Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

revert change to account auth #4727

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 22, 2024
Merged

revert change to account auth #4727

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 22, 2024

Conversation

techsmyth
Copy link
Member

@techsmyth techsmyth commented Nov 22, 2024

revert change to account auth that effectively removed the credentials for managing an account

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Streamlined authorization for resource creation by introducing host credentials.
    • Updated authorization rules for creating spaces, virtual contributors, and innovation packs.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling for uninitialized entities and missing relationships.
  • Refactor

    • Enhanced internal logic of authorization methods while maintaining existing method signatures.

@techsmyth techsmyth requested a review from Comoque1 November 22, 2024 14:27
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the AccountAuthorizationService class in src/domain/space/account/account.service.authorization.ts by removing two credential definitions, vcCampaignCredential and betaTesterCredential, and replacing them with hostCredentials for managing resource creation permissions. The extendAuthorizationPolicy method is updated to reflect this change for creating authorization rules related to spaces, virtual contributors, and innovation packs. The control flow remains intact, while error handling for uninitialized entities and missing relationships is consistent.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/domain/space/account/account.service.authorization.ts - Removed vcCampaignCredential and betaTesterCredential.
- Introduced hostCredentials for authorization rules in resource creation.
- Updated extendAuthorizationPolicy and extendAuthorizationPolicyForChildEntities methods to utilize the new credentials.
- Method signatures updated internally without changes to the public signatures.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix my account rules #4717: The changes in src/domain/space/account/account.service.authorization.ts in this PR involve modifications to the AccountAuthorizationService class, which directly relates to the changes made in the main PR regarding the management of authorization rules and credential definitions.

Suggested reviewers

  • valentinyanakiev

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/domain/space/account/account.service.authorization.ts (1)

Line range hint 288-305: LGTM! Consider updating authorization documentation

The consolidation of authorization rules around host credentials improves the code's maintainability and follows NestJS best practices. The changes maintain proper error handling and validation while simplifying the authorization model.

Consider updating the authorization documentation to reflect:

  1. The simplified credential model
  2. The role of host credentials in resource creation
  3. The authorization flow for different user types
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d49affc and 9357964.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/domain/space/account/account.service.authorization.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/domain/space/account/account.service.authorization.ts (1)

Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.

🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/domain/space/account/account.service.authorization.ts (1)

288-288: Verify the impact on existing users' permissions

The change from specific feature credentials to host credentials could affect existing users who previously had access through beta tester or VC campaign credentials. This might impact their ability to create spaces, virtual contributors, and innovation packs.

Let's verify the authorization rules and their impact:

Also applies to: 296-296, 305-305

✅ Verification successful

No impact on existing users' permissions - change is part of intended functionality

The change from specific feature credentials to host credentials is part of the intended functionality and does not negatively impact existing users. The code analysis shows that:

  1. Host credentials are properly managed through accountHostService.getHostCredentials() which provides the appropriate access levels for account owners.
  2. The authorization rules are consistently applied across the codebase, with host credentials being used for managing account resources and creating entities.
  3. The change aligns with the platform's role-based access control system, where host credentials (user self-management or organization admin) are the primary mechanism for account-level permissions.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usage of removed credentials and potential impact

# Check for any remaining references to the old credentials
rg -i "vcCampaignCredential|betaTesterCredential" 

# Check for existing authorization rules that might be affected
ast-grep --pattern 'createCredentialRule($$$)' 

# Look for tests that might need updating
fd -e spec.ts -e test.ts | xargs rg -l "CREATE_SPACE|CREATE_VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTOR|CREATE_INNOVATION_PACK"

Length of output: 206


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to analyze the changes

# Check the content of the authorization service file
cat src/domain/space/account/account.service.authorization.ts

# Search for any credential-related constants or types
rg -A 3 "enum.*Credential|type.*Credential|interface.*Credential"

# Look for host credentials usage
rg -A 3 "hostCredentials"

# Find any authorization-related test files
fd "auth.*\.(spec|test)\.ts$"

Length of output: 71960

@Comoque1
Copy link
Member

Tested OK locally, the creation of entities from org admin, when the organization has AccountLicensePlus

@Comoque1 Comoque1 merged commit c2fdce3 into develop Nov 22, 2024
3 checks passed
@Comoque1 Comoque1 deleted the authFix branch November 25, 2024 09:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants