Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DEVOP-102: run broker Docker build in self hosted runner #249

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 14, 2021

Conversation

kare
Copy link
Contributor

@kare kare commented Oct 14, 2021

No description provided.

@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Oct 14, 2021

DEVOP-102 GitHub Actions self-hosted runner specs

  • 4/8 x CPU?
  • 16GB memory
  • Debian 11
  • Hetzner CX41 or CPX41?

This runner is for building Docker container in network-monorepo. Server can host multiple runners for other purposes as well.

Current 2CPU 8GB self-hosted runner is a dedicated box, but looks like dedicated cores don't offer much for this purpose.

@github-actions github-actions bot added broker Related to Broker Package ci Related to CI configuration labels Oct 14, 2021
@kare kare merged commit b9ffc87 into main Oct 14, 2021
@kare kare deleted the DEVOP-102-ci-run-broker-docker-build-in-self-hosted branch October 14, 2021 11:59
timoxley added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2021
* main:
  fix(network): Node: rm unused constructor opts
  network: unit test for TrackerConnector (#250)
  network [NET-264]: rework node propagation logic (#211)
  broker: remove Todo type (#248)
  Update plugins.md
  Update README.md
  Update README.md
  DEVOP-102: run broker Docker build in self hosted runner (#249)
  network: refactor inbound/outboundNodes to neighbors (#247)
timoxley pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2021
* ci: run broker Docker build on self-hosted runner

* ci: remove GA workflow for self hosted runner
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
broker Related to Broker Package ci Related to CI configuration
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant