Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disable Blocking-Reactive module on Windows in native mode #871

Conversation

michalvavrik
Copy link
Member

@michalvavrik michalvavrik commented Sep 2, 2023

Summary

I made mistake here #864 as daily builds are now failing https://github.com/quarkus-qe/quarkus-test-framework/actions/runs/6043338198/job/16408485818 over known issue quarkusio/quarkus#27061. I've opened ticket for this https://issues.redhat.com/browse/QQE-150. #867 follow-up.

Please check the relevant options

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Dependency update
  • Refactoring
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • This change requires a documentation update
  • This change requires execution against OCP (use run tests phrase in comment)

Checklist:

  • Example scenarios has been updated / added
  • Methods and classes used in PR scenarios are meaningful
  • Commits are well encapsulated and follow the best practices

@rsvoboda rsvoboda merged commit d17e573 into quarkus-qe:main Sep 6, 2023
5 checks passed
@rsvoboda
Copy link
Member

rsvoboda commented Sep 6, 2023

If #864 was backported this needs to be also backported. But didn't see backport label in history of tha PR ... @michalvavrik pls double check

@michalvavrik michalvavrik deleted the feature/disable-win-native-disable-race branch September 6, 2023 08:34
@michalvavrik
Copy link
Member Author

If #864 was backported this needs to be also backported. But didn't see backport label in history of tha PR ... @michalvavrik pls double check

This is FW example and they are not run against 3.2. The FW will be eventually backported to TS 3.2 anyway for we need changes in the latest PRs.

@michalvavrik michalvavrik mentioned this pull request Sep 15, 2023
11 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants