[PRE REVIEW]: gcamfaostat: An R package to prepare, process, and synthesize FAOSTAT data for global agroeconomic and multisector dynamic modeling

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @realxinzhao (Xin Zhao)
Repository: https://github.com/JGCRI/gcamfaostat
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @hugoledoux
Reviewers: @klau506, @HenriKajasilta
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/bf4762e8bef702f36b800e0cb4d478a8"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/bf4762e8bef702f36b800e0cb4d478a8/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/bf4762e8bef702f36b800e0cb4d478a8/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/bf4762e8bef702f36b800e0cb4d478a8)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @realxinzhao. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@realxinzhao if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.13 s (1516.5 files/s, 298520.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                           119           4154            389          16264
R                               45           2210           3124           7472
CSS                              4            152             57            655
XML                              1              0              0            360
TeX                              1              5              0            339
Rmd                              6            266            520            334
YAML                             6             45             11            293
JavaScript                       4             64             32            264
Markdown                         3            138              0            242
SVG                              1              0              1             11
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           190           7034           4134          26234
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 3161

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1088/1748-9326/ac5766 is OK
- 10.1038/s43016-022-00464-4 is OK
- 10.1038/s41558-023-01661-0 is OK
- 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.08.003 is OK
- 10.1029/2022EF003063 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0291577 is OK
- 10.1088/1748-9326/ac2965 is OK
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146238 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.est.9b03554 is OK
- 10.5194/gmd-15-429-2022 is OK
- 10.21642/JGEA.070101AF is OK
- 10.1111/agec.12086 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.00550 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.8010145 is OK
- 10.5194/gmd-12-677-2019 is OK
- 10.5334/jors.266 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2016.18 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1017/9781009157926.022 may be a valid DOI for title: Annex III: Scenarios and modelling methods
- 10.1142/s2010007820500049 may be a valid DOI for title: The critical role of conversion cost and comparative advantage in modeling agricultural land use change
- 10.1016/j.eap.2021.07.007 may be a valid DOI for title: The role of global agricultural market integration in multiregional economic modeling: Using hindcast experiments to validate an Armington model
- 10.5334/jors.208 may be a valid DOI for title: Demeter–A Land Use and Land Cover Change Disaggregation Model

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[realxinzhao]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @realxinzhao, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[realxinzhao]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1088/1748-9326/ac5766 is OK
- 10.1038/s43016-022-00464-4 is OK
- 10.1017/9781009157926.022 is OK
- 10.1038/s41558-023-01661-0 is OK
- 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.08.003 is OK
- 10.1029/2022EF003063 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0291577 is OK
- 10.1088/1748-9326/ac2965 is OK
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146238 is OK
- 10.1142/s2010007820500049 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.est.9b03554 is OK
- 10.5194/gmd-15-429-2022 is OK
- 10.21642/JGEA.070101AF is OK
- 10.1016/j.eap.2021.07.007 is OK
- 10.1111/agec.12086 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.00550 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.8010145 is OK
- 10.5194/gmd-12-677-2019 is OK
- 10.5334/jors.266 is OK
- 10.5334/jors.208 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2016.18 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[realxinzhao]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[realxinzhao]

Dear Editors,

Here is a list of potential reviewers:

1. tscheypidi (via Reviewers Management System; no conflict of interest)
2. KristinaRiemer (via Reviewers Management System; no conflict of interest)
3. Claudia Rodes: [email protected] (via research network; no conflict of interest)

Please let us know if we can provide more information.

[realxinzhao]

Adding two additional potential reviewers who are agroeconomic modelers from two groups.
4. Alessandro Gatto ([email protected]), Wageningen University
5. Florian Humpenöder ([email protected]), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research

[realxinzhao]

Adding an additional potential reviewer who might be interested:
Dr. Aman Malik ([email protected]), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)

Please don't hesitate to let us know if there is anything we can do to facilitate the review.

[kthyng]

@realxinzhao Hi and thanks for your submission! We had a little background work moving the submission between tracks. Next step is for me to find an appropriate editor for this who unfortunately can't be @crvernon.

[kthyng]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[kthyng]

@openjournals/dev Why isn't the list of similar papers coming up for this submission?

[kthyng]

@realxinzhao no relevant editors are currently available so I will add this submission to the waitlist. Thanks for your patience.

[realxinzhao]

Thanks, Kristen, @kthyng, for the updates!
Would you happen to know a rough timeline/wait time we should expect? Thanks!

[arfon]

@openjournals/dev Why isn't the list of similar papers coming up for this submission?

Good question! I don't know... Checking...

[arfon]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[kthyng]

@realxinzhao Sorry it really just depends on how long until the editors are available so I'm not sure.

@arfon Still not coming through...

[arfon]

@kthyng – this is a bug with how we generate the papers on GitHub. As an interim solution, I've generated this list locally:

The top 5 most similar papers are:
geostan: An R package for Bayesian spatial analysis
Submitting author: @ConnorDonegan
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @wcjochem, @becarioprecario
Similarity score: 0.8179978544494104

grapesAgri1: Collection of Shiny Apps for Data Analysis in Agriculture
Submitting author: @pratheesh3780
Handling editor: @fabian-s (Active)
Reviewers: @adithirgis, @elimillera
Similarity score: 0.8132841262870389

StatAid: An R package with a graphical user interface for data analysis
Submitting author: @VincentAlcazer
Handling editor: @mikldk (Retired)
Reviewers: @nistara, @adithirgis
Similarity score: 0.8099523747873361

rnassqs: An R package to access agricultural data via the USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA-NASS) 'Quick Stats' API
Submitting author: @potterzot
Handling editor: @kyleniemeyer (Active)
Reviewers: @kyleniemeyer
Similarity score: 0.8092332754201275

Visualizations with statistical details: The 'ggstatsplot' approach
Submitting author: @IndrajeetPatil
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @njtierney, @kevinrue
Similarity score: 0.8060231737780731

[realxinzhao]

Hi @arfon and @kthyng, as it has been two months since the submission, I wanted to check if there are any updates on the progress or an estimated timeline (for finding an editor). Thank you!

[kthyng]

Hi @realxinzhao! One editor who has edited a submission like this before just got a freed up slot so let's check with them.

@hugoledoux Could you edit this submission?

[kthyng]

@editorialbot invite @hugoledoux as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[realxinzhao]

Great! Thank you so much!

[hugoledoux]

@editorialbot assign @hugoledoux as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @hugoledoux is now the editor

[realxinzhao]

Dear @hugoledoux,

Thank you for editing this paper. Here is a list of potential reviewers:

1. tscheypidi (via Reviewers Management System; no conflict of interest)
2. KristinaRiemer (via Reviewers Management System; no conflict of interest)
3. Claudia Rodes: [email protected] (via research network; no conflict of interest)
4. jiangyongye (gcam research network; no conflict of interest)

Please let us know if we can provide more information to facilitate this process.

[hugoledoux]

@editorialbot add @klau506 as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@klau506 added to the reviewers list!

[hugoledoux]

@editorialbot add @HenriKajasilta as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@HenriKajasilta added to the reviewers list!

[hugoledoux]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #6388.