-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 77
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[patch] Release v1.7.3 #2558
[patch] Release v1.7.3 #2558
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes primarily involve formatting and structural improvements to the documentation of the Flush RPC method. Enhancements include better alignment of tables, specifically the fields related to Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Server
User->>Server: Request Flush
Server-->>User: Acknowledge Request
Server->>Database: Flush Data
Database-->>Server: Confirm Flush
Server-->>User: Return Success Response
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Deploying vald with Cloudflare Pages
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- docs/api/flush.md (2 hunks)
Additional context used
LanguageTool
docs/api/flush.md
[uncategorized] ~56-~56: The verb “is” doesn’t seem to fit in this context, “are” is probably more formally correct.
Context: ...te indicating whethervald-agent
pods is present in the saving. | ### Status ...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CPT_IS_ARE)
Additional comments not posted (1)
docs/api/flush.md (1)
49-49
: LGTM!The line
Object.Info_Index_Count
is correctly formatted.
3756543
to
678e98d
Compare
[patch] Release v1.7.13
Changelog
[Bugfix]
General Fixes
Backport and Release-Related
E2E and Index
Documentation and Other
[Enhancement]
General Improvements
API and Logic Changes
Performance and Optimization
index-operator
template implementation #2375 (#2424)Testing and Metrics
[CI]
[Backport]
[Documentation]
[Other]
Versions