-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[warm-upgrade][202012] Slow Celestica platform init in rc.local causes lacp-teardown #10152
Labels
Comments
Bad case: 202012 image 53 to 202012 image 54:
|
PR#10237 raised to fix the issue: This fix reduced about 8-9s of time in setup dx010 platform modules. How to verify it
|
sujinmkang
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 21, 2022
…#10237) Why I did it To fix issue #10152 for dx010. 202012 Warm upgrade causes lacp-teardown on Dx010 TOR. platform code initialize slow causing lacp timeout. How I did it Remove the python2 sonic platform wheel which is deprecated. Optimize the dx010 sonic platform script to speed up the init process. How to verify it Check the warm reboot log, warm reboot is 8-9s faster than before. Signed-off-by: Eric Zhu <[email protected]>
6 tasks
#10237 closes this issue. Thanks Celestica team! |
Blueve
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 22, 2022
…#10313) * Optimize dx010 sonic platform init script to speed up init process * Merge issue #10152: [warm-upgrade][202012] Slow Celestica platform init in rc.local causes lacp-teardown fix into master branch Signed-off-by: Eric Zhu <[email protected]>
liushilongbuaa
pushed a commit
to liushilongbuaa/sonic-buildimage
that referenced
this issue
Jun 20, 2022
Related work items: #49, #58, #107, sonic-net#247, sonic-net#249, sonic-net#277, sonic-net#593, sonic-net#597, sonic-net#1035, sonic-net#2130, sonic-net#2150, sonic-net#2165, sonic-net#2169, sonic-net#2178, sonic-net#2179, sonic-net#2187, sonic-net#2188, sonic-net#2191, sonic-net#2195, sonic-net#2197, sonic-net#2198, sonic-net#2200, sonic-net#2202, sonic-net#2206, sonic-net#2209, sonic-net#2211, sonic-net#2216, sonic-net#7909, sonic-net#8927, sonic-net#9681, sonic-net#9733, sonic-net#9746, sonic-net#9850, sonic-net#9967, sonic-net#10104, sonic-net#10152, sonic-net#10168, sonic-net#10228, sonic-net#10266, sonic-net#10288, sonic-net#10294, sonic-net#10313, sonic-net#10394, sonic-net#10403, sonic-net#10404, sonic-net#10421, sonic-net#10431, sonic-net#10437, sonic-net#10445, sonic-net#10457, sonic-net#10458, sonic-net#10465, sonic-net#10467, sonic-net#10469, sonic-net#10470, sonic-net#10474, sonic-net#10477, sonic-net#10478, sonic-net#10482, sonic-net#10485, sonic-net#10488, sonic-net#10489, sonic-net#10492, sonic-net#10494, sonic-net#10498, sonic-net#10501, sonic-net#10509, sonic-net#10512, sonic-net#10514, sonic-net#10516, sonic-net#10517, sonic-net#10523, sonic-net#10525, sonic-net#10531, sonic-net#10532, sonic-net#10538, sonic-net#10555, sonic-net#10557, sonic-net#10559, sonic-net#10561, sonic-net#10565, sonic-net#10572, sonic-net#10574, sonic-net#10576, sonic-net#10578, sonic-net#10581, sonic-net#10585, sonic-net#10587, sonic-net#10599, sonic-net#10607, sonic-net#10611, sonic-net#10616, sonic-net#10618, sonic-net#10619, sonic-net#10623, sonic-net#10624, sonic-net#10633, sonic-net#10646, sonic-net#10655, sonic-net#10660, sonic-net#10664, sonic-net#10680, sonic-net#10683
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Description
202012 Warm upgrade failure on Dx010 TOR.
Steps to reproduce the issue:
Describe the results you received:
are hitting issues in warm-upgrading Celestica devices running SONiC from any image to 202012 branch image.
Short description of the issue:
a. Degradation is seen specifically in first boot steps in rc.local:
b. installing and enabling platform-modules takes a lot of time – in 202012 branch.
c. For comparison, time taken for rc.local processing.
i. Same image warm reboot: ~3s.
ii. Cross branch or in-branch warm “upgrades” to 202012 image: ~30s.
d. The difference in the boot up path is degradation in 202012 upgrade scenario, which caused points 1, 2 above.
Note that this is a 202012 branch specific – I tried 201811 in-branch upgrade, and see that rc.local processing time is much lesser.
This is a blocker for warm upgrades, hence we need a faster resolution for this.
Questions:
Describe the results you expected:
No LAG should flap after warmreboot.
Unblocked, shorter rc.local processing.
Output of
show version
:Output of
show techsupport
:Additional information you deem important (e.g. issue happens only occasionally):
dx010-202012-54-54-warm.txt
dx010-202012-53-54-warm.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: