Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change make command #2765

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 10, 2024
Merged

Change make command #2765

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 10, 2024

Conversation

vankichi
Copy link
Contributor

@vankichi vankichi commented Dec 4, 2024

Description

SSIA

Related Issue

Versions

  • Vald Version: v1.7.14
  • Go Version: v1.23.3
  • Rust Version: v1.82.0
  • Docker Version: v27.3.1
  • Kubernetes Version: v1.31.2
  • Helm Version: v3.16.2
  • NGT Version: v2.3.4
  • Faiss Version: v1.9.0

Checklist

Special notes for your reviewer

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the job target name for the Docker image scanning workflow to enhance clarity and alignment with naming conventions.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 4, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies a GitHub Actions workflow configuration for Docker image scanning. It specifically updates the target name for the operator-helm job from operator/helm to helm-operator. This change ensures that the workflow invocation aligns with the new target name, but no other aspects of the job definitions, scheduling, or concurrency settings are altered.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/dockers-image-scan.yaml Updated job target from operator/helm to helm-operator in operator-helm job.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

type/refactoring, area/helm, size/S, actions/backport/release/v1.7

Suggested reviewers

  • datelier

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9bd9034 and 7bb31e9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/dockers-image-scan.yaml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/dockers-image-scan.yaml (2)

91-93: LGTM - Change follows established pattern

The modification maintains consistency with other job definitions in the workflow and properly uses the reusable workflow pattern.


92-92: Verify the existence of the new make target

The target name has been changed from operator/helm to helm-operator. While the change itself is straightforward, we should verify that this new target exists in the build system.

Consider documenting this target name change in:

  1. The PR description to explain the rationale
  2. Any relevant documentation that references Docker image building
✅ Verification successful

Based on the comprehensive analysis of the Makefiles and Dockerfile, I can now provide the final response:

Target name change is valid and properly aligned with the build system

The change from operator/helm to helm-operator is valid and consistent with the build system for the following reasons:

  1. The target helm-operator exists in docker.mk as a proper make target:
.PHONY: docker/build/helm-operator
docker/build/helm-operator:
	@make DOCKERFILE="$(ROOTDIR)/dockers/operator/helm/Dockerfile" \
		IMAGE=$(HELM_OPERATOR_IMAGE) \
		EXTRA_ARGS="--build-arg OPERATOR_SDK_VERSION=$(OPERATOR_SDK_VERSION) --build-arg UPX_OPTIONS=$(UPX_OPTIONS) $(EXTRA_ARGS)" \
		docker/build/image
  1. The Dockerfile exists at the correct path: dockers/operator/helm/Dockerfile

  2. The change aligns with the project's naming convention where the image is referred to as helm-operator throughout the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the new make target exists and if there are any related configurations

# Check if the make target exists in Makefiles
echo "Checking for helm-operator target in Makefiles..."
rg -l 'helm-operator:' Makefile* **/Makefile*

# Check for any related Docker configurations
echo "Checking for related Docker configurations..."
rg -l 'helm-operator' ./**/Dockerfile* ./**/*.mk

Length of output: 936


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual content of the Makefiles that mention helm-operator
echo "=== Content of Makefile.d/helm.mk ==="
cat Makefile.d/helm.mk

echo -e "\n=== Content of Makefile.d/docker.mk ==="
cat Makefile.d/docker.mk

echo -e "\n=== Content of Makefile.d/dependencies.mk ==="
cat Makefile.d/dependencies.mk

echo -e "\n=== Content of Makefile.d/k8s.mk ==="
cat Makefile.d/k8s.mk

Length of output: 56769


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if the Dockerfile exists and verify the target name change
echo "=== Checking for helm operator Dockerfile ==="
ls -l dockers/operator/helm/Dockerfile

echo -e "\n=== Content of helm operator Dockerfile ==="
cat dockers/operator/helm/Dockerfile

Length of output: 4737


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@vdaas-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

vdaas-ci commented Dec 4, 2024

[CHATOPS:HELP] ChatOps commands.

  • 🙆‍♀️ /approve - approve
  • 🍱 /format - format codes and add licenses
  • /gen-test - generate test codes
  • 🏷️ /label - add labels
  • 🔚 2️⃣ 🔚 /label actions/e2e-deploy - run E2E deploy & integration test

@vankichi vankichi requested review from kmrmt and datelier December 4, 2024 03:29
Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Deploying vald with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: e12f949
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://5dc32ba0.vald.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://ci-workflow-fix-failed-workf.vald.pages.dev

View logs

@vankichi vankichi merged commit e06133d into main Dec 10, 2024
22 of 23 checks passed
@vankichi vankichi deleted the ci/workflow/fix-failed-workflow branch December 10, 2024 04:35
vdaas-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2024
vankichi added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2024
Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Kiichiro YUKAWA <[email protected]>
This was referenced Dec 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants