[REVIEW]: geostan: An R package for Bayesian spatial analysis #4716

editorialbot · 2022-08-28T15:03:21Z

Submitting author: @ConnorDonegan (Connor Donegan)
Repository: https://github.com/ConnorDonegan/geostan
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): JOSS
Version: v0.4.1
Editor: @jbytecode
Reviewers: @wcjochem, @becarioprecario
Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.7311716

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8505b8bf1923490258ef23a1eea6138b"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8505b8bf1923490258ef23a1eea6138b/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8505b8bf1923490258ef23a1eea6138b/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8505b8bf1923490258ef23a1eea6138b)

Reviewers and authors:

Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)

Reviewer instructions & questions

@wcjochem & @becarioprecario, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review.
First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:

@editorialbot generate my checklist

The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @jbytecode know.

✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨

Checklists

📝 Checklist for @becarioprecario

📝 Checklist for @wcjochem

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

editorialbot · 2022-08-28T15:03:22Z

Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot · 2022-08-28T15:03:31Z

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.11 s (828.9 files/s, 146986.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                            41           1300            133           6559
R                               29            213           2464           3141
TeX                              3             63              0            493
CSS                              3             98             52            442
JavaScript                       3             64             32            256
Markdown                         3             93              0            240
Rmd                              3            191            295            125
XML                              1              0              0            123
YAML                             3              3              4             85
SVG                              1              0              1             11
Bourne Shell                     2              4              2              4
C/C++ Header                     1              0              1              0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            93           2029           2984          11479
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

editorialbot · 2022-08-28T15:03:32Z

Wordcount for paper.md is 1047

editorialbot · 2022-08-28T15:04:05Z

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.31219/osf.io/3ey65 is OK
- 10.1016/j.spasta.2020.100450 is OK
- 10.3390/ijerph18136856 is OK
- 10.2307/2532039 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00484.x is OK
- 10.1016/C2017-0-01015-7 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2007.00708.x is OK
- 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.08.013 is OK
- 10.1007/s13524-016-0499-1 is OK
- 10.1016/j.csda.2008.07.033 is OK
- 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970415)16:7<741::aid-sim501>3.0.co;2-1 is OK
- 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980930)17:18<2025::aid-sim865>3.0.co;2-m is OK
- 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00999.x is OK
- 10.1007/BF00116466 is OK
- 10.1177/0962280216660421 is OK
- 10.1016/j.sste.2019.100301 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v063.i18 is OK
- 10.1080/10618600.2016.1172487 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.1308151 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v092.i10 is OK
- 10.1214/17-BA1091 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

editorialbot · 2022-08-28T15:04:49Z

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

jbytecode · 2022-08-28T15:09:53Z

Dear @wcjochem and @becarioprecario

This is the review thread. Firstly, type

@editorialbot generate my checklist

to generate your own checklist. In that checklist, there are 20 check items. Whenever you complete the corresponding task, you can check off them. The review process is interactive so you can always interact with the authors, reviewers, and the editor. You can also create issues and pull requests in the target repo. Please do mention this thread's URL in the issues so we can keep tracking what is going on out of our world.

Please do not hesitate to ask me anything, anytime.

Thank you in advance!

jbytecode · 2022-09-08T10:28:13Z

Dear @wcjochem and @becarioprecario

Could you please update your status on how is going your review and generate your task lists?

Thank you in advance.

jbytecode · 2022-09-14T16:35:37Z

@editorialbot remind @wcjochem in two days

editorialbot · 2022-09-14T16:35:37Z

Reminder set for @wcjochem in two days

jbytecode · 2022-09-14T16:36:05Z

@editorialbot remind @becarioprecario in two days

editorialbot · 2022-09-14T16:36:06Z

Reminder set for @becarioprecario in two days

jbytecode · 2022-09-14T16:36:14Z

Thanks @editorialbot !

editorialbot · 2022-09-14T16:36:15Z

You are welcome

editorialbot · 2022-09-16T16:35:41Z

👋 @wcjochem, please update us on how your review is going (this is an automated reminder).

editorialbot · 2022-09-16T16:36:09Z

👋 @becarioprecario, please update us on how your review is going (this is an automated reminder).

ConnorDonegan · 2022-09-20T02:35:11Z

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot · 2022-09-20T02:37:19Z

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

jbytecode · 2022-09-20T07:25:35Z

@wcjochem, @becarioprecario - could you please update your status?

Can I kindly ask you to create your check list first?

Thank you in advance.

wcjochem · 2022-09-20T17:13:51Z

Hi @jbytecode when I agreed to review this submission I said I couldn't start until after 15 September. So I have only started my review and it is ongoing. Thanks.

jbytecode · 2022-09-20T17:23:10Z

@wcjochem - I am so sorry for bothering and pinging you too much, my bad! I totally forgot your deadline. Thank you for reminding that.

jbytecode · 2022-10-07T13:46:46Z

@becarioprecario - could you please update your status? We have failed to get a life signal from you. Setting a deadline for us would be great, if possible. Thank you in advance.

jbytecode · 2022-10-13T09:20:21Z

Dear @becarioprecario,

This is the last reminder. Since you never sent a response, I assume that you are so much busy to reply messages, and/or you are not able to receive notifications. If you don't set a deadline for us until 15th October, I will try to find another reviewer for this issue.

Thank you in advance.

becarioprecario · 2022-10-13T09:44:36Z

Hi, Sorry for the delay. I will try to send the review by the end of the week. Best, Virgilio El 13 oct 2022, a las 11:20, Mehmet Hakan Satman ***@***.******@***.***>> escribió: Dear @becarioprecario<https://github.com/becarioprecario>, This is the last reminder. Since you never sent a response, I assume that you are so much busy to reply messages, and/or you are not able to receive notifications. If you don't set a deadline for us until 15th October, I will try to find another reviewer for this issue. Thank you in advance. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#4716 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABYD6WSVIO4RWQRSZ6H5V7LWC7H6DANCNFSM573GXAFQ>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

jbytecode · 2022-11-10T18:58:30Z

@editorialbot recommend-accept

editorialbot · 2022-11-10T18:58:31Z

Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...

ConnorDonegan · 2022-11-10T18:59:18Z

Thanks @jbytecode, @wcjochem and @jbytecode for a smooth and productive editorial experience.

editorialbot · 2022-11-10T19:00:10Z

⚠️ Error preparing paper acceptance. The generated XML metadata file is invalid.

ID tblU003Amodels already defined

editorialbot · 2022-11-10T19:07:46Z

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.31219/osf.io/3ey65 is OK
- 10.1016/j.spasta.2020.100450 is OK
- 10.3390/ijerph18136856 is OK
- 10.1093/biomet/10.1.179 is OK
- 10.2307/2532039 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00484.x is OK
- 10.1016/C2017-0-01015-7 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2007.00708.x is OK
- 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.08.013 is OK
- 10.1007/s13524-016-0499-1 is OK
- 10.1111/gean.12215 is OK
- 10.1016/j.csda.2008.07.033 is OK
- 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970415)16:7<741::aid-sim501>3.0.co;2-1 is OK
- 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980930)17:18<2025::aid-sim865>3.0.co;2-m is OK
- 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00999.x is OK
- 10.1007/BF00116466 is OK
- 10.1177/0962280216660421 is OK
- 10.2139/ssrn.2420725 is OK
- 10.1016/j.sste.2019.100301 is OK
- 10.1111/rssa.12378 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v063.i18 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00700.x is OK
- 10.1080/10618600.2016.1172487 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.1308151 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v092.i10 is OK
- 10.1214/17-BA1091 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

jbytecode · 2022-11-10T19:12:32Z

@openjournals/dev - I need your help, thank you in advance!

tarleb · 2022-11-11T08:42:32Z

This looks like a pandoc bug. As a workaround, the \label should be moved directly below the \caption of the table.

jbytecode · 2022-11-11T08:46:34Z

@ConnorDonegan - could you please help changing the markdown as suggested?

jbytecode · 2022-11-11T15:39:37Z

@editorialbot recommend-accept

editorialbot · 2022-11-11T15:39:38Z

Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...

editorialbot · 2022-11-11T15:41:18Z

👋 @openjournals/sbcs-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.

Check final proof 👉📄 Download article

If the paper PDF and the deposit XML files look good in openjournals/joss-papers#3717, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the command @editorialbot accept

editorialbot · 2022-11-11T15:45:48Z

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.31219/osf.io/3ey65 is OK
- 10.1016/j.spasta.2020.100450 is OK
- 10.3390/ijerph18136856 is OK
- 10.1093/biomet/10.1.179 is OK
- 10.2307/2532039 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00484.x is OK
- 10.1016/C2017-0-01015-7 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2007.00708.x is OK
- 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.08.013 is OK
- 10.1007/s13524-016-0499-1 is OK
- 10.1111/gean.12215 is OK
- 10.1016/j.csda.2008.07.033 is OK
- 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970415)16:7<741::aid-sim501>3.0.co;2-1 is OK
- 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980930)17:18<2025::aid-sim865>3.0.co;2-m is OK
- 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00999.x is OK
- 10.1007/BF00116466 is OK
- 10.1177/0962280216660421 is OK
- 10.2139/ssrn.2420725 is OK
- 10.1016/j.sste.2019.100301 is OK
- 10.1111/rssa.12378 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v063.i18 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00700.x is OK
- 10.1080/10618600.2016.1172487 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.1308151 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v092.i10 is OK
- 10.1214/17-BA1091 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

arfon · 2022-11-16T16:17:28Z

@editorialbot accept

editorialbot · 2022-11-16T16:17:29Z

Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...

editorialbot · 2022-11-16T16:19:23Z

🐦🐦🐦 👉 Tweet for this paper 👈 🐦🐦🐦

editorialbot · 2022-11-16T16:19:24Z

🚨🚨🚨 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! 🚨🚨🚨

Here's what you must now do:

Check final PDF and Crossref metadata that was deposited 👉 Creating pull request for 10.21105.joss.04716 joss-papers#3730
Wait a couple of minutes, then verify that the paper DOI resolves https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04716
If everything looks good, then close this review issue.
Party like you just published a paper! 🎉🌈🦄💃👻🤘

Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...

arfon · 2022-11-16T17:39:04Z

@wcjochem, @becarioprecario – many thanks for your reviews here and to @jbytecode for editing this submission! JOSS relies upon the volunteer effort of people like you and we simply wouldn't be able to do this without you ✨

@ConnorDonegan – your paper is now accepted and published in JOSS ⚡🚀💥

editorialbot · 2022-11-16T17:39:06Z

🎉🎉🎉 Congratulations on your paper acceptance! 🎉🎉🎉

If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:

Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04716/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04716)

HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04716">
  <img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04716/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>

reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04716/status.svg
   :target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04716

This is how it will look in your documentation:

We need your help!

The Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:

Volunteering to review for us sometime in the future. You can add your name to the reviewer list here: https://joss.theoj.org/reviewer-signup.html
Making a small donation to support our running costs here: https://numfocus.org/donate-to-joss

editorialbot added C++ R review Shell Track: 4 (SBCS) Social, Behavioral, and Cognitive Sciences labels Aug 28, 2022

editorialbot assigned jbytecode Aug 28, 2022

editorialbot mentioned this issue Aug 28, 2022

[PRE REVIEW]: geostan: An R package for Bayesian spatial analysis #4578

Closed

jbytecode mentioned this issue Nov 11, 2022

fix pandoc issue ConnorDonegan/geostan#9

Merged

editorialbot added the recommend-accept Papers recommended for acceptance in JOSS. label Nov 11, 2022

editorialbot added accepted published Papers published in JOSS labels Nov 16, 2022

arfon closed this as completed Nov 16, 2022

editorialbot mentioned this issue Sep 25, 2023

[PRE REVIEW]: inAccessMod: An R package to automate data downloading and processing for AccessMod #5641

Closed

arfon mentioned this issue Dec 9, 2023

[PRE REVIEW]: gcamfaostat: An R package to prepare, process, and synthesize FAOSTAT data for global agroeconomic and multisector dynamic modeling #6054

Closed

editorialbot mentioned this issue Dec 27, 2023

[PRE REVIEW]: ceylon: An R package for plotting the maps of Sri Lanka #6173

Closed

editorialbot mentioned this issue Jan 12, 2024

[PRE REVIEW]: AISanalyze: an R-package to correct, interpolate, and extract AIS data #6222

Closed

editorialbot mentioned this issue Jan 22, 2024

[PRE REVIEW]: SSN2: The next generation of spatial stream network modeling in R #6259

Closed

editorialbot mentioned this issue Jun 23, 2024

[PRE REVIEW]: statConfR: An R Package for Static Models of Decision Confidence and Metacognition #6680

Closed

editorialbot mentioned this issue Jul 25, 2024

[PRE REVIEW]: stgam: An R package for GAM-based space-time varying coefficient models #7034

Closed

[REVIEW]: **geostan**: An R package for Bayesian spatial analysis #4716

[REVIEW]: **geostan**: An R package for Bayesian spatial analysis #4716

Comments

editorialbot commented Aug 28, 2022 • edited Loading

Status

Reviewer instructions & questions

Checklists

editorialbot commented Aug 28, 2022

editorialbot commented Aug 28, 2022

editorialbot commented Aug 28, 2022

editorialbot commented Aug 28, 2022

editorialbot commented Aug 28, 2022

jbytecode commented Aug 28, 2022

jbytecode commented Sep 8, 2022

jbytecode commented Sep 14, 2022

editorialbot commented Sep 14, 2022

jbytecode commented Sep 14, 2022

editorialbot commented Sep 14, 2022

jbytecode commented Sep 14, 2022

editorialbot commented Sep 14, 2022

editorialbot commented Sep 16, 2022

editorialbot commented Sep 16, 2022

ConnorDonegan commented Sep 20, 2022

editorialbot commented Sep 20, 2022

jbytecode commented Sep 20, 2022

wcjochem commented Sep 20, 2022

jbytecode commented Sep 20, 2022

jbytecode commented Oct 7, 2022

jbytecode commented Oct 13, 2022

becarioprecario commented Oct 13, 2022 via email

jbytecode commented Nov 10, 2022

editorialbot commented Nov 10, 2022

ConnorDonegan commented Nov 10, 2022

editorialbot commented Nov 10, 2022

editorialbot commented Nov 10, 2022

jbytecode commented Nov 10, 2022

tarleb commented Nov 11, 2022

jbytecode commented Nov 11, 2022

jbytecode commented Nov 11, 2022

editorialbot commented Nov 11, 2022

editorialbot commented Nov 11, 2022

editorialbot commented Nov 11, 2022

arfon commented Nov 16, 2022

editorialbot commented Nov 16, 2022

editorialbot commented Nov 16, 2022

editorialbot commented Nov 16, 2022

arfon commented Nov 16, 2022

editorialbot commented Nov 16, 2022

[REVIEW]: geostan: An R package for Bayesian spatial analysis #4716

[REVIEW]: geostan: An R package for Bayesian spatial analysis #4716

editorialbot commented Aug 28, 2022 •

edited

Loading