Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add AdminState Property to Virtual Network Gateway Resource Properties #23978

Conversation

nimaller
Copy link
Contributor

@nimaller nimaller commented May 13, 2023

Adding property AdminState to Virtual Network Gateway. This will allow users to choose which Express Route gw to use to serve traffic during Express Route gateway migration.

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
    This release is managed by networking team.
  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@nimaller nimaller requested a review from MikhailTryakhov as a code owner May 13, 2023 01:08
@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @nimaller Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected]

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 13, 2023

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.4)] new version base version
    virtualNetworkGateway.json 2023-02-01(bd3a3da) 2022-11-01(main)
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared tags (via openapi-validator v2.1.2) new version base version
    package-2023-02 package-2023-02(bd3a3da) package-2023-02(release-network-Microsoft.Network-official-2023-02-01)

    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'virtualNetworkGatewayName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L37
    LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L91
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L185
    LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L194
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L246
    LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L258
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'virtualNetworkGatewayName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L319
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'virtualNetworkGatewayName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L372
    ParametersInPost gatewayVip is a query parameter. Post operation must not contain any query parameter other than api-version.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L379
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L409
    LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L421
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'virtualNetworkGatewayName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L436
    LroPostReturn 200 response for a LRO POST operation must have a response schema specified.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L437
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L469
    LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L475
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'virtualNetworkGatewayName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L490
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L535
    LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L541
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'virtualNetworkGatewayName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L556
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L601
    LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L607
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'virtualNetworkGatewayName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L622
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L658
    LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L664
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'virtualNetworkGatewayName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L679
    ParametersInPost peer is a query parameter. Post operation must not contain any query parameter other than api-version.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L686
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L722
    LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L728
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'virtualNetworkGatewayName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L743
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'virtualNetworkGatewayName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/virtualNetworkGateway.json#L793
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️❌SwaggerAPIView: 0 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    ️️✔️CadlAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for CadlValidation.
    ️️✔️TypeSpec Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for TypeSpec Validation.
    ️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Summary.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 13, 2023

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️⚠️SDK Breaking Change Tracking warning [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 failed [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️🔄 azure-resource-manager-schemas inProgress [Detail]
    ️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 13, 2023

    Generated ApiView

    Language Package Name ApiView Link
    Swagger Microsoft.Network Create ApiView failed. Please ask PR assignee for help
    Go sdk/resourcemanager/network/armnetwork https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/955debf3b07a43108fe805e77de84756
    Java azure-resourcemanager-network-generated https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/72967f3abdb549609f1ec43827669fd8
    JavaScript @azure/arm-network https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/467de6a4f7354943a00867193329c010

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @nimaller, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff. If you have any questions, please post your questions in this channel https://aka.ms/swaggersupport.

    TaskHow to fixPriority
    AvocadoFix-AvocadoHigh
    Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHigh
    Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHigh
    LintDiffFix-LintDiffhigh
    If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback.

    @nimaller nimaller removed DoNotMerge <valid label in PR review process> use to hold merge after approval NotReadyForReview <valid label in PR review process>It is in draft for swagger or not swagger PR labels May 15, 2023
    @openapi-pipeline-app openapi-pipeline-app bot added DoNotMerge <valid label in PR review process> use to hold merge after approval NotReadyForReview <valid label in PR review process>It is in draft for swagger or not swagger PR labels May 15, 2023
    @JackTn
    Copy link
    Member

    JackTn commented May 17, 2023

    @nimaller is this pr ready for review ?

    @nimaller
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    @JackTn Yes, it is ready for review

    @JackTn
    Copy link
    Member

    JackTn commented May 18, 2023

    /azp run

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

    @nimaller
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    @JackTn could you please review?

    @JackTn
    Copy link
    Member

    JackTn commented May 22, 2023

    @nimaller Can you add headers that to fix model validation #23978 (comment)

    @JackTn
    Copy link
    Member

    JackTn commented May 25, 2023

    /azp run

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

    @JackTn
    Copy link
    Member

    JackTn commented May 25, 2023

    @nimaller did you need merge this pr now ?

    @nimaller
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    @JackTn yes please

    @JackTn
    Copy link
    Member

    JackTn commented May 26, 2023

    @JackTn yes please

    @msyyc take a look on this pr and help to merge it, Thanks

    @msyyc
    Copy link
    Member

    msyyc commented May 30, 2023

    @nimaller Please remove the label before we merge:
    image

    @msyyc
    Copy link
    Member

    msyyc commented May 30, 2023

    @tadelesh @qiaozha Please help confirm SDK breaking

    @tadelesh
    Copy link
    Member

    @tadelesh @qiaozha Please help confirm SDK breaking

    No breaking for Go. Removed the label.

    @nimaller nimaller removed DoNotMerge <valid label in PR review process> use to hold merge after approval NotReadyForReview <valid label in PR review process>It is in draft for swagger or not swagger PR labels May 30, 2023
    @nimaller
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    @JackTn removed tags, PR is ready to be merged.

    @JackTn
    Copy link
    Member

    JackTn commented May 31, 2023

    @JackTn removed tags, PR is ready to be merged.

    @msyyc

    @msyyc msyyc merged commit 033a1e4 into Azure:release-network-Microsoft.Network-official-2023-02-01 Jun 1, 2023
    msyyc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2023
    * Adds base for updating Microsoft.Network from version stable/2022-11-01 to version 2023-02-01
    
    * Updates readme
    
    * Updates API version in new specs and examples
    
    * Fixed double header issue (#23896)
    
    * Edited description for additional nics (#24071)
    
    * swagger 20230201 adding resource guid (#24154)
    
    * Appgw: Remove 499 status code from custom error page (#24095)
    
    * Add AdminState Property to Virtual Network Gateway Resource Properties (#23978)
    
    * add adminstate
    
    * update description
    
    * add headers to 202
    
    * prettier fix
    
    * AppGW: Add default predefined ssl policy field in resource (#24094)
    
    * Fix examples (#24274)
    
    ---------
    
    Co-authored-by: Mikhail <[email protected]>
    Co-authored-by: JainRah <[email protected]>
    Co-authored-by: sssharma24 <[email protected]>
    Co-authored-by: Prateek Sachan <[email protected]>
    Co-authored-by: nimaller <[email protected]>
    Co-authored-by: Sindhu Aluguvelli <[email protected]>
    harryli0108 pushed a commit to harryli0108/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2023
    * Adds base for updating Microsoft.Network from version stable/2022-11-01 to version 2023-02-01
    
    * Updates readme
    
    * Updates API version in new specs and examples
    
    * Fixed double header issue (Azure#23896)
    
    * Edited description for additional nics (Azure#24071)
    
    * swagger 20230201 adding resource guid (Azure#24154)
    
    * Appgw: Remove 499 status code from custom error page (Azure#24095)
    
    * Add AdminState Property to Virtual Network Gateway Resource Properties (Azure#23978)
    
    * add adminstate
    
    * update description
    
    * add headers to 202
    
    * prettier fix
    
    * AppGW: Add default predefined ssl policy field in resource (Azure#24094)
    
    * Fix examples (Azure#24274)
    
    ---------
    
    Co-authored-by: Mikhail <[email protected]>
    Co-authored-by: JainRah <[email protected]>
    Co-authored-by: sssharma24 <[email protected]>
    Co-authored-by: Prateek Sachan <[email protected]>
    Co-authored-by: nimaller <[email protected]>
    Co-authored-by: Sindhu Aluguvelli <[email protected]>
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    5 participants