-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
new-log-viewer: LogbackFormatter: Only insert timestamp if date pattern was specified. #53
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… configured format string.
junhaoliao
changed the title
new-log-viewer: do not format date if no date pattern is specified in configured format string.
new-log-viewer: do not format date if no date pattern is specified in format string.
Aug 16, 2024
junhaoliao
changed the title
new-log-viewer: do not format date if no date pattern is specified in format string.
new-log-viewer: LogbackFormatter: do not format date if no date pattern is specified in format string.
Aug 16, 2024
kirkrodrigues
approved these changes
Aug 16, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For the PR title, how about:
new-log-viewer: LogbackFormatter: Only insert timestamp if date pattern was specified.
junhaoliao
changed the title
new-log-viewer: LogbackFormatter: do not format date if no date pattern is specified in format string.
new-log-viewer: LogbackFormatter: Only insert timestamp if date pattern was specified.
Aug 16, 2024
This was referenced Aug 17, 2024
This was referenced Aug 28, 2024
This was referenced Sep 11, 2024
This was referenced Sep 26, 2024
This was referenced Sep 27, 2024
This was referenced Oct 14, 2024
This was referenced Oct 22, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
References
#46 added support for decoding JSONL files. One issue was found that when the "formatString" does not include a date pattern, the formatted message still include formatted dates.
Description
Validation performed
Screenshot showing the formatted messages with dates
decoderOptions/formatString
with value[%process.thread.name] %log.level %message%n
, which is the default with the date pattern%d{yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSS}
removed from the beginning.Screenshot showing the formatted messages do not include dates because now no such is configured in decoderOptions/formatString