Async Chat Guidance engine using Matrix rooms instead of direct querying #7188
Conversation
change askGuidanceAQuestion from query to a mutation
|
Important Review skippedReview was skipped due to path filters ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe pull request introduces changes across multiple components and files, primarily involving the renaming of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
…ent-web into alkemio-1456/async-guidance
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
src/domain/communication/room/models/Message.ts (1)
Line range hint
3-16: Add JSDoc documentation for better maintainabilityConsider adding JSDoc comments to document the interface and its properties, especially for optional fields and nested structures.
+/** + * Represents a message in a chat/discussion thread + */ export interface Message { + /** Unique identifier for the message */ id: string; + /** Optional thread identifier for nested discussions */ threadID?: string; + /** Author information if available */ author?: Author; + /** Timestamp when the message was created */ createdAt: Date; + /** The message content */ message: string; + /** Array of reactions to the message */ reactions: { id: string; emoji: string; sender?: { id: string; profile: { displayName: string }; }; }[]; }src/main/guidance/chatWidget/ChatWidgetMutations.graphql (1)
8-12: Consider enhancing the createGuidanceRoom mutation with additional fields and error handlingThe current implementation could be improved in several ways:
- Add error handling fields to handle failure cases
- Include additional return fields to avoid extra queries
- Consider adding input parameters for room configuration
Consider this enhanced structure:
mutation createGuidanceRoom($input: CreateGuidanceRoomInput!) { createChatGuidanceRoom(input: $input) { id success room { id name createdAt } errors { message code } } }src/domain/communication/room/Comments/useMessages.ts (2)
Line range hint
5-28: Add JSDoc documentation to the interface.Consider adding JSDoc documentation to describe the purpose and usage of the
FetchedMessageinterface, especially since it's a core data structure for chat messages.+/** + * Represents a message fetched from the Matrix room. + * @interface FetchedMessage + * @property {string} id - Unique identifier of the message + * @property {string} [threadID] - Optional ID of the thread this message belongs to + * @property {string} message - The actual message content + * @property {Object} [sender] - Optional information about the message sender + * @property {number} timestamp - Unix timestamp of when the message was sent + * @property {Array<Object>} reactions - List of reactions to this message + */ interface FetchedMessage {
Line range hint
38-43: Add error handling for malformed messages.While optional chaining helps prevent runtime errors, consider adding explicit error handling for malformed messages and logging for debugging purposes.
export const useMessages = (messages: FetchedMessage[] | undefined) => useMemo(() => { - return messages?.map(message => ({ + return messages?.map(message => { + try { + return { id: message.id, threadID: message.threadID, message: message.message, author: message?.sender?.id ? buildAuthorFromUser(message.sender) : undefined, createdAt: new Date(message.timestamp), reactions: message.reactions, - })); + }; + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error processing message:', error, message); + return null; + } + }).filter(Boolean); }, [messages]);src/domain/communication/room/Comments/useRestoredMessages.ts (3)
Line range hint
31-45: Avoid direct state mutations in reduce callbackThe reducer directly mutates the
createdAtproperty of the accumulated object. This could lead to unexpected behavior in React's rendering cycle.Consider using immutable updates:
if (!restored[threadID]) { restored[threadID] = { id: threadID, deleted: true, author: undefined, reactions: [], createdAt: message.createdAt, }; } else if (restored[threadID].createdAt > message.createdAt) { - restored[threadID].createdAt = message.createdAt; + restored[threadID] = { + ...restored[threadID], + createdAt: message.createdAt + }; }
Line range hint
28-30: Add type guard for threadID accessThe code assumes threadID exists without proper type checking, which could lead to runtime errors.
Consider adding a type guard:
- const { threadID } = message; - if (!threadID) { + const threadID = message.threadID; + if (typeof threadID !== 'string' || !threadID) { return restored; }
Line range hint
15-46: Add error handling for edge casesThe hook lacks error handling for potential edge cases such as malformed message objects or invalid dates.
Consider adding validation and error handling:
return useMemo(() => { if (!messages) { return undefined; } + // Validate message objects + const validMessages = messages.filter(message => { + if (!message?.id || !message?.createdAt) { + console.warn('Invalid message object detected:', message); + return false; + } + return true; + }); - const messagesById = keyBy(messages, ({ id }) => id); + const messagesById = keyBy(validMessages, ({ id }) => id);src/domain/timeline/calendar/CalendarEventDetailContainer.tsx (1)
Line range hint
41-42: Address the TODO comment about code duplication.The comment indicates significant code duplication with
PostDashboardContainer. Consider extracting the common logic into a shared hook or utility to improve maintainability.Example approach:
// src/domain/shared/hooks/useMessageDashboard.ts export const useMessageDashboard = (roomId: string) => { // Extract common logic for messages, privileges, mutations etc. return { messages, privileges, mutations, // ... other shared functionality }; };src/domain/communication/room/Comments/MessageView.tsx (1)
106-108: Consider adding error boundary for content renderingThe markdown rendering could fail if the message content is malformed. Consider wrapping the content rendering with an error boundary to gracefully handle rendering failures.
Example implementation:
class MessageContentErrorBoundary extends React.Component<{ children: ReactNode }, { hasError: boolean }> { state = { hasError: false }; static getDerivedStateFromError() { return { hasError: true }; } render() { if (this.state.hasError) { return <Text color="error">Error rendering message content</Text>; } return this.props.children; } } // Usage: <MessageContentErrorBoundary> <WrapperMarkdown>{message.message}</WrapperMarkdown> </MessageContentErrorBoundary>src/main/guidance/chatWidget/useChatGuidanceCommunication.ts (2)
71-84: Add error handling inhandleSendMessagefunctionThe
handleSendMessagefunction currently does not handle potential errors from thecreateGuidanceRoomandaskQuestionmutations. Adding error handling will improve robustness and provide feedback to the user in case of failures.Apply this diff to include error handling:
const handleSendMessage = async (message: string): Promise<unknown> => { + try { if (!roomId) { await createGuidanceRoom({ refetchQueries: ['GuidanceRoomId'], }); } return await askQuestion({ variables: { chatData: { question: message!, language: i18n.language.toUpperCase() }, }, refetchQueries: ['GuidanceRoomId' /*, 'GuidanceRoomMessages'*/], awaitRefetchQueries: true, }); + } catch (error) { + // Handle error, e.g., show notification to the user + } };
86-91: Add error handling inclearChatfunctionThe
clearChatfunction does not handle errors from theresetChatGuidancemutation. Implementing error handling will ensure that failures are gracefully managed and users are appropriately notified.Apply this diff to include error handling:
const [clearChat, loadingClearChat] = useLoadingState(async () => { + try { await resetChatGuidance({ refetchQueries: ['GuidanceRoomId'], awaitRefetchQueries: true, }); + } catch (error) { + // Handle error, e.g., show notification to the user + } });src/main/guidance/chatWidget/ChatWidget.tsx (1)
243-245: Prevent rendering multipleLoadingcomponentsThe
Loadingcomponent is rendered wheneverloadingistrueby callingrenderCustomComponent(Loading, undefined);. Ifloadingremainstrueover multiple renders, this could result in multipleLoadingcomponents stacking up. Consider checking if aLoadingcomponent is already rendered before adding another one, or clear existing custom components before rendering a new one.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
src/core/apollo/generated/apollo-helpers.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**src/core/apollo/generated/apollo-hooks.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**src/core/apollo/generated/graphql-schema.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
src/domain/collaboration/post/containers/PostDashboardContainer/PostDashboardContainer.tsx(1 hunks)src/domain/communication/discussion/pages/DiscussionPage.tsx(1 hunks)src/domain/communication/discussion/views/DiscussionView.tsx(1 hunks)src/domain/communication/room/Comments/MessageView.tsx(1 hunks)src/domain/communication/room/Comments/useMessages.ts(1 hunks)src/domain/communication/room/Comments/useRestoredMessages.ts(1 hunks)src/domain/communication/room/models/Message.ts(1 hunks)src/domain/timeline/calendar/CalendarEventDetailContainer.tsx(1 hunks)src/main/guidance/chatWidget/ChatWidget.tsx(4 hunks)src/main/guidance/chatWidget/ChatWidgetMutations.graphql(1 hunks)src/main/guidance/chatWidget/ChatWidgetQueries.graphql(1 hunks)src/main/guidance/chatWidget/useChatGuidanceCommunication.ts(1 hunks)src/root.tsx(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/root.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (12)
src/domain/collaboration/post/containers/PostDashboardContainer/PostDashboardContainer.tsx (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/domain/communication/discussion/pages/DiscussionPage.tsx (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/domain/communication/discussion/views/DiscussionView.tsx (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/domain/communication/room/Comments/MessageView.tsx (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/domain/communication/room/Comments/useMessages.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/domain/communication/room/Comments/useRestoredMessages.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/domain/communication/room/models/Message.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/domain/timeline/calendar/CalendarEventDetailContainer.tsx (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/main/guidance/chatWidget/ChatWidget.tsx (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/main/guidance/chatWidget/ChatWidgetMutations.graphql (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{graphql,gql}: Review the GraphQL schema and queries for best practices, potential bugs, and adherence to the project's GraphQL standards.
Ensure that the schema is well-defined and queries are optimized.
Check for security vulnerabilities.
src/main/guidance/chatWidget/ChatWidgetQueries.graphql (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{graphql,gql}: Review the GraphQL schema and queries for best practices, potential bugs, and adherence to the project's GraphQL standards.
Ensure that the schema is well-defined and queries are optimized.
Check for security vulnerabilities.
src/main/guidance/chatWidget/useChatGuidanceCommunication.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
🪛 Biome
src/main/guidance/chatWidget/ChatWidget.tsx
[error] 254-254: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.
A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)
src/main/guidance/chatWidget/useChatGuidanceCommunication.ts
[error] 51-51: Unsafe usage of optional chaining.
If it short-circuits with 'undefined' the evaluation will throw TypeError here:
(lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
src/main/guidance/chatWidget/ChatWidgetQueries.graphql (1)
1-10: Consider adding null checks for guidanceRoom field
The query should handle cases where the user might not have an associated guidance room. Consider adding a null check in the client-side code that consumes this query.
Let's verify if there are any null checks in the consuming code:
src/domain/communication/room/models/Message.ts (1)
8-8: Property rename looks good, verify all consumers are updated
The rename from 'body' to 'message' is semantically clearer for a messaging context.
Let's verify all consumers have been updated:
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the GraphQL schema to ensure the property rename is reflected there.
Let me try one final search to find any remaining references to the old property name.
Property rename is safe and properly reflected in the codebase
Based on the verification results:
- The Message interface in
src/domain/communication/room/models/Message.tscorrectly uses themessageproperty - The GraphQL schema in
graphql-schema.tsalso usesmessageproperty - No remaining references to the old
bodyproperty in message-related code (the onlybodyreference found is unrelated HTML body element) - All message-related mutations and queries are using the new property name
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining uses of 'body' property in message contexts
rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' 'message\.body|\.body\s*:'
# Search for GraphQL operations that might need updates
rg -g '*.{ts,tsx,graphql}' 'query.*Message|mutation.*Message'
Length of output: 4348
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for message/body field definitions in GraphQL schema
rg -g '*.graphql' 'type.*Message.*{|input.*Message.*{' -A 10
# Search for any remaining references to 'body' in GraphQL files
rg -g '*.graphql' '\bbody\b'
Length of output: 226
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Message type definitions in GraphQL schema with fixed regex
rg -g '*.graphql' '(type|input).*Message.*\{' -A 10
# Search for message-related mutations input types
rg -g '*.graphql' 'input.*SendMessage.*\{' -A 10
Length of output: 104
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to 'body' in TypeScript/React files that might be using the Message type
rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' 'body:.*string|body\s*=|\.body\s*=' -B 2 -A 2
# Search for Message type usage in TypeScript files
rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' 'type.*Message.*=|interface.*Message.*{' -A 5
Length of output: 740
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Message type usage in TypeScript files with fixed regex
rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' '(type|interface)\s+Message\s*[={]' -A 5
# Search for any Message-related components that might use the property
rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' 'class.*Message|function.*Message' -A 5
Length of output: 5121
src/main/guidance/chatWidget/ChatWidgetMutations.graphql (2)
Line range hint 1-19: Verify Matrix room integration patterns
As this is part of a transition to using Matrix rooms instead of direct querying, ensure:
- Room IDs returned match Matrix room ID format
- Consider adding Matrix-specific fields (room aliases, visibility)
- Verify consistency with Matrix's message synchronization model
Let's check for other Matrix-related GraphQL definitions:
13-18: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance askChatGuidanceQuestion mutation with proper error handling and response fields
The mutation structure could be improved to handle responses more effectively:
- Add error details for failed requests
- Include the actual message/response in the return type
- Consider rate limiting metadata
Consider this enhanced structure:
mutation askChatGuidanceQuestion($chatData: ChatGuidanceInput!) {
askChatGuidanceQuestion(chatData: $chatData) {
id
success
message {
id
content
timestamp
}
errors {
message
code
}
rateLimit {
remaining
reset
}
}
}Let's verify the ChatGuidanceInput type definition:
src/domain/communication/room/Comments/useMessages.ts (1)
39-39: Verify consistent usage of the renamed 'message' property.
The property has been renamed from 'body' to 'message'. Let's verify this change is consistent across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify this change.
Let me try one more search to specifically look for message-related interfaces and types in the codebase.
Based on the comprehensive search results, I can now provide a definitive response.
The property rename from 'body' to 'message' is consistent across the codebase.
The search results confirm that:
- The
messageproperty is consistently used in all message-related interfaces and types (Message, FetchedMessage, etc.) - There are no remaining instances of a 'body' property being used for messages
- The change in the file
src/domain/communication/room/Comments/useMessages.tsaligns with the message interfaces and types defined throughout the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of 'body' property in message-related files
# and verify the consistent usage of 'message' property
# Search for remaining 'body' references in message-related files
echo "Checking for remaining 'body' references in message-related files..."
rg -l 'message\.body' --type ts --type tsx
# Search for the new 'message' property usage
echo "Verifying consistent usage of 'message' property..."
rg -l 'message\.message' --type ts --type tsx
# Search for potential message interfaces that might need updating
echo "Checking message-related interfaces..."
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $MESSAGE_TYPE { $$$body: string$$$ }'
Length of output: 577
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for 'body' property in message-related contexts
echo "Checking for 'body' property usage..."
rg "body" -B 2 -A 2 --type ts
# Search for 'message' property in similar contexts
echo -e "\nChecking for 'message' property usage..."
rg "message:" -B 2 -A 2 --type ts
# Look for message-related interfaces and types
echo -e "\nChecking message-related types..."
ast-grep --pattern 'type $MESSAGE = { $$$message$$$ }'
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $MESSAGE { $$$message$$$ }'
Length of output: 83258
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for message interfaces and types
echo "Checking message interfaces and types..."
rg -A 5 -B 2 "interface.*Message|type.*Message" --type ts
# Search for message property usage in the specific file and its imports
echo -e "\nChecking message property in the specific file..."
rg -A 2 -B 2 "message[\"']?:" src/domain/communication/room/Comments/useMessages.ts
Length of output: 67579
src/domain/communication/room/Comments/useRestoredMessages.ts (1)
5-5: Verify consistent property renaming across the codebase
The interface change from 'body' to 'message' needs to be consistently applied throughout the codebase to prevent runtime errors.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about message-related interfaces and their usage.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a conclusive response about the interface change:
The interface change is consistent with the codebase structure
The search results confirm that:
- The base
Messageinterface insrc/domain/communication/room/models/Message.tsuses themessageproperty - The
DeletedMessageinterface correctly extends and omits themessageproperty - No instances of using
.bodyin message-related contexts were found - All message-related interfaces consistently use the
messageproperty
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent usage of message property instead of body
# Check for any remaining references to 'body' property in message-related contexts
rg -A 2 -B 2 "\.body\b" "src/"
# Check for message property usage in TypeScript/JavaScript files
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ extends $_ { $$$message: $_$$$ }'
Length of output: 4347
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for interfaces and types related to messages
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ { $$$message: $_$$$ }'
# Search for Message type/interface definitions
rg -A 5 -B 5 "^(export )?(type|interface) (Deleted)?Message"
# Search for any remaining 'body' property in message-related contexts
rg "(Message|message).*\.body" --type ts
Length of output: 16218
src/domain/collaboration/post/containers/PostDashboardContainer/PostDashboardContainer.tsx (1)
76-76: LGTM! Verify message property consistency.
The property rename from body to message is consistent with the broader refactoring effort. The change is properly typed and maintains the component's functionality.
Let's verify the consistency of this change across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Property rename from body to message is consistent
Based on the search results, the property rename from body to message is consistent across the codebase. The occurrences of body found in the search results are related to CSS styling properties and not message content. All message-related interfaces and mappings consistently use the message property, particularly in:
- Message interfaces in
src/domain/communication/room/models/Message.ts - Message handling in
src/domain/communication/room/Comments/useMessages.ts - Message components in the post dashboard and other communication features
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify message property usage consistency
# Expected: All message-related interfaces and types should use 'message' instead of 'body'
# Check for any remaining 'body' properties in message-related types/interfaces
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
body: string
$$$
}'
# Check for any remaining 'body' properties in message-related mappings
rg -A 2 'messages\?.map.*body'
Length of output: 99
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for any remaining 'body' properties
# and 'message' properties to verify the consistency
# Search for 'body' property in TypeScript/JavaScript files
rg -g '*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}' 'body:' -A 2
# Search for message-related types and interfaces
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
message: string
$$$
}'
# Search for message mappings
rg -g '*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}' 'message:' -A 2
# Search specifically in the post domain
fd . src/domain/collaboration/post -t f -e ts -e tsx --exec rg -l 'body:'
Length of output: 36800
src/domain/timeline/calendar/CalendarEventDetailContainer.tsx (2)
78-78: LGTM: Property rename aligns with the standardization effort.
The change from body to message is consistent with the broader refactoring across the codebase as mentioned in the AI summary.
Line range hint 76-84: Verify XSS protection in message rendering.
The message content is mapped directly from the API response without sanitization. While React automatically escapes content, custom message rendering (e.g., markdown, rich text) might need additional protection.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about message rendering and sanitization.
Let me check the message rendering implementation and sanitization specifically.
Let me check the actual message rendering implementation.
Message content is properly sanitized through rehype-sanitize
The codebase has proper XSS protection in place:
- Messages are rendered through
WrapperMarkdowncomponent which usesrehype-sanitize(found in package.json dependencies) - The sanitization is implemented in
UnifiedConverter.tswhich shows the sanitization pipeline usingrehypeSanitize - Messages are consistently rendered using this sanitized markdown approach across the application
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for message rendering components to verify sanitization
rg -t typescript -t tsx "message.*render|render.*message"
# Check for sanitization libraries
rg -l "dompurify|sanitize|xss" package.json
Length of output: 153
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json content for sanitization dependencies
cat package.json
# Search for message rendering components with proper file extensions
rg -t tsx -t jsx "message.*render|render.*message"
# Look for any message-related components
fd -e tsx -e jsx | xargs rg "message.*component|component.*message" -l
# Check if there's any sanitization util or helper
fd -e ts -e tsx -e jsx | xargs rg "sanitize|escape|purify" -l
# Look for actual message rendering implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'render() {
$$$
message
$$$
}'
Length of output: 8115
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the UnifiedConverter implementation since it was found in sanitization search
cat src/core/ui/markdown/html/UnifiedConverter.ts
# Look for message rendering components in the timeline/calendar directory
fd -e tsx -e jsx . src/domain/timeline/calendar | xargs rg "message" -C 2
# Check for any Markdown or rich text rendering components
fd -e tsx -e jsx | xargs rg "ReactMarkdown|TipTap|Editor" -l
# Look for message display components
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = ({ message, $$ }) => {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 10667
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the MarkdownComponent implementation
cat src/core/ui/markdown/components/MarkdownComponent.tsx
# Check where messages are rendered in the PostDashboardView
fd -e tsx -e jsx | xargs rg "PostDashboardView" -C 5
# Look for WrapperMarkdown usage
fd -e tsx -e jsx | xargs rg "WrapperMarkdown" -C 2
# Check if messages are passed through markdown renderer
ast-grep --pattern 'message={$_}'
Length of output: 81032
src/domain/communication/room/Comments/MessageView.tsx (2)
107-107: Verify consistent property renaming across the codebase
The change from message.body to message.message aligns with the standardization effort mentioned in the PR summary.
Let's verify the consistency of this change across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Property rename from body to message is consistently applied
The verification shows that:
- No instances of
message.bodyremain in the codebase - The new
message.messageproperty is consistently used across all relevant files:- src/domain/communication/room/Comments/MessageView.tsx
- src/domain/communication/room/Comments/useMessages.ts
- src/main/guidance/chatWidget/ChatWidget.tsx
- src/main/guidance/chatWidget/useChatGuidanceCommunication.ts
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of message.body and new message.message usage
# to ensure consistent property naming
# Search for old property usage
echo "Checking for remaining message.body instances:"
rg "message\.body" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for new property usage
echo -e "\nChecking message.message usage:"
rg "message\.message" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 324
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try without specifying file types since tsx is not recognized
echo "Checking for remaining message.body instances:"
rg "message\.body"
echo -e "\nChecking message.message usage:"
rg "message\.message"
Length of output: 709
107-107: Verify XSS protection in markdown rendering
Ensure that the WrapperMarkdown component properly sanitizes the message content to prevent XSS attacks.
Let's check the implementation of WrapperMarkdown:
src/domain/communication/discussion/views/DiscussionView.tsx (1)
54-54: LGTM! Verify type safety with Message interface.
The property rename from body to message aligns with the standardization effort across the codebase.
Let's verify the Message interface and other usages for consistency:
✅ Verification successful
Property rename is type-safe and consistent with the codebase
The change from body to message is verified to be type-safe and aligns with the Message interface definition in src/domain/communication/room/models/Message.ts. The interface explicitly defines message: string as a required property. No remaining usages of body property were found in message-related contexts, confirming consistent naming across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Message interface and its usage across the codebase
# Check Message interface definition
ast-grep --pattern 'interface Message {
$$$
message: $_
$$$
}'
# Find any remaining usages of 'body' property in message-related files
rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' 'body:' src/domain/communication
Length of output: 1138
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify if there are any remaining usages of 'body' property in message-related contexts
# and check the actual usage of 'message' property in the component
# Check for 'body' property in message-related contexts
rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' '(?i)body.*:.*(?:message|comment|post)' src/
# Check how 'message' property is used in DiscussionView
rg -g 'DiscussionView.tsx' 'message[^a-zA-Z]' src/
# Check for any message-related interfaces or types
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ = {
$$$
message: $_
$$$
}'
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
message: $_
$$$
}'
Length of output: 18942
src/domain/communication/discussion/pages/DiscussionPage.tsx (1)
74-74: LGTM! Property rename is consistent with the new message structure.
The change from body to message aligns with the standardization of message handling across the application.
Let's verify the consistency of this change across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Property rename from body to message is consistently implemented across the codebase
The verification confirms:
- The
Messageinterface insrc/domain/communication/room/models/Message.tsdefinesmessageas the property name - All message-related components consistently use the
messageproperty:- CalendarEventDetailContainer
- PostDashboardContainer
- useMessages hook
- DiscussionPage
- ChatGuidance communication
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of the old 'body' property in message-related code
# and verify the adoption of the new 'message' property.
# Search for any remaining uses of 'body' in message-related contexts
echo "Checking for remaining 'body' properties in message contexts..."
rg -A 3 "body:\s+\w+\.body" "src/"
# Search for the new message property usage to ensure consistency
echo "Verifying 'message' property usage..."
rg -A 3 "message:\s+\w+\.message" "src/"
# Look for potential Message type definitions
echo "Checking Message type definitions..."
ast-grep --pattern 'interface Message {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 4024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/main/guidance/chatWidget/ChatWidgetMutations.graphql (1)
Line range hint
1-21: Consider implementing subscription support for real-time updatesWith the shift to a room-based chat system, consider these architectural aspects:
- Implement GraphQL subscriptions for real-time message updates
- Consider pagination for message history
- Add rate limiting directives to prevent abuse
Example subscription implementation:
subscription onNewMessage($roomId: ID!) { messageReceived(roomId: $roomId) { id content timestamp sender { id name } } }src/main/guidance/chatWidget/useChatGuidanceCommunication.ts (1)
15-21: Consider improving type safety of sendMessage return typeThe
sendMessagefunction's return type ofPromise<unknown>could be more specific based on the GraphQL mutation response type.Consider updating the interface to use the actual mutation response type:
- sendMessage: (message: string) => Promise<unknown>; + sendMessage: (message: string) => Promise<void | { data: { askChatGuidanceQuestion: boolean } }>;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
src/core/apollo/generated/graphql-schema.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/main/guidance/chatWidget/ChatWidgetMutations.graphql(1 hunks)src/main/guidance/chatWidget/useChatGuidanceCommunication.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
src/main/guidance/chatWidget/ChatWidgetMutations.graphql (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{graphql,gql}: Review the GraphQL schema and queries for best practices, potential bugs, and adherence to the project's GraphQL standards.
Ensure that the schema is well-defined and queries are optimized.
Check for security vulnerabilities.
src/main/guidance/chatWidget/useChatGuidanceCommunication.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
🪛 Biome
src/main/guidance/chatWidget/useChatGuidanceCommunication.ts
[error] 51-51: Unsafe usage of optional chaining.
If it short-circuits with 'undefined' the evaluation will throw TypeError here:
(lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/main/guidance/chatWidget/ChatWidgetMutations.graphql (1)
15-20: Verify input constraints and enhance response type
The mutation could benefit from additional security measures and response fields.
Let's verify the input type definition and any existing constraints:
Consider enhancing the response type:
mutation askChatGuidanceQuestion($chatData: ChatGuidanceInput!) {
askChatGuidanceQuestion(chatData: $chatData) {
id
success
+ errors {
+ message
+ code
+ }
+ message {
+ id
+ content
+ timestamp
+ status
+ }
}
}src/main/guidance/chatWidget/useChatGuidanceCommunication.ts (1)
93-102: LGTM! Clean and well-structured return value
The hook's return value properly combines all loading states and matches the interface definition.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/main/guidance/chatWidget/useChatGuidanceCommunication.ts (1)
24-127: Consider adding retry logic and rate limitingAs this hook manages multiple async operations and GraphQL queries, consider:
- Adding retry logic for failed operations using a library like
axios-retry- Implementing rate limiting for message sending to prevent abuse
- Adding a queue system for message sending to handle concurrent requests gracefully
This would improve reliability and prevent potential abuse of the chat system.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 61-61: Unsafe usage of optional chaining.
If it short-circuits with 'undefined' the evaluation will throw TypeError here:
(lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/main/guidance/chatWidget/useChatGuidanceCommunication.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/main/guidance/chatWidget/useChatGuidanceCommunication.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
🪛 Biome
src/main/guidance/chatWidget/useChatGuidanceCommunication.ts
[error] 61-61: Unsafe usage of optional chaining.
If it short-circuits with 'undefined' the evaluation will throw TypeError here:
(lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/main/guidance/chatWidget/useChatGuidanceCommunication.ts (2)
16-22: LGTM: Well-defined interface with clear contract
The Provided interface clearly defines the hook's return value with appropriate optional properties.
120-126: LGTM: Well-structured return value
The return value properly combines all loading states and matches the interface contract.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/main/guidance/chatWidget/ChatWidget.tsx (1)
160-167: Add accessibility attributes to Loading componentThe Loading component implementation looks good, but could benefit from accessibility improvements.
Add aria-label to indicate loading state:
const Loading = () => { const theme = useTheme(); return ( - <Box width="100%" display="flex" flexDirection="row" gap={gutters()}> + <Box width="100%" display="flex" flexDirection="row" gap={gutters()} aria-label="Loading message" role="status"> <Skeleton width={gutters(3)(theme)} height={gutters(4)(theme)} /> <Skeleton width="100%" height={gutters(4)(theme)} /> </Box> ); };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/main/guidance/chatWidget/ChatWidget.tsx(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/main/guidance/chatWidget/ChatWidget.tsx (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/main/guidance/chatWidget/ChatWidget.tsx (1)
253-258: LGTM! Changes align with previous review suggestions
The Widget component props have been properly updated, removing the unnecessary Fragment and implementing clean event handlers.
…ent-web into alkemio-1456/async-guidance
…ent-web into alkemio-1456/async-guidance
…ent-web into alkemio-1456/async-guidance
|
Merge together with server PR |
guidanceRoomfield tousercreateChatGuidanceRoomandaskChatGuidanceQuestionaskAiPersonaServiceQuestionbodyon some messages to be justmessageto be consistent with the serverformatChatGuidanceResponseAsMarkdown- We may want to add this back somewhere else