Adds meetings invite text endpoint

[pinkmanJ]

Relates to #250

I think we did this right, but I am a little confused on how to properly assert our responses call? If we comment out our calls to the client, it doesn't matter if the responses is hit.

    @responses.activate
    def test_invite_text(self):
        responses.add(
            responses.GET,
            "http://foo.com/meetings/ID/invitation",
        )
        self.component.invite_text(id="ID")
       
        # this is the line were talking about, the endpoint doesn't seem to be hit 
        assert responses.assert_call_count("http://foo.com/meetings/ID/invitation", 1)

[prschmid]

Thanks for putting together this PR and for adding a test!

At first glance, this does look to be correct...

Have you tried the example code that is in the responses documentation to see if that works?

responses.add(responses.GET, "http://example.com")
requests.get("http://example.com")
assert responses.assert_call_count("http://example.com", 1) is True

[pinkmanJ]

So I added a request.get() line in the commit I just pushed up and that makes our test pass. However I am a bit confused as to why self.component.invite_text(id="ID") isn't making that call?

I see in some other tests that there is no assertion for if the call is made. Example below.

@responses.activate
    def test_can_get(self):
        responses.add(responses.GET, "http://foo.com/meetings/ID")
        self.component.get(id="ID")

Which makes me wonder if maybe my understanding of these tests is wrong?
Here is my updated test that I just pushed.

@responses.activate
    def test_invite_text(self):
        responses.add(
            responses.GET,
            "http://foo.com/meetings/ID/invitation",
        )

        self.component.invite_text(id="ID")  # thinking this should make the call?

        # added this based on your comment, which makes the test pass.
        requests.get("http://foo.com/meetings/ID/invitation")

        assert responses.assert_call_count("http://foo.com/meetings/ID/invitation", 1)

Thank you for taking the time to check this out!

[ckcollab]

@prschmid sorry to bother, just wanted to bump this! I think this is good to go? tests passing and such, we've had this in prod for a minute