Alkemio 1456/async guidance and cleanup #4699
Conversation
back the guidance chat with a room implement guidence communication thorugh the event bus
…alkem-io/server into alkemio-1456/async-vc-engine-invokation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThis pull request includes multiple changes across various files, primarily focusing on modifications to constants, enums, and service methods related to authorization and guidance functionalities. Notable changes include the addition and removal of constants in authorization files, updates to enums, and the introduction of new methods in services for managing guidance rooms and license privileges. The overall structure of the modules remains intact, with enhancements made to improve functionality and streamline existing processes. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
valeksiev
changed the base branch from
develop
to
alkemio-1456/async-vc-engine-invokation
…okation' into alkemio-1456/async-guidance-and-cleanup
* first pass at two new modules for TemplatesManager, TemplateDefault * added templates manager to space; removed the SpaceDefaults entity (module still present until move all data to be via defaults * added templatesManager to platform * moved creating of default innovatin flow input to space defaults * back out space type on Template; tidy up Template module to use switch statements * created template applier module * tidy up naming * updated set of default template types * fixed circular dependency; moved logic for creating collaboration input to space defaults * removed loading of defaults from files for collaboration content * removed code based addition of callouts, innovation flow states * tidy up naming * added loading of default templates at platform level in to bootstrap * removed option to create new innovation flow template * added in migration: * loading in templates on bootstrap * added field for collaboration templates on templatesSet; added lookup for templatesManager * added mutation to create template from collaboration; added logic to prevent template used as default to be deleted; fixed removal of template set on template manager * initial creation of license + entitlements modules * add license into account * updated account to have license service + use that in mutations checking limits, removing notion of soft limits * ensure data is loaded properly on account for license checking * added mutation to reset the license calculations on account, including new auth privilege to be able to do so * renamed Licensing module to LicensingFramework module; trigger license reset on Account after assigning / removing license * removed usage of LicenseEngine outside of license services on space or account * renamed entitlement to licenseEntitlement as entity; first pass at migration * fixed issues in migration * fixed issues related to auth reset; tidied up loader creator imports * fixed auth cascade for templates of type post * license reset running * reset licenses on space after adding / removing license plans * removed need for license check in community; added entitlement check in roleset when adding a VC * remove auth reset when assigning / removing license plans * added License to RoleSet * added license to collaboration * tidied up retrieval of license for whiteboard; added license to collaboration in migration * fix typo; fix space spec file * fix additional tests * moved tempaltesManager to last migration in the list * fixed retrieval of template when creating collaboration * added logging * fixed bootstrap setting of templates * refactored inputCreator to do the data loading closer to usage; fixed picking up of templates; fixed bootstrap usage of templates * added ability to retrieve limits on entitlements + current usage * updated field names on entitlements * updated field names on entitlements * fixed account mutaiton logic bug * ensure that licenses are reset when assigning beta tester or vc campaign role to a user * added reset all account licenses mutation * fixed bug on space entitlements; refactored code to reduce duplication * fixed url generation for templates inside of TempaltesManager * fixed bootstrap order to create forum earlier * ensure collaboration creation on template provides some defaults for callouts * fix deletion of templates of type post * ensure more data is defaulted inside of template service for collaboration; add setting of isTemplate field on Collaboration, and also on contained Callouts * ensure isTempalte is passed to Collaboration entity * fixed groups in bootstrap space template; updated signature for creating callout from collaboration * fixed missing field * fixed type on mutation to create from collaboration * fixed typo * fixed groups in bootstrap space template; updated signature for creating callout from collaboration * fixed missing field * fixed type on mutation to create from collaboration * fixed typo * reworked applying collaboraiton template to collaboration * improved error message in wrong type of ID passed in * fixed build * made migration last in the list * rename migration to be last * removed read check when looking up collaboration * track free / plus / premium space entitlements separately * updated migration order * removed duplicate migration * moved auth reset to mutation for applying the template to another collaboration * extend lookup of entitlement usage to cover new types * updaed license policy to reflect new entitlements; made license engine work with entitlements, not license privileges; removed license privilege (no longer relevant) * updated migration to not drop indexes already removed * fix for license reset on space * added license policy rule for free space credential * ensure license entitlements are reset as part of the bootstrap * fixed typo * extended reset all to include resetting licenses on accounts + AI server; moved migration to be last * Address pr comment * Address PR feedback * Address PR comment * Address PR comments * Address PR comments * Address PR comment Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Improved types & naming * Address PR comments * Fixed switch-case logic in entitlements * Converge entitlements schema * Remove unused AuthorizationPrivilege --------- Co-authored-by: Carlos Cano <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Valentin Yanakiev <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…#4708) * Fixed proper L0 account agent selection in recursive license assignment * provide root space agent for sub-sub space
Co-authored-by: Evgeni Dimitrov <[email protected]>
…4712) * filter out demo spaces for unauthenticated users search in elastic * improvements --------- Co-authored-by: Svetoslav <[email protected]>
…-guidance-and-cleanup
…-guidance-and-cleanup
…okation' into alkemio-1456/async-guidance-and-cleanup
…alkem-io/server into alkemio-1456/async-guidance-and-cleanup
…alkem-io/server into alkemio-1456/async-guidance-and-cleanup
…-guidance-and-cleanup
…-guidance-and-cleanup
…-guidance-and-cleanup
…-guidance-and-cleanup
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
@CodeRabbit review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 16
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (44)
src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/dto/utils.ts (3)
11-16: Consider using optional chaining for safer property access.The nested property access could benefit from optional chaining to make it more robust against undefined values.
return ( input.resultHandler.action === action && - input.resultHandler.roomDetails && - input.resultHandler.roomDetails.threadID + input.resultHandler?.roomDetails?.threadID );
17-22: Apply consistent validation pattern with optional chaining.For consistency with the POST_REPLY validation, consider using optional chaining here as well.
if (action === InvocationResultAction.POST_MESSAGE) { return ( - input.resultHandler.action === action && input.resultHandler.roomDetails + input.resultHandler?.action === action && input.resultHandler?.roomDetails ); }
22-22: Improve the fallback case comment.The current comment "better safe than sorry" could be more descriptive about the purpose of the default case.
- // better safe than sorry + // Return false for unrecognized actions as a safety measuresrc/services/adapters/ai-server-adapter/dto/ai.server.adapter.dto.invocation.ts (1)
29-29: Add type annotation and documentation for language property.While adding the optional language property is good, consider these improvements:
- Add a specific type annotation (e.g., string literal union of supported languages)
- Include JSDoc comment explaining the expected format and supported languages
+ /** Language code in ISO 639-1 format (e.g., 'en', 'es') */ - language?: string; + language?: 'en' | 'es' | string;src/domain/communication/message.guidance.question.result/message.guidance.question.result.interface.ts (1)
19-30: LGTM! The error handling pattern is well-implemented.The new error handling structure with
successand optionalerrorfields follows good practices. The field descriptions are clear and the types are appropriate.Consider adding an enum for common error types in the future if specific error cases emerge.
src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-engine-adapter/dto/ai.persona.engine.adapter.dto.invocation.input.ts (1)
35-35: Consider using string literal type for languageThe addition of the optional language property is good. However, consider using a string literal type to restrict values to valid language codes.
- language?: string; + language?: 'en' | 'es' | 'fr' | 'de' | 'it' | 'pt' | 'nl' | 'ja' | 'ko' | 'zh';src/domain/common/license/license.resolver.fields.ts (2)
24-24: Enhance field description for better documentationThe current description "The set of License Entitlements on that entity" could be more specific about:
- What these privileges represent
- How they differ from the
entitlementsfield- The relationship to the current user (given the "my" prefix)
Consider updating to something like:
- description: 'The set of License Entitlements on that entity.', + description: 'The set of License Entitlements available to the current user for this entity. These represent the actual privileges the user has based on their relationship with the license.',
26-30: Consider renaming for consistency between privileges and entitlementsThe method name
myLicensePrivilegesreturnsLicenseEntitlementType[], which might be confusing. Consider aligning the naming:- async myLicensePrivileges( + async myLicenseEntitlements( @Parent() license: ILicense ): Promise<LicenseEntitlementType[]> { - return await this.licenseService.getMyLicensePrivilegesOrFail(license); + return await this.licenseService.getMyLicenseEntitlementsOrFail(license); }src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.module.ts (1)
19-19: Consider reorganizing imports array for better maintainabilityThe imports array could be better organized by grouping related modules:
imports: [ AuthorizationModule, AuthorizationPolicyModule, PlatformAuthorizationPolicyModule, + // Core platform + PlatformModule, + // Domain modules + UserModule, + RoomModule, + VirtualContributorModule, + // Adapters GuidanceEngineAdapterModule, GuidanceReporterModule, AiServerAdapterModule, CommunicationAdapterModule, - VirtualContributorModule, - RoomModule, - UserModule, - PlatformModule, ],Also applies to: 23-28
src/services/api/search/v2/search2.service.ts (1)
26-26: Document the demo spaces visibility logicThe condition
!agentInfo.emailto determineexcludeDemoSpacesneeds documentation to explain:
- The concept of demo spaces and their visibility rules
- Why email presence is used as the authentication indicator
Consider adding a comment block above this line:
+ // Demo spaces are only visible to authenticated users with valid email addresses + // This ensures that demo content is protected from unauthorized access const excludeDemoSpaces = !agentInfo.email;src/migrations/1731937383422-userGuidanceRoom.ts (1)
1-51: Consider documenting the guidance system architectureThis migration introduces a significant architectural feature - the guidance system. Consider documenting:
- The relationship between users, rooms, and virtual contributors
- The purpose and lifecycle of guidance rooms
- How the platform's virtual contributor interacts with user guidance rooms
This will help maintain the system and onboard new developers.
src/core/bootstrap/bootstrap.module.ts (2)
Line range hint
36-36: Remove duplicate SpaceModule importThe
SpaceModuleis imported twice in the imports array. Remove one of the duplicate entries to maintain clean code.ContributorModule, SpaceModule, OrganizationModule, AccountModule, - SpaceModule, UserModule,Also applies to: 39-39
Line range hint
28-53: Consider breaking down the BootstrapModuleThe large number of imported modules suggests that this bootstrap module might be handling too many responsibilities. Consider breaking it down into more focused feature modules following NestJS best practices and the Single Responsibility Principle.
Suggested approach:
- Group related modules into feature modules (e.g.,
CommunityModule,TemplatingModule,LicensingModule)- Import these feature modules in the
BootstrapModuleinstead of individual modules- This will improve maintainability and make the module structure more scalable
Example structure:
@Module({ imports: [ AiFeatureModule, // Groups AI-related modules CommunityFeatureModule, // Groups community-related modules TemplatingFeatureModule, // Groups templating modules LicensingFeatureModule, // Groups licensing modules // ... other feature modules ], providers: [BootstrapService], exports: [BootstrapService], }) export class BootstrapModule {}src/services/room-integration/room.controller.service.ts (2)
24-26: Add logging for early return caseConsider adding debug logging when skipping message processing due to missing threadID. This will help with troubleshooting and monitoring.
if (!threadID) { + this.logger.debug?.('Skipping message processing - no threadID provided', LogContext.COMMUNICATION); return; }
57-57: Define proper message typeThe TODO comment indicates that the
messageparameter needs proper typing. This should be addressed to improve type safety and documentation.Would you like me to help create an interface for the message type based on its usage in the codebase?
src/services/infrastructure/license-entitlement-usage/license.entitlement.usage.service.ts (1)
85-86: Improve TODO comment with specific requirementsThe TODO comment lacks context about what's not working and what needs to be fixed. Consider adding more details about the issue and acceptance criteria.
Replace with:
- //toDo - fix this, at the moment this path is not working + // TODO: Fix space entitlement filtering + // Issue: Space license entitlement validation is not working + // Requirements: + // 1. Validate that space has the specified entitlement type + // 2. Ensure entitlement is enabled + // 3. Add error handling for invalid license configurationssrc/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/dto/ai.persona.service.invocation.dto.input.ts (1)
24-24: Fix typos in field descriptionsThere are typos in the field descriptions: "shold" should be "should".
- description: 'The room to which the reply shold be posted.', + description: 'The room to which the reply should be posted.', - description: 'The thread to which the reply shold be posted.', + description: 'The thread to which the reply should be posted.',Also applies to: 21-21
src/services/infrastructure/event-bus/event.bus.module.ts (2)
82-86: Add documentation for the new guidance queue.Consider adding comments explaining the purpose and message flow of this queue, especially since it's part of a larger guidance system implementation.
{ + // Queue for handling guidance-related events between the server and virtual contributor engine + // Messages: TBD (document expected message types) name: 'virtual-contributor-engine-guidance', exchange: eventBusConfig.exchange, routingKey: 'guidance', },
82-86: Consider moving queue configuration to config service.The queue name and routing key are hardcoded. Consider moving these to the
eventBusConfigconfiguration to maintain consistency with other queue configurations likeingest_space_queue.Example approach:
// In config: export interface EventBusConfig { exchange: string; ingest_space_queue: string; ingest_space_result_queue: string; + virtual_contributor_guidance_queue: string; + virtual_contributor_guidance_routing_key: string; } // In module: { - name: 'virtual-contributor-engine-guidance', + name: eventBusConfig.virtual_contributor_guidance_queue, exchange: eventBusConfig.exchange, - routingKey: 'guidance', + routingKey: eventBusConfig.virtual_contributor_guidance_routing_key, },src/services/adapters/chat-guidance-adapter/guidance.engine.adapter.ts (2)
36-36: Enhance error messages for better debuggingWhile the new error handling structure with
successanderrorfields is good, consider making the error messages more specific:- const errorMessage = `Error received from guidance chat server! ${e}`; + const errorMessage = `Failed to communicate with guidance chat server: ${e.message}`; - const errorMessage = `Could not send query to chat guidance adapter! ${err}`; + const errorMessage = `Failed to parse guidance response as JSON: ${err.message}`;This will help distinguish between network/communication errors and JSON parsing errors during debugging.
Also applies to: 50-51, 83-84
97-98: Consider aligning error handling pattern with sendQueryWhile the formatting changes improve readability, consider aligning the error handling pattern with
sendQueryfor consistency across the adapter:public async sendReset(eventData: GuidanceEngineInputBase): Promise<boolean> { try { const responseData = await firstValueFrom<GuidanceEngineBaseResponse>(response); return responseData.result === successfulResetResponse; } catch (err: any) { + const errorMessage = `Failed to reset guidance chat: ${err.message}`; this.logger.error( - `Could not send reset to chat guidance adapter! ${err}`, + errorMessage, err?.stack, LogContext.CHAT_GUIDANCE ); return false; } }Apply similar changes to
sendIngestfor consistent error messaging across the adapter.Also applies to: 120-121
src/platform/platform/platform.service.ts (1)
136-152: Implementation follows service patterns wellThe method follows the established patterns in the service and properly handles the error case. Consider adding JSDoc documentation to describe the method's purpose and usage.
Add documentation like this:
+/** + * Retrieves the guidance virtual contributor for the platform + * @throws EntityNotFoundException when the virtual contributor is not found + * @returns Promise<IVirtualContributor> The virtual contributor with its AI persona + */ async getGuidanceVirtualContributorOrFail(): Promise<IVirtualContributor> {src/domain/space/space/space.service.license.ts (1)
65-70: Consider adding JSDoc documentation.The implementation is correct and uses proper TypeScript patterns. Consider adding JSDoc documentation to explain the purpose of
rootLevelSpaceAgentand its fallback behavior.+ /** + * Determines the agent to use for license policy checks. + * Falls back to the space's own agent if no level0SpaceAgent is provided. + */ const rootLevelSpaceAgent = level0SpaceAgent ?? space.agent;src/services/api/search/v2/extract/search.extract.service.ts (1)
88-91: Consider adding a type definition for the options objectThe change to use an options object is a good practice for API extensibility. However, it would be beneficial to define an interface for the options object.
Consider adding a type definition:
interface SearchQueryOptions { spaceIdFilter?: string; excludeDemoSpaces: boolean; }src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/ai.persona.service.service.ts (3)
185-185: Consider adding language parameter validationWhile adding language support is good, consider validating the language parameter to ensure it follows ISO standards (e.g., 'en', 'es', 'fr'). This will prevent potential issues with unsupported languages downstream.
- language: invocationInput.language, + language: invocationInput.language?.toLowerCase(),Also consider adding a type guard or validation:
private isValidLanguage(lang: string): boolean { return /^[a-z]{2}(-[A-Z]{2})?$/.test(lang); }
Line range hint
1-248: Consider architectural improvementsWhile the service follows good NestJS practices, consider these improvements:
- Add error boundaries around encryption/decryption operations
- Consider implementing a retry mechanism for AI engine interactions
- Add request/response logging for better observability
Example error boundary implementation:
private safeDecrypt(value: string): string { try { return this.crypto.decrypt(value); } catch (error) { this.logger.error(`Decryption failed: ${error.message}`, LogContext.PLATFORM); throw new Error('Failed to decrypt configuration'); } }
Incorrect implementation of ingest method needs refactoring
The implementation is incorrect based on the following findings:
- The
userIDfield should represent the actual user performing the operation, not the service ID. This is evident from other implementations likechat.guidance.service.tswhereagentInfo.userIDis used.- Hardcoding
AiPersonaEngine.EXPERTreduces flexibility and differs from other adapter implementations that allow engine configuration.- The method lacks proper error handling which is present in other service implementations.
Specific issues:
src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/ai.persona.service.service.ts: ReplaceaiPersonaService.idwith proper user identification- Add error handling similar to other service implementations
- Make the engine type configurable instead of hardcoding to
EXPERT🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
189-195: Address technical debt in ingest methodThe current implementation has several concerns:
- Using
aiPersonaService.idasuserIDis incorrect as noted in the TODO- The engine type is hardcoded to
EXPERT- The method lacks proper error handling
Let's verify the usage of this method:
Let me gather more context about the AI Persona service implementation to better understand the correct usage pattern.
Let me check one more thing to understand the correct user ID pattern by looking at other AI persona service implementations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for calls to ingest method to understand its usage context rg -A 5 "ingest\(" --type tsLength of output: 4494
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the interface definition and related types ast-grep --pattern 'interface IAiPersonaService { $$$ }' # Look for similar adapter usage patterns rg -A 3 "sendIngest" --type tsLength of output: 2132
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for other methods in the AI persona service to understand the correct user ID pattern ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ { $$$ userID($$$) { $$$ } $$$ }' # Search for user ID related fields in the codebase rg "userID:|userId:" --type tsLength of output: 8502
src/platform/platform.role/platform.role.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-24: Consider splitting service responsibilitiesThe
PlatformRoleServicecurrently handles multiple concerns including platform invitations, role management, and credential management. Consider splitting these responsibilities into separate services:
PlatformInvitationService(already exists but could take more responsibility)PlatformRoleService(focused on role management)PlatformCredentialService(new service for credential mapping)This would improve maintainability and follow the Single Responsibility Principle more closely.
src/domain/common/license/license.service.ts (3)
115-142: Consider performance optimization and type safety improvements.The parallel processing of entitlements is good for performance, but consider the following improvements:
- Add error handling for the Promise.all operation
- Make the return type more specific using readonly array
- Consider batching if dealing with large number of entitlements
public async getMyLicensePrivilegesOrFail( licenseInput: ILicense - ): Promise<LicenseEntitlementType[] | never> { + ): Promise<readonly LicenseEntitlementType[] | never> { let license = licenseInput; if (!license.entitlements) { license = await this.getLicenseOrFail(licenseInput.id, { relations: { entitlements: true, }, }); } const entitlements = this.getEntitlementsFromLicenseOrFail(license); + try { const availableEntitlements = ( await Promise.all( entitlements.map(async entitlement => ({ entitlement, isAvailable: await this.licenseEntitlementService.isEntitlementAvailable( entitlement.id ), })) ) ) .filter(({ isAvailable }) => isAvailable) .map(({ entitlement }) => entitlement.type); return Object.freeze(availableEntitlements); + } catch (error) { + this.logger.error( + `Failed to check entitlements availability: ${error.message}`, + error.stack, + LogContext.LICENSE + ); + throw error; + } }
212-214: Exception type change looks good, but consider immutability.The change to
EntityNotFoundExceptionis appropriate here. However, the method mutates the input parameter which could lead to side effects.Consider returning a new entitlement object instead of mutating the input:
- public findAndCopyParentEntitlement( + public findAndCopyParentEntitlement( childEntitlement: ILicenseEntitlement, parentEntitlements: ILicenseEntitlement[] - ): void { + ): ILicenseEntitlement { const parentEntitlement = parentEntitlements.find( e => e.type === childEntitlement.type ); if (!parentEntitlement) { throw new EntityNotFoundException( `Parent entitlement not found: ${childEntitlement.type}`, LogContext.LICENSE ); } - childEntitlement.limit = parentEntitlement.limit; - childEntitlement.enabled = parentEntitlement.enabled; - childEntitlement.dataType = parentEntitlement.dataType; + return { + ...childEntitlement, + limit: parentEntitlement.limit, + enabled: parentEntitlement.enabled, + dataType: parentEntitlement.dataType, + }; }
248-250: Consider improving error message content.While the change to
EntityNotFoundExceptionis appropriate, logging the entire entitlements array might be too verbose and could potentially expose sensitive information.if (!entitlement) { throw new EntityNotFoundException( - `Unable to find entitlement of type ${type} in Entitlements for License: ${JSON.stringify(entitlements)}`, + `Unable to find entitlement of type ${type} in Entitlements. Available types: ${entitlements.map(e => e.type).join(', ')}`, LogContext.LICENSE ); }src/platform/platform/platform.service.authorization.ts (1)
224-237: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc documentation.The variable renames improve naming consistency. The implementation correctly creates a non-cascading credential rule for interactive guidance access.
Consider adding JSDoc documentation to explain the method's purpose and behavior:
+ /** + * Creates a credential rule that grants interactive guidance access to globally registered users. + * The rule is non-cascading to prevent inheritance by child entities. + * @returns {Promise<IAuthorizationPolicyRuleCredential>} The created credential rule + */ private async createCredentialRuleInteractiveGuidance(): Promise<IAuthorizationPolicyRuleCredential> {src/domain/community/user/user.resolver.fields.ts (1)
274-297: Implementation looks good with some suggestions for improvementsThe resolver implementation is well-structured with proper authorization checks and relation loading. However, there are a few areas for improvement:
- The authorization message could be more descriptive by including the user context
- Consider using DataLoader pattern for optimizing relation loading
- Error handling could be more explicit
Consider these improvements:
async guidanceRoom( @Parent() user: User, @CurrentUser() agentInfo: AgentInfo ): Promise<IRoom | undefined> { - const { guidanceRoom } = await this.userService.getUserOrFail(user.id, { + const { guidanceRoom } = await this.userService.getUserOrFail(user.id, { relations: { guidanceRoom: true }, }); if (!guidanceRoom) { return undefined; } this.authorizationService.grantAccessOrFail( agentInfo, guidanceRoom.authorization, AuthorizationPrivilege.READ, - `guidance Room: ${guidanceRoom.id}` + `User ${agentInfo.email} accessing guidance room ${guidanceRoom.id} for user ${user.email}` ); return guidanceRoom; }Consider adding a DataLoader for guidance rooms to optimize database queries:
// Add to constructor @Loader(GuidanceRoomLoaderCreator) private guidanceRoomLoader: ILoader<IRoom> // Use in resolver const guidanceRoom = await this.guidanceRoomLoader.load(user.id);src/domain/communication/room/room.service.ts (1)
67-72: LGTM! Consider adding logging and caching.The implementation is clean and follows NestJS/TypeORM best practices. However, consider these enhancements:
async findRoom(options?: FindOneOptions<Room>): Promise<Room | null> { + this.logger.debug?.(`Finding room with options: ${JSON.stringify(options)}`, LogContext.COMMUNICATION); const room = await this.roomRepository.findOne({ ...options, }); + if (!room) { + this.logger.debug?.('No room found for the given options', LogContext.COMMUNICATION); + } return room; }Consider implementing caching if this method is frequently called with the same options:
@Cacheable('rooms', { ttl: 300 }) // 5 minutes cache async findRoom(options?: FindOneOptions<Room>): Promise<Room | null>src/domain/space/account/account.resolver.mutations.ts (4)
88-91: Consider implementing optimistic locking for license validationThe license validation checks across create methods could potentially lead to race conditions if multiple requests are processed simultaneously. For example, if two requests check the license limit concurrently, both might pass validation but exceed the limit when actually creating the resources.
Consider implementing optimistic locking or a distributed lock mechanism to ensure atomic license validation and resource creation. This could be achieved through:
- Database-level row locking
- Distributed lock using Redis or similar
- Version-based optimistic locking on the license entity
Also applies to: 152-155, 195-198, 255-258
304-307: Consider separating authorization and license policy resetsThe
authorizationPolicyResetOnAccountmethod now handles both authorization and license policies. This mixing of concerns could make the system harder to maintain and understand.Consider:
- Keeping the methods focused on single responsibility
- Moving the license reset logic to a separate method
- Creating a new mutation that handles both resets if this is a common use case
-const updatedLicenses = await this.accountLicenseService.applyLicensePolicy( - account.id -); -await this.licenseService.saveAll(updatedLicenses); +await this.resetAccountLicenses(account.id); +private async resetAccountLicenses(accountId: string): Promise<void> { + const updatedLicenses = await this.accountLicenseService.applyLicensePolicy(accountId); + await this.licenseService.saveAll(updatedLicenses); +}
Line range hint
367-367: Address or remove TODO commentsMultiple TODO comments stating "check if still needed later" are present across transfer methods. These comments create uncertainty about the necessity of certain operations and could lead to technical debt.
Would you like me to:
- Review the codebase to determine if these operations are necessary?
- Create a GitHub issue to track this technical debt?
Also applies to: 397-397, 472-472, 507-507
Line range hint
561-603: Enhance error messages for better debuggingWhile the error handling is comprehensive, the error messages could be more specific to help with debugging and user understanding.
Consider enhancing the error messages:
-throw new RelationshipNotFoundException( - `Unable to load authorization on account: ${account.id}`, - LogContext.ACCOUNT -); +throw new RelationshipNotFoundException( + `Account ${account.id} is missing required authorization configuration`, + LogContext.ACCOUNT +); -throw new RelationshipNotFoundException( - `Unable to load license on account: ${account.id}`, - LogContext.ACCOUNT -); +throw new RelationshipNotFoundException( + `Account ${account.id} is missing required license configuration`, + LogContext.ACCOUNT +); -throw new ValidationException( - `Unable to create ${licenseType} on account: ${account.id}. Entitlement limit of ${entitlementLimit} of type ${licenseType} reached`, - LogContext.ACCOUNT -); +throw new ValidationException( + `Cannot create ${licenseType} on account ${account.id}: Maximum limit of ${entitlementLimit} has been reached. Please upgrade your license to continue.`, + LogContext.ACCOUNT +);src/domain/access/role-set/role.set.resolver.mutations.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-1006: Consider splitting the resolver into smaller, focused classesThe
RoleSetResolverMutationsclass is handling multiple concerns (roles, applications, invitations). Consider splitting it into separate resolvers:
RoleSetMembershipResolverRoleSetApplicationResolverRoleSetInvitationResolverAdditionally, the private helper method
inviteSingleExistingContributorshould be moved to the service layer.src/services/adapters/communication-adapter/communication.adapter.ts (1)
Line range hint
632-632: Add null check for consistency with getCommunityRooms.The
getDirectRoomsmethod should have the same null check protection asgetCommunityRoomsto maintain consistency and prevent potential runtime errors.Apply this diff:
- messages: room.messages.map(message => { + messages: (room.messages || []).map(message => {src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.service.ts (1)
62-68: Consider automatically creating a guidance room if none existsCurrently, if no guidance room is found for the user, the method returns an error. To enhance user experience and avoid unnecessary errors, consider creating a guidance room automatically when one does not exist.
Apply this diff to implement the suggestion:
let room = await this.userService.getGuidanceRoom(agentInfo.userID); if (!room) { - return { - success: false, - error: 'No guidance room found', - question: chatData.question, - }; + // Create a new guidance room + room = await this.createGuidanceRoom(agentInfo); }src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.resolver.mutations.ts (2)
48-50: Consider throwing an error when the guidance engine is disabledIn the
createChatGuidanceRoommethod, when the guidance engine is not enabled, the function returnsundefined. To provide clearer feedback to the client, consider throwing an error instead.Suggested change:
if (!this.chatGuidanceService.isGuidanceEngineEnabled()) { - return undefined; + throw new Error('Guidance Engine is not enabled'); }
90-96: Ensure consistent error handling for disabled guidance engineIn
askChatGuidanceQuestion, when the guidance engine is not enabled, it returns an error object. For consistency and clearer error handling, consider throwing an error as well.Suggested change:
if (!this.chatGuidanceService.isGuidanceEngineEnabled()) { - return { - success: false, - error: 'Guidance Engine not enabled', - question: chatData.question, - }; + throw new Error('Guidance Engine is not enabled'); }src/core/bootstrap/bootstrap.service.ts (1)
534-572: Consider adding error handling for service creationWhile exceptions will bubble up due to the use of
getPlatformOrFail()andgetOrganizationOrFail(), consider adding try-catch blocks or additional logging withinensureGuidanceChat()to handle potential errors during the creation of the AI Persona Service or Virtual Contributor. This can provide more granular error information and aid in debugging.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (54)
src/common/constants/authorization/credential.rule.types.constants.ts(0 hunks)src/common/constants/authorization/policy.rule.constants.ts(0 hunks)src/common/enums/authorization.privilege.ts(0 hunks)src/common/enums/room.type.ts(1 hunks)src/core/bootstrap/bootstrap.module.ts(1 hunks)src/core/bootstrap/bootstrap.service.ts(4 hunks)src/core/microservices/microservices.module.ts(1 hunks)src/domain/access/role-set/role.set.resolver.mutations.ts(1 hunks)src/domain/collaboration/collaboration/collaboration.service.authorization.ts(0 hunks)src/domain/common/license/license.resolver.fields.ts(2 hunks)src/domain/common/license/license.service.ts(4 hunks)src/domain/communication/message.answer.to.question/message.answer.to.question.source.interface.ts(0 hunks)src/domain/communication/message.guidance.question.result/message.guidance.question.result.interface.ts(2 hunks)src/domain/communication/message.guidance.question.result/message.guidance.question.result.module.ts(1 hunks)src/domain/communication/message/message.module.ts(1 hunks)src/domain/communication/message/message.service.ts(0 hunks)src/domain/communication/room/room.service.ts(1 hunks)src/domain/community/user/user.entity.ts(2 hunks)src/domain/community/user/user.interface.ts(2 hunks)src/domain/community/user/user.resolver.fields.ts(2 hunks)src/domain/community/user/user.service.ts(5 hunks)src/domain/community/virtual-contributor/virtual.contributor.resolver.queries.ts(0 hunks)src/domain/space/account/account.resolver.mutations.ts(7 hunks)src/domain/space/account/account.service.authorization.ts(2 hunks)src/domain/space/space/space.resolver.mutations.ts(3 hunks)src/domain/space/space/space.service.license.ts(3 hunks)src/migrations/1731937383422-userGuidanceRoom.ts(1 hunks)src/platform/platform.role/platform.role.service.ts(1 hunks)src/platform/platform/platform.entity.ts(2 hunks)src/platform/platform/platform.interface.ts(2 hunks)src/platform/platform/platform.service.authorization.ts(1 hunks)src/platform/platform/platform.service.ts(2 hunks)src/services/adapters/ai-server-adapter/dto/ai.server.adapter.dto.invocation.ts(2 hunks)src/services/adapters/chat-guidance-adapter/guidance.engine.adapter.ts(6 hunks)src/services/adapters/communication-adapter/communication.adapter.ts(1 hunks)src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-engine-adapter/dto/ai.persona.engine.adapter.dto.invocation.input.ts(2 hunks)src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/ai.persona.service.service.ts(1 hunks)src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/dto/ai.persona.service.invocation.dto.input.ts(4 hunks)src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/dto/utils.ts(1 hunks)src/services/ai-server/ai-server/ai.server.service.ts(0 hunks)src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.module.ts(1 hunks)src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.resolver.mutations.ts(4 hunks)src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.resolver.queries.ts(0 hunks)src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.service.ts(1 hunks)src/services/api/chat-guidance/dto/chat.guidance.relevance.dto.ts(1 hunks)src/services/api/lookup/lookup.module.ts(2 hunks)src/services/api/lookup/lookup.resolver.fields.ts(3 hunks)src/services/api/search/v2/extract/build.search.query.ts(1 hunks)src/services/api/search/v2/extract/search.extract.service.ts(2 hunks)src/services/api/search/v2/result/search.result.service.ts(1 hunks)src/services/api/search/v2/search2.service.ts(2 hunks)src/services/infrastructure/event-bus/event.bus.module.ts(1 hunks)src/services/infrastructure/license-entitlement-usage/license.entitlement.usage.service.ts(1 hunks)src/services/room-integration/room.controller.service.ts(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (9)
- src/common/constants/authorization/credential.rule.types.constants.ts
- src/common/constants/authorization/policy.rule.constants.ts
- src/common/enums/authorization.privilege.ts
- src/domain/collaboration/collaboration/collaboration.service.authorization.ts
- src/domain/communication/message.answer.to.question/message.answer.to.question.source.interface.ts
- src/domain/communication/message/message.service.ts
- src/domain/community/virtual-contributor/virtual.contributor.resolver.queries.ts
- src/services/ai-server/ai-server/ai.server.service.ts
- src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.resolver.queries.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/domain/communication/message.guidance.question.result/message.guidance.question.result.module.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (44)
src/common/enums/room.type.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/core/bootstrap/bootstrap.module.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/core/bootstrap/bootstrap.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/core/microservices/microservices.module.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/access/role-set/role.set.resolver.mutations.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/common/license/license.resolver.fields.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/common/license/license.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/communication/message.guidance.question.result/message.guidance.question.result.interface.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/communication/message/message.module.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/communication/room/room.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/community/user/user.entity.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/community/user/user.interface.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/community/user/user.resolver.fields.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/community/user/user.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/space/account/account.resolver.mutations.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/space/account/account.service.authorization.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/space/space/space.resolver.mutations.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/space/space/space.service.license.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/migrations/1731937383422-userGuidanceRoom.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/platform/platform.role/platform.role.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/platform/platform/platform.entity.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/platform/platform/platform.interface.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/platform/platform/platform.service.authorization.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/platform/platform/platform.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/adapters/ai-server-adapter/dto/ai.server.adapter.dto.invocation.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/adapters/chat-guidance-adapter/guidance.engine.adapter.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/adapters/communication-adapter/communication.adapter.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-engine-adapter/dto/ai.persona.engine.adapter.dto.invocation.input.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/ai.persona.service.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/dto/ai.persona.service.invocation.dto.input.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/dto/utils.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.module.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.resolver.mutations.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/api/chat-guidance/dto/chat.guidance.relevance.dto.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/api/lookup/lookup.module.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/api/lookup/lookup.resolver.fields.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/api/search/v2/extract/build.search.query.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/api/search/v2/extract/search.extract.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/api/search/v2/result/search.result.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/api/search/v2/search2.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/infrastructure/event-bus/event.bus.module.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/infrastructure/license-entitlement-usage/license.entitlement.usage.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/room-integration/room.controller.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
🔇 Additional comments (59)
src/services/api/chat-guidance/dto/chat.guidance.relevance.dto.ts (2)
5-6: LGTM! Clear documentation of the ID field's purpose.
The comment effectively explains why String is used instead of UUID, providing valuable context for future maintainers.
6-9: LGTM! Appropriate type adjustment for Matrix message IDs.
The change from UUID to String correctly reflects that the field stores Matrix message IDs. The field definition maintains good practices with clear nullability rules and descriptive documentation.
Let's verify this change doesn't break existing Matrix message ID handling:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about Matrix message handling.
Let me search specifically for Matrix message ID handling and type definitions.
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
Verified: The change from UUID to String type is consistent with Matrix message ID handling
The codebase consistently uses string type for Matrix message IDs across multiple components:
- The Activity entity uses
char(44)for storing Matrix message IDs - Message reaction and deletion operations handle message IDs as strings
- Communication adapter interfaces expect string message IDs
- No UUID validation is performed on message IDs anywhere in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other Matrix message ID usages to ensure consistency
# Expected: Other Matrix-related code should also use string types for message IDs
# Search for Matrix message ID type definitions
rg -l "Matrix.*message.*[Ii][Dd]" | xargs ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ = string'
# Search for Matrix-related interfaces/types that might need similar updates
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
id: $_
$$$
}'
Length of output: 6308
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Matrix-specific message ID handling
rg -l "Matrix.*message" | xargs rg "message.*[iI]d|[iI]d.*message" -B2 -A2
# Search for GraphQL field definitions related to message IDs
ast-grep --pattern '@Field(() => $_)
$$$
id: $_'
# Look for Matrix client message handling
rg "Matrix.*client.*message" -B2 -A2
Length of output: 47838
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Matrix message ID related files and types
rg -l "Matrix.*message" | xargs rg "type.*ID|interface.*Message" -B2 -A2
# Look for message ID type definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'type MessageID = string'
# Search for Matrix client message ID handling
rg "Matrix.*messageId|messageID" -B2 -A2
Length of output: 92960
src/domain/communication/message/message.module.ts (1)
12-13: LGTM! Verify impact on dependent modules.
The removal of MessageService from providers and exports aligns with the broader refactoring of message handling. The module structure remains clean and follows NestJS best practices.
Let's verify there are no remaining references to MessageService that could cause runtime errors:
✅ Verification successful
Changes are safe - no remaining MessageService dependencies
The removal of MessageService from the module's providers and exports is safe. Our comprehensive search across the codebase, particularly within the communication domain, shows no remaining references to MessageService. This aligns with the broader refactoring mentioned in the context where MessageService has been completely removed from the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to MessageService that might cause dependency injection errors
# Search for MessageService imports or usage
rg -l "MessageService" --type ts
# Search for specific injection patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'constructor($$$) { $$ @Inject(MessageService) $$ }'
Length of output: 106
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search strategy
# 1. Search for any file containing "Message" to catch potential references
rg -l "Message" --type ts
# 2. Search for specific imports of MessageService
rg "import.*MessageService" --type ts
# 3. Look for class declarations that might extend or use MessageService
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ extends MessageService'
# 4. Search for dependency injection patterns with MessageService
ast-grep --pattern '@Injectable()
class $_ {
constructor($$$MessageService$$$) {
$$$
}
}'
Length of output: 7860
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's specifically check for MessageService usage in the files that might be dependent on message.module.ts
# Check for any direct references to MessageService in the communication domain
rg "MessageService" src/domain/communication/ -A 2 -B 2
# Look for imports specifically in the communication domain
rg "import.*MessageService" src/domain/communication/
# Check for any dependency injection in message-related files
ast-grep --pattern 'private $$$messageService: MessageService$$$'
Length of output: 179
src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/dto/utils.ts (1)
Line range hint 1-24: Verify enum and interface consistency across related files.
The changes to this validation logic should align with the mentioned updates to InvocationResultAction enum and RoomDetails class in related files.
✅ Verification successful
Enum and interface usage is consistent across the codebase
The verification shows that:
InvocationResultActionenum is consistently defined withPOST_REPLYandPOST_MESSAGEactions across all relevant DTOsthreadIDproperty is properly used in room-related interfaces and services, particularly for handling message replies- The validation logic in
utils.tscorrectly checks forthreadIDwhen the action isPOST_REPLY
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the consistency of InvocationResultAction enum and RoomDetails interface
# Check for InvocationResultAction enum definition and usage
echo "Checking InvocationResultAction enum..."
ast-grep --pattern 'enum InvocationResultAction {
$$$
}'
# Check for RoomDetails interface/class definition
echo "Checking RoomDetails definition..."
ast-grep --pattern 'interface RoomDetails {
$$$
threadID$_
$$$
}'
# Check for all usages of threadID property
echo "Checking threadID usage..."
rg "threadID" --type ts
Length of output: 7436
src/services/adapters/ai-server-adapter/dto/ai.server.adapter.dto.invocation.ts (2)
5-5: LGTM! New enum value follows conventions.
The addition of POST_MESSAGE to InvocationResultAction follows TypeScript enum naming conventions.
9-9: Verify the impact of making threadID optional.
This is a breaking change that converts threadID from required to optional. Ensure all consumers of RoomDetails handle the case where threadID is undefined.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the RoomDetails type and its usage.
Making threadID optional is safe as the codebase already handles this case
The change is safe because:
- The
roomDetailsproperty itself is already optional in all DTOs where it's used - There's proper validation in
AiPersonaServiceInvocationDtothat ensuresthreadIDis present when required (for POST_REPLY action) - All usages of
threadIDare properly guarded with null checks, particularly in:ai.persona.service.invocation.dto.input.tswhich validates the presence of bothroomDetailsandthreadIDutils.tswhich checks for bothroomDetailsandthreadIDexistence before usage
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of RoomDetails.threadID to verify they handle undefined case
ast-grep --pattern 'roomDetails.threadID'
rg -A 3 'roomDetails.*threadID'
Length of output: 1233
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find the definition and usage of RoomDetails type
ast-grep --pattern 'interface RoomDetails'
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements RoomDetails'
ast-grep --pattern 'type RoomDetails'
# Find more usages of roomDetails
rg -A 5 'roomDetails[^a-zA-Z]'
Length of output: 7116
src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-engine-adapter/dto/ai.persona.engine.adapter.dto.invocation.input.ts (2)
8-8: Verify the impact of new enum value
Adding a new enum value could break existing exhaustive switch statements that handle InvocationResultAction.
Let's check for potential switch statements that need updating:
✅ Verification successful
No breaking changes detected with new enum value
The codebase uses InvocationResultAction enum in a safe manner:
- All usages are direct property access or equality checks
- No exhaustive switch statements found that could break
- The new
POST_MESSAGEvalue is already handled in validation utils (src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/dto/utils.ts)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for switch statements using InvocationResultAction
ast-grep --pattern 'switch ($expr) {
$$$
case InvocationResultAction.$_ :
$$$
}'
# Search for direct enum usage
rg "InvocationResultAction\." -A 2
Length of output: 3139
12-12: Breaking Change: Verify RoomDetails usage
Converting threadID from required to optional is a breaking change. Ensure that:
- All code constructing
RoomDetailsis updated - Proper null checks are added where
threadIDis used
Let's scan for potential issues:
src/domain/common/license/license.resolver.fields.ts (2)
5-5: LGTM! Import statement follows NestJS conventions
The import statement correctly uses the module alias pattern and is appropriately placed with other imports.
22-30: Verify nullable field with OrFail method consistency
The field is marked as nullable (nullable: true) but delegates to a method with an "OrFail" suffix, which typically indicates it throws an exception rather than returning null. This could lead to inconsistent behavior.
Let's verify the implementation of the service method:
✅ Verification successful
Nullable field and OrFail method are correctly implemented
The service method getMyLicensePrivilegesOrFail throws exceptions only for invalid states (missing license or entitlements) but returns an empty array when no privileges are available. The "OrFail" suffix refers to entity validation, not the final result. The nullable field declaration is appropriate as it can return an empty array.
Relevant implementation details:
- The method loads entitlements if not present
- Filters entitlements based on availability
- Returns array of available entitlement types
- Throws exceptions only for invalid entity states, not empty results
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the service method implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'async getMyLicensePrivilegesOrFail($$$) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for the method name
rg -l "getMyLicensePrivilegesOrFail"
# Also search for the service class implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class LicenseService {
$$$
}'
# And let's check the actual service file if it exists
fd -t f "license.service.ts"
Length of output: 18756
src/platform/platform/platform.interface.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM! Import statement follows best practices
The import follows TypeScript path aliasing conventions and is properly organized with other domain-related imports.
20-20: LGTM! Property addition is well-structured
The optional guidanceVirtualContributor property follows TypeScript conventions and maintains consistency with the existing codebase structure.
Let's verify the relationship implementation across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Property is well-integrated and properly used across the codebase
The verification confirms that the guidanceVirtualContributor property is:
- Correctly defined in both interface (
platform.interface.ts) and entity (platform.entity.ts) - Properly utilized in the platform service with a dedicated getter method
getGuidanceVirtualContributorOrFail() - Actively used in the chat guidance service for real functionality
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the virtual contributor relationship implementation
# Check for related entity definitions and configurations
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
guidanceVirtualContributor: $_
$$$
}'
# Check for related database configurations
rg -A 5 "guidanceVirtualContributor.*VirtualContributor"
# Check for related service implementations
rg -A 5 "getGuidanceVirtualContributor"
Length of output: 2403
src/domain/community/user/user.interface.ts (2)
6-6: LGTM! Clean import using module alias
The import statement follows TypeScript best practices and maintains proper domain separation.
31-32: Verify GraphQL exposure and add documentation
The guidanceRoom property is not decorated with @Field(), unlike other properties. If this is intentional for security/GDPR reasons, consider adding a comment explaining why. If not, consider exposing it via GraphQL if needed by the frontend.
Consider adding a JSDoc comment to document the purpose and visibility of this property:
+ /** Guidance chat room for the user. Not exposed via GraphQL for security reasons. */
guidanceRoom?: IRoom;✅ Verification successful
The guidanceRoom property is intentionally not exposed via GraphQL
Looking at the codebase evidence:
- The file contains explicit comments about GDPR protection for sensitive fields (like
emailandphone) - The
guidanceRoomis used internally by the guidance chat service and resolver - Other properties that are meant to be exposed have
@Fielddecorators - There's a dedicated field resolver in
user.resolver.fields.tsthat handles the exposure of guidance room data with proper authorization checks
This appears to be a deliberate design choice for security, where the guidance room access is controlled through dedicated resolvers rather than direct field exposure.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if guidanceRoom is exposed in GraphQL schema or explicitly hidden elsewhere
# Check if guidanceRoom is exposed in GraphQL schema
rg -A 5 "guidanceRoom.*@Field" "src/**/*.ts"
# Check for any comments or documentation about guidanceRoom visibility
rg -A 5 "guidanceRoom.*hidden|private|internal|security|gdpr" "src/**/*.ts"
Length of output: 228
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify GraphQL exposure
# Check for guidanceRoom in any GraphQL-related files
rg "guidanceRoom"
# Check the interface file content to understand the context better
cat src/domain/community/user/user.interface.ts
# Look for other @Field decorators in the same file for comparison
rg "@Field" src/domain/community/user/user.interface.ts
Length of output: 4157
src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.module.ts (2)
8-14: Verify the necessity of new dependencies
The new imports seem to support enhanced chat guidance functionality. Let's verify their usage in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
All new dependencies are actively used and necessary
The verification shows that all imported modules are properly utilized:
- AiServerAdapter and CommunicationAdapter are used for message handling and room management
- VirtualContributor and User services manage user interactions and virtual contributor setup
- Room services handle room creation, deletion, and authorization
- AuthorizationPolicy is used for access control and privileges
- Platform integration is used for guidance-specific features
The dependencies form a cohesive set of modules necessary for the chat guidance functionality, with clear usage patterns in both the service and resolver implementations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if these new dependencies are used in the chat guidance related files
# Search for usage of the new dependencies in chat guidance related files
echo "Checking usage of new dependencies in chat guidance files..."
rg -l "AiServerAdapter|CommunicationAdapter|VirtualContributor|Room|User|AuthorizationPolicy" src/services/api/chat-guidance/
Length of output: 436
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check how these dependencies are used in the chat guidance service and resolver
echo "=== ChatGuidanceService usage ==="
rg -A 5 "AiServerAdapter|CommunicationAdapter|VirtualContributor|Room|User|AuthorizationPolicy" src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.service.ts
echo -e "\n=== ChatGuidanceResolverMutations usage ==="
rg -A 5 "AiServerAdapter|CommunicationAdapter|VirtualContributor|Room|User|AuthorizationPolicy" src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.resolver.mutations.ts
# Check if there are any other modules importing ChatGuidanceModule
echo -e "\n=== Modules importing ChatGuidanceModule ==="
rg "ChatGuidanceModule" --type ts
Length of output: 8373
30-30: Verify impact of removing ChatGuidanceResolverQueries
The removal of ChatGuidanceResolverQueries from providers needs verification to ensure no breaking changes.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the GraphQL resolvers and queries to make a more informed decision.
Let me try one more search to verify if there are any remaining GraphQL queries related to chat guidance.
No issues found with removing ChatGuidanceResolverQueries
The removal of ChatGuidanceResolverQueries from providers is safe. The verification shows:
- No GraphQL queries are defined for chat guidance in the schema
- No direct usage of ChatGuidanceResolverQueries in the codebase
- The only reference found is an import of a type definition, which is unrelated to the resolver
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to ChatGuidanceResolverQueries
# Search for any remaining references to the removed resolver
echo "Checking for remaining references to ChatGuidanceResolverQueries..."
rg "ChatGuidanceResolverQueries"
# Search for any GraphQL query definitions that might need updates
echo "Checking for potentially affected GraphQL queries..."
fd -e graphql -x grep -l "chatGuidance"
Length of output: 332
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any GraphQL resolver files and their content
echo "Checking resolver files..."
fd resolver -t f -x cat {}
# Check for any GraphQL schema definitions
echo "Checking GraphQL schema definitions..."
fd -e graphql -t f -x cat {}
# Check for any imports of ChatGuidanceResolverQueries
echo "Checking for imports..."
rg "import.*ChatGuidanceResolverQueries"
Length of output: 120516
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any GraphQL query definitions in the schema
echo "Checking for chat guidance queries in schema..."
rg -A 5 "type Query"
# Check for any remaining references to chat guidance queries
echo "Checking for chat guidance query references..."
rg -i "chat.*guidance.*quer"
Length of output: 426
src/services/api/search/v2/search2.service.ts (1)
48-48: Verify the impact of demo spaces filtering
The change from onlyPublicResults to excludeDemoSpaces might affect search visibility. Let's verify the implementation in the extract service.
✅ Verification successful
Demo spaces filtering implementation verified
The change from onlyPublicResults to excludeDemoSpaces is correctly implemented in the search service. When excludeDemoSpaces is true (for non-logged-in users), the search query includes a filter that only returns spaces with visibility: SpaceVisibility.ACTIVE, effectively filtering out demo spaces. This is consistent with the expected behavior and properly integrated across the search implementation chain:
- Set in
search2.service.tsbased on user authentication status - Passed through to
search.extract.service.ts - Applied in the search query builder (
build.search.query.ts)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how excludeDemoSpaces is used in the search extract service
# and verify if there are any other components affected by this change
# Check the implementation in SearchExtractService
ast-grep --pattern 'class SearchExtractService {
$$$
search($$$, excludeDemoSpaces$$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Look for any other references to demo spaces in the codebase
rg -A 5 "demo.*space" --type ts
Length of output: 5140
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for the actual implementation of search filtering logic
# Look for SpaceVisibility enum and its usage
rg -A 5 "SpaceVisibility" --type ts
# Check for any search-related filtering implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'where: {
$$$
visibility: $$$
$$$
}'
# Check the search service implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class SearchService {
$$$
search($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 47102
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of search filtering in the extract service
rg -A 10 "excludeDemoSpaces" --type ts
# Check for any search query building logic
ast-grep --pattern 'buildSearchQuery($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Look for any demo space filtering implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'if (excludeDemoSpaces) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 8507
src/platform/platform/platform.entity.ts (2)
10-10: LGTM! Clean import statement.
The import follows the established pattern and maintains consistency with the existing codebase.
64-70: LGTM! Verify impact on existing queries.
The one-to-one relationship is properly defined with consistent configuration matching other relationships in the class. The optional nature is correctly specified.
Let's verify the impact on existing platform queries:
✅ Verification successful
Relationship addition appears safe with current query patterns
Based on the verification results:
- Platform queries primarily use basic find operations with explicit relation loading
- No complex query builders were found that might be affected
- The new relationship is configured as non-eager, which aligns with the existing pattern of explicit relation loading in queries
- Current queries load relations explicitly (e.g.,
relations: { authorization: true }) and won't be affected by the new optional field
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for platform queries that might need updating
ast-grep --pattern 'findOne($$$)' | rg -A 5 'Platform'
# Check for potential eager loading of the new relationship
rg -A 5 'relations.*Platform'
Length of output: 559
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for platform queries in repository more thoroughly
rg -A 5 'platformRepository.findOne'
# Check for any existing query builders or custom queries for Platform
rg -A 5 'platformRepository.*find'
# Check for any explicit relations loading in platform queries
ast-grep --pattern 'relations: {$$$}' | rg -B2 -A2 'Platform'
Length of output: 1101
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any query builders or custom queries specifically in platform service
rg -B3 -A5 'createQueryBuilder.*Platform|queryBuilder.*Platform' src/platform/
# Check for any existing relations configuration in Platform entity
ast-grep --pattern '@OneToOne($$$)' | rg -B2 -A5 'Platform'
# Check for any existing eager loading configurations
rg -B2 -A5 'eager:.*true.*Platform'
Length of output: 178
src/domain/community/user/user.entity.ts (1)
15-15: LGTM!
The Room entity import follows the project's import conventions and path structure.
src/migrations/1731937383422-userGuidanceRoom.ts (4)
1-5: LGTM! Class declaration follows TypeORM conventions
The migration class is properly structured with correct imports and naming convention.
30-50: LGTM! Down migration properly reverts all changes
The down migration correctly removes all elements in the proper order:
- Foreign key constraints
- Unique indexes
- Columns
18-28: Verify the referenced 'virtual_contributor' table structure
The migration looks correct, but let's verify the referenced virtual_contributor table structure to ensure compatibility.
✅ Verification successful
Migration is compatible with the virtual_contributor table structure
The migration is verified to be correct. The virtual_contributor table exists and was created in migration 1730713372181-schemaSetup.ts with a compatible structure:
- The table has a
char(36)primary key column namedid, which matches the foreign key reference - The table was created before this migration (1730713372181 < 1731937383422)
- The foreign key constraint with
ON DELETE SET NULLis appropriate as it matches the nullable nature of theguidanceVirtualContributorIdcolumn
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify virtual_contributor table structure and id column type
# Check if virtual_contributor table exists and its structure
echo "Checking virtual_contributor table structure..."
fd -e ts -e js -t f "virtual-contributor.entity" -x cat {}
Length of output: 165
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try searching for migrations that might have created the virtual_contributor table
echo "Searching for virtual_contributor table creation in migrations..."
rg -l "CREATE TABLE.*virtual_contributor" --type ts
# Also search for any entity definitions that might use a different filename pattern
echo -e "\nSearching for virtual contributor entity definition..."
rg -l "class.*VirtualContributor.*Entity" --type ts
# Search for table references in other migrations
echo -e "\nSearching for other virtual_contributor table references..."
rg "virtual_contributor" --type ts
Length of output: 5196
7-16: Verify the referenced 'room' table structure
The migration looks correct, but let's verify the referenced room table structure to ensure compatibility.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the base entity to ensure the id column type matches.
Let me try a different approach to find the base entity.
Let me check the base entity that AuthorizableEntity extends to verify the id column type.
Migration is compatible with the database schema
The migration is verified to be correct:
- The
Roomentity extendsAuthorizableEntitywhich extendsBaseAlkemioEntity BaseAlkemioEntitydefines theidcolumn aschar(36)with UUID generation- The migration's foreign key
guidanceRoomIdis correctly defined aschar(36)to match the referencedroom.idcolumn - The unique index and foreign key constraints are properly defined with appropriate ON DELETE SET NULL behavior
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify room table structure and id column type
# Check if room table exists and its structure
echo "Checking room table structure..."
fd -e ts -e js -t f "room.entity" -x cat {}
Length of output: 1114
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the base entity (AuthorizableEntity) structure
echo "Checking AuthorizableEntity structure..."
fd -e ts "authorizable-entity" -x cat {}
Length of output: 133
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for base entity in common directory
echo "Searching for base entity..."
rg -l "class.*AuthorizableEntity" --type ts
# If found, show the content
echo "Content of files containing AuthorizableEntity:"
rg -A 10 "class.*AuthorizableEntity" --type ts
Length of output: 23688
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for BaseAlkemioEntity definition
echo "Searching for BaseAlkemioEntity..."
rg -A 10 "class.*BaseAlkemioEntity" --type ts
Length of output: 7792
src/core/bootstrap/bootstrap.module.ts (1)
25-25: LGTM: AI persona service integration
The integration of AiPersonaServiceModule is properly implemented following NestJS best practices.
Also applies to: 30-30
src/services/room-integration/room.controller.service.ts (1)
Line range hint 3-7: Clean up commented code
There are several commented-out code sections that should be removed if they're no longer needed. If they represent future work, they should be moved to GitHub issues for proper tracking.
Let's check if these commented sections are tracked elsewhere:
Also applies to: 58-59
src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/dto/ai.persona.service.invocation.dto.input.ts (3)
8-8: LGTM: New enum value properly added
The addition of POST_MESSAGE to InvocationResultAction enum follows TypeScript conventions and is properly integrated with GraphQL schema registration.
24-27: LGTM: Nullable threadID properly implemented
The change to make threadID optional is properly implemented with correct TypeScript and GraphQL decorators.
61-63: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Review validation logic implementation
The current validation implementation has potential issues:
- Making
validateRoomDetailsoptional might lead to validation being skipped - The validation only checks
threadIDbut ignores other required fields (roomID,communicationID) - Consider implementing a more comprehensive validation
Consider implementing a more robust validation:
- validateRoomDetails?() {
- return this.roomDetails && this.roomDetails.threadID;
+ validateRoomDetails() {
+ return (
+ this.roomDetails &&
+ this.roomDetails.roomID &&
+ this.roomDetails.communicationID &&
+ (this.action !== InvocationResultAction.POST_REPLY || this.roomDetails.threadID)
+ );
+ }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 62-62: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
src/services/api/lookup/lookup.module.ts (2)
35-35: LGTM! Import statement follows project conventions.
The import statement for LicenseModule follows the established project structure and naming conventions.
69-69: LGTM! Module import maintains consistency.
The addition of LicenseModule to the imports array:
- Maintains alphabetical ordering
- Follows NestJS dependency injection pattern
- Properly supports the new license resolver functionality
src/services/infrastructure/event-bus/event.bus.module.ts (1)
82-86: Verify the integration with virtual contributor engine.
The new queue addition suggests communication with a virtual contributor engine. Ensure the engine is configured to handle messages with the 'guidance' routing key.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try another search strategy to verify the integration.
Integration with virtual contributor engine is properly configured
The verification shows that:
- The virtual contributor engine for guidance is properly configured in the system with corresponding queue definitions in
MessagingQueueenum - The engine is integrated via
GuidanceEngineAdapterinsrc/services/adapters/chat-guidance-adapter/ - The service is defined in Docker compose files (
quickstart-services-ai.yml) with the correct queue configuration - The routing key 'guidance' matches the queue configuration in both the message bus and the service definition
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for corresponding message handlers in the codebase
echo "Searching for guidance message handlers..."
rg -t ts -t js "guidance.*Handler|@RabbitSubscribe.*guidance"
# Search for message type definitions
echo "Searching for guidance message types..."
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $NAME {
$$$
type: "guidance"
$$$
}'
Length of output: 321
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any files containing 'guidance' in their content
echo "Searching for files containing 'guidance'..."
rg -l "guidance"
# Search for virtual contributor engine related configurations
echo "Searching for virtual contributor engine configurations..."
rg -i "virtual.*contributor.*engine"
# Search for message queue configurations
echo "Searching for queue configurations..."
rg -t ts -t js "routingKey.*guidance"
Length of output: 13992
src/core/microservices/microservices.module.ts (1)
102-102: Verify the async configuration change for the guidance engine
The guidance engine is now configured differently from other virtual contributor engines by setting the boolean parameter to true. This change might affect its behavior compared to other similar services.
Let's verify the configuration consistency and impact:
Could you please clarify:
- Why does the guidance engine need different async behavior compared to other virtual contributor engines?
- What is the purpose of this boolean parameter in
clientProxyFactory?
✅ Verification successful
The durable parameter change is correct and intentional
Looking at the implementation, the durable parameter in clientProxyFactory defaults to true, and the guidance engine adapter requires reliable message delivery for its query, reset, and ingest operations. The change aligns the configuration with the default and intended behavior of the message queue client.
Key findings:
- The
clientProxyFactoryhasdurable = trueas its default parameter value - The guidance engine adapter uses
firstValueFromto wait for responses, requiring reliable message delivery - The adapter handles critical operations (queries, resets, ingestion) that should not lose messages
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the clientProxyFactory usage across the codebase
# and verify if this is an intentional difference
# Check the implementation of clientProxyFactory
echo "Checking clientProxyFactory implementation:"
rg -A 10 "clientProxyFactory.*=.*" --type ts
# Check other usages of VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTOR_ENGINE_GUIDANCE
echo "Checking other references to the guidance engine:"
rg "VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTOR_ENGINE_GUIDANCE" --type ts
Length of output: 2084
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of the guidance engine adapter to understand the usage
ast-grep --pattern 'class GuidanceEngineAdapter {
$$$
}'
# Also check the queue context mapping to understand if there's any special handling
rg -A 5 "QUEUE_CONTEXT_MAP.*=.*" --type ts
Length of output: 14332
src/services/adapters/chat-guidance-adapter/guidance.engine.adapter.ts (1)
13-13: LGTM! Import change aligns with interface renaming
The import statement correctly reflects the renamed interface and follows NestJS domain organization patterns.
src/platform/platform/platform.service.ts (1)
24-24: LGTM! Import follows established patterns
The import statement follows the project's conventions and is correctly placed with other interface imports.
src/domain/space/space/space.service.license.ts (2)
28-31: LGTM! Well-structured method signature.
The optional parameter is properly typed and follows TypeScript best practices. The naming clearly indicates its purpose.
88-91: Verify recursive license policy application.
The implementation correctly propagates the root level space agent through the space hierarchy.
Let's verify that this is the only recursive call to applyLicensePolicy in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Implementation correctly handles recursive license policy application
The recursive call to applyLicensePolicy in space.service.license.ts is correctly implemented. The search results show that:
- The recursive pattern only exists in the space hierarchy through
space.service.license.ts - Other services (account, collaboration, role-set) use
applyLicensePolicybut don't implement recursion - The propagation of
rootLevelSpaceAgentthrough the space hierarchy is unique to this implementation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other recursive calls to applyLicensePolicy
ast-grep --pattern 'applyLicensePolicy($$$)' | grep -v 'subspace'
Length of output: 65
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search for applyLicensePolicy
rg "applyLicensePolicy" -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 12630
src/services/api/search/v2/extract/search.extract.service.ts (1)
73-73: Verify the impact of renaming the parameter
The parameter rename from onlyPublicResults to excludeDemoSpaces represents a significant change in functionality. This is a breaking change that could affect API consumers.
src/platform/platform.role/platform.role.service.ts (2)
Line range hint 41-47: Well-implemented error handling
The error handling approach is robust with:
- Custom exceptions for specific error cases
- Proper validation checks
- Clear error messages with logging context
48-48: Verify data persistence after moving createdBy assignment
The change moves the createdBy assignment from platformInvitation to platformInvitationData. While this is a valid approach, we need to ensure that this value is properly persisted through the creation process.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response since I have sufficient information about the createdBy field handling across the codebase.
Moving createdBy assignment is safe and consistent with data model
The verification shows that createdBy is properly defined in both:
- Platform invitation entity (
src/platform/invitation/platform.invitation.entity.ts) - Platform invitation DTO (
src/platform/invitation/dto/platform.invitation.dto.create.ts)
The field is consistently defined as a required string field in both places, ensuring the value will be properly persisted through the creation process. Moving the assignment from platformInvitation to platformInvitationData is safe as both objects follow the same data structure for this field.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for createdBy handling in PlatformInvitation entity and related files
ast-grep --pattern 'class PlatformInvitation {
$$$
createdBy$_: $_
$$$
}'
# Search for createdBy handling in create invitation DTOs and interfaces
rg -A 5 'createdBy.*:.*string'
Length of output: 11963
src/domain/common/license/license.service.ts (1)
226-228: Error handling changes look good.
The distinction between EntityNotFoundException and RelationshipNotFoundException is well-applied here:
EntityNotFoundExceptionwhen license is missingRelationshipNotFoundExceptionwhen entitlements are not loaded
src/domain/space/space/space.resolver.mutations.ts (1)
23-24: LGTM: Dependencies properly injected following NestJS patterns
The new services are correctly imported and injected following NestJS dependency injection best practices.
Also applies to: 38-39
src/domain/community/user/user.resolver.fields.ts (1)
35-35: LGTM: Import statement follows project conventions
The import statement for IRoom interface is correctly placed and follows the project's import organization pattern.
src/domain/space/account/account.service.authorization.ts (3)
285-293: LGTM: New credential definitions are well-structured
The new credential definitions for VC campaign and beta testers follow the correct interface structure and naming conventions.
295-298: LGTM: Good use of DRY principle
Creating a shared array for credentials promotes code reusability and maintainability.
Line range hint 299-323: LGTM: Authorization rules are properly configured
The authorization rules for creating spaces, virtual contributors, and innovation packs are consistently implemented with appropriate credential types and safety measures (cascade=false).
Let's verify that all necessary privileges are covered:
✅ Verification successful
Authorization rules are properly configured and all CREATE privileges are covered
The verification confirms that the authorization rules in the code are correctly implemented:
- All CREATE privileges from the enum are properly handled either through global admin privileges or specific beta/VC campaign credentials
- The three rules under review (CREATE_SPACE, CREATE_VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTOR, CREATE_INNOVATION_PACK) are consistently implemented with cascade=false for security
- The privileges align with the AuthorizationPrivilege enum values found in the codebase
- The implementation includes proper credential checks and follows the platform's authorization pattern
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all CREATE privileges in AuthorizationPrivilege enum are properly handled
# Search for all CREATE privileges in the enum
echo "Checking CREATE privileges in AuthorizationPrivilege enum:"
rg -A 1 "CREATE_[A-Z_]+" "src/common/enums/authorization.privilege.ts"
# Search for their usage in authorization rules
echo "Checking their usage in authorization rules:"
rg "AuthorizationPrivilege\.CREATE_[A-Z_]+" "src/domain/**/authorization.ts"
Length of output: 1056
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for authorization rules in the correct file path
echo "Checking usage of CREATE privileges in authorization files:"
rg "AuthorizationPrivilege\.CREATE_[A-Z_]+" "src/domain/**/*.authorization.ts"
# Let's also check the specific file we're reviewing
echo -e "\nChecking the specific file under review:"
cat "src/domain/space/account/account.service.authorization.ts"
Length of output: 14282
src/services/api/search/v2/result/search.result.service.ts (1)
185-187: LGTM! Improved query readability
The reformatting of the where clause enhances code readability while maintaining the same functionality.
src/services/api/lookup/lookup.resolver.fields.ts (3)
68-69: LGTM!
The imports are correctly added and follow the existing import pattern in the file.
103-104: LGTM!
The LicenseService is properly injected following the dependency injection pattern.
714-725: Verify authorization implementation in LicenseService
Let's verify that the LicenseService properly implements authorization checks.
✅ Verification successful
Authorization is implemented through a separate service layer
The codebase shows a well-structured authorization implementation:
LicenseAuthorizationServicehandles authorization policiesLicenseService.getLicenseOrFail()is used in conjunction with@UseGuards(GraphqlGuard)at the resolver level- Authorization policies are properly inherited and managed through
AuthorizationPolicyService
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if LicenseService implements authorization properly
ast-grep --pattern 'class LicenseService {
$$$
getLicenseOrFail($_) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Check for authorization-related tests
rg -l "license.*authorization" --type=ts --glob "**/*.spec.ts"
Length of output: 161
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the LicenseService implementation first
fd -e ts "license.service"
# Then let's look for any authorization-related code in the service
rg -i "authorization|permission|access" -C 3 -t ts "license.service"
# Also check for any guard implementations related to licenses
fd -e ts "license.*guard"
rg -i "guard.*license" -t ts
Length of output: 314
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of both license service files
cat src/domain/common/license/license.service.authorization.ts
cat src/domain/common/license/license.service.ts
# Let's also check if getLicenseOrFail is using any authorization service
ast-grep --pattern 'getLicenseOrFail($$$) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 9410
src/services/adapters/communication-adapter/communication.adapter.ts (1)
554-554: LGTM! Defensive null check added.
The addition of (room.messages || []) prevents potential runtime errors when messages is undefined.
src/services/api/search/v2/extract/build.search.query.ts (3)
6-11: Refactored function signature enhances flexibility
Introducing the options parameter object in buildSearchQuery improves the function's extensibility and readability by grouping optional parameters.
34-38: Well-structured buildFilter function supports new filtering options
Modifying buildFilter to accept an options object allows for cleaner expansion of filtering criteria, such as the new excludeDemoSpaces parameter.
71-75:
Ensure correct serialization of SpaceVisibility.ACTIVE in Elasticsearch query
Verify that SpaceVisibility.ACTIVE serializes to the expected value in the Elasticsearch term query. Enum values might serialize to numeric representations, which could cause mismatches if Elasticsearch expects a string.
Confirm that the visibility field in the Elasticsearch index stores values in the same format as SpaceVisibility.ACTIVE. Adjust the code if necessary to match the expected data type.
src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.resolver.mutations.ts (1)
42-47: Verify proper asynchronous handling in authorization checks
Ensure that the grantAccessOrFail method handles asynchronous operations correctly and that any promises are appropriately awaited.
Run the following script to verify the usage of grantAccessOrFail:
Also applies to: 83-88
src/core/bootstrap/bootstrap.service.ts (4)
62-65: Imports for AI Persona Service are correctly added
The added imports for AiPersonaServiceService, AiPersonaEngine, AiPersonaBodyOfKnowledgeType, and AiPersonaDataAccessMode are necessary and properly included for the new functionality.
89-89: Dependency injection of AiPersonaServiceService is properly implemented
The AiPersonaServiceService is correctly injected into the constructor, following NestJS dependency injection best practices.
121-121: Adding ensureGuidanceChat() to the bootstrap sequence
The invocation of ensureGuidanceChat() within the bootstrap() method ensures that the guidance chat functionality is initialized during the bootstrap process.
534-572: Verify parameters in ensureGuidanceChat() method
Please verify the parameters passed to createAiPersonaService:
bodyOfKnowledgeIDis set to an empty string.bodyOfKnowledgeTypeis set toAiPersonaBodyOfKnowledgeType.NONE.promptis an empty array.externalConfigis explicitly set toundefined.
Ensure these values are appropriate for the intended AI Persona Service and won't lead to unintended behavior.
...communication/message.guidance.question.result/message.guidance.question.result.interface.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/services/infrastructure/license-entitlement-usage/license.entitlement.usage.service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 20
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (40)
src/services/api/chat-guidance/dto/chat.guidance.relevance.dto.ts (1)
5-5: Consider using JSDoc format for the comment.While the current comment is informative, using JSDoc format would be more consistent with TypeScript documentation standards.
- // Message id is not a UUID, it's the id of the message in Matrix + /** Message id is not a UUID, it's the id of the message in Matrix */src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/dto/utils.ts (1)
11-16: Consider enhancing type safety for roomDetails validation.The validation logic looks good, but we could make it more type-safe and maintainable.
Consider this type-safe refactoring:
if (action === InvocationResultAction.POST_REPLY) { return ( input.resultHandler.action === action && - input.resultHandler.roomDetails && - input.resultHandler.roomDetails.threadID + Boolean(input.resultHandler.roomDetails?.threadID) ); }This change:
- Uses optional chaining for safer property access
- Explicitly converts to boolean to handle undefined/null
- Reduces the number of checks while maintaining the same logic
src/services/adapters/ai-server-adapter/dto/ai.server.adapter.dto.invocation.ts (1)
29-29: Consider adding language validationThe addition of optional language support is good. Consider:
- Adding validation for supported languages
- Documenting the expected language format (e.g., ISO 639-1 codes)
- Providing a default language if none is specified
export class AiServerAdapterInvocationInput { // ... other properties - language?: string; + @IsOptional() + @IsISO6391() // or custom validator for supported languages + language?: string = 'en'; // default to English if not specified }src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-engine-adapter/dto/ai.persona.engine.adapter.dto.invocation.input.ts (1)
35-35: Consider using a more specific type for languageInstead of using
string, consider using a union type of ISO language codes or an enum to ensure type safety and valid language values.- language?: string; + language?: 'en' | 'es' | 'fr' | /* other supported languages */;Or create a dedicated enum:
export enum SupportedLanguage { English = 'en', Spanish = 'es', French = 'fr', // Add other supported languages } // Then use it in the interface language?: SupportedLanguage;src/domain/common/license/license.resolver.fields.ts (1)
22-25: Improve field description for better clarityThe current description "The set of License Entitlements on that entity" is vague and redundant. Consider clarifying:
- What these privileges represent
- Who "my" refers to (current user?)
- How these differ from the
entitlementsfield@ResolveField('myLicensePrivileges', () => [LicenseEntitlementType], { nullable: true, - description: 'The set of License Entitlements on that entity.', + description: 'The set of license privileges available to the current user for this entity.', })src/domain/community/user/user.interface.ts (1)
31-31: LGTM! Well-structured property additionThe optional guidanceRoom property is properly typed and matches the one-to-one relationship design. Consider documenting the purpose of this relationship with a JSDoc comment for better maintainability.
Consider adding documentation like:
+ /** + * One-to-one relationship with a guidance Room. + * This room is used for user guidance/support conversations. + */ guidanceRoom?: IRoom;src/services/api/search/v2/search2.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
28-46: Consider enhancing error handling with more specific exceptionsWhile the current error handling is good, consider creating a more specific exception type for space-related errors (e.g.,
SpaceNotFoundException) instead of using the genericEntityNotFoundException. This would make error handling more precise and improve error filtering in upper layers.-throw new EntityNotFoundException( +throw new SpaceNotFoundException( 'Space with the given identifier not found', LogContext.SEARCH, { message: `Space with the given identifier not found: ${searchData.searchInSpaceFilter}`, } );src/migrations/1731937383422-userGuidanceRoom.ts (1)
1-51: Consider documenting the guidance room architecture decisionsThe migration establishes one-to-one relationships for guidance functionality:
- Each user can have at most one guidance room (nullable)
- Each platform can have at most one guidance virtual contributor (nullable)
Consider documenting these architectural decisions in your project's documentation to help future maintainers understand:
- Why these relationships are one-to-one instead of one-to-many
- The lifecycle management of guidance rooms and virtual contributors
- The implications of the SET NULL delete behavior
src/services/room-integration/room.controller.service.ts (2)
57-57: Type the message parameter properlyThe TODO comment about typing appears in multiple methods. Consider creating a shared interface for the message type to resolve these TODOs consistently.
interface RoomMessage { result: string; sources?: Array<{ title: string; uri: string; }>; }
55-75: Refactor common patterns between postMessage and postReplyBoth methods share similar patterns for room retrieval, message sending, and event publishing. Consider extracting these into private helper methods to reduce duplication and improve maintainability.
private async sendAndPublish( roomID: string, communicationID: string, message: any, options?: { threadID?: string } ) { const room = await this.roomService.getRoomOrFail(roomID); const messageData = { roomID: room.externalRoomID, message: this.convertResultToMessage(message), ...options }; const answerMessage = options?.threadID ? await this.roomService.sendMessageReply(room, communicationID, messageData, 'virtualContributor') : await this.roomService.sendMessage(room, communicationID, messageData); this.subscriptionPublishService.publishRoomEvent( room, MutationType.CREATE, answerMessage ); return answerMessage; }src/services/infrastructure/event-bus/event.bus.module.ts (1)
82-86: Consider adding queue configuration options for reliability.While the basic queue configuration is correct, consider adding options for better reliability and message handling:
{ name: 'virtual-contributor-engine-guidance', exchange: eventBusConfig.exchange, routingKey: 'guidance', + options: { + durable: true, + deadLetterExchange: `${eventBusConfig.exchange}.dlx`, + messageTtl: 86400000 // 24 hours + } },src/core/microservices/microservices.module.ts (1)
99-104: Document the boolean parameter's purposeThe boolean parameter's purpose in
clientProxyFactoryis not immediately clear from the code. Consider adding a comment explaining why the guidance service requires this parameter to betruewhile others usefalseor omit it.Add a comment like:
provide: VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTOR_ENGINE_GUIDANCE, useFactory: clientProxyFactory( MessagingQueue.VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTOR_ENGINE_GUIDANCE, + // Enable async processing for guidance service to handle long-running operations true ),src/services/adapters/chat-guidance-adapter/guidance.engine.adapter.ts (3)
50-51: Consider standardizing error message formatWhile the error handling structure is good, consider standardizing the error messages for better consistency and parsing:
- error: errorMessage, + error: { + message: errorMessage, + code: 'GUIDANCE_ENGINE_ERROR', + context: LogContext.CHAT_GUIDANCE + },This structure would make it easier to handle errors consistently across the application.
Also applies to: 83-84
Line range hint
133-157: Consider improving type safety in extractMetadataThe
extractMetadatamethod could benefit from stronger typing and validation:- private extractMetadata(metadata: string): Source[] { + private extractMetadata(metadata: string[]): Source[] { if (!Array.isArray(metadata)) { + this.logger.warn('Invalid metadata format', LogContext.CHAT_GUIDANCE); + return []; } // Rest of the implementation... }Also, consider adding input validation and proper type guards to ensure robust handling of malformed metadata.
Line range hint
38-86: Consider implementing custom error typesThe error handling could be improved by implementing custom error types for different failure scenarios:
class GuidanceEngineError extends Error { constructor( message: string, public readonly code: string, public readonly context: LogContext ) { super(message); } } class GuidanceEngineParseError extends GuidanceEngineError { constructor(message: string) { super(message, 'PARSE_ERROR', LogContext.CHAT_GUIDANCE); } }This would allow for more specific error handling and better error categorization.
src/platform/platform/platform.service.ts (1)
136-152: Add JSDoc documentation for the new methodThe method implementation looks good, but would benefit from documentation explaining its purpose and failure conditions.
Add JSDoc documentation:
+/** + * Retrieves the platform's guidance virtual contributor with its AI persona. + * @throws {EntityNotFoundException} If the guidance virtual contributor is not found + * @returns {Promise<IVirtualContributor>} The guidance virtual contributor + */ async getGuidanceVirtualContributorOrFail(): Promise<IVirtualContributor> {src/domain/space/space/space.service.license.ts (3)
28-31: Consider renaming the parameter for clarity.The optional parameter
level0SpaceAgentcould be renamed torootSpaceAgentfor better readability while maintaining the same functionality.async applyLicensePolicy( spaceID: string, - level0SpaceAgent?: IAgent + rootSpaceAgent?: IAgent ): Promise<ILicense[]>
65-65: LGTM! Consider consistent naming if parameter is renamed.The nullish coalescing operator is appropriately used here. If you adopt the previous suggestion to rename the parameter, update this line accordingly:
-const rootLevelSpaceAgent = level0SpaceAgent ?? space.agent; +const rootSpaceAgent = rootSpaceAgent ?? space.agent;
88-91: Consider monitoring performance for deep space hierarchies.The recursive propagation of the root agent to subspaces is correct. However, for deep space hierarchies, consider monitoring the performance impact and potentially implementing pagination or batch processing if needed.
src/services/api/search/v2/extract/search.extract.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
164-192: Update getIndices method for consistency and clarityThe
getIndicesmethod still uses the old parameter nameonlyPublicResultswhile thesearchmethod usesexcludeDemoSpaces. Additionally, the filtering logic might need to be updated to properly handle demo space exclusion.Apply these changes:
private getIndices( entityTypesFilter: string[] = [], - onlyPublicResults: boolean + excludeDemoSpaces: boolean ): string[] { const filteredIndices = entityTypesFilter.map( type => TYPE_TO_INDEX(this.indexPattern)[type as SearchEntityTypes] ); // todo: remove this when whiteboard is a separate search result // include the whiteboards, if the callout is included if (entityTypesFilter.includes(SearchEntityTypes.CALLOUT)) { filteredIndices.push( TYPE_TO_INDEX(this.indexPattern)[SearchEntityTypes.WHITEBOARD] ); } - if (onlyPublicResults) { + if (excludeDemoSpaces) { const publicIndices = Object.values( TYPE_TO_PUBLIC_INDEX(this.indexPattern) ); return intersection(filteredIndices, publicIndices); }Also, consider updating the method's documentation to clarify the new filtering behavior.
src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/ai.persona.service.service.ts (1)
185-185: LGTM! Consider adding language validation.The addition of language support is a good enhancement. However, consider adding validation for supported languages.
Consider adding language validation before passing it to the adapter:
+ import { SUPPORTED_LANGUAGES } from '@common/constants'; ... public async invoke( invocationInput: AiPersonaServiceInvocationInput, history: InteractionMessage[] ): Promise<void> { + if (invocationInput.language && !SUPPORTED_LANGUAGES.includes(invocationInput.language)) { + throw new BadRequestException(`Unsupported language: ${invocationInput.language}`); + } const aiPersonaService = await this.getAiPersonaServiceOrFail(src/platform/platform.role/platform.role.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-248: Consider architectural improvements for better maintainability.A few suggestions to enhance the codebase:
- Extract the credential mapping logic from
getCredentialForRoleinto a dedicated service or use a more maintainable pattern (e.g., a decorator or mapping configuration).- Reduce duplication by extracting the license-related logic in
assignPlatformRoleToUserandremovePlatformRoleFromUserinto a shared method.- Consider creating more specific error types for role-related exceptions.
Example refactor for the license-related logic:
private async handleAccountLicense( userID: string, accountID: string, operation: 'grant' | 'revoke' ): Promise<void> { const accountAgent = await this.accountService.getAgent(accountID); const accountLicenseCredential: ICredentialDefinition = { type: LicenseCredential.ACCOUNT_LICENSE_PLUS, resourceID: accountID, }; if (operation === 'grant') { await this.agentService.grantCredential({ agentID: accountAgent.id, ...accountLicenseCredential, }); } else { await this.agentService.revokeCredential({ agentID: accountAgent.id, ...accountLicenseCredential, }); } }src/domain/common/license/license.service.ts (1)
115-142: Consider adding error handling and improving method name clarity.While the implementation is solid, consider these improvements:
- Add try-catch around the Promise.all to handle potential failures in parallel processing
- Consider renaming to
getMyAvailableLicensePrivilegesOrFailto better reflect that it returns only available entitlements- public async getMyLicensePrivilegesOrFail( + public async getMyAvailableLicensePrivilegesOrFail( licenseInput: ILicense ): Promise<LicenseEntitlementType[] | never> { let license = licenseInput; if (!license.entitlements) { license = await this.getLicenseOrFail(licenseInput.id, { relations: { entitlements: true, }, }); } const entitlements = this.getEntitlementsFromLicenseOrFail(license); + try { const availableEntitlements = ( await Promise.all( entitlements.map(async entitlement => ({ entitlement, isAvailable: await this.licenseEntitlementService.isEntitlementAvailable( entitlement.id ), })) ) ) .filter(({ isAvailable }) => isAvailable) .map(({ entitlement }) => entitlement.type); return availableEntitlements; + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to check entitlements availability: ${error.message}`); + } }src/platform/platform/platform.service.authorization.ts (1)
224-237: Consider improving the error message specificity.While the error handling is appropriate, the error message could be more specific about which authorization is missing.
Consider updating the error message to be more specific:
- 'Authorization definition not found for Platform Communication', + 'Platform Communication authorization policy is undefined',src/domain/community/user/user.resolver.fields.ts (1)
274-297: LGTM with minor suggestions for improvement!The implementation correctly handles authentication, authorization, and null checks. However, there are a few improvements that could be made:
- Enhance the error message in
grantAccessOrFailto include more context:this.authorizationService.grantAccessOrFail( agentInfo, guidanceRoom.authorization, AuthorizationPrivilege.READ, - `guidance Room: ${guidanceRoom.id}` + `User ${agentInfo.email} accessing guidance room: ${guidanceRoom.id} for user: ${user.email}` );
- Consider adding try-catch block for error handling:
async guidanceRoom( @Parent() user: User, @CurrentUser() agentInfo: AgentInfo ): Promise<IRoom | undefined> { + try { const { guidanceRoom } = await this.userService.getUserOrFail(user.id, { relations: { guidanceRoom: true }, }); if (!guidanceRoom) { return undefined; } this.authorizationService.grantAccessOrFail( agentInfo, guidanceRoom.authorization, AuthorizationPrivilege.READ, `guidance Room: ${guidanceRoom.id}` ); return guidanceRoom; + } catch (error) { + this.logger.error( + `Failed to retrieve guidance room for user ${user.email}: ${error.message}` + ); + throw error; + } }src/domain/space/account/account.service.authorization.ts (1)
302-302: Consider documenting the authorization strategy.The authorization rules are consistently implemented across different resource types. However, adding documentation about the authorization strategy would help future maintainers understand why beta testers and VC campaign users have these creation privileges.
Consider adding a comment block above the
createResourcesUnderAccountCredentialsarray explaining:
- The rationale behind these privileges
- The relationship between beta testers and VC campaign users
- Any limitations or restrictions that apply
Also applies to: 310-310, 319-319
src/domain/communication/room/room.service.ts (1)
67-72: Add documentation and logging for better maintainabilityWhile the implementation is correct, consider these improvements for better maintainability:
- Add JSDoc documentation to describe the method's purpose, parameters, and return type
- Add debug logging similar to other methods in this service
+ /** + * Finds a room based on the provided options without throwing an exception if not found + * @param options - TypeORM find options for Room entity + * @returns Promise resolving to Room if found, null otherwise + */ async findRoom(options?: FindOneOptions<Room>): Promise<Room | null> { + this.logger.debug?.(`Finding room with options: ${JSON.stringify(options)}`, LogContext.COMMUNICATION); const room = await this.roomRepository.findOne({ ...options, }); + this.logger.debug?.(`Room ${room?.id ?? 'not'} found`, LogContext.COMMUNICATION); return room; }src/domain/space/account/account.resolver.mutations.ts (2)
Line range hint
561-603: Consider improving method naming and error messagesThe implementation is solid, but there are two suggestions for improvement:
- The method name could better reflect its async nature (e.g.,
validateSoftLicenseLimitOrFailAsync)- The error message could be more user-friendly by removing technical details like account ID
Consider these improvements:
- private async validateSoftLicenseLimitOrFail( + private async validateSoftLicenseLimitOrFailAsync( account: IAccount, agentInfo: AgentInfo, authorizationPrivilege: AuthorizationPrivilege, licenseType: LicenseEntitlementType ) { // ... existing validation code ... throw new ValidationException( - `Unable to create ${licenseType} on account: ${account.id}. Entitlement limit of ${entitlementLimit} of type ${licenseType} reached`, + `Cannot create more ${licenseType.toLowerCase().replace('_', ' ')}s. You have reached the limit of ${entitlementLimit}.`, LogContext.ACCOUNT ); }
Line range hint
367-367: Address or remove TODO commentsThere are several TODO comments with the note "check if still needed later". These should be either addressed or removed to maintain code clarity.
Would you like me to help create GitHub issues to track these TODOs?
Also applies to: 449-449, 486-486
src/domain/community/user/user.service.ts (1)
141-142: Enhance the comment documentationWhile the comment indicates that the guidance room is created on demand, it would be helpful to document why this design decision was made (e.g., performance optimization, resource management, etc.).
src/domain/access/role-set/role.set.resolver.mutations.ts (1)
Line range hint
192-219: Consider adding error handling for license-related edge casesThe method handles authorization checks well but could benefit from more specific error handling for license-related scenarios. Consider adding specific error messages for:
- Missing license
- Missing entitlements
- Invalid entitlement type
async assignRoleToVirtualContributor( @CurrentUser() agentInfo: AgentInfo, @Args('roleData') roleData: AssignRoleOnRoleSetToVirtualContributorInput ): Promise<IVirtualContributor> { const roleSet = await this.roleSetService.getRoleSetOrFail( roleData.roleSetID, { relations: { license: { entitlements: true, }, }, } ); + if (!roleSet.license) { + throw new LicenseException( + 'No license found for the role set', + LogContext.COMMUNITY + ); + } // ... existing authorization checks ... // Also require SPACE_FLAG_VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTOR_ACCESS entitlement for the RoleSet this.licenseService.isEntitlementEnabledOrFail( roleSet.license, LicenseEntitlementType.SPACE_FLAG_VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTOR_ACCESS );src/services/adapters/communication-adapter/communication.adapter.ts (1)
Line range hint
636-648: Add null safety check for consistency.Similar to the improvement in
getCommunityRooms, consider adding a null check forroom.messageshere to maintain consistency and prevent potential runtime errors.- messages: room.messages.map(message => { + messages: (room.messages || []).map(message => {src/services/api/search/v2/extract/build.search.query.ts (2)
6-8: Improve readability by defining an interface for optionsConsider defining an interface for the
optionsparameter to enhance readability and maintainability. This makes the code more self-documenting and facilitates future extensions.You can define the interface as:
interface BuildSearchQueryOptions { spaceIdFilter?: string; excludeDemoSpaces?: boolean; }And update the function signature:
-export const buildSearchQuery = ( - terms: string, - options?: { - spaceIdFilter?: string; - excludeDemoSpaces?: boolean; - } -): QueryDslQueryContainer => { +export const buildSearchQuery = ( + terms: string, + options?: BuildSearchQueryOptions, +): QueryDslQueryContainer => {
34-37: Align parameter naming for consistencyIn the
buildFilterfunction, consider renaming the parameteroptstooptionsto maintain consistency withbuildSearchQuery. This improves clarity and makes the codebase more uniform.Apply this change:
-const buildFilter = (opts?: { +const buildFilter = (options?: { spaceIdFilter?: string; excludeDemoSpaces?: boolean; }): QueryDslQueryContainer | undefined => { - const { spaceIdFilter, excludeDemoSpaces } = opts ?? {}; + const { spaceIdFilter, excludeDemoSpaces } = options ?? {};src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.resolver.mutations.ts (2)
Line range hint
108-113: EnsuregrantAccessOrFailis awaitedThe
resetChatGuidancemutation is missing anawaitbeforegrantAccessOrFail, which could result in unauthorized access if the authorization check is not completed in time.Apply this diff:
- this.authorizationService.grantAccessOrFail( + await this.authorizationService.grantAccessOrFail( agentInfo, await this.platformAuthorizationService.getPlatformAuthorizationPolicy(), AuthorizationPrivilege.ACCESS_INTERACTIVE_GUIDANCE, `Access interactive guidance: ${agentInfo.email}` );
Line range hint
126-131: Await the authorization check to prevent security risksIn the
ingestmutation, the lack ofawaitbeforegrantAccessOrFailcould allow the function to execute without verifying the user's administrative privileges.Apply this diff:
- this.authorizationService.grantAccessOrFail( + await this.authorizationService.grantAccessOrFail( agentInfo, await this.platformAuthorizationService.getPlatformAuthorizationPolicy(), AuthorizationPrivilege.PLATFORM_ADMIN, `Access interactive guidance: ${agentInfo.email}` );src/domain/space/space/space.resolver.mutations.ts (1)
234-246: Consider adding error handling for license management operationsThe code for retrieving
level0Space, applying the license policy, and saving updated licenses involves asynchronous operations that could fail. To enhance robustness, consider adding error handling or exception management to handle potential failures in these operations.src/core/bootstrap/bootstrap.service.ts (3)
62-65: Consider renamingAiPersonaServiceServicefor clarityThe class name
AiPersonaServiceServiceis somewhat redundant with the repeated "Service". Renaming it toAiPersonaServicewould improve readability and align with naming conventions.
89-89: Refine the variable nameaiPersonaServiceServiceSimilarly, the variable
aiPersonaServiceServicein the constructor has a redundant naming. Consider renaming it toaiPersonaServiceto enhance clarity.
533-572: Ensure consistency in loggingCurrently, there is no logging within the
ensureGuidanceChatmethod. Adding logs at key steps can help with monitoring and debugging. For example:
- Log when the guidance virtual contributor already exists.
- Log the creation of the
aiPersonaService.- Log the creation of the virtual contributor.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (54)
src/common/constants/authorization/credential.rule.types.constants.ts(0 hunks)src/common/constants/authorization/policy.rule.constants.ts(0 hunks)src/common/enums/authorization.privilege.ts(0 hunks)src/common/enums/room.type.ts(1 hunks)src/core/bootstrap/bootstrap.module.ts(1 hunks)src/core/bootstrap/bootstrap.service.ts(4 hunks)src/core/microservices/microservices.module.ts(1 hunks)src/domain/access/role-set/role.set.resolver.mutations.ts(1 hunks)src/domain/collaboration/collaboration/collaboration.service.authorization.ts(0 hunks)src/domain/common/license/license.resolver.fields.ts(2 hunks)src/domain/common/license/license.service.ts(4 hunks)src/domain/communication/message.answer.to.question/message.answer.to.question.source.interface.ts(0 hunks)src/domain/communication/message.guidance.question.result/message.guidance.question.result.interface.ts(2 hunks)src/domain/communication/message.guidance.question.result/message.guidance.question.result.module.ts(1 hunks)src/domain/communication/message/message.module.ts(1 hunks)src/domain/communication/message/message.service.ts(0 hunks)src/domain/communication/room/room.service.ts(1 hunks)src/domain/community/user/user.entity.ts(2 hunks)src/domain/community/user/user.interface.ts(2 hunks)src/domain/community/user/user.resolver.fields.ts(2 hunks)src/domain/community/user/user.service.ts(5 hunks)src/domain/community/virtual-contributor/virtual.contributor.resolver.queries.ts(0 hunks)src/domain/space/account/account.resolver.mutations.ts(7 hunks)src/domain/space/account/account.service.authorization.ts(2 hunks)src/domain/space/space/space.resolver.mutations.ts(3 hunks)src/domain/space/space/space.service.license.ts(3 hunks)src/migrations/1731937383422-userGuidanceRoom.ts(1 hunks)src/platform/platform.role/platform.role.service.ts(1 hunks)src/platform/platform/platform.entity.ts(2 hunks)src/platform/platform/platform.interface.ts(2 hunks)src/platform/platform/platform.service.authorization.ts(1 hunks)src/platform/platform/platform.service.ts(2 hunks)src/services/adapters/ai-server-adapter/dto/ai.server.adapter.dto.invocation.ts(2 hunks)src/services/adapters/chat-guidance-adapter/guidance.engine.adapter.ts(6 hunks)src/services/adapters/communication-adapter/communication.adapter.ts(1 hunks)src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-engine-adapter/dto/ai.persona.engine.adapter.dto.invocation.input.ts(2 hunks)src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/ai.persona.service.service.ts(1 hunks)src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/dto/ai.persona.service.invocation.dto.input.ts(4 hunks)src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/dto/utils.ts(1 hunks)src/services/ai-server/ai-server/ai.server.service.ts(0 hunks)src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.module.ts(1 hunks)src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.resolver.mutations.ts(4 hunks)src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.resolver.queries.ts(0 hunks)src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.service.ts(1 hunks)src/services/api/chat-guidance/dto/chat.guidance.relevance.dto.ts(1 hunks)src/services/api/lookup/lookup.module.ts(2 hunks)src/services/api/lookup/lookup.resolver.fields.ts(3 hunks)src/services/api/search/v2/extract/build.search.query.ts(1 hunks)src/services/api/search/v2/extract/search.extract.service.ts(2 hunks)src/services/api/search/v2/result/search.result.service.ts(1 hunks)src/services/api/search/v2/search2.service.ts(2 hunks)src/services/infrastructure/event-bus/event.bus.module.ts(1 hunks)src/services/infrastructure/license-entitlement-usage/license.entitlement.usage.service.ts(1 hunks)src/services/room-integration/room.controller.service.ts(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (9)
- src/common/constants/authorization/credential.rule.types.constants.ts
- src/common/constants/authorization/policy.rule.constants.ts
- src/common/enums/authorization.privilege.ts
- src/domain/collaboration/collaboration/collaboration.service.authorization.ts
- src/domain/communication/message.answer.to.question/message.answer.to.question.source.interface.ts
- src/domain/communication/message/message.service.ts
- src/domain/community/virtual-contributor/virtual.contributor.resolver.queries.ts
- src/services/ai-server/ai-server/ai.server.service.ts
- src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.resolver.queries.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- src/domain/communication/message.guidance.question.result/message.guidance.question.result.module.ts
- src/services/api/search/v2/result/search.result.service.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (43)
src/common/enums/room.type.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/core/bootstrap/bootstrap.module.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/core/bootstrap/bootstrap.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/core/microservices/microservices.module.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/access/role-set/role.set.resolver.mutations.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/common/license/license.resolver.fields.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/common/license/license.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/communication/message.guidance.question.result/message.guidance.question.result.interface.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/communication/message/message.module.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/communication/room/room.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/community/user/user.entity.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/community/user/user.interface.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/community/user/user.resolver.fields.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/community/user/user.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/space/account/account.resolver.mutations.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/space/account/account.service.authorization.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/space/space/space.resolver.mutations.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/space/space/space.service.license.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/migrations/1731937383422-userGuidanceRoom.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/platform/platform.role/platform.role.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/platform/platform/platform.entity.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/platform/platform/platform.interface.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/platform/platform/platform.service.authorization.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/platform/platform/platform.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/adapters/ai-server-adapter/dto/ai.server.adapter.dto.invocation.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/adapters/chat-guidance-adapter/guidance.engine.adapter.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/adapters/communication-adapter/communication.adapter.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-engine-adapter/dto/ai.persona.engine.adapter.dto.invocation.input.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/ai.persona.service.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/dto/ai.persona.service.invocation.dto.input.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/dto/utils.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.module.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.resolver.mutations.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/api/chat-guidance/dto/chat.guidance.relevance.dto.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/api/lookup/lookup.module.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/api/lookup/lookup.resolver.fields.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/api/search/v2/extract/build.search.query.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/api/search/v2/extract/search.extract.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/api/search/v2/search2.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/infrastructure/event-bus/event.bus.module.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/infrastructure/license-entitlement-usage/license.entitlement.usage.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/services/room-integration/room.controller.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
🔇 Additional comments (64)
src/common/enums/room.type.ts (2)
8-8: LGTM! The new room type follows established patterns.
The addition of GUIDANCE room type maintains consistency with existing enum members in terms of naming convention and value format.
8-8: Verify consistent usage of the new room type.
Let's ensure the new GUIDANCE room type is used consistently across the codebase.
src/services/api/chat-guidance/dto/chat.guidance.relevance.dto.ts (1)
5-9: LGTM! The type change aligns with Matrix message ID requirements.
The change from UUID to String is correct as it properly reflects the actual type of Matrix message IDs. The added comment provides clear context for the change.
src/domain/communication/message/message.module.ts (2)
12-13: Module structure looks good
The simplified module structure maintains clean separation of concerns while following NestJS best practices. The MessageResolverFields remains properly encapsulated and exported.
12-13: Verify dependencies on the removed MessageService
The removal of MessageService from providers and exports could impact dependent modules. Let's verify there are no remaining dependencies.
✅ Verification successful
MessageService removal appears safe
The absence of any references to MessageService in the codebase suggests that its removal from the module's providers and exports was part of a clean-up where all related code and dependencies were properly removed. The changes appear to be consistent with the broader restructuring of message handling mentioned in the AI summary.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining imports or usages of MessageService
rg -l "MessageService" --type ts
# Search for any dependency injection of MessageService
ast-grep --pattern 'constructor($$$, private readonly messageService: MessageService, $$$)'
Length of output: 126
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for MessageService class definition and imports
rg "class MessageService|import.*MessageService" --type ts
# Search for any file that might contain MessageService in its name
fd -e ts -e js "MessageService"
# Look for any remaining references to messageService as a property or parameter
rg "messageService" --type ts
Length of output: 122
src/services/adapters/ai-server-adapter/dto/ai.server.adapter.dto.invocation.ts (2)
5-5: Verify handlers for the new InvocationResultAction
The addition of POST_MESSAGE action looks good, but we should ensure all switch statements and handlers are updated to handle this new action type.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to check for any switch statements or handlers that might be using this enum.
The new POST_MESSAGE action is properly handled
Based on the verification results, I can confirm that the new POST_MESSAGE action is properly handled in the codebase:
- The action is correctly validated in
src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/dto/utils.tswith a dedicated validation check:
if (action === InvocationResultAction.POST_MESSAGE) {
return (input.resultHandler.action === action && input.resultHandler.roomDetails);
}-
The enum is consistently defined across all relevant DTOs and is properly imported where needed.
-
All switch statements and conditional handlers for
InvocationResultActionhave been updated to handle the new action type appropriately.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for switch statements or if-else chains handling InvocationResultAction
rg -A 5 "switch.*InvocationResultAction|if.*InvocationResultAction"
# Search for handler implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'case InvocationResultAction.$_ {'
Length of output: 1656
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for files containing InvocationResultAction
rg -l "InvocationResultAction"
# Search for any handling of InvocationResultAction with context
rg -A 10 "InvocationResultAction"
Length of output: 28417
9-9: Breaking Change: Verify impact of optional threadID
Making threadID optional is a breaking change that could affect existing code. Please ensure:
- All consumers of
RoomDetailshandle the case wherethreadIDis undefined - Documentation is updated to reflect this change
src/domain/communication/message.guidance.question.result/message.guidance.question.result.interface.ts (1)
Line range hint 7-30: LGTM! Well-structured result type with clear error handling
The field structure follows best practices:
- Clear separation between success and error states
- Appropriate nullability for each field
- Descriptive field documentation
src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-engine-adapter/dto/ai.persona.engine.adapter.dto.invocation.input.ts (1)
12-12: Verify the impact of making threadID optional
The change from required to optional threadID is a breaking change that could affect existing code.
✅ Verification successful
Making threadID optional is safe and consistent with codebase usage
The codebase already handles optional threadID appropriately:
- Room controller has null checks:
if (!threadID) { return; } - AI service validates threadID presence when required:
validateRoomDetails() - Other DTOs and services consistently treat threadID as optional
- The change aligns with existing patterns where threadID is undefined for initial messages and required for replies
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct usage of threadID to ensure all consumers handle the optional case
ast-grep --pattern 'roomDetails.threadID'
Length of output: 41
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any usage of threadID property
rg "threadID" -A 2 -B 2
# Search for any usage of threadID in type definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'threadID: string'
# Search for any usage of threadID in optional contexts
ast-grep --pattern 'threadID?: string'
Length of output: 22390
src/domain/common/license/license.resolver.fields.ts (2)
5-5: LGTM: Import statement follows NestJS conventions
The import statement is correctly placed and follows the NestJS path aliasing convention.
26-30: Verify error handling for the OrFail service method
The method uses getMyLicensePrivilegesOrFail which suggests it might throw exceptions, but there's no visible error handling. Let's verify the service implementation and error propagation.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the error handling implementation.
Let me check for the error handling implementation in the base service and any global exception filters.
Let me check one final thing about the base exception types used in the application.
Error handling is properly implemented through global exception filters
The GraphQL resolver's use of getMyLicensePrivilegesOrFail without try-catch is actually the correct pattern here because:
-
The application has a comprehensive global exception handling system with multiple layers:
- GraphQL-specific exception filter (
GraphqlExceptionFilter) - Generic error handler (
UnhandledExceptionFilter) - HTTP exception filter (
HttpExceptionFilter)
- GraphQL-specific exception filter (
-
The "OrFail" suffix follows the established pattern in the codebase where exceptions are meant to propagate up to these global handlers, which will properly format and log the error responses.
-
All exceptions in the system extend from
BaseExceptionwhich integrates with the GraphQL error handling system throughGraphQLError.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the service method implementation and error handling
ast-grep --pattern 'async getMyLicensePrivilegesOrFail($_) {
$$$
}'
# Look for error handling in similar OrFail methods
rg -A 5 "OrFail.*License"
Length of output: 1172
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the getMyLicensePrivilegesOrFail implementation
rg -A 10 "getMyLicensePrivilegesOrFail" src/
# Look for any error handling decorators or filters at module level
rg "@.*Exception" src/domain/common/license/
Length of output: 1157
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for getLicenseOrFail implementation which is used internally
rg -A 10 "getLicenseOrFail.*Promise" src/
# Look for global exception filters and handlers
rg -A 5 "ExceptionFilter|@Catch" src/
Length of output: 4096
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for base exceptions and license-related exceptions
rg -A 5 "class.*Exception" src/common/exceptions/
rg -A 5 "class.*Exception" src/domain/common/license/
Length of output: 38865
src/platform/platform/platform.interface.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM! Clean import statement.
The import follows TypeScript best practices and maintains proper layer separation by importing from the domain layer.
20-20: LGTM! Verify entity mappings.
The optional property addition follows the established pattern and maintains backward compatibility.
Let's verify the corresponding entity mappings and decorators:
✅ Verification successful
Entity mappings are properly configured and consistent
The verification confirms:
- The
Platformentity has the correct TypeORM relationship decorator and join column forguidanceVirtualContributor - The migration script properly sets up the foreign key relationship with
virtual_contributortable - The interface
IVirtualContributoris consistently used across the codebase - The entity mapping follows the established pattern with proper nullable foreign key setup
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the entity mapping for guidanceVirtualContributor in the Platform entity
# Search for the Platform entity definition and its relationship with VirtualContributor
ast-grep --pattern 'class Platform {
$$$
@$_($$$)
guidanceVirtualContributor$$$
$$$
}'
# Also check for any TypeORM migrations that might be needed
fd -e ts -e js -p "migrations|schema.ts" --exec rg -A 5 "guidanceVirtualContributor"
Length of output: 861
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the entity mapping in the Platform entity and related files
rg -A 5 "class Platform" | rg -B 5 -A 15 "@Entity"
# Check for the relationship decorator in Platform entity
rg -B 2 -A 2 "guidanceVirtualContributor.*VirtualContributor"
# Check for any interface implementations or type definitions
rg "IVirtualContributor"
Length of output: 12482
src/domain/community/user/user.interface.ts (1)
6-6: LGTM! Clean import statement
The import for IRoom is properly scoped and follows TypeScript best practices.
src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.module.ts (2)
8-14: LGTM! Module structure follows NestJS best practices.
The changes maintain a clean module structure with proper dependency organization. The new imports and their corresponding module declarations in the imports array follow NestJS conventions.
Also applies to: 19-19, 23-28, 30-30
30-30: Verify the removal of ChatGuidanceResolverQueries.
Let's ensure that the removal of ChatGuidanceResolverQueries from providers doesn't break any existing query functionality.
✅ Verification successful
Removal of ChatGuidanceResolverQueries is safe
Based on the code analysis, the removal of ChatGuidanceResolverQueries from the providers array is safe because:
- The module only contains mutations (ChatGuidanceResolverMutations) and no query operations
- All chat guidance functionality is implemented through mutations: createChatGuidanceRoom, askChatGuidanceQuestion, resetChatGuidance, ingest, and updateAnswerRelevance
- The service (ChatGuidanceService) doesn't expose any query methods that would require a query resolver
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to ChatGuidanceResolverQueries
# and verify if the queries are handled elsewhere
# Search for any remaining references to ChatGuidanceResolverQueries
rg -l "ChatGuidanceResolverQueries"
# Look for GraphQL query definitions that might have been moved
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements ResolverQuery {
$$$
@Query($_)
$$$
}'
Length of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the removal
# 1. Check for any historical references to ChatGuidanceResolverQueries
rg "ChatGuidanceResolverQueries" -A 5 -B 5
# 2. Look for GraphQL queries specifically in the chat guidance directory
fd . src -t f -e ts --full-path ".*chat-guidance.*" --exec rg "@Query" -A 5 -B 5 {}
# 3. Check for any Query decorators in resolver files
fd resolver -t f -e ts --exec rg "@Query" -A 5 -B 5 {}
Length of output: 21547
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's specifically look for chat guidance related queries and their implementations
# 1. Search for chat guidance related files
fd . src -t f -e ts -e js --exec rg -l "chat.*guidance" {}
# 2. Look for any GraphQL schema definitions related to chat guidance
fd . src -t f -e graphql --exec rg "type.*Chat.*Guidance" -A 5 {}
# 3. Check for any remaining query implementations in chat guidance service
fd . src -t f -e ts -e js --exec rg "ChatGuidanceService.*query" -A 5 {}
Length of output: 735
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the chat guidance service and module implementation
# 1. Look at the chat guidance service implementation
cat src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.service.ts
# 2. Check the module definition
cat src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.module.ts
# 3. Look for any query-related code in the mutations resolver
cat src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.resolver.mutations.ts
Length of output: 12088
src/services/api/search/v2/search2.service.ts (2)
26-26: Improved naming clarity with excludeDemoSpaces
The variable rename from onlyPublicResults to excludeDemoSpaces better reflects its actual functionality and makes the code more maintainable.
48-48: Verify coordinated changes across dependent services
The renamed parameter is passed to searchExtractService.search(). Let's verify that all dependent services have been updated accordingly.
✅ Verification successful
Parameter renaming is correctly coordinated
The parameter excludeDemoSpaces is correctly used in both the caller (search2.service.ts) and the implementation (search.extract.service.ts). The parameter names match and are being passed correctly between the services.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining instances of onlyPublicResults to ensure complete renaming
rg "onlyPublicResults" --type ts
# Search for the search method signature in SearchExtractService
ast-grep --pattern 'class SearchExtractService {
$$$
search($_, $excludeDemoSpaces) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 327
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual implementation of SearchExtractService to see the parameter names
rg -A 10 "class SearchExtractService" src/services/api/search/v2/extract/search.extract.service.ts
# Also check where this service is being called from
rg "searchExtractService\.search" --type ts
Length of output: 682
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's see the full implementation of the search method in SearchExtractService
rg -B 5 -A 15 "async search\(" src/services/api/search/v2/extract/search.extract.service.ts
# And let's see how it's being used in search2.service.ts
rg -B 5 -A 15 "searchExtractService\.search" src/services/api/search/v2/search2.service.ts
Length of output: 1105
src/platform/platform/platform.entity.ts (2)
10-10: LGTM! Import statement follows the established patterns.
The import statement for VirtualContributor follows the existing pattern and is properly scoped from the domain module.
64-70: LGTM! OneToOne relationship is properly configured.
The guidanceVirtualContributor relationship:
- Follows the established pattern of other OneToOne relationships in the class
- Has appropriate configuration for eager loading, cascading, and deletion behavior
- Is properly marked as optional with the
?modifier
Let's verify the VirtualContributor entity structure and its relationships:
✅ Verification successful
OneToOne relationship is correctly configured and verified
The verification confirms that:
- The Platform entity has a properly configured unidirectional OneToOne relationship to VirtualContributor
- The VirtualContributor entity does not have a reverse relationship to Platform, which is the correct design for this use case
- The configuration matches other OneToOne relationships in the codebase with appropriate cascade and deletion behavior
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify VirtualContributor entity structure and relationships
# Look for any circular dependencies or inconsistent relationship definitions
# Check VirtualContributor entity definition
ast-grep --pattern 'class VirtualContributor {
$$$
}'
# Check for any reverse relationships in VirtualContributor
ast-grep --pattern '@OneToOne(() => Platform, $$$)
$$$
platform'
Length of output: 128
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the VirtualContributor entity
# First, find the file containing VirtualContributor entity
fd "virtual.*contributor.*\.(ts|js)" --type f
# Then let's use ripgrep to examine the content and relationships
rg "class VirtualContributor" -A 10
# Also check for any imports of VirtualContributor
rg "import.*VirtualContributor" -A 1
Length of output: 41662
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the VirtualContributor entity definition and its relationship with Platform
rg -A 20 "class VirtualContributor.*extends" src/domain/community/virtual-contributor/virtual.contributor.entity.ts
# Also check for any Platform relationships in VirtualContributor
rg "@OneToOne.*Platform" src/domain/community/virtual-contributor/virtual.contributor.entity.ts
Length of output: 215
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to examine the entity relationships
# First, let's look at the content of the VirtualContributor entity file
cat src/domain/community/virtual-contributor/virtual.contributor.entity.ts
# Also check for any references to Platform in the file
rg -l "Platform" src/domain/community/virtual-contributor/virtual.contributor.entity.ts
# And check for any references to guidanceVirtualContributor in Platform entity
rg "guidanceVirtualContributor" src/platform/platform/platform.entity.ts -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 1384
src/domain/community/user/user.entity.ts (2)
15-15: LGTM! Import follows consistent pattern
The Room entity import is properly placed with other entity imports and follows the project's import style.
73-79: Verify cascade behavior for guidance room deletion
The OneToOne relationship configuration looks good and follows the established pattern. However, the cascade settings might need careful consideration:
cascade: truewill propagate all operations (insert/update/remove) to the related Room entityonDelete: 'SET NULL'means the reference will be nullified when the Room is deleted
Please verify if this is the intended behavior, especially for user deletion scenarios.
✅ Verification successful
Cascade behavior for guidance room is correctly configured
The current configuration is appropriate because:
- When a User is deleted, the
user.service.tsexplicitly handles the deletion of the associated guidance room viaroomService.deleteRoom() - When a Room is deleted independently, the
onDelete: 'SET NULL'ensures the user's reference is safely nullified - The
cascade: truesetting allows for automatic persistence of new rooms when creating/updating users
The implementation shows consistent room cleanup patterns across the codebase, where rooms are explicitly deleted by their respective services rather than relying on cascading deletions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Room entity deletion handling in related services
ast-grep --pattern 'async delete$$$Room($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Search for User deletion handling to understand the cleanup flow
ast-grep --pattern 'async deleteUser($$$) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 112
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Room entity deletion handling with a broader pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
delete($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Search for any Room deletion references
rg -A 5 "delete.*Room"
# Check Room entity definition to understand relationships
fd "room.entity" --exec cat {}
# Check User entity for other Room relationships
fd "user.entity" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 10546
src/migrations/1731937383422-userGuidanceRoom.ts (3)
1-5: LGTM! Migration class follows TypeORM conventions
The migration class is properly structured with a timestamp-based name and correctly implements the MigrationInterface.
30-50: LGTM! Down migration properly reverses all changes
The down method correctly drops all constraints, indexes, and columns in the proper order, ensuring a clean rollback of the migration.
6-28: Verify referenced tables and columns exist
The migration adds foreign key constraints to the room.id and virtual_contributor.id columns. Let's verify these dependencies exist.
✅ Verification successful
Dependencies verified successfully
The referenced tables and columns exist in the schema:
roomtable withidcolumn (char(36)) is created in migration 1730713372181-schemaSetup.tsvirtual_contributortable withidcolumn (char(36)) is created in migration 1730713372181-schemaSetup.ts
The foreign key constraints in the new migration are correctly referencing existing tables and columns with matching data types.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the referenced tables and columns exist in other migrations
# Check for room table and id column
echo "Checking room table..."
rg -l "CREATE TABLE.*\`room\`" "src/migrations/"
rg "ALTER TABLE.*\`room\`.*ADD.*\`id\`" "src/migrations/"
# Check for virtual_contributor table and id column
echo "Checking virtual_contributor table..."
rg -l "CREATE TABLE.*\`virtual_contributor\`" "src/migrations/"
rg "ALTER TABLE.*\`virtual_contributor\`.*ADD.*\`id\`" "src/migrations/"
Length of output: 1840
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual table creation statements to verify the id columns
echo "Checking room table creation..."
rg -A 10 "CREATE TABLE.*\`room\`" "src/migrations/1730713372181-schemaSetup.ts"
echo -e "\nChecking virtual_contributor table creation..."
rg -A 10 "CREATE TABLE.*\`virtual_contributor\`" "src/migrations/1730713372181-schemaSetup.ts"
Length of output: 5642
src/core/bootstrap/bootstrap.module.ts (2)
25-25: LGTM! Import statement follows NestJS conventions.
The import statement for AiPersonaServiceModule follows proper NestJS conventions and uses the correct aliased path.
29-31: Verify AiPersonaServiceModule configuration and dependencies.
The placement near AiServerModule makes sense for related AI services. However, let's verify:
- That AiPersonaServiceModule is properly configured
- If there are any initialization dependencies that require a specific import order
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the module's configuration and dependencies.
AiPersonaServiceModule is properly configured with no initialization order dependencies
The module is correctly configured with:
- Proper exports of its service components (AiPersonaServiceService and AiPersonaServiceAuthorizationService)
- GraphQL resolvers for mutations and fields
- No circular dependencies with AiServerModule
- No specific initialization order requirements
The current import order in bootstrap.module.ts is appropriate and won't cause any initialization issues.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check AiPersonaServiceModule configuration and dependencies
# Check if AiPersonaServiceModule has required dependencies
ast-grep --pattern 'class AiPersonaServiceModule {
$$$
}'
# Check for any initialization order dependencies
rg -A 5 "AiPersonaServiceModule" --type ts
Length of output: 3928
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check AiPersonaServiceModule's internal configuration
ast-grep --pattern 'class AiPersonaServiceModule {
$$$
}' src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/ai.persona.service.module.ts
# Check for module imports and configuration
rg -B 5 "export class AiPersonaServiceModule" --type ts
# Check for any service dependencies
ast-grep --pattern 'class AiPersonaServiceService {
constructor($_) {
$$$
}
}'
Length of output: 1016
src/services/api/lookup/lookup.module.ts (2)
35-35: LGTM! Import statement follows project conventions
The import statement for LicenseModule follows the established pattern and module organization structure.
69-69: LGTM! Module registration is properly configured
The LicenseModule is correctly registered in the imports array, maintaining alphabetical order and following NestJS's dependency injection pattern.
Let's verify the LicenseModule's existence and structure:
✅ Verification successful
LicenseModule is properly configured and widely used across the codebase
The verification confirms that:
- LicenseModule exists at
src/domain/common/license/license.module.ts - It's properly configured with necessary imports, providers, and exports
- It's correctly imported and used in multiple modules across the codebase, including the lookup module under review
- The module follows NestJS best practices with proper dependency injection setup
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify LicenseModule structure and its exports
# Expected: Should find the LicenseModule class with proper exports
ast-grep --pattern 'export class LicenseModule {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 59
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the LicenseModule file first
fd -t f -e ts "license.module.ts"
# Then search for any references to LicenseModule
rg "LicenseModule" -A 2
Length of output: 5790
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of the LicenseModule file
cat src/domain/common/license/license.module.ts
Length of output: 999
src/services/infrastructure/event-bus/event.bus.module.ts (1)
82-86: Consider implementing a more structured message routing system.
The current implementation adds individual queues with hardcoded routing keys. Consider:
- Creating an enum for routing keys to prevent typos and improve maintainability
- Implementing a message routing strategy pattern for different virtual contributor engine types
- Adding documentation about the message flow and queue purposes
Example implementation:
// src/types/event-bus.types.ts
export enum VirtualContributorRoutingKey {
EXPERT = 'expert',
GUIDANCE = 'guidance'
}
// Queue configuration factory
const createVirtualContributorQueue = (
routingKey: VirtualContributorRoutingKey,
exchange: string
) => ({
name: `virtual-contributor-engine-${routingKey}`,
exchange,
routingKey,
options: {
durable: true
}
});Let's verify the message routing patterns in use:
src/core/microservices/microservices.module.ts (2)
102-102: Verify the impact of enabling this flag for the guidance service
The boolean parameter for the guidance service has been changed from false to true, while other virtual contributor services remain unchanged. This asymmetry might indicate a specific requirement for the guidance service.
Let's verify the usage and impact:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the durable parameter and its usage across different services.
Setting durable=true for guidance service is correct and consistent with the codebase
The change from false to true for the guidance service's durable parameter is correct because:
- The
durableparameter inclientProxyFactorydetermines if the RabbitMQ queue survives broker restarts, withtruebeing the default value - Most services in the module use the default
durable=truesetting - The guidance service should maintain message durability like other critical services to prevent message loss during broker restarts
- Only the community manager service explicitly sets
durable=false, suggesting it has a specific reason to be non-durable
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for documentation or usage of clientProxyFactory to understand the boolean parameter
rg -A 5 "clientProxyFactory.*true|clientProxyFactory.*false" --type ts
# Search for any related configuration or constants
rg "VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTOR_ENGINE_GUIDANCE" --type ts
Length of output: 1479
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other virtual contributor engine configurations
rg "MessagingQueue\." -A 5 --type ts src/core/microservices/
# Check the client proxy factory implementation
cat src/core/microservices/client.proxy.factory.ts
# Look for any related configuration documentation
fd README.md | xargs rg -i "queue|durable|messaging"
Length of output: 8546
Line range hint 99-165: Review consistency across virtual contributor configurations
The configuration pattern varies across different virtual contributor services:
- Guidance: Uses
true - Community Manager: Uses
false - Expert, Generic, OpenAI Assistant: No boolean parameter
This inconsistency might indicate:
- Different handling requirements for each service
- Potential oversight in configuration
Let's verify the requirements:
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for the clientProxyFactory implementation to understand the boolean parameter's purpose.
The boolean parameter inconsistency is intentional and correct
The durable parameter in clientProxyFactory determines whether the RabbitMQ queue survives broker restarts. Looking at the implementation:
- It defaults to
trueif not specified - Guidance explicitly sets it to
true(same as default) - Community Manager explicitly sets it to
false(non-durable queue) - Other services use the default value (
true) by omitting the parameter
The configuration is consistent with RabbitMQ queue durability requirements for different services.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any documentation about different virtual contributor types
rg "VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTOR_ENGINE_[A-Z_]+" --type ts -B 2 -A 2
# Look for any configuration files or constants related to these services
fd -e ts -e json -H "virtual.*contributor|guidance"
Length of output: 13177
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for clientProxyFactory implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'const clientProxyFactory = $_'
# Search for any usage or documentation of the boolean parameter
rg "clientProxyFactory.*true|clientProxyFactory.*false" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 2877
src/services/adapters/chat-guidance-adapter/guidance.engine.adapter.ts (3)
13-13: LGTM: Import change aligns with interface renaming
The import statement follows NestJS conventions and correctly reflects the interface renaming.
97-98: LGTM: Improved readability with consistent formatting
The formatting changes enhance code readability while maintaining the same functionality.
Also applies to: 120-121
36-36: Verify consumers of sendQuery method
The return type change from IMessageAnswerToQuestion to IMessageGuidanceQuestionResult looks good, but we should verify that all consumers are updated to handle the new interface.
✅ Verification successful
Return type change appears safe - no external consumers found
The method sendQuery is only defined in the GuidanceEngineAdapter class and there are no direct usages found in the codebase. This suggests it's either:
- A newly added method, or
- Called through dependency injection/interface implementation where consumers would be forced to adapt to the new return type
Since the change is isolated and any potential consumers would be required to handle the new return type through the interface, this change appears safe.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of sendQuery to verify they handle the new return type
ast-grep --pattern 'sendQuery($$$).then($$$)' || ast-grep --pattern 'await sendQuery($$$)'
Length of output: 47
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any usage of sendQuery method in the codebase
rg "sendQuery" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 500
src/platform/platform/platform.service.ts (2)
24-24: LGTM: Import follows established patterns
The import statement follows the project's conventions for importing domain interfaces using absolute paths.
136-152: Consider performance optimization for frequent access
The method looks well-implemented, but consider these optimizations:
- If this method is frequently accessed, consider implementing caching
- Verify if eager loading of aiPersona is always necessary
Let's verify the usage pattern:
src/domain/space/space/space.service.license.ts (1)
67-70: LGTM!
The method call is properly structured and correctly uses the new agent parameter.
src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/ai.persona.service.service.ts (1)
185-185: Verify language handling in the adapter.
Let's verify that the AI persona engine adapter properly handles the language parameter.
✅ Verification successful
Language parameter is properly handled throughout the adapter chain
The verification shows that the language parameter is correctly defined and passed through the entire chain:
- It's defined as an optional string parameter in
AiPersonaEngineAdapterInvocationInput - The parameter is properly passed from the service to the adapter in
ai.persona.service.service.ts - The adapter's
invokemethod accepts and processes the input containing the language parameter - The language type is well-defined in the guidance adapter with specific language codes (EN, US, UK, UA)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for language handling in the adapter
ast-grep --pattern 'class AiPersonaEngineAdapter {
$$$
invoke($input) {
$$$
language
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Check if language is defined in the DTO
ast-grep --pattern 'interface AiPersonaEngineAdapterInvocationInput {
$$$
language
$$$
}'
Length of output: 217
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for the adapter class and its implementation
rg -l "AiPersonaEngineAdapter"
# Search for language-related code in the adapter files
rg "language" --type ts -C 3
# Search for the input interface definition
rg "AiPersonaEngineAdapterInvocationInput" --type ts -C 3
Length of output: 11788
src/platform/platform.role/platform.role.service.ts (1)
48-48: LGTM! Verify persistence behavior.
Moving the createdBy assignment to the input data before entity creation follows better practices. This change provides clearer data flow and ensures the data is available during entity creation.
Let's verify the persistence behavior:
✅ Verification successful
Moving createdBy assignment is safe and follows entity design
The change is safe and aligns with the codebase design:
- The
createdByfield is properly defined inPlatformInvitationentity as a required UUID field - The
createPlatformInvitationmethod correctly handles the input data and creates the entity - The persistence layer properly saves the entity with all required fields
- The change maintains data integrity as the field is non-nullable in the database schema
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for related persistence layer handling of createdBy
rg -A 5 "createdBy.*platformInvitation" --type ts
# Check for any validation or transformation of createdBy
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
validate($_, $_) {
$$$
createdBy
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 766
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the platform invitation entity/model definition
rg -l "PlatformInvitation" --type ts
# Then examine the schema/entity definition
ast-grep --pattern 'class PlatformInvitation {
$$$
}'
# Also check for any repository usage of createdBy
rg "createdBy.*save" --type ts -A 3
Length of output: 2067
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the platform invitation entity definition
cat src/platform/invitation/platform.invitation.entity.ts
# Check how createdBy is used in the invitation service
cat src/platform/invitation/platform.invitation.service.ts
Length of output: 6579
src/domain/common/license/license.service.ts (2)
212-212: LGTM: Appropriate error type selection.
The change from RelationshipNotFoundException to EntityNotFoundException better represents the error case where a parent entitlement entity is not found.
226-226: LGTM: Consistent error handling improvements.
The changes to use EntityNotFoundException are appropriate in both cases:
- When the license itself is not found (line 226)
- When a specific entitlement is not found (line 248)
The retention of RelationshipNotFoundException on line 232 correctly differentiates between missing entities and missing relationships.
Also applies to: 248-248
✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Error handling is correctly differentiated between entity and relationship cases
The code shows proper error handling:
getEntitlementsFromLicenseOrFailusesEntityNotFoundExceptionwhen the license itself is missing, andRelationshipNotFoundExceptionwhen the entitlements relationship is not loadedgetEntitlementFromEntitlementsOrFailusesEntityNotFoundExceptionwhen a specific entitlement type is not found within the loaded entitlements
The error types accurately reflect the nature of what's missing in each case.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent error handling across the codebase
# Look for similar patterns of error handling in related files
# Search for EntityNotFoundException usage in similar contexts
rg "throw new EntityNotFoundException.*License" -A 2
# Search for RelationshipNotFoundException usage in similar contexts
rg "throw new RelationshipNotFoundException.*License" -A 2
Length of output: 115
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to understand the error handling patterns
# Search for all EntityNotFoundException usages
rg "EntityNotFoundException" -A 2
# Search for all RelationshipNotFoundException usages
rg "RelationshipNotFoundException" -A 2
# Look for the specific method implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'getEntitlementsFromLicenseOrFail($$$) {
$$$
}'
ast-grep --pattern 'getEntitlementFromEntitlementsOrFail($$$) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 101256
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's look for the specific methods and their error handling patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'getEntitlementsFromLicenseOrFail($$$) {
$$$
throw new EntityNotFoundException($$$)
$$$
}'
ast-grep --pattern 'getEntitlementsFromLicenseOrFail($$$) {
$$$
throw new RelationshipNotFoundException($$$)
$$$
}'
ast-grep --pattern 'getEntitlementFromEntitlementsOrFail($$$) {
$$$
throw new EntityNotFoundException($$$)
$$$
}'
# Also search for the file content to see the full context
rg -l "getEntitlementsFromLicenseOrFail" | xargs cat
Length of output: 8745
src/platform/platform/platform.service.authorization.ts (1)
224-237: LGTM! Improved variable naming for better clarity.
The renaming of variables from userGuidanceChatAccess* to userChatGuidanceAccess* better reflects the feature's purpose. The implementation remains correct with appropriate privilege settings and cascade control.
src/domain/community/user/user.resolver.fields.ts (1)
35-35: LGTM!
The import statement follows the project's module structure and is correctly placed.
src/domain/space/account/account.service.authorization.ts (2)
295-298: LGTM! Good use of DRY principle.
Creating a shared array for credentials reduces duplication and improves maintainability.
285-293: LGTM! Verify empty resourceID intention.
The credential definitions are well-structured and properly typed. However, please confirm if the empty resourceID is intentional for these platform-wide credentials.
✅ Verification successful
Empty resourceID is correct for platform-wide credentials
Based on the search results, empty resourceID is consistently used for platform-wide and global authorization credentials. This pattern is evident in similar cases:
- Global admin credentials:
AuthorizationCredential.GLOBAL_ADMINwith empty resourceID - Global registered credentials:
AuthorizationCredential.GLOBAL_REGISTEREDwith empty resourceID - Space default roles:
AuthorizationCredential.SPACE_MEMBER/LEAD/ADMINwith empty resourceID
The empty resourceID for VC_CAMPAIGN and BETA_TESTER credentials follows this established pattern for platform-wide authorizations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if empty resourceID is consistent with other platform-wide credentials
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_: ICredentialDefinition = {
type: $_,
resourceID: "",
}'
Length of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for credential definitions and their resourceID patterns
rg -U "const \w+: ICredentialDefinition = \{[\s\S]+?resourceID:" --type ts
Length of output: 3414
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's also check the interface definition to understand the resourceID requirement
ast-grep --pattern 'interface ICredentialDefinition {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 64
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other credential type declarations to understand the pattern
rg "type: AuthorizationCredential\." --type ts -A 1
Length of output: 16651
src/domain/communication/room/room.service.ts (1)
67-72: LGTM! The implementation is clean and follows the service's patterns
The new method provides a non-throwing alternative to getRoomOrFail, which is useful for optional room lookups. The implementation correctly uses TypeORM's repository pattern and maintains consistency with the service's architecture.
Let's verify the usage of this new method:
✅ Verification successful
The new findRoom method complements the existing getRoomOrFail pattern
The implementation is indeed clean and follows the service's patterns. The codebase analysis reveals:
findRoomprovides a non-throwing alternative togetRoomOrFailgetRoomOrFailis used extensively throughout the service for operations that require the room to exist- The new method maintains consistency with TypeORM repository patterns and will be useful for optional room lookups
- While currently not used elsewhere in the codebase, it's a valuable addition to the service's API
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of findRoom method to understand its integration
rg "findRoom\(" --type ts
Length of output: 146
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any similar methods in the service to understand the pattern
rg "Room\(" -A 5 -B 5 src/domain/communication/room/room.service.ts
Length of output: 4559
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for getRoomOrFail to understand the relationship between these methods
rg "getRoomOrFail" -A 3 src/domain/communication/room/room.service.ts
Length of output: 651
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's see the implementation of getRoomOrFail to understand the complete pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'async getRoomOrFail($_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 56
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different pattern to see the getRoomOrFail implementation
rg "getRoomOrFail" -A 10 -B 2 src/domain/communication/room/room.service.ts
Length of output: 1978
src/domain/space/account/account.resolver.mutations.ts (2)
88-91: LGTM: Consistent license validation implementation
The license validation is properly implemented across all resource creation methods, following the fail-fast principle by validating before resource creation.
Also applies to: 152-156, 195-199, 255-259
304-307: Verify error handling for license policy application
While the implementation is correct, consider adding error handling to ensure both authorization and license updates succeed or fail together.
Consider wrapping the operations in a try-catch block:
- const accountAuthorizations =
- await this.accountAuthorizationService.applyAuthorizationPolicy(account);
- await this.authorizationPolicyService.saveAll(accountAuthorizations);
- const updatedLicenses = await this.accountLicenseService.applyLicensePolicy(
- account.id
- );
- await this.licenseService.saveAll(updatedLicenses);
+ try {
+ const accountAuthorizations =
+ await this.accountAuthorizationService.applyAuthorizationPolicy(account);
+ await this.authorizationPolicyService.saveAll(accountAuthorizations);
+ const updatedLicenses = await this.accountLicenseService.applyLicensePolicy(
+ account.id
+ );
+ await this.licenseService.saveAll(updatedLicenses);
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to reset account policies: ${error.message}`);
+ }src/services/api/lookup/lookup.resolver.fields.ts (3)
68-69: LGTM!
The imports are correctly added and follow the existing import pattern.
103-104: LGTM!
The LicenseService is properly injected into the constructor.
Line range hint 1-725: Verify consistent authorization patterns across resolvers
The file shows a consistent pattern of authorization checks across all resolvers except for a few special cases (space, community) which have explicit comments explaining why. Let's verify this pattern is maintained across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Authorization patterns are consistently applied across resolvers
After reviewing the resolver files, I can confirm that the authorization patterns are consistently applied across the codebase. The exceptions noted in the original file (space, community, roleSet) are indeed special cases with explicit comments explaining the rationale. The authorization checks follow these consistent patterns:
- Direct authorization checks using
grantAccessOrFailfor most entity resolvers - Commented out checks for public entities with clear explanations
- Decorator-based authorization using
@AuthorizationAgentPrivilegefor platform-level operations - Per-field authorization checks for nested entities where the authorization needs to be checked on the child entity rather than the parent
The codebase demonstrates a robust and consistent approach to authorization across all resolver implementations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all resolver methods that might be missing authorization checks
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
@ResolveField()
async $_($$$) {
const $_ = await this.$_OrFail($_);
return $_;
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 142
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for resolver methods that fetch entities and return them directly without authorization checks
rg -U "@ResolveField.*\n.*async.*\{[\s\S]*?OrFail.*\n.*return" --type ts
Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for resolver methods with authorization checks
rg -U "@ResolveField.*\n.*async.*\{[\s\S]*?grantAccessOrFail.*\n.*return" --type ts
Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any commented out authorization checks
rg -U "//.*grantAccessOrFail" --type ts
Length of output: 459
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for resolver methods with more context
rg -U "@ResolveField.*\n.*async.*\{[\s\S]{0,200}" --type ts
Length of output: 61
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for authorization patterns in resolver files
fd -e ts resolver.fields.ts -x cat {}
Length of output: 103173
src/domain/community/user/user.service.ts (2)
67-68: LGTM: Clean import additions
The new imports are properly organized and necessary for the guidance room functionality.
379-379: LGTM: Proper resource cleanup
The changes correctly handle the cleanup of the guidance room during user deletion:
- The relation is properly loaded
- The deletion is properly guarded with a null check
- The order of deletion is appropriate (child entities before parent)
Also applies to: 418-421
src/domain/access/role-set/role.set.resolver.mutations.ts (1)
204-207:
Breaking Change: New entitlement check for virtual contributor role assignment
A new license entitlement check has been added that requires the SPACE_FLAG_VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTOR_ACCESS entitlement. This is a breaking change that could affect existing virtual contributor role assignments.
src/services/adapters/communication-adapter/communication.adapter.ts (1)
Line range hint 554-564: LGTM! Null safety improvement.
The addition of the null coalescing operator (room.messages || []) effectively prevents potential runtime errors when mapping over undefined messages.
src/services/api/search/v2/extract/build.search.query.ts (3)
11-11: Ensure proper handling of undefined options
While destructuring options, using options ?? {} prevents errors when options is undefined. Verify that default behaviors are correctly applied when properties like spaceIdFilter or excludeDemoSpaces are not provided.
78-81: Confirm returning undefined is handled appropriately
When filters.length === 0, the function returns undefined. Ensure that the calling code correctly handles this undefined value and that Elasticsearch accepts a filter field set to undefined without causing issues.
70-76: Validate the filter condition for excluding demo spaces
The filter condition uses SpaceVisibility.ACTIVE to exclude demo spaces. Confirm that this value correctly represents non-demo spaces in the context of your application and that all demo spaces have a different visibility status.
src/services/api/chat-guidance/chat.guidance.service.ts (1)
22-29: Dependencies are correctly injected with proper typing.
The constructor parameters are appropriately typed and follow NestJS dependency injection best practices.
src/domain/space/space/space.resolver.mutations.ts (3)
23-24: LGTM
The new services SpaceLicenseService and LicenseService are correctly imported, and the import statements are properly structured.
38-39: LGTM
The new services are properly injected into the constructor, following NestJS dependency injection best practices.
234-246: Verify unit test coverage for the new license management logic
Ensure that the new code related to license policy application and saving is adequately covered by unit tests to maintain code quality and prevent regressions.
src/core/bootstrap/bootstrap.service.ts (1)
533-572: Validate parameters when creating aiPersonaService
In the ensureGuidanceChat method, you are creating an aiPersonaService with potentially placeholder or empty values:
bodyOfKnowledgeIDis set to an empty string.promptis an empty array.externalConfigisundefined.
Ensure that these values are acceptable and won't lead to issues when the AI persona service is utilized. If default values are required, consider explicitly stating them or adding validation.
...communication/message.guidance.question.result/message.guidance.question.result.interface.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/services/infrastructure/license-entitlement-usage/license.entitlement.usage.service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/services/ai-server/ai-persona-service/dto/ai.persona.service.invocation.dto.input.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…-guidance-and-cleanup
…alkem-io/server into alkemio-1456/async-guidance-and-cleanup
…okation' into alkemio-1456/async-guidance-and-cleanup
…-guidance-and-cleanup
…okation' into alkemio-1456/async-guidance-and-cleanup
…okation' into alkemio-1456/async-guidance-and-cleanup
valeksiev
merged commit bd69993
into
alkemio-1456/async-vc-engine-invokation
Related to: alkem-io/virtual-contributor-engine-guidance#60
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Chores