-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
expression: fix the wrong behavior of conv
function
#53681
Conversation
Hi @qw4990. Thanks for your PR. PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #53681 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 74.4884% 74.6399% +0.1515%
================================================
Files 1506 1506
Lines 357618 431174 +73556
================================================
+ Hits 266384 321828 +55444
- Misses 71857 89455 +17598
- Partials 19377 19891 +514
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
/test check-dev2 |
@qw4990: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hawkingrei, time-and-fate, XuHuaiyu The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #53505
Problem Summary: expression: fix the wrong behavior of
conv
functionWhat changed and how does it work?
When evaluating
Constant
, should always useConstant.EvalXXX()
instead of accessingConstant.Value
directly, otherwise there might be wrong result if it's a parameter (?
).Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.