe.
If not already present in the meta.yaml, make sure to specify
run_exports
(see here for the rationale and comprehensive explanation).Add a
run_exports
section like this:with
...
being one of:{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x") }}
{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}
{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}
(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x.x") }}
(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin=None) }}
while replacing
"myrecipe"
with eithername
if aname|lower
variable is defined in your recipe or with the lowercase name of the package in quotes.Bot commands for PR management
Please use the following BiocondaBot commands:
Everyone has access to the following BiocondaBot commands, which can be given in a comment:
@BiocondaBot please update
@BiocondaBot please add label
please review & merge
label.@BiocondaBot please fetch artifacts
You can use this to test packages locally.
Note that the
@BiocondaBot please merge
command is now depreciated. Please just squash and merge instead.Also, the bot watches for comments from non-members that include
@bioconda/<team>
and will automatically re-post them to notify the addressed<team>
.