Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RFC] Initial multiclock support in token channels & synthesizable unit tests #90

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 8, 2018

Conversation

davidbiancolin
Copy link
Contributor

@davidbiancolin davidbiancolin commented Sep 28, 2018

This is big change, but not one that should affect default FireSim targets. There are three major additions here, they can be factored into two different PRs if that's desired.

  1. Adds preliminary multiclock support in channels between the transformed-RTL and endpoints
    • Restricted to integer / reciprocal clock ratios
    • Channel generation introspects on endpoint clock-ratio during Simulation Mapping
  2. Adds synthesizable unittest generation framework
    • Derived from RocketChip's unittest package
    • Generator (App) lives in src/main/scala/midas
    • Makefrag lives in src/main/cc/unittest
  3. Reworks the build system for RTL simulation (MIDAS-level)
    • to share code between unittests, and MIDAS-level simulations
    • recipes for building VCS and Verilator simulators moved to src/main/cc/rtlsim

Copy link
Member

@sagark sagark left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@taeksangsong taeksangsong merged commit ff52eaf into dev Oct 8, 2018
@sagark sagark mentioned this pull request Oct 12, 2018
3 tasks
@davidbiancolin davidbiancolin deleted the firesim-multiclock branch March 25, 2019 23:09
davidbiancolin pushed a commit to davidbiancolin/midas that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2019
[RFC] Initial multiclock support in token channels & synthesizable unit tests
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants