Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Status of testing Providers that were prepared on November 14, 2024 #44041

Closed
eladkal opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 15 comments
Closed

Status of testing Providers that were prepared on November 14, 2024 #44041

eladkal opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 15 comments
Labels
area:providers kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases

Comments

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor

eladkal commented Nov 14, 2024

Body

I have a kind request for all the contributors to the latest provider packages release.
Could you please help us to test the RC versions of the providers?

The guidelines on how to test providers can be found in

Verify providers by contributors

Let us know in the comment, whether the issue is addressed.

Those are providers that require testing as there were some substantial changes introduced:

Provider amazon: 9.1.0rc4

Provider apache.beam: 5.9.1rc1

Provider apache.drill: 2.8.1rc1

Provider apache.druid: 3.12.1rc1

Provider apache.hive: 8.2.1rc1

Provider apache.impala: 1.5.2rc1

Provider apache.pinot: 4.5.1rc1

Provider apache.spark: 4.11.3rc1

Provider apprise: 1.4.1rc1

Provider atlassian.jira: 2.7.1rc1

Provider celery: 3.8.4rc1

Provider cloudant: 4.0.3rc1

Provider cncf.kubernetes: 10.0.0rc1

Provider common.compat: 1.2.2rc1

Provider common.sql: 1.20.0rc1

Provider databricks: 6.13.0rc1

Provider dbt.cloud: 3.11.2rc1

Provider docker: 3.14.1rc1

Provider elasticsearch: 5.5.3rc1

Provider exasol: 4.6.1rc1

Provider fab: 1.5.1rc1

Provider google: 10.26.0rc1

Provider http: 4.13.3rc1

Provider jdbc: 4.5.3rc1

Provider microsoft.azure: 11.1.0rc1

Provider microsoft.mssql: 3.9.2rc1

Provider microsoft.winrm: 3.6.1rc1

Provider mysql: 5.7.4rc1

Provider odbc: 4.8.1rc1

Provider openlineage: 1.14.0rc1

Provider oracle: 3.12.1rc1

Provider pagerduty: 3.8.1rc1

Provider papermill: 3.8.2rc1

Provider pinecone: 2.1.1rc1

Provider postgres: 5.14.0rc1

Provider presto: 5.7.0rc1

Provider slack: 8.9.2rc1

Provider smtp: 1.8.1rc1

Provider snowflake: 5.8.1rc1

Provider sqlite: 3.9.1rc1

Provider standard: 0.0.1rc1

Provider teradata: 2.6.1rc1

Provider trino: 5.9.0rc1

Provider vertica: 3.9.1rc1

Provider ydb: 2.0.0rc1

All users involved in the PRs:
@basvandriel @TJaniF @vgvoleg @kacpermuda @pyrr @Illumaria @MaksYermak @pranshupand-db @kunaljubce @romsharon98 @nathadfield @kaxil @Udbv @childe @krzysztof-kubis @LyndonFan @mobuchowski @ferruzzi @brou

Committer

  • I acknowledge that I am a maintainer/committer of the Apache Airflow project.
@eladkal eladkal added kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases labels Nov 14, 2024
@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Nov 16, 2024

I checked all my changes - most of them were docs and dependencies. Dependencies look good (openlineage change of mine was overwritten later by @JDarDagran - so all good there as well.

So everything looks good from my side. 👍

@JDarDagran
Copy link
Contributor

I checked all my changes - most of them were docs and dependencies. Dependencies look good (openlineage change of mine was overwritten later by @JDarDagran - so all good there as well.

Yup, confirming my changes from from #43740 work as expected.

@jimwbaldwin
Copy link
Contributor

#43622: @jimwbaldwin

Heya, confirming that #43622 is working correctly after installing 9.1.0rc4

@gopidesupavan
Copy link
Member

I verified all my changes and tested a few DAG examples. The Spark, Beam, and Docker operators are working as expected.

For Snowflake, I couldn't test in a real environment but confirmed that the imports appear correct.

As for the following providers—Apprise, Atlassian, PagerDuty, OpenLineage, and SMTP—they only have documentation updates, which also look fine.

@gopidesupavan
Copy link
Member

gopidesupavan commented Nov 17, 2024

I verified all my changes and tested a few DAG examples. The Spark, Beam, and Docker operators are working as expected.

For AWS (appflow), Snowflake, I couldn't test in a real environment but confirmed that the imports appear correct.

As for the following providers—Apprise, Atlassian, PagerDuty, OpenLineage, and SMTP—they only have documentation updates, which also look fine.

google, celery providers also fine.

One thing i observed the in the docker provider connection documentation. the auth reference url broken. raised fix here #44112

@kunaljubce
Copy link
Contributor

kunaljubce commented Nov 17, 2024

Verified that my changes on azure provider works as expected with microsoft.azure: 11.1.0rc1!

@brouberol
Copy link
Contributor

I checked that my changes related to using Kerberos authentication for the stable API work with apache-airflow-providers-fab==1.5.1rc1.

@mrk-andreev
Copy link
Contributor

I checked pull-43840 ( #43840 ) for docker: 3.14.1rc1.

Apache Airflow _ Fix logs with leading spaces in the Docker operator (#33692) (#43840)_ @mrk-andreev.pdf

@ambika-garg
Copy link
Contributor

ambika-garg commented Nov 17, 2024 via email

@moiseenkov
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,
#43259 and #43924 work as expected

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor Author

eladkal commented Nov 18, 2024

One thing i observed the in the docker provider connection documentation. the auth reference url broken. raised fix here #44112

Thanks. This will be added in the next wave

@dabla
Copy link
Contributor

dabla commented Nov 18, 2024

43646 works as expected

@VladaZakharova
Copy link
Contributor

Hi there! Changes #43474 and #43474 work fine

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor Author

eladkal commented Nov 18, 2024

Thank you everyone. Providers are released.

I invite everyone to help improve providers for the next release, a list of open issues can be found here.

@eladkal eladkal closed this as completed Nov 18, 2024
@Udbv
Copy link
Contributor

Udbv commented Nov 19, 2024

Hi #43576 works as expected.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:providers kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests