Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: statConfR: An R Package for Static Models of Decision Confidence and Metacognition #6680

Closed
editorialbot opened this issue Apr 25, 2024 · 31 comments
Assignees
Labels
pre-review R TeX Track: 4 (SBCS) Social, Behavioral, and Cognitive Sciences

Comments

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator

editorialbot commented Apr 25, 2024

Submitting author: @ManuelRausch (Manuel Rausch)
Repository: https://github.com/ManuelRausch/StatConfR
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v.0.1.2
Editor: @samhforbes
Reviewers: @haoxue-fan, @christinamaher
Managing EiC: Olivia Guest

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/dbac9fa6ff476bf8eda77f12aa077192"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/dbac9fa6ff476bf8eda77f12aa077192/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/dbac9fa6ff476bf8eda77f12aa077192/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/dbac9fa6ff476bf8eda77f12aa077192)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ManuelRausch. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@ManuelRausch if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot editorialbot added pre-review Track: 4 (SBCS) Social, Behavioral, and Cognitive Sciences labels Apr 25, 2024
@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.02 s (1690.9 files/s, 233808.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               26            410            710           2513
TeX                              3             68             10            621
Markdown                         2             44              0            156
YAML                             1              1              4             18
Rmd                              1              2              6              0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            33            525            730           3308
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    64	Manuel Rausch
     8	Hellmann

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 791

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.concog.2017.02.007 is OK
- 10.1038/s41467-021-23540-y is OK
- 10.3758/s13414-017-1431-5 is OK
- 10.1038/s41562-019-0813-1 is OK
- 10.3758/s13414-021-02284-3 is OK
- 10.1037/a0019737 is OK
- 10.1093/nc/nix007 is OK
- 10.1037/rev0000249 is OK
- 10.7554/eLife.75420 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-642-45190-4_3 is OK
- 10.1093/nc/niw002 is OK
- 10.1038/s41467-022-31727-0 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104522 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116963 is OK
- 10.1038/s41562-022-01464-x is OK
- 10.1037/rev0000411 is OK
- 10.1037/xge0001524 is OK
- 10.1037/met0000634 is OK
- 10.31234/osf.io/5ze8t is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Signal detection theory and psychophysics
- No DOI given, and none found for title: A signal detection theoretic method for estimating...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Detection theory: A user’s guide
- 10.1121/1.1907783 may be a valid DOI for title: Operating Characteristics Determined by Binary Dec...
- 10.31234/osf.io/g9qzh may be a valid DOI for title: The nature of metacognitive inefficiency in percep...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: How do humans give confidence? A comprehensive com...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Full material to "Confidence in masked orientation...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Full material to "Measures of metacognitive effici...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Full material to "Cognitive modelling reveals dist...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Type 2 signal detection theory analysis using meta...
- Entry without DOI or title found
- No DOI given, and none found for title: HMeta-d

INVALID DOIs

- 10.1177/174569162210756 is INVALID

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@crvernon
Copy link

👋 @ManuelRausch - the editor best suited to take this on is currently occupied with other reviews right now. We are going to waitlist this submission and we will get this assigned ASAP! Thank you for your patience!

@crvernon crvernon added the waitlisted Submissions in the JOSS backlog due to reduced service mode. label May 24, 2024
@ManuelRausch
Copy link

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.concog.2017.02.007 is OK
- 10.1038/s41467-021-23540-y is OK
- 10.3758/s13414-017-1431-5 is OK
- 10.1038/s41562-019-0813-1 is OK
- 10.3758/s13414-021-02284-3 is OK
- 10.1037/a0019737 is OK
- 10.1093/nc/nix007 is OK
- 10.1037/rev0000249 is OK
- 10.7554/eLife.75420 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-642-45190-4_3 is OK
- 10.1093/nc/niw002 is OK
- 10.1038/s41467-022-31727-0 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104522 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116963 is OK
- 10.1038/s41562-022-01464-x is OK
- 10.1037/rev0000411 is OK
- 10.1037/xge0001524 is OK
- 10.1037/met0000634 is OK
- 10.31234/osf.io/5ze8t is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Signal detection theory and psychophysics
- No DOI given, and none found for title: A signal detection theoretic method for estimating...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Detection theory: A user’s guide
- 10.1121/1.1907783 may be a valid DOI for title: Operating Characteristics Determined by Binary Dec...
- 10.31234/osf.io/g9qzh may be a valid DOI for title: The nature of metacognitive inefficiency in percep...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: How do humans give confidence? A comprehensive com...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Full material to "Confidence in masked orientation...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Full material to "Measures of metacognitive effici...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Full material to "Cognitive modelling reveals dist...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Type 2 signal detection theory analysis using meta...
- Entry without DOI or title found
- No DOI given, and none found for title: HMeta-d

INVALID DOIs

- 10.1177/174569162210756 is INVALID

I corrected the invalid doi and added various missing dois. The remaining references without doi are books or book sections and to my best knowledge do not have doi.

@ManuelRausch
Copy link

👋 @ManuelRausch - the editor best suited to take this on is currently occupied with other reviews right now. We are going to waitlist this submission and we will get this assigned ASAP! Thank you for your patience!

No worries. We all know how it's like.

@ManuelRausch
Copy link

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@crvernon
Copy link

@editorialbot invite @samhforbes as editor

👋 @samhforbes - are you able to take this one on as editor?

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Jun 23, 2024

@editorialbot generate pdf

☝ to generate the most similar paper recommendation list which has been broken for some time.

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

bayestestR: Describing Effects and their Uncertainty, Existence and Significance within the Bayesian Framework
Submitting author: @DominiqueMakowski
Handling editor: @cMadan (Active)
Reviewers: @paul-buerkner, @tjmahr
Similarity score: 0.8225

statsExpressions: R Package for Tidy Dataframes and Expressions with Statistical Details
Submitting author: @IndrajeetPatil
Handling editor: @mikldk (Retired)
Reviewers: @humanfactors, @tomfaulkenberry
Similarity score: 0.8199

Empirical and non-parametric copula models with the cort R package
Submitting author: @lrnv
Handling editor: @pdebuyl (Active)
Reviewers: @coatless, @agisga
Similarity score: 0.8190

geostan: An R package for Bayesian spatial analysis
Submitting author: @ConnorDonegan
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @wcjochem, @becarioprecario
Similarity score: 0.8174

see: An R Package for Visualizing Statistical Models
Submitting author: @strengejacke
Handling editor: @fboehm (Active)
Reviewers: @MatthewSmith430, @jakobbossek
Similarity score: 0.8173

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

@samhforbes
Copy link

@editorialbot assign me as editor

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Assigned! @samhforbes is now the editor

@samhforbes
Copy link

Hi @haoxue-fan, @lwu9 would either of you be interested in reviewing this for us?

@samhforbes samhforbes removed the waitlisted Submissions in the JOSS backlog due to reduced service mode. label Jun 27, 2024
@haoxue-fan
Copy link

happy to help :)!

@samhforbes
Copy link

@editorialbot add @haoxue-fan as reviewer

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@haoxue-fan added to the reviewers list!

@samhforbes
Copy link

Hi @sdparsons @raybecker/ would either of you be willing to review this package?

@lwu9
Copy link

lwu9 commented Jul 1, 2024 via email

@samhforbes
Copy link

No worries, thanks @lwu9

@samhforbes
Copy link

Hi @marcoapintoo @christinamaher would either of you be willing to review this package for JOSS?

@christinamaher
Copy link

Yes definitely! Happy to help.

@samhforbes
Copy link

@editorialbot add @christinamaher as reviewer

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@christinamaher added to the reviewers list!

@samhforbes
Copy link

@editorialbot start review

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

OK, I've started the review over in #6966.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pre-review R TeX Track: 4 (SBCS) Social, Behavioral, and Cognitive Sciences
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants