Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

expression: fix the wrong behavior of conv function (#53681) #56889

Merged

Conversation

ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This is an automated cherry-pick of #53681

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #53505

Problem Summary: expression: fix the wrong behavior of conv function

What changed and how does it work?

When evaluating Constant, should always use Constant.EvalXXX() instead of accessing Constant.Value directly, otherwise there might be wrong result if it's a parameter (?).

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test
    • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/planner SIG: Planner size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. type/bugfix This PR fixes a bug. type/cherry-pick-for-release-7.1 This PR is cherry-picked to release-7.1 from a source PR. labels Oct 28, 2024
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 28, 2024
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. approved and removed size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 6, 2024
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the lgtm label Nov 6, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 6, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hawkingrei, qw4990

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot removed the needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. label Nov 6, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 6, 2024

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2024-11-06 12:51:23.684372628 +0000 UTC m=+1045396.523528174: ☑️ agreed by qw4990.
  • 2024-11-06 12:54:08.083866033 +0000 UTC m=+1045560.923021579: ☑️ agreed by hawkingrei.

@qw4990
Copy link
Contributor

qw4990 commented Nov 11, 2024

/test unit-test

Copy link

tiprow bot commented Nov 11, 2024

@qw4990: No presubmit jobs available for pingcap/[email protected]

In response to this:

/test unit-test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@qw4990
Copy link
Contributor

qw4990 commented Nov 11, 2024

/test unit-test

Copy link

tiprow bot commented Nov 11, 2024

@qw4990: No presubmit jobs available for pingcap/[email protected]

In response to this:

/test unit-test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 11, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 40.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (release-7.1@cc04dd7). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             release-7.1     #56889   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage               ?   73.4805%           
================================================
  Files                  ?       1212           
  Lines                  ?     381316           
  Branches               ?          0           
================================================
  Hits                   ?     280193           
  Misses                 ?      83227           
  Partials               ?      17896           

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit f35f0f1 into pingcap:release-7.1 Nov 11, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. lgtm release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/planner SIG: Planner size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. type/bugfix This PR fixes a bug. type/cherry-pick-for-release-7.1 This PR is cherry-picked to release-7.1 from a source PR.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants