Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Agency vs Provider Clarification. [#148] #150

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 31, 2018
Merged

Agency vs Provider Clarification. [#148] #150

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 31, 2018

Conversation

hunterowens
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR changes some of the language in README to clarify between agency, provider, and how to implement. It also removes some CityOfLA specific phrasing.

@thekaveman thekaveman changed the base branch from dev to 0.2.x October 23, 2018 23:14
@thekaveman thekaveman added this to the 0.2.1 milestone Oct 30, 2018
@hunterowens hunterowens requested a review from black-tea October 30, 2018 17:41
Copy link
Contributor

@black-tea black-tea left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good. thanks!

@black-tea black-tea merged commit 23e19be into 0.2.x Oct 31, 2018
@black-tea black-tea deleted the readme-fix branch October 31, 2018 17:40
hunterowens added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2018
* 0.2.1: (61 commits)
  updating release notes for 0.2.x
  fix for required properties in generated schema
  add WIND as a dockless mobility provider (#185)
  add Spin as a dockless mobility provider (#184)
  Reverts PR #146, moving Timestamp change into future release (#180)
  wheels (#177)
  adding info about mailing list. (#175)
  Adding Release guidelines (#147)
  Update providers.csv (#174)
  Add `next` link requirement (#166)
  Add OAauth client_credentials auth guidelines section
  update JUMP provider URL (#164)
  allowing null for links.next (#162)
  Agency vs Provider Clarification. [#148] (#150)
  Add LADOT Guidelines for the Handling of MSP Data (#154)
  allowing for null links properties
  Suggestion: Add Clarification to Propulsion Types
  fix versions
  remove oneOf when required is being added
  regenerate the schemas
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants