-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 266
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Aztec Connect Style Uniswap Bridge #2167
Labels
T-tracking
Type: Tracking Issue. This contains tasklists.
Comments
This was referenced Sep 14, 2023
Closed
rahul-kothari
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 19, 2023
Part of #2167 - creates the tokenPortal Standard + updates cross chain tests (and cross chain harness file) Doc is TBD * moved address types to aztec-nr * Created #2291 - where I will purge `NonNativeToken` * In a future PR, I will update uniswap portal too. For now I have skipped the uniswap test (to keep this PR small-ish) as it uses `crosschainHarness` which is integral to the other cross-chain e2e tests * I have created a separate public/private flow for depositing to Portal (and therefore separate flow for cancelling such L1->L2 messages) *
This was referenced Sep 25, 2023
This was referenced Sep 26, 2023
rahul-kothari
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2023
Part of #2167 - create the private flow for uniswap This is already a large PR so omitted failure cases and public flow. * UniswapPortal.sol -> has a separate flow for public and private. Updated relevant tests too * Uniswap aztec-nr contract -> just the private flow for now. * Deleted the sandbox example * Updated e2e uniswap test with the private flow. Failure cases and public flow will be in a separate PR * Update the canary test * **Also comments out base rollup check on public data reads as explained in #2521**
rahul-kothari
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 6, 2023
Closing this for now as it have no priority at the moment. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Goal: Support something similar to Aztec connect in function that uses L2 to aggregate
Extension of #843 with a prior issue at #879, updated here to elaborate on the tasks for clarity.
Tasks
Dependencies
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: