Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes #651: Frees the qdr_connection_t and qdr_http2_connection_t obj… #652

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ganeshmurthy
Copy link
Contributor

…ect leaks by freeing them when a closed connection is being activated

…nnection_t object leaks by freeing them when a closed connection is being activated
if (connector->ctx)
qdr_core_close_connection((qdr_connection_t *)connector->ctx);
if (connector->ctx) {
qdr_connection_t *conn = (qdr_connection_t *)connector->ctx;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this line is not according to clang-format, it is not aligned with the lane below

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

$ sudo dnf install git-clang-format
$ git clang-format -f

should be the magic (to format outstanding changes)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should make the clang-format as part of the build ASAP. We should just bite the bullet and do it. I will fix this. Thx.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we can make git clang-format be part of precommit checks. Therefore, all new (added or modified) code will have to be formatted, while old code can remain unchanged.

Advantage: it should be reatively painless.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ganeshmurthy ganeshmurthy Aug 4, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should do what you did earlier which is agree on a clang format, format all the code in the repo by running the tool and check all that modified code back into the repo. Then enable the tool in cmake so that it fails the build (locally and on CI) if the code violates the format. This is what I meant by bite the bullet and do it. :)
In other words, this should work very similar to the python-checker if possible

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I know. I proposed to do this in two steps, instead, and soften the bullet for the first step.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jiridanek 2 steps most definitely

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants